The Church Fathers on this verse

Luke 23:9Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

And he questioned him in many words. But he answered him nothing.

Douay-Rheims

επηρωτα δε αυτον εν λογοις ικανοις αυτος δε ουδεν απεκρινατο αυτω

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

10 Church Fathers comment on this verse · 11 commentaries

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

Herod interrogated Him on numerous matters, adopting an ironic and mocking tone throughout; as a result, Jesus remained silent. The One who fashioned all creation through His words and of whom David affirmed that ‘he will give firmness to his words in judgement’ (Psalm 111:5), understands the appropriate moment to respond. What purpose does it serve to reply to someone who seeks not to learn? What merit is there in casting pearls before swine (Matt. 7:6)? Conversely, as previously noted, humanity often requires silence in such situations. For verbal exchanges yield no benefit for those who are inattentive and may lead them to a deeper condemnation. However, Pilate, possessing more goodwill than Herod, receives a response from the Lord, albeit not in straightforward terms.

Read more (102 words)

When Pilate inquired, Are Thou the King of the Jews? the Lord’s reply was, Thou sayest. This response can be interpreted in two ways. One interpretation affirms, I am indeed the King of the Jews; you have spoken the truth. Alternatively, it may imply, I do not speak; you proclaim, you hold the power and you speak. In contrast, Herod, as a persistent scoffer, chose not to reply at all. Indeed, as Isaiah prophesized (Isaiah 3:4, 12), the offspring of the wicked, the sons of the lawless, specifically the Jews of that era, were oppressed by collectors and ruled over by mockers.

Ambrose of Milan

4th centuryChurch Father

Herod desired to meet Jesus, hoping to witness a miraculous sign. However, Jesus remained silent and offered no miracles. The wicked man standing before Him was unworthy of witnessing divine wonders, and the Lord chose not to showcase His power. Herod represents the archetype of all unjust individuals; those who disregard both the law and the prophets cannot truly honor the magnificent miracles of Christ as depicted in the Gospel.

When Herod sought to witness miraculous signs, Christ remained silent and did not act. Herod’s brutality did not merit a display of divine wonders, and the Lord chose not to reveal His might. It could be said that Herod exemplifies all the evildoers who, lacking belief in the law and the prophets, are unable to perceive the divine works of Christ as presented in the Gospel.

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryCommentator

He posed numerous inquiries to Him, filled with cleverness and temptation. Yet, He provided no response, deeming them as unworthy of a reply. Understanding that this individual sought a miracle not out of genuine faith, but rather for amusement and curiosity rather than as a testament to divine authority, He chose not to perform a miracle in his presence.

Philaret (Gumilevski)

19th centuryChurch Father

He interrogated Him with numerous inquiries. He inquired about various topics that mere curiosity and empty speculation might anticipate, which could easily devolve into unproductive musings or become a target for mockery and blasphemy. These were the trivial questions posed by Herod to Jesus. Yet, He (the Lord Jesus) remained silent. Such inquiries warranted responses rooted only in sycophantic compliance. However, no schemes from a ruler or Pharisee could sway the Divine Teacher. Would Herod have offered protection to Jesus from His adversaries had He performed a miracle in his presence? The destiny of Jesus was not contingent upon Herod. The circumstances of Herod and his attendants, however, could face transformation through the workings of Jesus' miracles.

Read more (96 words)

Yet for those aligned with Satan, such miracles hold no value; thus, they are not granted to them (Matthew 4:6). The Lord refrained from disclosing to Herod the depths of his sinful existence, his depravity, or his wrongdoing against the herald of repentance, as well as the impending judgment that awaited him, even in this life. Why did He choose not to speak? Because the Preacher of Repentance had already imparted much on these matters to him, though it bore no fruit. The Savior instructed His disciples, 'Do not cast your pearls before swine' (Matt. 7:6).

Alexander Gorsky

19th centuryCommentator

Herod had long desired to meet Jesus, whom he knew as a performer of signs and wonders. He anticipated witnessing a miraculous event, yet his expectations led to disappointment. Viewing Jesus as unable to manifest divine acts, he chastised Him, dressing Him in a purple robe to mockingly present Him as a false King-Messiah, and then sent Jesus to Pilate.

