The Church Fathers on this verse

Luke 16:1Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

And he said also to his disciples: There was a certain rich man who had a steward: and the same was accused unto him, that he had wasted his goods.

Douay-Rheims

ελεγεν δε και προς τους μαθητας αυτου ανθρωπος τις ην πλουσιος ος ειχεν οικονομον και ουτος διεβληθη αυτω ως διασκορπιζων τα υπαρχοντα αυτου

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

9 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

I have frequently mentioned to you throughout my discussions that a particular erroneous belief has taken root in the hearts of many, exacerbating sinfulness while diminishing the grace available to each of us for personal restoration. This misguided notion posits that we possess everything in life as if we were sovereign over it. Because of this false assumption, we engage in desperate struggles, harsh judgments, and an undue attachment to these possessions as though they were our rightful claims. In reality, the situation is quite the contrary; all that we experience in this earthly existence is not truly ours, nor do we hold it as rightful owners but merely as sojourners and wanderers.

Read more (932 words)

We are often led unexpected paths at the Lord's discretion, experiencing the fragility of life that exists solely at His pleasure. Consequently, the things of this transient existence represent nothing lasting. One moment we may bask in abundant blessings; the next, we might find ourselves devoid of even the essentials for survival. This stark truth highlights the supremacy of God, who remains unchanged and possesses eternal life, glory, and authority.

The origin of this message is discernible to those who reflect and love wisdom. Luke provides a powerful metaphor in the form of a parable about a steward who, upon being confronted about his management of his master's resources, is told to account for his actions and relinquish his position, as he cannot continue to operate with disregard for the owner’s authority. This story serves not as a historical event but as guidance in virtue. Thus, let everyone understand that we are stewards of what belongs to another; casting aside pride and self-aggrandizement, we should exercise humility and prudence, anticipating the Lord's return and preparing an account of our stewardship. You are but a traveler granted brief access to what is not yours. Reflect on the ownership of your property; whether inherited or acquired, consider those who wielded possession before you and those who will hold it after you. To whom does this dominion truly belong—the current possessors or the ultimate owner? Should one gather such a multitude, it would be evident that the actual owners far exceed the visible count.

To illustrate further, think of a grand tree encountered on a summer journey, its vast branches extending outward, providing cool shade to those who rest beneath it. You found comfort there until the moment came to move on, allowing another traveler to take your place, each individual enjoying the tree's shelter in turn. The owner of the tree remains unchanged, providing comfort to many, yet its true dominion belongs solely to the Creator, who grants life that does not perish. Similarly, the inn where you rested during your voyage provided you with many necessities—yet when your time was up, another guest hurriedly displaced you, eager to claim your comfort for himself. Such is the nature of our existence; it is an illusion to claim ownership over such fleeting comforts.

I am astonished by those who declare, "This is my estate; this is my home." How futile to internalize what cannot be owned and cherish what is given for a season! Like performers donning disguises, we must acknowledge that the land and the possessions upon it do not truly belong to us. Consider, are you greater than a king? Yet, if one were to dissect a royal robe, they would find it was worn by many. All inheritances fade, their enjoyment turning ephemeral from one moment to the next. What embodies the dignity of authority? Is it found in opulent carriages or lavish scepters? Such luxuries are inconstant, bestowed upon one only temporarily. As bodies pass away, so too do symbols of power transition from one bearer to another.

This understanding repeatedly echoes through the Apostle's teachings: "for the fashion of this world passeth away" (1 Cor. 7:31); "as having nothing, and yet possessing all things" (2 Cor. 6:10). All of this points toward a single aim: to live with a day-by-day awareness that we are awaiting our departure from this life. To fully grasp the laws to which we are subject, we must first recognize that even our souls are bound by virtue's commands; we are not our own masters, as everything we do and every action is governed by a higher authority. Though you have received a body from your Creator and have stewardship over its senses, neither you nor they act independently. The eyes are tasked with observing the beauty of creation—the sun that brightens the universe, the moon that dispels the night, and the stars that add splendor to the skies. Be sure to savor the beauty in life but guard against the temptations that can ensnare the soul.

