The Church Fathers on this verse

Luke 24:43Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

And when he had eaten before them, taking the remains, he gave to them.

Douay-Rheims

και λαβων ενωπιον αυτων εφαγεν

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

9 Church Fathers comment on this verse · 11 commentaries

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

It undoubtedly occurred in a miraculous manner, not due to a necessity in nature, but rather as an act of divine condescension, providing evidence of the resurrection.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

The meal He partook in carries a profound significance. By consuming a piece of baked fish, the Lord reveals that through the fire of His Divinity, He has transformed our human nature, which navigates the salty seas of life, drying up the moisture brought forth from the depths and the tumultuous waves. In doing so, He has transformed what once was ordinary into a sacred nourishment, making that which was previously unholy a joyous offering to God. This is symbolized by the honeycomb of the bee, representing the newfound sweetness of our nature that was once cast aside.

Read more (119 words)

Moreover, I interpret the ‘baked fish’ as symbolizing the active life, which, through solitude and the quiet heat of coals, eliminates the excess dampness and weightiness within us. The ‘honeycomb honey’ signifies knowledge or contemplation, as the words of God are indeed sweet (Psalms 18:11). There exists both the honey of the honeycomb—representing secular wisdom—and the honey of the bee—representing divine wisdom, with Christ as the bee. Although small in stature, for His message may seem brief and lacking in might, as Paul claims he does not preach with eloquence lest the cross lose its power (1 Cor. 1:17), it remains precious to both rulers and the common man, who harness its work for the salvation of their souls.

Cyrill of Alexandria

5th centuryChurch Father

They presented Him with a piece of broiled fish, which He accepted and consumed in their midst. His intention was solely to demonstrate that He who had triumphed over death was the same individual who, in times past, had shared meals and fellowship with them during His earthly ministry, engaging with them as a man, fulfilling the prophecy's declaration: to make them recognize that while the human body requires such sustenance, the spirit does not. Thus, who among those claiming faith and wholeheartedly embracing the witness of the holy evangelists can continue to entertain the fables of heretics or tolerate their distractions? The might of Christ exceeds human comprehension; it does not conform to the realm of ordinary understanding.

Read more (60 words)

He ate a piece of fish because of the Resurrection, yet the usual effects of consumption did not apply in His case, despite what skeptics might assert, knowing well that ‘whatever enters the mouth must necessarily be spewed out and fall into the draught.’ However, the faithful will dismiss such doubts and entrust the situation to the omnipotence of God.

To bolster their belief in the resurrection, Jesus requested something to eat. They provided Him with a piece of baked fish, which He took and consumed in their presence (Luke 24:43). His purpose in doing this was to unequivocally demonstrate that He had indeed risen from the dead, the same individual who had shared meals and conversations with them as a man, in fulfillment of the prophet’s words. They must have understood that while the physical body required sustenance, the spirit was beyond such needs. Thus, who, having chosen to embrace faith and wholeheartedly accepting the testimony of the holy evangelists, would still be swayed by heretical claims and entertain the supposed wisdom of others? The power of Christ far exceeds human inquiry and comprehension of the mundane.

Read more (57 words)

He ate the fish to affirm the reality of His resurrection, and there was no subsequent meal for Him, as the skeptic may question, recognizing that whatever enters the body will eventually exit and be expelled (Matthew 15:17). Conversely, the believer will not entertain such thoughts but will entrust the matter to the divine power of God.

John Damascene

8th centuryChurch Father

Following His resurrection from the dead, Christ liberated Himself from all passions, including corruption, hunger, thirst, sleep, and weariness. Although He did eat after rising (cf. Lk. 24:43), it was not due to natural necessity, as He experienced no hunger. Rather, this act was in service of the divine purpose of establishing faith in the reality of His resurrection. It affirmed that it was in His flesh that suffering occurred and through which He rose again. He did not relinquish any aspects of His nature—neither body nor soul—but remains fully embodied and spiritual, possessing both mind and intellect, as well as the faculties of desire and action.

