It suffices to acknowledge that these stories serve the purpose of illustrating the joy of repentance, inspiring those for whom repentance is unnecessary to rejoice alongside the repentant, much like the angels and neighbors celebrated when the sheep and drachma were recovered.
Thus, I am astonished that Tertullian, in his treatise on Chastity, which opposes the notion of repentance and seeks to distort an age-old truth with a novel interpretation, concluded that the publicans and sinners who dined with the Lord were Gentiles. This contradicts Scripture, which states, ‘Let there be no tribute-gatherer from among the Israelites’ (Deut. 23:18 according to the LXX), as if Matthew, a publican of the circumcised, were not an Israelite, or as if the publican who prayed in the temple, too ashamed to look up to heaven, were not one of God’s chosen people. Furthermore, Luke writes, ‘and all the people that heard, and the publicans justified God, being baptized with the baptism of John’ (Luke 7:29), showing that publicans were indeed considered among the Jews.
It is highly implausible to think that a Gentile entered the temple or that the Lord would share meals with them, given His careful adherence to the Law. He came first to seek the lost sheep of Israel. When a Canaanite woman sought healing for her daughter, He replied, “It is not good to take away the bread of the children, and to cast it to the dogs” (Matt. 15:26). Additionally, He instructed His disciples, ‘Do not go into the way of the Gentiles or enter a Samaritan city’ (Matthew 10:5). This indicates that the term tax collectors in Scripture generally refers to sinners, encompassing both Gentiles and Jews. Thus, those who claim, alongside their foolish and slanderous partners, that those who repent should not be welcomed back into the Christian community have failed to prove their point, asserting that tax collectors can only refer to Gentiles. Therefore, without further elaboration, I will present the very words of the Gospel and provide my commentary on them.