The Church Fathers on this verse

Luke 2:1Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

And it came to pass that in those days there went out a decree from Caesar Augustus that the whole world should be enrolled.

Douay-Rheims

εγενετο δε εν ταις ημεραις εκειναις εξηλθεν δογμα παρα καισαρος αυγουστου απογραφεσθαι πασαν την οικουμενην

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

12 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

Matthew focuses solely on the incarnation of Christ in human form, while Luke provides a temporal context by mentioning the census that occurred during that epoch. He writes: "In the forty-first year of Caesar Augustus, there came out... a command to take a census of the whole earth..." Luke includes this census to establish a timeline and to reveal that the profound mystery, albeit evident, isn’t immediately recognized. He notes that the inaugural and mandatory census marks the arrival of humanity. It was imperative that, alongside the birth of Christ, the glorification of the flesh, the defeat of the adversary, and the annihilation of death occurred—so that the names of the righteous and faithful might be recorded in the celestial ledger, commanded on earth by Caesar and in heaven by the Father to the angels. In this context, the Lord taught His disciples, saying: "Rejoice not that the spirits obey you, but rejoice that your names are written in heaven" (Luke 10:20).

Beloved, when our shared Savior Jesus Christ was destined to be born, a universal edict was issued by Caesar Augustus. As divine grace was set to illuminate the entire world, so too did this public decree touch upon matters of faith, unifying the cosmic order at the Savior's birth. The command from Caesar Augustus mandated a census of all creation to foster the unity of faith, paving the way for the proclamation of the Gospel and the dissemination of doctrine. Prior to this, numerous local authorities existed without a Caesar’s decree to announce such a universal occurrence; but as the Gospel was to be proclaimed far and wide, the entire world came together under a single directive, bridging earth and heaven for the benefit of humanity, ensuring that the divine truth was revealed to all. Caesar Augustus commanded, and Joseph complied, taking the Virgin Mary. When one inquires of a Greek or a Jew why Augustus was celebrated with an extended reign—fifty-six years and four months—often they remain perplexed, attributing his longevity to chance, unaware of the divine plan at work. Under his reign, Christ was born. Thus, since Augustus held the title of Roman emperor and was the first, Christ naturally chose to incarnate at the inception of the Roman Empire’s dominance.

The rule of iron was to be introduced, as proclaimed by David, "Thou shalt shepherd them with a rod of iron," and “Ask of Me, and I will give Thee the nations for Thy inheritance, and the ends of the earth for Thy possession” (Ps. 2:9, 8). It is as though the Father speaks to the Son, indicating that the Jews rejected His kingship and scorned His authority, diminishing in number those who converted. "Ask of Me, and I will give Thee the nations for Thy heritage, and the farthest reaches of the earth for Thy possession, not just a small section of Palestine or a circumcised people who are empty and without heart." You will scatter them, not just by words, but through actions, with a rod of iron wielded by Roman authority; thus, they became subject to the dominion of the rod.

When Jesus arrived in Jerusalem and encountered commerce within the temple—merchants buying and selling under the guise of sacrificial offerings—He fashioned a whip from cords and expelled the vendors, exclaiming, "Do not make my Father's house a house of merchandise" (John 2:16). Had they accepted that rod, they could have avoided the rod of iron; however, since they disregarded the saving rod, they fell not to the scourge of discernment with words, but under the iron rod, which struck them down, not merely wounding them, but leading to their destruction. Consequently, when the kingdom of iron began during Augustus's rule, it ushered in the birth of Christ. The Roman dominion marked the commencement of the proclamation of the Gospel, the fourth kingdom of prophecy. This reality is intricately foretold by the prophets; neither the Old nor the New Testament remains unrecorded, as the Old warns the New and the New elucidates the Old.