The Lord reminded us through Matthew: "Everyone who looks at a woman with lust has already committed adultery with her in his heart" (Matthew 5:28). Therefore, it is wiser to guard one's eyes against enticing sights. Similarly, the ears should be vigilant; one must be attentive to good counsel and avoid the foulness of sinful words. Let your speech be pure and aligned with truth, avoiding slander or unjust accusations while uplifting one another through righteous words. As the Psalmist declared, "I will guard my ways, so that I may not sin with my tongue" (Ps. 38:2).

May your senses be kept chaste; the hands ought to perform acts of kindness, extending themselves for charity rather than greed. They should be hands of compassion, reaching out to the weary and distressed, not seeking to gather what belongs to others. The Word has made it clear that we are not absolute lords over our lives but rather stewards. All is subject to divine laws; we are servants to the Lawgiver. If our own bodies are not free from authority, how can we claim rightful possession of earthly treasures? In truth, nothing belongs to you, but rather all you have is bestowed by the Lord. You entered this world without material goods and received what you have in accordance with divine order—be it through inheritance, divine blessing in marriage, or endeavors supported by divine providence.

Hence, it becomes evident that nothing truly belongs to you. The parable of the unfaithful steward serves as a reminder that all is stewardship, not ownership.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

Each parable conveys the fundamental nature of a topic in a somewhat indistinct and figurative manner, yet it does not equate to the topic it seeks to illuminate. Thus, it is unnecessary to delve into every single aspect of a parable with meticulous detail; rather, we should draw upon the topic as far as is appropriate and disregard the other elements, which serve merely to maintain the integrity of the parable and lack direct relevance to the topic itself. This approach should guide our interpretation of the present parable. If we attempt to explore in excessive detail the identities of the housekeeper, who appointed him, who accused him, the nature of the debtors, why one owes oil and the other wheat, and the significance of each owing a hundred, we risk obscuring the message.

Read more (163 words)

Overanalyzing can lead to confusion and absurd interpretations. Therefore, let us focus on the principal lesson of this parable. The Lord aims to instruct us on how to wisely manage the resources bestowed upon us. Firstly, we are reminded that we do not possess ownership of these resources; we are stewards of wealth that belongs to others, entrusted to us by the Lord, so we may manage it according to His will. We also learn that if we misuse these resources for our selfish purposes instead of following the Lord's intent, we become stewards worthy of rebuke. It is the Lord’s desire for us to utilize what has been entrusted to us for the benefit of our fellow servants rather than for our own gratification. When we are called to account for our stewardship, particularly at the end of our earthly life, we may realize too late what actions were necessary and, in our mismanagement, we seek to make connections through unrighteous means.

Cyrill of Alexandria

5th centuryChurch Father

Our Lord Jesus Christ, while revealing His splendor to the Jewish nation and to all who have faith in Him, proclaimed: ‘I am the light of the world,’ and also, ‘I have come as a light into this world.’ He enlightens the hearts of those who revere Him with a heavenly and rational illumination so that they do not wander off the righteous path, shrouded in darkness, but instead learn to progress in every good deed and in everything that enables one to live a sanctified life. Consequently, He desires that we embody kindness, be ready for fellowship, love one another, exhibit mercy, and be adorned with the virtues of charity. Thus, He has wisely prepared for us this parable, which we aim to expound as clearly as possible for those who cherish learning.

Read more (963 words)

Parables teach us indirectly and figuratively much that is beneficial for our edification if we take a moment to reflect on their essential meanings. We ought not to delve too deeply or inquisitively into every component of a parable, lest we exhaust even the most eager listeners with unnecessary complexity and verbosity. For example, if someone attempts to clarify who we should regard as the man with a steward, or who the accuser might be, or who those indebted may be, and why one person owes oil while another owes wheat, their reasoning can quickly become convoluted and extraneous. Not every detail of the parable serves a vital purpose in elucidating the conveyed truths but rather forms a picture that communicates significant lessons for the benefit of the audience.

