Furthermore, the Evangelist later reveals that Pilate and Herod became allies from that point forward, suggesting Pilate sought to mend their previous discord by treating the Lord with dignity, as though He were an esteemed guest in Herod's temporary quarters. Ultimately, Pilate might have anticipated that Herod would deliver a positive assessment of Jesus' situation, hoping that such a judgment would bolster his own position against the relentless complaints from the religious leaders, thereby sparing the Lord from His accusers. This is evidenced in Pilate acknowledging Herod’s shared view regarding Christ (v. 15).
"To Herod, who was also in Jerusalem these days": As a Jewish leader adhering to the Jewish faith, Herod had traveled from his Galilean center in Tiberias to Jerusalem for the Passover festival in accordance with the Mosaic Law. "Herod rejoiced greatly": This is the same Herod Antipas who had executed John the Baptist, and upon hearing of Christ’s deeds, thought that it might be John risen from the grave. "Long desired to see Him": This illustrates why Herod was elated upon witnessing the Lord. The Evangelist previously mentioned Herod’s longing to observe Jesus, the miracle worker (Luke 9:7-9); as news of Christ’s miracles spread, Herod’s desire only intensified, though the Lord had avoided this encounter. His excitement stemmed from hoping to witness some miraculous act, implying that if he had accepted Jesus as the genuine Miracle Worker, his faith would have been strengthened long ago; however, it is questionable whether this corrupt monarch, who had slain the Baptist, truly held sincere faith in the humble Prophet from Galilee. He likely perceived Jesus as a sorcerer capable of producing remarkable wonders through hidden means and wished to witness such feats, yet he misjudged; such vain and immoral expectations were not met by Christ. "He desired to see some miracle from Jesus, not with the intention of belief, but merely to satisfy his curiosity, akin to how one watches a magician perform tricks, amazed by illusions of swallowing serpents or swords."
"Proposed to Him many questions": Although the Evangelist does not specify the questions, their nature can be inferred partly from Herod Antipas' well-known character (cf. note on Mt. 2:22, 14, and parallels in Lk. 9:7-9), and also from the fact that the Lord found no necessity to respond. "For what need is there to answer him who seeks not for truth? Why offer pearls before swine (Matt. 7:6)? Humanity often calls for silence in such circumstances. The spoken word does no good for the inattentive and can lead them to greater condemnation."
"Accused strenuously": The religious leaders accompanied Christ from Pilate to Herod, determined not to lose sight of Him amidst their concerns for maintaining their influence. This urgency is why they vehemently accused the Lord before Herod, just as they had done before Pilate. However, their attempts here met with no success; Herod, feeling slighted rather than swayed by their accusations, was offended that the Lord neither performed a miracle before him nor answered any of his inquiries, leaving him feeling humiliated. Though the Evangelist does not elaborate on the manner of this humiliation, he notes a significant aspect: he "clothed" the Lord "in a brilliant" (in truth, white) "garment, and sent Him back to Pilate." In Roman custom, individuals aspiring to honor were dressed in bright (white) apparel, as were Roman generals in battle and Jewish kings during significant events, adorned with precious stones (as noted by Flavius, the dazzling white attire of Agrippa, rich with jewels, would be blinding in the sun). By enveloping the Lord in such garments and returning Him to Pilate, Herod mockingly portrayed Him as a trivial pretender to the Jewish throne, subtly communicating to Pilate that this pretender was undeserving of death, only worthy of mockery. Pilate recognized this implication, as evident in the subsequent account (v. 15).
"They became friends," etc.: The origins of their previous discord remain unclear; possibly, it stemmed from Pilate's harsh actions against the Galileans under Herod's domain (Luke 13:1). Their reconciliation was not born from shared animosity toward the Lord, as was often the case; rather, it was Pilate's courteous treatment of Herod—demonstrated by sending the Lord to him as a Galilean—that forged their alliance.