As I have often stated, the two covenants and their respective servants serve as guardians accompanying our Sovereign Lord. The Lord was proclaimed through the prophets; Christ is revealed in the New Testament; the new is not entirely new, for it is grounded in the old, and the old is not disregarded, as it is interpreted through the New Testament. You may recall that Daniel, though young, was graced with prophetic insight in Babylon. Why Babylon? Because the people had been exiled there for seventy years after their captivity in Assyria. In that foreign land, Daniel was raised, untouched by the surrounding influences. He possessed fatherly discernment, and from his youth served as a prophet, filled with the Holy Spirit, commencing his prophetic mission at eighteen.

Daniel prophesied numerous things, including interpretations of the four kingdoms. Nebuchadnezzar, the Assyrian king, had a vision of an image composed of four distinct elements—gold, silver, brass, and iron—that represented four kingdoms (Dan. 2:31-45). The king perceived it, but none could offer an explanation. The magicians, the Chaldeans, and fortune-tellers were summoned, and they proposed, "Tell us the dream, and we will interpret it" (Dan. 2:4). God, intending to protect the king from their deceit, made him forget the dream; so he asked, "Tell me the dream" (Dan. 2:9). When they confessed their inability to disclose the king's dream unless they heard it, Daniel, known for his divine gifts, was called upon. He approached King Nebuchadnezzar, revealing the dream through the Holy Spirit’s guidance, saying, "O king, you have seen this." Among the prophet's words, the listener recalled his vision, and after sharing the dream, Daniel was recognized as a dependable interpreter. He explained that the image represents four kingdoms destined to arise on the earth (Dan. 2:37-38).

This image, a unified entity, bore four distinct components. Yet, he warned the king, "You have observed that a stone was cut out without hands and crushed the image, which then filled the entire land" (Dan. 2:34-35). How was that stone hewn? Not by iron, but without human intervention, akin to how the Virgin birthed without human aid; this stone struck the image and grew into a vast mountain that filled the entire earth. What sort of stone is that? Consider what Isaiah proclaims: "Behold, I lay in Zion a stone of stumbling and a rock of offense" (cf. Is. 8:14, Is. 28:16), and "whoever believes in Him shall not be ashamed" (Rom. 9:33). Yet Isaiah does not speak solely of this stone; David too prophesies: "The stone which the builders rejected has become the chief cornerstone; this is the Lord's doing, and it is marvelous in our eyes" (Ps. 117:22-23). What does the cornerstone symbolize? Each corner unites two walls; this Stone, therefore, binds the New Testament and the Old Testament and brings together the two peoples—the Gentiles and the Jews—demonstrating that "this is the Lord's doing, and it is marvelous in our eyes," particularly for those of us who believe.

So, whenever you witness the preservation of the church composed of both Jews and Gentiles through the mediation of this single Stone, keep these insights foremost in your thoughts. Yet, someone may inquire, "Where do the Jews fit in among us? We see only the Gentiles. But where are the Jews? From where do Paul, Peter, Andrew, and John hail? From where did the thousands in Jerusalem originate? Initially, they came from the Jews, and then from the Gentiles. When those among them, trusting in godliness, came to faith, the rod of iron would come and disperse those who remained in disbelief, for "Thou shalt smite them with a rod of iron; Thou shalt shatter them like a potter's vessel" (Ps. 2:9).

Why likened to a potter's vessel? If clay falls while it is still soft, it can be restored, but if a vessel is formed and then fired, turning into a hard shard, it cannot be remade once broken. "Forsake me under the rod of iron, as the vessels of scarcity crush me." Christ's birth occurred during the iron's reign, as the stone is hewn without human intervention. Note how the actions align with the spoken words: the stone shattered the image and abolished the kingdoms that existed on earth; it became a great mountain, filling the entire world. Nebuchadnezzar witnessed this dream, but he forgot it, lest he reveal it to the magicians and be misled by them, hearing one thing instead of another.

