Theophylact of Bulgaria
After the Sadducees were embarrassed, the scribes, pleased with their triumph over them, endorsed Jesus as their contender.
And some of the scribes answering, said to him: Master, thou hast said well.
αποκριθεντες δε τινες των γραμματεων ειπον διδασκαλε καλως ειπας
7 Church Fathers comment on this verse · 8 commentaries
After the Sadducees were embarrassed, the scribes, pleased with their triumph over them, endorsed Jesus as their contender.
It is noted in that context, "And when the people heard, they marvelled at His teaching."
When the Pharisees were rendered speechless by this response, the Sadducees, part of the same Sanhedrin, took pleasure in their embarrassment and quickly posed a question to Him regarding their denial of the resurrection of the dead, citing implausible outcomes they had drawn from it. Much like His previous condemnations toward the Pharisees, the Lord addressed the fundamental flaw in their beliefs. They referred to a scenario involving a woman who had been married to seven brothers according to human law. The Lord illustrated to the Sadducees that their misunderstanding stemmed from two key failures: (1) their inability to grasp the Scriptures and (2) their lack of comprehension regarding God's limitless power.
Had they genuinely understood the texts they accepted, in both letter and spirit, they would have recognized the essential link between the religious teachings they contained and the belief in the eternal existence of humanity. Furthermore, a true understanding of God’s omnipotence would lead them to realize that the future existence of humans is not merely a continuation of current forms and relationships; rather, it could transform into a glorified state. He then disclosed that the life beyond must align with that of the exalted beings. To substantiate this notion, He referred to the frequent declarations found within the writings of Moses regarding the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. How could God engage in such an intimate bond with these revered individuals, bestowing upon them significant honor and dignity as their God, if they were simply transient beings and not destined for eternal life?
The Gospel narratives do not clearly indicate that the Sadducees participated alongside the Pharisees in this instance. It is possible that, witnessing how Jesus humiliated the Pharisees and delighting in it, they sought to have Him mock the Pharisees’ belief in the resurrection of the dead. This belief held that when the Messiah arrived, all Israelites would be resurrected and would inhabit the holy land. At the very least, Jesus’ response was well-received by the scribes (Luke 39), and the Sadducees’ defeat through His words bolstered the Pharisees (Matthew 34). The Sadducees contended that the law of levirate marriage (Deuteronomy 25:5-6), which allows a woman to have multiple husbands during her lifetime, made resurrection (as understood by the Pharisees) implausible.
They concluded that this law must either be unreasonable or that resurrection could not be possible. Since God’s commandments cannot be deemed unreasonable, the law itself seems to imply that the resurrection of the dead is nonexistent. The root of the Sadducees’ objection lay in the Pharisees’ overly corporeal understanding of life after resurrection. Consequently, Jesus told the Sadducees (along with the Pharisees) that they were unaware of the Scriptures, clarifying that after resurrection, “they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like the angels of God in heaven” (Matthew 30). Since the Sadducees’ argument rested on the belief that a decayed human body cannot rise, the Lord pointed out that they did not grasp “the power of God.” He referenced the Scriptures (Exodus 3:6) to demonstrate that there is existence beyond death and that a resurrection of the dead will indeed occur.
The scribes who were there, secretly pleased at the triumph over their adversaries concerning the issue of resurrection, overlooked the fact that the Sadducees shared their beliefs. Their joy was evident as they addressed Jesus, affirming, "Teacher, you have spoken rightly. You have spoken rightly." The onlookers, witnessing the downfall of the Herodians, the disciples of the Pharisees, and the Sadducees, were astounded by the wisdom of Jesus.
This response was marked by such divine wisdom that even a few of the scribes could not help but show their admiration, openly affirming: ‘Teacher, you have spoken well!’
The Evangelist Mark describes that the scribe who inquired of the Lord recognized that He had responded skillfully to the Sadducees (Mark 12:23) and later voiced his admiration openly (Mark 12:32). It is possible that this particular scribe, along with others of his kind, is referenced here. Luke notes that following the Lord’s response to the Sadducees, they remarked to Him, "Teacher, you have spoken rightly." The Lord demonstrated so effectively from the Scriptures the truth of the resurrection of the dead that even His adversaries acknowledged His wisdom in that moment.
The narrative presented by Luke regarding the inquiry from the Sadducees and the Lord's response mirrors closely that of the first two Gospel writers, with only slight variations in terminology. For a detailed comparison, refer to Matthew 22:23-33 and Mark 12:18-27. Notably, the term "showed" can be interpreted as "proclaimed," indicating that Moses documented the words of the Lord delivered to him in the Tabernacle. In this account, God identifies Himself as the God of the ancestors of the Jewish nation, highlighting that Moses, the one who received the commandments through divine revelation, recognized Him as the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.
Concerning the scribes mentioned, it is likely they were not part of the Sadducee sect, which would have found it difficult to publicly commend the Lord for His astute reply. Instead, they may have belonged to the Pharisees, who, despite collaborating with the Sadducees in challenging the Lord, took pleasure in witnessing their rivals being outmatched, as indicated in Matthew 22:34 and beyond. Mark notes that one scribe, after hearing the Lord's effective response to the Sadducees, acknowledged His wisdom (Mark 12:23) and later voiced his approval (Mark 12:32).
This particular scribe, along with like-minded individuals, praised the Lord's answer by addressing Him, "Master, you have spoken well." The Lord adeptly used Scripture to affirm the truth of the resurrection, earning respect even from those who opposed Him (Luke 20:40-44).
Furthermore, the Lord posed a question regarding the Messiah, specifically about whose Son He is, which is presented in a manner consistent with Matthew and Mark. For additional context, consult Matthew 22:41-46 and Mark 12:35-37. After the Sadducees' embarrassment, a scribe inquired about the greatest commandment in the law (Matthew 22:35-40; Mark 12:28-34). Following this, both Matthew and Mark indicate that no one dared to challenge Him further, with Luke noting that His question about Christ was initiated by Himself rather than prompted by others. Thus, after addressing the Sadducees regarding the resurrection, Luke continues with, "How then is He the Son of him?" While Luke does not comment on the audience's reaction to this question, Matthew and Mark enhance the narrative by stating that no one was able to respond, while the crowd listened to Him with great interest.
Passages read together with this verse.
Greek text, 9 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.