Cyrill of Alexandria
Cyril. The representations articulated here may lack clarity, and they do not manifest distinctly through other priests; yet they appear to radiate in Aaron, who exemplifies the image of Christ. The Scriptures further reveal: "But the great priest among his brethren, upon whose head the anointing oil is laid, and who is consecrated to wear the holy garments, shall not uncover his head, nor rend his garments; neither shall he come near to any dead body: even his own father or mother shall not defile him. And he shall not leave the sanctuary, nor dishonor the sanctuary of his God: for the sanctification of the anointing oil of his God is upon him. I am the Lord. He shall take a maiden for a wife...
Read more (793 words)
a widow, or a rejected woman, or a defiled woman, or a harlot he shall not take; but a maiden of his people he shall take as a wife; he shall not defile his offspring among his people: for I am the Lord... who sanctifies him" (Lev. 21:10-15). Therefore, even in images, we perceive Immanuel and Christ as they are symbolized in Aaron: for He is anointed with the Spirit, as the Scriptures affirm (Isaiah 11:2, 42, etc.), being the perfect Priest. Consequently, He possesses the inherent glory of the priesthood: "let him not," it is stated, "uncover his head," meaning he should not remove his priestly garments; for it is declared concerning the Savior and Redeemer: "Thou art a priest forever after the order of Melchizedek" (Psalms 109:4). "Moreover, those priests were many, because death did not allow one to remain alone; but this One, because He remains forever, has an unending priesthood, thus He is able to save completely those who come to God through Him," as the divine Paul wrote (Hebrews 7:23-25). Therefore, the command against removing the kiddar from his head signifies the permanence of the priesthood. If we also assert, "Let him not remove the mitre from his head," it becomes evident that it symbolizes the fidelity and stability of his kingdom: the mitre, adorned with a golden plaque at the front, signifies authority and kingship. However, "let it not be stripped," it is advised. Some may practice this in mourning for the dead; yet this action is wholly uncharacteristic of Christ, as life cannot be affected by death. For the dead hold no significance to it; rather, it embodies both the cessation of death and the overthrow of corruption. Likewise, the Savior reproached those who sought to grieve for the ruler’s daughter, saying: "Depart, and weep not: for the maiden is not dead, but asleep" (Matthew 9:24). It was foolish to shed tears over the maiden, treating her as deceased, in the presence of Him who is the Source of all life. While He wept over Lazarus (John 11:35), it is understood to stem from love, and His compassion for us emanated from Divine goodness: the pain felt due to death elicited His compassion, leading to tears as a response to suffering. Palladius. It seems to be so. Cyril. Furthermore, that nothing in Christ is profane is implied by the admonition that the bishop must remain separate from the dead, avoiding all contact with death, not even to venerate his father, mother, or brethren. Observe the wisdom of the law and the significance it places on the inner beauty of sacred things: regarding other priests, it accommodates natural feelings, permitting the consecrated to perform customary acts toward very close and blood relatives who have died; it does not overly concern itself with imperfections in such instances, since our transgressions are portrayed in images referring to individuals for whom, if defilement occurred, there was nothing extraordinary about it: "for we all stumble in many ways" (James 3:2), and our nature is fragile, prone to sin. But in the great Hierarch, Christ, honor remains untainted even within the images, pure within the very shadows, so that the beauty of truth may remain undisturbed, because Christ is without sin and knows no defilement; rather, He partakes of divine light and mental purity, existing in complete sanctity, and this manifestation is eternal, grounded in natural laws, maintaining its position consistently. This is encapsulated in the proclamation, "And from the sanctuary he shall not depart, nor dishonor the sanctuary of his God" (Leviticus 21:12). The Scriptures then clearly specify that the wife intended for marriage must be a virgin, thereby excluding those who have been rejected from this union. This reflects the image of the Jewish synagogue, as it has been cast away from fellowship; concerning her, it is spoken through the prophet, "For she is not my wife, nor am I her husband" (Hos. 2:2). Paul, too, refers to "the church among the Gentiles as a pure virgin," who is "without spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing, but that she should be holy and blameless" (cf. 2 Cor. 11:2 with Eph. 5:27). Thus, the connection to the church of the Gentiles and the mother of the Jews, the synagogue, holds true, and the imagery is beautiful. Yet if anyone seeks to extend these thoughts to all individuals, we affirm that Christ does not engage with the souls of the unrighteous and the unholy; rather, He unites spiritually with the holy and pure, likened to virgins, making them fruitful and claiming them as His own: "For whosoever shall do the will of My Father which is in heaven," He declares, "the same is My brother, and sister, and mother" (Matt. 12:50).