Then Daniel had a separate vision, not merely a dream but a revelation. It seemed to him as if he stood by the sea; he reported, "Four great beasts came up from the sea" (Dan. 7:3). As we proceed with the prophecy’s nuances, he mentions, "There arose four great beasts out of the sea, different from one another," indicating major distinctions. "The first was like a lion, but it had eagle's wings" (Dan. 7:4). There we see gold connected to luxury, and here a lion for its strength and nobility. The second beast appeared as a bear, "standing on one side" (Dan. 7:5). That is silver, here depicted as a bear, symbolizing cruelty. The third beast appeared as a leopard (Gr. 'παρδαλις') (Dan. 7:6), the swiftest of creatures. Alexander, king of Macedon, quickly invaded the east, hence the leopard's comparison. Again, copper is mentioned in association with the eloquence of Greek speech; yet the leopard signifies the remarkable swiftness of conquest. He also spoke of a fourth beast, describing it as "terrible and exceedingly dreadful" (Dan. 7:7), having great iron teeth that ravaged, crushed, and trampled the remnants. It was unlike any beast before it; thus, the prophet refrained from naming it, to avoid denouncing the Roman power.

Yet when this fourth beast appeared, the prophet trembled, overwhelmed by its terror as it devoured and dominated everything; it asserted its control over all it encountered. The prophet then described a vision where "thrones were set, and the Ancient of Days took His seat; thousands and thousands served Him, and myriads stood before Him" (Dan. 7:9-10). "The books were opened" (Dan. 7:10), and behold, "the Son of Man came with the clouds of heaven and approached the Ancient of Days" (Dan. 7:13). What followed? No longer did beasts roam, nor was there fear of the sea; He took authority and became the ultimate Sovereign: "His dominion is an everlasting dominion, which shall not pass away, and His kingdom is one that shall not be destroyed" (Dan. 7:14). "Here is the end of the word" (Dan. 7:28), states the prophet. The prophet observed the four kingdoms aligned with his spiritual detachment, while the king perceived them in splendor—gold, silver, brass, and iron. If the king had viewed the kingdoms as beasts and Daniel had declared, "Thou art the first beast," it would have been offensive; instead, the king saw as royalty, while the prophet perceived in a different dimension.

This discourse, beloved, was shared not without purpose, nor without merit, for it reassures us that the reign of Augustus was glorified, honored, and enduring, simply because Christ was born under him. Thus, humanity was so esteemed that even his name became synonymous with honor. He ruled fifty-six years, and when he was forty-two years old, Christ arrived; thus, Christ was nurtured during fifteen years of Augustus’s reign. Following Augustus, Tiberius took the throne, and in the eighteenth year of his reign, Christ was crucified, suffered, was resurrected, and ascended. Consequently, during Augustus’ rule, He lived for fifteen years, but under Tiberius, He lived eighteen. Jesus, at thirty years of age during Tiberius Caesar's reign, revealed His divinity to His disciples and preached for three years. The Trinity is revered throughout this timeline; after three years of ministry, He faced suffering in the eighteenth year of Tiberius’ rule, fulfilling the divine plan.

Read the full text in the app

Cyrill of Alexandria

5th centuryChurch Father

Christ was born in Bethlehem during the period when Caesar Augustus mandated the first census. One might wonder why the wise Evangelist would highlight this detail. It is important to acknowledge the timing of our Savior's birth, as the Patriarch proclaimed, "The scepter shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh comes; and to Him shall be the gathering of the people" (Genesis 49:10). Thus, it is essential to understand that at that time, the people of Israel did not have a king from the Davidic line, and the authority among their leaders had diminished. The mention of Caesar's decree is significant, for Judah was then under his authority, along with other nations, demonstrating that he who issued the command was indeed their ruler.

Ambrose of Milan

4th centuryChurch Father

When discussing the birth of the Savior, it is important to contemplate the timing of His incarnation. The reference to the worldly census in the narrative of the Lord’s nativity serves to unveil a divine mystery: a census intended for earthly acknowledgment is rich with spiritual significance, marking the reign of a heavenly Sovereign. This enumeration of souls symbolizes a profession of faith, highlighting the necessity for a revival of acknowledgment for the Church, especially when the old synagogue's membership had diminished in value. This new census doesn’t call for martyrdom; rather, it brings an end to it. It signifies an educational purpose, indicating that names were already being mysteriously inscribed for Christ.