The essential message of the parable can be expressed as follows: ‘The God of all desires that all people be saved and come to the knowledge of the truth.’ Thus, ‘He also gave the law to assist,’ as the prophet states. By ‘the law,’ we refer not only to what was given by Moses but to all inspired Scriptures, through which we discover the path leading directly to all goodness and salvation. Consequently, the Lord of all calls upon us to remain steadfast in our pursuit of virtue and to direct our aspirations toward a better and holy existence by liberating ourselves from worldly distractions, the love of material wealth, and the pleasures that accompany it, so that we may continually serve Him with undivided hearts. As it is spoken through the psalmist’s harp, ‘Be still, and know that I am God.’ Moreover, the Saviour Himself addresses those who possess material riches: ‘Sell your possessions and give to the poor; make for yourselves purses that do not wear out, an enduring treasure in heaven.’ This command, intended for our salvation, encounters resistance because the human mind tends to cling to earthly things and remains unwilling to detach from the pleasures of riches. People often indulge in empty pride, are soothed by flattery, yearn for luxurious lifestyles, and value temporary accolades above all. Understanding this, the Saviour proclaimed: ‘How difficult it is for those with riches to enter the kingdom of God!’ He further states, ‘It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God.’ When one is immersed in wealth and pleasures, concern for godliness dissipates. For riches cause individuals to become contemptible and can sow seeds of lust within the hearts of the wealthy.

Is there then no hope for the rich? Are they utterly void of God’s grace? Is the place prepared for them the same as that designated for the devil and his angels? Not at all; for the Saviour illustrates the path to salvation in this parable. Through the gracious providence of Almighty God, they have been entrusted with worldly wealth; in His plan, they have been made stewards for the poor. Yet they mismanage their stewardship by squandering what was entrusted to them by the Lord, indulging solely in personal pleasures and seeking temporary honors, neglecting God’s call, ‘Open your heart to your brother, especially to the one in need.’ Indeed, Christ, our Saviour, counsels us, ‘Be merciful as your Father in heaven is merciful.’ But these individuals, as previously mentioned, exhibit no mercy toward their brethren, focusing solely on their own pride. This very pride condemns them before the Lord of all, and surely, as death approaches, they will cease their stewardship by removing themselves from worldly matters. For no one can escape the snare of death. What, then, does Christ ask of them? While they are still in this life, if they are unwilling to share their wealth among the poor, they should at least use a portion of it to acquire friends for themselves—those who would testify to their charitable acts—so that when their earthly wealth is gone, they may receive a welcome in their eternal dwellings.

It is undeniable that love for the needy will be reciprocated. Therefore, whether one gives away all their wealth or merely a fraction, they will benefit their soul. The action befitting the saints, worthy of profound praise, is not to hoard earthly treasures but to generously distribute them to the needy, thus securing treasures in heaven and accumulating blessings that do not fade. Additionally, one can employ a strategy to gain the favor of those who are particularly close to God by sharing a portion of their wealth and assisting many suffering from poverty. Something similar is eluded to by the wise Paul, who advises those enamored with riches: ‘Let your surplus meet their needs, so that their abundance may also meet your needs.’ Thus, it is our duty, if we are to be righteous, to fix our eyes on what lies ahead, remembering the Scriptures, which clearly state, ‘We must all appear before the judgement seat of Christ, that each one may receive what is due for the things done in the body, whether good or bad.’ If we dread a relentless and fierce fire, we must heed God’s call, who demands charity towards our brethren, compassion for the suffering, generosity towards the needy, and recognition of the saints, to whom Christ declares: ‘He who receives you receives Me; and he who receives Me receives Him who sent Me.’ The Saviour Himself instructs us that such charity towards our brethren is not in vain: ‘He who gives even a cup of cold water to one of these little ones will not lose his reward.’ For the Saviour of all is bountiful in bestowing grace; to Him, be glory and power, along with God the Father and the Holy Spirit, forever and ever, Amen.

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryCommentator

This parable speaks to Christians who hesitate to fully relinquish their earthly possessions, encouraging them to at least show kindness to those in need. It was directed towards the disciples, signifying that such believers are indeed disciples. The rich man symbolizes God, who cares for humanity and requires nothing, while the steward represents anyone who has amassed wealth. These individuals are not masters but stewards because God declared: ‘My silver and My gold’ (Haggai 2:8). It was brought to God's attention that the unfaithful steward was squandering divine resources on unsuitable ventures and failing to provide for the poor with the excess he possessed.

