THEOSISCyrill of Alexandria
Cyril. To differentiate these afflictions more precisely, the law states: And if there is a suspicion or assumption that leprosy has developed either in a blistered sore or in a previously burned area of the body, the priest must exercise the same diligence and watchfulness. If the whitish area that appears to be blossoming has not transformed into leprosy, it is declared to be clean. However, if the white is indeed morphing into leprosy, he shall be deemed unclean and defiled (Leviticus 13:18-28). The Law also instructs us that numerous spiritual ailments can arise, which have been alleviated through a righteous life but may resurface due to our negligence. In such cases, Christ, our supreme High Priest, will assess these conditions and render a just verdict.
Read more (140 words)
If the affliction exists solely in the thoughts, then even in that scenario, the individual is not without blame; he is said to be excommunicated (Leviticus 13:26), yet he is not entirely forsaken, nor is he completely dead. If, however, the affliction has extended beyond mere thoughts to desires, and the one stricken has deteriorated completely, then the penalties for defilement must be applied. Therefore, we must be particularly cautious to prevent latent passions from being rekindled, to avoid reopening spiritual wounds, and to refrain from reverting to former sins. Otherwise, we may find ourselves echoing the words of the saint: ‘But it happens to them according to the faithful proverb: the dog returns to his vomit, and: the washed pig goes to wallow in the mud’ (2 Pet. 2:22). Palladium. I believe your observations are both insightful and relevant.