Read more (283 words)

This census does not measure physical dimensions, but rather the worth of the soul and intellect; it does not impose limits but broadens them; it does not segregate individuals by age but encompasses all, for it acknowledges everyone: all generations are accountable to Christ! He is recognized through the martyrdom of innocent infants; His presence is proclaimed joyfully by those still nestled in the womb (see Matt. 2:16, Luke 1:44). This census holds no fear, cruelty, or harshness; each person is judged solely by their faith. Are you curious about who was appointed by Christ to conduct the census? He instructs them to carry it out without blows or threats, urging compassion towards the populace, to sheath their swords and possess no gold (see Matt. 10:9-10, Luke 9:3). Through such scribes, He reached the entirety of the world.

Understand that this is not the census of Augustus, but that of Christ! All corners of the earth are commanded to be counted. At Christ’s birth, all names are reported; as the census encompasses the entire globe, every individual is examined. Who possesses the authority to command a count of the entire universe, if not the Lord of all creation? It is not Augustus’ earth that matters, but the Lord's domain, the cosmos, and all its inhabitants (Psalms 23:1). Augustus lacked dominion over the Goths and had no claim over the Armenians, but Christ reigns over them. They welcomed the messenger of Christ’s census, and the martyrs of Christ emerged among them. Perhaps this is why they currently prevail against us, as the events around us reveal; they acknowledged Christ through the offering of their blood, while the Arians in our land dispute His birth.

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryCommentator

To conduct a census of the entire world. The purpose of this census was to ensure that taxes could be collected and paid, as the world was already under the governance of the Romans, ruled by Caesar. However, this dominion of the whole world by Caesar and the census itself foreshadow the ultimate dominion of the entire creation by Christ and the record of those who are in heaven. The census was initiated at the time of Christ's birth, so that the Virgin could travel to Bethlehem (for all were to be registered in their hometowns) and there give birth to Christ.

Read more (47 words)

This was done to fulfill the prophecy, "And thou, Bethlehem, O land of Judah, art by no means least among the rulers of Judah; for out of thee shall come a Ruler who will shepherd my people Israel." This is clearly noted in the Gospel of Matthew.

Gregory the Great

6th centuryChurch Father

With the grace of the Lord, we gather today to hold three significant Liturgies, which limits our ability to delve deeply into the Gospel passage. However, the very incarnation of our Savior compels us to offer some reflections, even if they are brief. The fact that a census is conducted throughout the universe prior to the birth of the Lord serves as a clear sign that He, who exists outside of time and counts His chosen ones, would soon take on human form. In contrast, the Prophet speaks of the wicked, declaring, "Let them be consumed from the book of the living, and with the Just let them not be written" (Psalm 68:29).

Innocentius of Kherson

19th centuryChurch Father

Let us return to the account of Luke the Evangelist, who narrates the very genesis of Jesus Christ. He states, "But it came to pass in those days, that a decree went out from Caesar Augustus." What days are referred to here? This follows the narrative about the child (John) who "grew..." (Luke 1:80). Clearly, this does not pertain to that earlier time but rather to the period following the birth of the Baptist. "A decree went out from Caesar Augustus to register the entire realm." Although the wording appears straightforward, it carries a vivid and profound significance. The directive emanates from Augustus, who held dominion over nearly the entire known world, almost as if it were issued by God Himself.

Read more (304 words)