Theophilus

2nd centuryChurch Father

Theophilus, the seventh bishop of Antioch succeeding the apostle Peter, gifted us with a remarkable synthesis by compiling the teachings of all four evangelists into a singular work. In his interpretations of this parable, he describes the rich man as representative of God Almighty, who possesses unmatched riches. The steward, depicted as Paul, diligently studied the holy scriptures under Gamaliel's guidance (Acts 22:3) and was entrusted with the stewardship of God’s law. While he once persecuted and imprisoned believers in Christ, even taking their lives and squandering the Lord's resources, the Lord called him to accountability: ‘Saul, Saul, why do you persecute Me? It is hard for you to kick against the goads’ (Acts 9:4, 5).

Theophan the Recluse

19th centuryChurch Father

Enthusiasts of the Scriptures, upon engaging with the parable of the unjust steward, often find themselves confronted by challenging questions. Specifically, how can the unjust steward be commended and serve as a model for those pursuing eternal life, as if wrongful gain can lead to the Kingdom? After offering some reflections to elucidate these passages and address potential confusions, it seemed superfluous to produce a more extensive analysis for those who read them, as such perplexities may arise in various individuals and contexts.

Read more (1134 words)

In what way is the unjust steward commended? The understanding of this parable is illuminated by the context in which it was conveyed. The Savior was surrounded not just by the holy Apostles but also by tax collectors and sinners who gathered to hear Him (see Luke 15:1). Aware of their vulnerabilities and longings, the Lord would have directed His message toward them. However, the Pharisees and scribes present criticized Him for associating with these sinners, questioning why He welcomed them (see Luke 15:2). Consequently, the Savior first addressed these Pharisees. Through a series of parables, He elucidated that sinners capable of repentance are precious to Him, akin to a lost sheep to its shepherd, a lost coin to a woman, and a wayward son to a father who joyfully receives him after long absence (see Luke 15). After addressing the Pharisees, the Lord turned His attention to the tax collectors and sinners who yearned for His message, finding both comfort and instruction in His parables. It was easy for them to realize that they were the ones sought after by the Lord and to ponder, "What must we do to belong to Him?"

While the Pharisees were plagued by pride, they were not immune to selfishness, which they could often mask behind vanity. Their pious pretenses hardened them, effectively shutting their hearts to repentance. Conversely, the tax collectors struggled openly with avarice and were subject to widespread disdain. This judgment weighed heavily on their consciences, as many felt the sting of their unrighteous actions. Grouped around the Savior, they likely sought guidance on escaping their moral dilemmas and finding refuge in God's light. The repentance of Zacchaeus illustrated the profound power of a contrite spirit and how it could liberate one from all burdens (see Luke 19:1-10). The transformation of a repentant heart is evident as it sheds the various shrouds that once enveloped it. However, not all possess such moral fortitude. The carefree and complacent seek an easier path. And here lies the Savior's message to them! Through the parable of the unjust steward, He seems to declare, "You are in disarray and seeking an exit... Here it is! Act like the steward. He too was in turmoil, yet he found a way forward and secured himself for the future; he managed to attain temporary relief, but you can earn for yourselves eternal rest in God's Kingdom."

It should not be assumed that the lesson of this parable was solely for the tax collectors. Its applicability extends to all who heard it, including the holy Apostles, among whom was Judas, and the Pharisees, who could easily acquire external wealth. The Lord instructed on the soul-saving use of wealth, of every possession, and of all life's gifts. This is particularly clear in His subsequent teachings (see Luke 16:10-13). Thus, we should interpret this parable and the entire discourse of the Savior (see Luke 16:1-13) in this light. It comprises three sections: first, a narrative backdrop (verses 1-8); second, the moral insight derived from the parable (verses 8-9); and lastly, the application of this insight to all listeners (verses 10-13).

