The Church Fathers on this verse

John 9:33Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

Unless this man were of God, he could not do anything.

Douay-Rheims

ει μη ην ουτος παρα θεου ουκ ηδυνατο ποιειν ουδεν

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

11 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

He stood firm in the struggle, whose observer and judge was God: many strong men against one steadfast man, a cloud of unbelief against one drop of faith.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

Then, knowing that they wished to obscure the miracle, he preaches the benefit with full understanding. If He were not from God, He would not have performed such a miracle, one which no one had ever performed from the beginning of the age.

Perhaps the eyes of blind men had been opened before, but not eyes ruined from birth, only eyes harmed by some illness. But what has happened now is unheard of. Therefore it is evident that He who performed such a miracle is more than man.

Cyrill of Alexandria

5th centuryChurch Father

The man who had just received sight and was wondrously freed from his original blindness sees the truth more clearly than those instructed in the law.

Indeed, he uses very many wise words to prove the falsity of the Pharisees' opinion.

Since they madly said of Christ, "We do not know where He is from" (Jn 9:29), he again strongly convicts them of thinking falsely.

They say that they do not know such a Wonderworker at all. Yet it is plain to all that one who is not from God cannot do anything that is accomplished by divine power.

God performs such works only through the saints. He would never grant one alien to holiness, and not yet arrived at piety toward Him, the ability to be adorned with such glory.

Read more (508 words)

Otherwise, let the foolish Pharisee appear and answer. What, in the end, is the difference before God between the holy and the unclean, the righteous and the sinner, the impious and the God-loving?

If each is allowed to shine with exactly the same works, without any distinction, then everything is confused. We may rightly say what is written: "What is enough for us to serve Him, or what profit is there in going to meet Him?" (Job 21:15).

For if, as one of the Greek poets said, "the same lot belongs to the man who remains at rest and to the man who fights" (Iliad 9.318), and if the bad and the good have equal honor, then would it not be vain to endure bitter labors for virtue?

But we must not think this so. Why not? "For those who glorify Me," God says, "I will glorify, and he who despises Me shall be despised" (1 Sam 2:30).

I would also ask the vainly wise Pharisees this. If God works these things without distinction even through sinners, why did the Egyptian magicians not do the same things as great Moses?

Why did they not perform wonders equal to his, and why did they not receive glory equal to his?

But you will say that the rod of Moses, when cast to the ground, became a serpent, and the rods of the magicians became quite the same.

Hear our answer to this. Their rods were not changed into serpents. It was deception and apparition, concealing reality from human sight.

It was a certain magical art that gave the rod the appearance of a serpent. But the rod of Moses truly changed into a serpent and passed into the nature of a beast.

You may see the truth of this statement in the distinction Scripture gives here. The rod of Moses devoured the rods of the magicians.

Since the latter had only the outward appearance of serpents, while the former truly and by nature was what it appeared to be, it became angry. It was shown to be a living creature, no longer a rod.

By an ineffable power surpassing the strength of a serpent, it devoured them. God performed this wonder.

Again let the Pharisee answer me. Those who gave their rods the appearance of serpents, why did they not also show the leprous hand to be clean?

When they proved unable to do this, they clearly said: "This is the finger of God" (Ex 8:19).

Tell me, why did the priests of Baal not bring down fire from heaven, while Elijah brought it down (1 Kgs 18:24, 38)?

Is God partial? By no means. Being righteous and loving the righteous, He works miraculous gifts through the saints, but not at all through sinners.

Thus the man once blind most reasonably restrains the insolence of the Pharisees' speech. He rebukes them for erroneous reasoning if they say that He is not from God.

For by the power to work miracles, He is witnessed as being by nature from God.

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

It was said openly, firmly, and truly. Indeed, by whom were the works performed by the Lord accomplished, if not by God? Or when such things are done by the disciples, was not the Lord abiding in them?

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryChurch Father

The greatness of the miracle shows that the one who performed it is some divine Person. He who performs a miracle greater than all the miracles accomplished by men is Himself greater than all men.

Nicephoros (Theotokis)

18th centuryChurch Father

From the creation of the world, he says, it has not been heard that a man opened the eyes of one who was born blind from his mother’s womb.

And truly no one, neither among the righteous before the law, nor among the holy prophets under the law, nor anyone under grace among the apostles and disciples of Christ, performed such a glorious miracle.