The title 'Cæsar' originates from Julius Cæsar, while 'Augustus' (meaning 'most revered') is the designation conferred upon him by the Senate. "To register the entire realm" refers to the Roman census. There were two types of censuses: one was a count of individuals, and the other, a valuation of property. The former could be conducted out of mere curiosity, while the latter served the purpose of tax collection. The census of individuals is what is being referenced here, as the property census would not take place until a decade later, as noted in the Acts (Acts 5:37). Archelaus, the governor of Judea, was exiled, leading to Judea's incorporation into the Roman Empire. Following this, the Jews revolted, but that census was carried out without incident. "The entire realm." If we interpret this literally, it would signify "the entire world." However, there were many regions that were not under Augustus' authority at that time. The term 'universe' in this context likely indicates the expanse of Roman rule. Augustus conducted two censuses during his reign. The period we are discussing pertains to the second one, which occurred in the forty-fifth year of his reign, with the birth of Jesus Christ being in the forty-ninth year. Nonetheless, 'the universe' may in essence denote only Judea. For writers of that era, the phrase πασαν οικουμενην had a significantly narrower meaning than it does today. Josephus Flavius illustrates this when he mentions that Ahab sent to search for Elijah throughout the whole universe. If we take 'the universe' to refer solely to Judea, it elucidates why secular historians did not document it; Augustus, aiming to assimilate Judea into the Roman Empire, sought to quantify its population. This context enriches our understanding of the Gospel accounts regarding the circumstances surrounding the earthly life of Jesus Christ. The Nativity of Christ.

Philaret of Moscow (Drosdow)

19th centuryChurch Father

The Roman Empire reached its peak of size and strength during the reign of Caesar Augustus. With the majority of the three major known territories having yielded to Roman rule, they proclaimed themselves masters of the entire world. Consequently, Augustus, eager to gain a precise understanding of the Empire's resources and population, mandated a census of his people and instituted a poll tax that was applicable to everyone.

Alexander Gorsky

19th centuryCommentator

The initial word about the Messiah among the populace was meant by Divine Providence to emerge following His birth, and it should have originated from the city associated with His lineage from the house of David. This Divine plan began to unfold during the census commanded by Augustus in Judea. Since we encounter various complications while aligning the conditions described by St. Luke with the historical narrative of the Jewish nation, we aim to delve deeper into this matter, potentially shedding light on several Gospel events.

Read more (1336 words)

1. What was this census that the evangelist mentions, which occurred across the entirety of the earth? 2. How could this census be enforced in Judea under Augustus' authority when Herod was ruling there? 3. How could Quirinius, serving as governor of Syria, oversee this census during Herod's reign, given that he took office after both Herod and his son Archelaus had concluded their rule? 4. Why does Josephus remain silent on the matter of this census?

1. The census occurring at the end of Herod's reign—whether it involved merely counting individuals or also included the normal procedure of tax assessments—was not truly a census for the entire world, but rather it affected all subjects of the Roman Empire, including associated peoples. While Suetonius records three censuses under Augustus, they only pertained to Roman citizens; thus, only the Roman populace was enumerated. Moreover, evidence substantiates that none of these censuses parallels the one around the time of Christ's birth. It would be implausible to think that historians overlooked such a widespread enumeration across the Roman Empire and its provinces, as witnessed in Judea. Therefore, it appears this census was specific to Judea, which does not conflict with the evangelist’s mention of the entire land, πάσαν τήν οίκουμένην. The term οίκουμένη was often understood in a broader context to signify the Roman Empire, though it could also refer specifically to Judea, as seen in Luke (Acts 11:28) and Josephus (8:13, 5). The term πάσαν may indicate that all regions in Judea, including Galilee where Josephus lived, were indeed subject to this census, a detail the evangelist would surely have acknowledged since subsequently, the territories of Judea were partitioned into independent sections.

2. The presence of a king in Judea did not restrain the Roman emperor from ordering a census there. The Romans maintained complete control over Herod, ensuring the Jews remained subject to their authority. Notably, Herod could not autonomous govern his kingdom, as he needed the emperor's consent for his decisions. Evidence shows that shortly before his demise, Herod paid tribute to the emperor. Consequently, during a time of unrest, the provinces inherited by his son Archelaus were under lawful subjugation, and as noted by Josephus, the emperor reduced the tax by a quarter. It is clear that this tax was not destined for Archelaus. Josephus attributes the beginning of the Jewish people's subjugation to Roman rule to Pompey's invasion of Judea. Additionally, Anpianus states that even Herod had to pay tribute to Antony, his ally. Considering all these circumstances reveals that there was no inconsistency in conducting a census in Herod's domain at the behest of the Roman emperor, even if it involved actual taxation, rather than merely counting the Jewish populace.