Bogolepow D.P.

19th centuryCommentator

During this period, Herod appeared to regard the Rabbi, renowned for His miraculous deeds, merely as an intriguing entertainer (cf. Luke 9:7-9). He was eager to witness a display of His miraculous powers. However, the Lord remained silent, offering no response to either his curiosity or the accusations leveled against Him. Subsequently, Herod, having ridiculed Him, sent Him back to Pilate, adorned in a bright royal robe, as a gesture of scorn, portraying Him as a pretender to the throne.

Gladkow B.I.

19th centuryCommentator

Christ not only refrained from performing any signs for Herod, but He also chose not to respond to his inquiries. It's likely that if He had performed a miracle in Herod's presence, the ruler would have released Him from the Sanhedrin's scrutiny. However, Christ refrained from using His divine authority for His own benefit, and moreover, employing this power merely to entertain the whims of a corrupt king would be akin to offering precious gifts to those who cannot appreciate their value.

Lopuchin A.P.

19th centuryCommentator

Herod, residing in a palace near the Praetorium, was pleased to finally encounter the individual he had long heard about and wished to meet. Intrigued by the tales of His wondrous deeds, he approached Jesus with questions about His works, thinking that this captive, in an effort to gain his favor, might perform some remarkable sign before him, one that could even be relayed to his associates in Rome. However, he was disheartened when Christ, aware of the king's lowly nature—having previously referred to him as a ‘fox’ rather than the ‘lion’ he fancied himself to be—remained silent before him.

Makkaveiski N.K.

19th centuryCommentator

Herod Antipas, the tetrarch of Galilee and Perea, was an intelligent and ambitious figure, yet largely inactive, cruel, crafty, and indulgent—truly, a fitting descendant of his father, Herod the Great. The description of him as a 'fox,' given by the Lord Jesus Christ Himself, reveals the Tetrarch's sly nature. His illicit relationship with Herodias, the wife of his half-brother Philip, alongside the execution of John the Baptist, openly showcases his indulgence and brutality. Yet, these heinous acts left a mark on Herod's fearful and superstitious psyche; he was plagued by nightmares of retribution for the innocent blood he had spilt. A wave of terror washed over him when he learned of a new prophet performing miracles not far from his capital shortly after John’s death.

Read more (157 words)

Initially, Antipas established Sepphoris as his principal city, but like his father, he had a penchant for extravagant architecture. Under Emperor Tiberius, he constructed a new city on the western shore of the Sea of Galilee, naming it Tiberias in the emperor's honor. This city became his primary residence, but he traveled to Jerusalem for the Passover feast and likely stayed in his father’s opulent palace, located in the northwest part of Zion. In this setting, Jesus Christ was brought before him, and one can imagine Herod's superstitious intrigue upon hearing of the miraculous feats performed by this Prophet, whom he regarded as perhaps the specter of the slain John, brought to him for judgment. The Evangelist records that ‘Herod, when he saw Jesus, rejoiced greatly.’ The slayer of the Baptist was eager to see Jesus perform a miracle to quench his curiosity. However, the only response came in the form of silence to all his inquiries.

Michail (Lusin)

19th centuryCommentator

Only Luke among the Gospel writers recounts the judgment rendered by the Lord against Herod, providing notable detail. The phrase "Sent Him to Herod" begs the question of motivation; it seems unlikely that Pilate intended to absolve himself of Jesus' case, thereby delegating it to Herod as the Galilean governor. He did not perceive the matter as being outside his legal accountability; rather, it was Herod who considered it beyond his authority and returned the Lord to Pilate after reproaching Him. Pilate likely sought clearer insight into Jesus and the charges against Him, which he found vague at best.

Read more (662 words)

Additionally, the Evangelist notes that Pilate and Herod formed an alliance after this event, suggesting that Pilate aimed to end their previous discord by showing courtesy to Herod, treating Jesus respectfully as a guest during His brief stay. It is reasonable to conclude that Pilate hoped for a favorable opinion from Herod regarding Jesus’ case, thereby bolstering his own position against the unyielding accusations of the religious leaders and aiming to release Jesus from His accusers. This is indicated by his statement about Herod’s agreement with his assessment of Christ.