The backdrop is rather straightforward. An explanation is not required; instead, it necessitates some clarification of certain unspecified details, indicating that the narrative's exact parameters are not defined and that no overarching allegorical interpretation applies. “And He said unto His disciples, A certain rich man had a steward; and the same was accused unto him that he had wasted his goods.” When Saint Luke notes that Jesus spoke to the Pharisees and scribes and then addressed His disciples, he implies not just the twelve Apostles but all who gathered to eagerly listen and follow Him. Many were indeed present. The Gospel of John observes that many of His disciples turned away and followed Him no longer (see John 6:66). Therefore, anyone who heeded His words was regarded as His disciple. Saint Luke notes that those who listened to the Savior constituted an entire “crowd of disciples” (see Luke 6:17). They were present on this occasion as well, with tax collectors coming forth to hear Him (see Luke 15:1). The rich man isn't depicted with specific traits, as seen in the subsequent parable (vv. 19 ff.), because he is not the central figure but merely the master. His wealth necessitated the presence of a steward. It remains unclear if there were additional stewards; the emphasis lies not in the extent of the master's riches but in the worldly wisdom of worldly sons, illustrated through a single example—the management of a modest estate. Traditionally, trusted servants were assigned as stewards, a practice continuing in the East. Occasionally, free individuals were hired for such roles. The steward portrayed in this parable appears to be one of the latter, as he seemed unafraid of physical punishment, imprisonment, or any severe consequences from his master—except losing his position, leading to poverty and need. The steward was accused of misusing the resources. The term "slandered" may imply a false accusation, yet it can also denote a valid indictment. In this case, the accusation was likely justified but labeled as slanderous possibly due to the manner of its delivery, being whispered rather than declared openly. The overall context suggests the steward was indeed culpable and offered no defense against his master's charge, perhaps because he had none to give. The essence of the steward’s mismanagement related to his incompetence, resulting in a neglect that wasted the estate's potential. There is no indication he had previously embezzled the owner's possessions; otherwise, upon dismissal, he would not have expected to face extreme destitution unless he had squandered everything through theft. The central notion is that the steward failed in his duties, being of no benefit to his master or even to himself.

The significance of the parable of the unfaithful steward establishes that in parables, one need not extract meaning from every detail but should focus on the primary message, which is often indicated by the Lord Himself. For instance, the Savior describes Himself as a thief, emphasizing His unexpected and unobserved return. The other traits associated with a thief need not be considered. Similarly, in this parable, the Lord intends to convey a singular point: how the unfaithful steward, upon learning of his impending dismissal, did not grow apathetic but instead took immediate action to secure his future. The application is this: we, knowing certainly that the Kingdom awaits us, do not heed this reality: we live as if no calamity is approaching. This is the thought the Lord expressed when He stated, “The children of this world are in their generation wiser than the children of light.” We should remain focused on this lesson, refraining from interpreting additional elements of the parable, even though there is more that could be said.

Gladkow B.I.

19th centuryCommentator

A wealthy man had a steward accused of squandering his possessions. Upon calling the steward, the master asked him for an account of his administration, stating he could no longer remain in charge. The steward thought to himself about what actions he could take, recognizing that he could not dig and was too embarrassed to beg. He devised a plan to ensure that when he was dismissed, he would be welcomed into others' homes. He then reached out to his lord's debtors individually, asking the first how much he owed. The debtor replied that he owed one hundred measures of oil. The steward instructed him to take his receipt, sit down quickly, and change the amount to fifty.

Read more (853 words)

He then asked another debtor how much he owed, and upon receiving the answer of one hundred measures of wheat, he told him to write eighty instead. The master praised the dishonest steward for his shrewdness, noting that the children of this age are more astute than the sons of light in their generation. The steward advised, “Make friends for yourselves with unrighteous riches, that when you fail, they may receive you into everlasting dwellings."

Faithfulness in small matters translates to faithfulness in larger ones, and unfaithfulness in minor issues indicates unfaithfulness in significant matters. Consequently, if one has not been trustworthy with unrighteous wealth, who would entrust them with true riches? If one has not been responsible with someone else's belongings, who will give them their own? A servant cannot serve two masters; one will inevitably be loved while the other is despised. One cannot serve God and wealth.