3. The phrase “Αϋτη ή άπογραφή πράτη έγένετο ήγεμονεύοντος τής Συρίας Κυρηνίου” has been subjected to various interpretations. The most plausible explanation suggests interpreting πρώτη instead of προτέρα and linking the subsequent genitive cases to it (see John 1:15), so that the meaning would be that this census occurred before the one instituted by Quirinius, the governor of Syria. The full expression would thus read: “αϋτη ή άπογραφή πρώτη τής τού ήγεμονεύοντος τής Συρίας Κυρηνίου.” However, just as the member must sometimes be omitted (as seen in similar expressions in Luke, such as 13:1, which discusses the mixing of blood), this perspective finds support in the well-documented census made in Judea approximately fourteen years later when Quirinius served as governor of Syria.

4. To address the absence of mention by Josephus regarding this census, we should briefly recount the concluding years of Herod's reign. During these years, Herod was at odds with the Arabian king Hovod, who failed to return a debt owed to Herod. Additionally, various bands of thieves from Arabia raided Herod's territories, leading Herod to seek satisfaction; however, the robbers received protection from the Arabian king and minister Silius. Herod appealed to Roman officials stationed in Syria, resulting in a stipulation that both Herod and Hovod return the captives and money within thirty days, a deadline that lapsed without fulfillment. Silius subsequently traveled to Rome to complain against Herod, prompting Herod, with imperial sanction, to invade Arabia, where he triumphed over his foes, killing 2,500 Arabians alongside their leader. Augustus, questioning the fairness of Herod’s incursion, ultimately, after confirming Silius' report, made it clear that he would henceforth treat Herod not as a friend but as a subject.

Herod sent envoys to Rome for justification, but they were dismissed. In the midst of this turmoil, Gadfly died, leaving a vacuum of power, while Aretas ascended the throne of Arabia without the emperor's approval, thus sending an embassy to Rome against Silius, which went unacknowledged. According to Josephus, the situations in the kingdoms of Judah and Arabia deteriorated steadily; of the two rulers, one was not exercising true sovereignty, while the other, Herod, faced harsh treatment from the emperor. To resolve these calamities, Herod dispatched Nicholas of Damascus to explain the circumstances to Augustus, vindicating himself and ultimately regaining favor with the emperor.

Shortly thereafter, internal strife arose within Herod’s family, notably between his eldest son Antipater and his brother Theros, intensifying tensions. Herod's sister Salomia, upon learning of this alliance, alerted Herod. Whereas Herod had already suspected treachery, he was unaware of the full extent of Salomiah’s revelations. During this period, a certain sect of Jews known for their zealous adherence to the law, labeled Pharisees, openly opposed Herod, as they refused to pledge allegiance to the emperor. When Herod imposed penalties upon them, Theros’ wife intervened, paying their dues as recognition for their prophetic abilities, foretelling the transfer of Herod’s kingdom to Theros's lineage as decreed by God. This act, and others like it, incited Herod's wrath, leading to the execution of prominent Pharisees and their sympathizers.

By examining these tumultuous events toward the end of Herod’s reign, we can establish that Josephus’ reference to an oath aligns with the census mentioned by Luke. If we accept that the birth of Jesus Christ occurred 12 or 15 months earlier, it is feasible to conclude that it didn’t happen within the same year that encompasses the events described. Numerous elements of this oath correspond with the Gospel account of Jesus Christ's birth. Luke notes a decree from Caesar Augustus regarding the census, reflecting the unwavering authority of the emperor over his subjects. The connection between the census and the allegiance oath, underlined by the indignation in Jerusalem regarding the prophecy of a new king is compelling.