Herod, being present in Jerusalem during that time, was a Jewish ruler who had traveled from his Galilean capital in Tiberias to partake in the Passover feast, adhering to the commandments of the Mosaic Law. He was overjoyed at seeing the Lord, which was noteworthy because he was the very Herod Antipas who had executed John the Baptist and, upon hearing of the works of Jesus, mistakenly speculated that John had been raised from the dead. Herod’s significant eagerness to see Jesus stemmed from the reports circulating about Jesus’ miraculous deeds, a curiosity that had grown over time. However, the Lord chose to avoid fulfilling this curiosity. Herod also looked forward to witnessing a miracle from Him; had he truly believed in Jesus as the genuine Miracle Worker, it is reasonable to assume that his faith would have been affirmed long ago. But could this corrupt monarch—a murderer of the Baptist—have had sincere faith in the Galilean Prophet? More likely, he viewed Jesus as a sorcerer capable of conjuring wondrous feats through cunning means, desiring merely to witness such trickery. However, his expectations were misguided; such vain hopes were not met by Christ. He sought to observe a miracle not for the sake of belief but to satisfy his spectacle-seeking curiosity, akin to how spectators marvel at magicians who appear to perform impossible feats.

Herod presented numerous questions to Jesus, though the Evangelist does not specify them. The nature of his inquiries can be surmised from both Herod's notorious character and the fact that the Lord found no need to answer him. Why should the Word respond to one who did not seek divine instruction? As it is written, "What need is there to cast beads before swine?" (Matt. 7:6). In such instances, silence is often the most fitting response. Speaking unhelpfully to the inattentive can lead only to greater condemnation.

The accusers of Christ persistently followed Him from Pilate to Herod, vigilant not to lose sight of Him, fearing a potential loss of favor among the rulers. Hence, they strenuously pressed their accusations before Herod just as they had done before Pilate. However, their endeavors met with disappointing results, for it was not their claims that swayed Herod but his own wounded pride, stemming from the Lord's refusal to perform any miracles before him or to acknowledge his queries. The Evangelist records only a singular act of mockery: he dressed Jesus in a brilliant (or white) robe and returned Him to Pilate. Such robes were traditionally worn by candidates aspiring for high office; Roman generals donned them in battle, and Jewish kings wore white garments on formal occasions, often embellished with precious stones. In donning such apparel and sending Jesus back to Pilate, Herod derisively portrayed Him as a laughable aspirant to the Jewish crown, indirectly suggesting to Pilate that such an impostor deserved ridicule rather than a capital sentence. This interpretation seems to have been understood by Pilate, as evidenced in the subsequent narrative.

The reconciliation between Pilate and Herod, contrasted with their prior enmity, is unspecified; it may have been influenced by past events, such as Pilate's harsh treatment of the Galileans, who were subjects of Herod. Their newly forged camaraderie did not arise from a shared animosity toward the Lord, unlike the relentless hatred displayed by the rulers of the people. Instead, Pilate’s gesture of courtesy towards Herod—sending Jesus to him as a Galilean—served to mend their relationship.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 11 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. ἐπηρώτα
    epērōta
    I interrogate
    G1905 · ἐπερωτάω
  2. δὲ
    de
    but
    G1161 · δέ
  3. αὐτὸν
    auton
    he
    G846 · αὐτός
  4. ἐν
    en
    in
    G1722 · ἐν
  5. λόγοις
    logois
    a word
    G3056 · λόγος
  6. ἱκανοῖς
    hikanois
    sufficient
    G2425 · ἱκανός
  7. αὐτὸς
    autos
    he
    G846 · αὐτός
  8. δὲ
    de
    but
    G1161 · δέ
  9. οὐδὲν
    ouden
    no one
    G3762 · οὐδείς
  10. ἀπεκρίνατο
    apekrinato
    I answer
    G611 · ἀποκρίνω
  11. αὐτῷ
    autō
    he
    G846 · αὐτός