This parable presents challenges in interpretation, leading some scholars to shy away from explaining it thoroughly, suggesting potential text alterations by scribes. While I acknowledge the difficulties, I cannot support the notion of textual corruption, as this stance undermines the integrity of the Gospel as preserved through the Evangelists' manuscripts. It is vital to admit when we lack understanding and to search for the reasons within ourselves rather than attributing our confusion to the subject matter. Our grasp of spiritual truths is minuscule compared to the vastness of divine wisdom.

Embracing the text as authentic, let us pursue the interpretation of this challenging parable with God’s guidance. The exhortation to "make friends for yourselves by unrighteous wealth" has been misinterpreted by greedy individuals throughout early Christian history. Some erroneously concluded that giving a portion of ill-gotten gains to the needy could curry favor with God, even leading figures like Julian the Apostate to mock Christian teachings. Yet, Church Fathers such as Athanasius, Basil the Great, Augustine, and John Chrysostom consistently refuted such misinterpretations.

John Chrysostom passionately addressed these misinterpretations, warning against the absurdity of thinking one can redeem the act of murder by charitable giving. He condemned those who, after robbing others, believed they could appease God with superficial acts of charity. Chrysostom made it clear that Christ rejects offerings tainted by greed and ill-gotten gains, stressing that it is better to give nothing than to offer what is not rightfully yours.

Blessed Theophylact provided a significant observation about parables, suggesting each is rich in meaning but not always directly comparable to the truths they aim to illustrate. therefore, a detailed examination of each component of a parable is unnecessary. Instead, he argued for a focus on the overarching teaching, which, in the case of our parable, emphasizes the need for wise stewardship of the wealth entrusted to us by God.

Theophylact noted that our possessions do not belong to us; we are stewards, tasked with using what we have for the benefit of our brothers and sisters. Failing to do so hoards what is meant for sharing and is thus unrighteous. When we face the end of our earthly stewardship, we can neither work nor seek help, as the time for action will have passed. The wise course is to prepare for eternal life by sharing resources, as the poor in Christ will receive us into heavenly dwellings.

The parable continues with the principle that true stewards of God's possessions will be faithful in both small and great things. Earthly wealth is transient and ultimately insignificant compared to the lasting riches of heaven. Unfaithfulness in managing earthly goods will lead to unworthiness for eternal blessings. The reference to "unrighteous wealth" speaks to the nature of material goods that are often mismanaged; to possess them implies responsibility—not neglecting the needs of the community.

In terms of serving God versus mammon, the teachings warn that attachment to material wealth will hinder true service to God. It becomes imperative to manage wealth without becoming enslaved by it. Blessed Theophylact emphasizes that wealth is termed "unrighteous" when it is hoarded in self-interest rather than shared for the common good. The call to distribute wealth among the needy aligns with gaining friends in the spirit of charity, ultimately leading to eternal fellowship.

Therefore, while acknowledging that all earthly riches belong to God, the faithful are reminded that their use must reflect God's command to love and care for others. The notion of the unjust tenants suggests a mismanagement of God-given resources and a lack of beneficence towards those in need.

A righteous life embraces the stewardship of both material and spiritual treasures, with God requiring us to account for how we manage all that He has entrusted to us. The parable illustrates the urgency of understanding our roles as stewards and the unredeemed nature of selfish wealth. We must strive to be generous, reconciling with others and fulfilling our duty to care for the less fortunate as expressions of our love and obedience to God.

Ultimately, one must reflect deeply on the dynamic interplay between wealth, stewardship, and our accountability to God, recognizing the opportunities to turn worldly riches into tools for faithful service and eternal reward.

Lopuchin A.P.

19th centuryCommentator

The Saviour conveyed important lessons through parables during His final period in Galilee. On one such occasion, He shared a parable with His disciples about a dishonest steward who mismanaged his master’s estate. Learning of his impending dismissal, he negotiated with his master’s debtors to reduce the amounts owed to facilitate future support from them. This act demonstrated his shrewdness in handling resources, prompting the Saviour to encourage His followers to manage their possessions wisely. He taught them to cultivate relationships with the needy, so that they might have allies who would welcome them into eternal homes, since these companions would be the poor, whose acts of charity grant them access to everlasting dwellings.