Herod's reaction to the Magi's inquiry and their subsequent deception resulted in a decree to eliminate all male infants in Bethlehem, a narrative echoed by Josephus, emphasizing the bloodshed during this period. Notably, Josephus paints the Pharisees and their zeal for prophecy as subjects of mockery, despite his own identification with their faction, indicating an ironic stance toward their predicted lineage of kings. The entire situation invites contemplation, especially regarding the prophecy of a Messiah that would bring an end to Herodian rule, a narrative echoed in both scriptural texts and the historical records of Josephus, intertwining expectant reverence for the prophetic word with the harsh realities of Herod's reign.

In conclusion, discerning the birth year of Jesus Christ involves integrating various chronological references from the Gospel narrators regarding His birth, baptism, and death. Key indications highlight that Jesus was born during Herod’s reign, shortly before his death. Given that the event leading to the massacre of the infants was predicated on Christ’s age, the timeframe when John the Baptist began his ministry under Tiberius also aids in situating the events historically. Furthermore, utilizing prophecies and historical data, we can ascertain that the entrance of Jesus into public ministry and His subsequent actions correlate with the prophetic revelation surrounding His identity and mission. Ascertaining the exact year of Jesus’ birth, based largely on these chronological markers by early Church Fathers, tends to converge toward the years around 751 or 752, despite variances emerging from differing methodologies of reckoning related to His life and ministry.

Bogolepow D.P.

19th centuryCommentator

Luke opens his narrative of the Lord's Nativity by highlighting that before His birth, the parents of Jesus Christ, who had been residing in Nazareth, were compelled to travel to Bethlehem. This journey was prompted by a decree from Augustus regarding a national census. Luke observes that the specific timing of this decree is noted vaguely; he simply refers to "those days," a phrase that can span many years (cf. Matt. 3:1). Historically, it is acknowledged that Augustus's mandate for a census affecting all territories within the Roman Empire was issued approximately 27 years prior to the Dionysian era. This census was implemented gradually, and in Judea, it was not enforced until around the time of Christ's birth.

Read more (66 words)

Although Herod the Great was the sovereign ruler of Judea at that moment—enjoying an alliance with Rome—he had no power to obstruct the implementation of this decree from the Roman authorities. His rule was granted by Rome, and he was bound to its decisions; thus, he could neither wage wars nor establish peace nor determine the succession to the throne after his death without Roman assent.

Gladkow B.I.

19th centuryCommentator

The narrative of the Gospel commences with Luke’s description of the circumstances leading up to and surrounding the births of John the Baptist and our Savior, Jesus Christ. Sadly, the Evangelist does not indicate the specific year in which these occurrences transpired; he simply notes that they happened during the reign of Herod, the ruler of the Jews (Luke 1:5), while Caesar Augustus ordered a census of the entire world.

Lopuchin A.P.

19th centuryCommentator

During this period, the people of Judea were under the dominion of Roman rule, having been subjugated since the days of Pompey in 63 B.C. At that time, Emperor Augustus reigned, dedicating his administrative talents to impose stability upon the expansive empire, which had recently endured the devastating impacts of civil conflict. The finances of the realm, plunged into turmoil amidst the turbulence of civil unrest, required urgent attention. To address this, the emperor mandated a census throughout all provinces of the empire, signaling the importance he placed on this critical undertaking. He compiled comprehensive statistics covering the entire empire, detailing the population of citizens and allies as well as the taxes levied.

Read more (85 words)

Under his rule, three censuses were conducted: one at the commencement of his reign in the year 726 A.U.C., a second in the year 746, and a final one at around the year 760 A.U.C. The second census eventually reached Judea, forcing its inhabitants to comply with the edict of the emperor. Herod the Great ruled over Judea, yet as a client king, he was entirely beholden to Roman authority. He dutifully executed Caesar's commands, ordering that the entire populace be registered for the census.

Michail (Lusin)

19th centuryCommentator

"In those days" refers to an unspecified period, often used as a transition between narratives, and in this context, it clearly indicates the time preceding the birth of Jesus Christ. - The reference to Caesar Augustus pertains to Caesar Octavian Augustus, the Roman emperor during whose reign Christ was born. - The term "command" or decree (δογμα, cf. Acts 17:7, Dan. 2:13) signifies an official order. - "To take a census" likely pertains to an assessment of the land, its inhabitants, and their property, often described as a revision. - The phrase "throughout the whole earth" does not refer solely to Palestine (as it can sometimes imply - Num.