If Christ, the blind man continues, were not a man sent from God, then He could do nothing, that is, no deed so glorious. The blind man’s proof is unanswerable. But see what the Pharisees answer him.

Alexander Gorsky

19th centuryChurch Father

“This is what is strange,” the healed man continued in the same tone, “that you do not know where He is from, though He healed me. Without God such a miracle could not have been done.”

Thus the blind man saw more than those with sight, though he still knew nothing about Jesus except His name.

Bogolepow D.P.

19th centuryChurch Father

The great miracle of healing the man blind from birth caused all the stronger excitement in Jerusalem because the healed man was very well known in the city as a beggar blind from birth. Therefore, when this miracle was brought to the Pharisees' attention, they began a most careful investigation of the event.

All their efforts in this case were directed toward casting doubt on the reality of the miracle. For this purpose they questioned, about what had happened, now the former blind man and now his parents.

But the parents of the healed man, out of fear of being excommunicated from the synagogue, refused, under the pretense of ignorance, to give testimony about how their son had received sight.

Read more (111 words)

The healed man himself, however, despite the Pharisees' efforts to draw him to their side in judging Jesus, never for a moment ceased to bear firm and courageous witness to the truth.

At last he did not fear to expose the malicious blindness of the Pharisees, who said that they did not know "where He is from." "This is a marvel," the firm confessor of Christ observed, "that you do not know where He is from, and yet He opened my eyes. This is surely a work of God."

The judges could not endure such a bold and sharp rebuke, and they cast the former blind man out of the assembly.

Gladkow B.I.

19th centuryChurch Father

The healed man reproaches them precisely for this lie, saying, “It is astonishing that you do not know where He is from (Jn 9:30). He opened my eyes and performed a miracle unheard of from the beginning of the age.

Yet we know that God does not hear sinners. He hears only the one who honors Him and does His will. If He were not from God, He could not have performed such a miracle.”

Lopuchin A.P.

19th centuryChurch Father

“This is what is astonishing,” he answered, “that you do not know where He is from, and yet He opened my eyes. But we know that God does not hear sinners.

“He hears the one who honors God and does His will. From the beginning of the age it has not been heard that anyone, even great Moses himself, opened the eyes of one born blind.

“If He were not from God, He could do nothing.” Rarely, perhaps, has any learned commission ever found itself in a more difficult and pitiable position.

Wlastow G.K.

19th centuryChurch Father

The convictions of the man who received sight had been fully formed. With relentless logic he proves to his teachers that they are either false or dull of understanding.

In his gratitude toward the One who healed him, whom he had not yet seen with his eyes, since after receiving sight he had not seen the Lord, he nevertheless thought deeply about every question touching his sight and the One who had authority to grant it.

This preparation of his soul by his own good will for the reception of grace was rewarded by the Lord's merciful appearance to him. The Lord was pleased to seek him out and reveal Himself to him, probably as to a chosen vessel.

Read more (149 words)

Standing before the Pharisees of the synagogue, the man who received sight reproaches them not only for not knowing whence the Healer draws His power. He reproaches them for their deliberate refusal to acknowledge Him as having come from God.

In just the same way, the Pharisees did not want to acknowledge John the Baptist as sent from God, because of their worldly calculations. Compare the Lord's words in Mt 21:24-27 and parallels, Mk 11:31; Lk 20:5.

Then, very soundly pointing out to the Pharisees the impossibility of a sinner working miracles, including such a miracle as had never been heard from the ages and is equal to creation, the man who received sight comes to a conclusion the Jews cannot refute: the One who works these miracles has come from God.

The Jews could devise no other answer to this except abuse and the expulsion of the speaker.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 10 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. εἰ
    ei
    if
    G1487 · εἰ
  2. μὴ
    mē
    not
    G3361 · μή
  3. ἦν
    ēn
    I am
    G1510 · εἰμί
  4. οὗτος
    houtos
    this
    G3778 · οὗτος
  5. παρὰ
    para
    from
    G3844 · παρά
  6. Θεοῦ
    theou
    God
    G2316 · θεός
  7. οὐκ
    ouk
    no
    G3756 · οὐ
  8. ἠδύνατο
    ēdynato
    I am powerful
    G1410 · δύναμαι
  9. ποιεῖν
    poiein
    I do
    G4160 · ποιέω
  10. οὐδέν
    ouden
    no one
    G3762 · οὐδείς