Read more (137 words)

The increasing burden on Palestine from financial exploitation by the Romans and the Herodian dynasty is poignantly depicted throughout the Gospels. Christ’s discussions often include themes of debt, lending, and incarceration. This chaotic system, which was undermining the empire, severely impacted agricultural communities like the Jews. Essentials such as oil and grain were borrowed from wealthy households (Luke 16:6). Lacking proper tools, farmers resorted to digging their fields with pickaxes instead of plows. In desperation, the distressed homeowner lamented, “What shall I do? I cannot dig; I am ashamed to ask” (Luke 16:3). This portrayal in the Gospels consistently reflects the dire circumstances of the Jewish people under Roman authority, which deteriorated further during the final years of Christ's earthly ministry, culminating in an extensive financial crisis that erupted across the empire five years after His crucifixion.

Michail (Lusin)

19th centuryCommentator

"To his disciples": this term is not limited strictly to the twelve or the seventy but refers broadly to all those present, particularly the tax collectors and sinners (Luke 15:1), whom the scribes and Pharisees condemned for their close association with Him. The subsequent parable of the unfaithful steward serves to instruct these marginalized tax collectors, though it similarly applies to anyone who possesses the comforts of this world. The very role of tax collectors—gathering taxes—often led to a lack of integrity and honesty in their duties, as they tended to be motivated more by self-interest than by love and compassion for their fellow beings.

Read more (246 words)

The Lord, accustomed to drawing moral lessons from everyday life, took the opportunity presented by the publicans eager for His guidance, despite the Pharisees' criticism, to illustrate how these individuals might leverage their earthly resources to attain eternal life, resisting the urge to misuse their position. Through parables, He reveals the moral failings associated with greed (v. 1), the challenges that an unscrupulous individual might face (vv. 2-7), the importance of wisely stewarding worldly goods (vv. 8-9), and ultimately, the impossibility of serving both God and wealth (vv. 10-13). - "Some man": represents God, who holds authority over all earthly possessions and allocates them to humanity according to His divine wisdom and goodness. - "Steward": refers to a person tasked with overseeing the household under the master's authority, especially when the household is too large for the master to manage alone. In ancient Eastern customs, it was common to appoint the most reliable and faithful servants to this role, as it contained numerous temptations related to greed; the master could not monitor every action of the steward and had to trust in their honesty. - "Wastes his estate": fundamentally misappropriates resources, failing to use them as intended, ultimately harming the master’s interests and misusing their position. The steward represents all individuals who misuse the blessings bestowed upon them by God, specifically highlighting the tax collectors who exploit their role to the detriment of others for their own gain, thus squandering and misusing the gifts of God.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 22 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. Ἔλεγεν
    elegen
    I say
    G3004 · λέγω
  2. δὲ
    de
    but
    G1161 · δέ
  3. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  4. πρὸς
    pros
    to
    G4314 · πρός
  5. τοὺς
    tous
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  6. μαθητάς
    mathētas
    a learner
    G3101 · μαθητής
  7. Ἄνθρωπός
    anthrōpos
    a man
    G444 · ἄνθρωπος
  8. τις
    tis
    any one
    G5100 · τις
  9. ἦν
    ēn
    I am
    G1510 · εἰμί
  10. πλούσιος
    plousios
    rich
    G4145 · πλούσιος
  11. ὃς
    hos
    who
    G3739 · ὅς, ἥ
  12. εἶχεν
    eichen
    I have
    G2192 · ἔχω
  13. οἰκονόμον
    oikonomon
    a steward
    G3623 · οἰκονόμος
  14. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  15. οὗτος
    houtos
    this
    G3778 · οὗτος
  16. διεβλήθη
    dieblēthē
    I slander
    G1225 · διαβάλλω
  17. αὐτῷ
    autō
    he
    G846 · αὐτός
  18. ὡς
    hōs
    as
    G5613 · ὡς
  19. διασκορπίζων
    diaskorpizōn
    I scatter
    G1287 · διασκορπίζω
  20. τὰ
    ta
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  21. ὑπάρχοντα
    hyparchonta
    I am
    G5225 · ὑπάρχω
  22. αὐτοῦ
    autou
    he
    G846 · αὐτός