Read more (485 words)

2:3, Luke 4:25), but encompasses the entire Roman Empire of that era (orbis terrarum), which, in the understanding of that time, signified the whole world or universe. - The note that "this census was the first in the reign of Quirinius of Syria" is among the most challenging to clarify, leading to various interpretations. The issue arises from the fact that Quirinius came to administer Syria approximately 12-15 years after Christ’s birth: how could the census that prompted Joseph to journey to Bethlehem, where Christ was born (Luke 2:3-7), occur during his governance? The most credible interpretation might be that it should read not this census, but rather the census itself (not αὐ'τη but αὐτὴ, since ancient manuscripts, including the Gospel of Luke, were penned without the later additions of accents or aspirations). This reading renders the passage to suggest: "In those days, a decree from Augustus Caesar was issued to conduct a census throughout the Roman Empire, which included Judea; however, the census in Judea was the first recorded during Quirinius' administration in Syria." This distinction implies that the timing of Augustus' decree concerning the census differs from the actual counting in Judea. It is plausible to assert that under Augustus' proclamation, a census of the entire Roman Empire began in Judea at the time of Christ’s birth, but due to the death of Herod the Great and subsequent political turmoil in Judea, it was temporarily halted. This census was later resumed and concluded under Quirinius, the proconsul in Syria and Judea, approximately 12-15 years later. - The Evangelist’s note that this census was the first under Quirinius in Judea seemingly aims to convey that Jesus the Messiah was born at a time when the census highlighted Judea’s profound state of humiliation, a fact recognized by the Jewish people themselves, leading to their resentment towards the Romans (Acts 11:26). It is indeed notable that at his birth, the Lord Jesus was officially recorded as a subject of the Roman Empire. - The fact that Augustus ordered a universal census is corroborated by the accounts of Tacitus, a contemporary Roman historian, who noted (Ann. 1, 11) that upon Augustus’ death (around 17 P. X.), his successor Tiberius presented a handwritten note in the Roman Senate, which included specific details about the strength, wealth, and military resources of allied cities. - How could Augustus have provided such specific information regarding Judea without conducting a census? Additionally, the fact that Augustus' allies, including Herod, were also subject to this census is not surprising when considering the nature of Roman emperors like Octavian Augustus. It is evident that Herod had no choice but to comply with Augustus' decree, given his unpopularity in Rome (Joseph. Antt. 4:1; 17:5-8, 11), and considering his character, which was both obsequious and ambitious; he was thus inclined to take any action necessary to please the Roman authority and maintain his power over Judea.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 15 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. Ἐγένετο
    egeneto
    I come into being
    G1096 · γίνομαι
  2. δὲ
    de
    but
    G1161 · δέ
  3. ἐν
    en
    in
    G1722 · ἐν
  4. ταῖς
    tais
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  5. ἡμέραις
    hēmerais
    a day
    G2250 · ἡμέρα
  6. ἐκείναις
    ekeinais
    that
    G1565 · ἐκεῖνος
  7. ἐξῆλθεν
    exēlthen
    I go out
    G1831 · ἐξέρχομαι
  8. δόγμα
    dogma
    a decree
    G1378 · δόγμα
  9. παρὰ
    para
    from
    G3844 · παρά
  10. Καίσαρος
    kaisaros
    Caesar
    G2541 · Καῖσαρ
  11. Αὐγούστου
    augoustou
    Augustus
    G828 · Αὔγουστος
  12. ἀπογράφεσθαι
    apographesthai
    I enroll
    G583 · ἀπογράφω
  13. πᾶσαν
    pasan
    all
    G3956 · πᾶς
  14. τὴν
    tēn
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  15. οἰκουμένην
    oikoumenēn
    the inhabited (Roman) world
    G3625 · οἰκουμένη