Read more (78 words)

Thus, He sits at the right hand of the Father, divinely and humanly yearning for our salvation while executing the divine orchestration of all creation as well as its sustenance and governance. He also recalls His earthly mission, observing the worship offered by every rational creature. His holy soul knows that it is united in hypostatic union with the Word of God and that together they receive worship, signifying its divine nature rather than being merely a soul.

At His resurrection, Christ liberated Himself from all passions, specifically from corruption, which includes hunger, thirst, sleep, exhaustion, and similar frailties. Although He did consume food post-resurrection, it was not out of necessity, as He felt no hunger. Rather, this act served to affirm the truth of His resurrection and to demonstrate that the same flesh that endured suffering also triumphed over death.

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryCommentator

He did not partake of food out of necessity, but rather to provide complete assurance and to confirm that He was not a phantom. In His divine nature, He both tasted and consumed what He had tasted. It is important to recognize that what the Savior performed within God's family is not a standard to be followed or classified under the category of nature, for no one else, while possessing incorruption, can simultaneously retain wounds or partake of nourishment.

Alexander Gorsky

19th centuryCommentator

The approach used to affirm His resurrection, which underscores that glorification can only be attained through this pivotal event and subsequently illustrates the realization of this glorification in Jesus, markedly differs from the method employed with Mary Magdalene and later with Thomas—being rooted in mere physical recognition of His former earthly form. While the disciples from Emmaus were recounting their encounter with the Lord to the apostles and others in their company, the Lord appeared among them despite the doors being locked due to fear of the Jews. Confusion, fear, and joy intermingled in their hearts.

Read more (295 words)

The Lord addressed them with a greeting of peace, confirmed the reality of His resurrection by presenting the wounds in His hands, feet, and side, and sharing in a meal with them. He then articulated the necessity of His sufferings and glorification through resurrection, drawing from the Scriptures as He had done when enlightening the Emmaus travelers.

Having reassured His apostles of the truth of His resurrection—excluding Thomas—the Lord departed, reiterating His blessing of ‘Peace be with you,’ which signified their mission. Having fulfilled His earthly ministry, He entrusted the continuation of His work to them. To equip them for this task, He bestowed upon them a share of the powers essential for their future ministry—powers that He had uniquely secured for humanity through His ultimate act of redemption. They were granted the privilege to wield these powers with the same authority He would have exercised. This marked the conclusion of the significant day of Christ’s resurrection. The apostles then grasped that their Lord was sovereign over life and death; the truths He proclaimed about Himself were irrefutable. Such a remarkable event—where one had risen from the dead—had never been heard of before, reaffirming that their previous experiences with Jesus still held profound meaning: they were reinstated as His apostles.

Yet, as the Risen Lord appeared and then withdrew, not remaining with them as He had previously, they were meant to understand that a new, distinct relationship was to form. His presence was now predominantly spiritual rather than physical (as His flesh was transformed), indicating a gradual transition from a tangible connection to a purely spiritual and invisible relationship that would deepen at the time of His ascension. It is likely that on the same day, the Lord also appeared to James (1 Cor. 15:7).

Gladkow B.I.

19th centuryCommentator

They observed and touched Him, yet their faith was incomplete; they felt joy and astonishment instead. To further confirm that He was not merely a spirit standing before them, Jesus inquired, “Do you have any food here?” They handed Him a piece of baked fish and a honeycomb. He took it and ate in their presence.

Read more (271 words)

The gravity of the Apostles’ skepticism regarding the resurrection was profound, and the substantial evidence they sought to alleviate their doubts was significant. Yet some claim that the Apostles believed so naively in their Master’s resurrection and wished so fervently to witness Him alive that they allowed their minds to deceive them, perceiving nothing more than a phantom conjured by their desires. How can one suggest that the Apostles were deluded when they dismissed the testimonies of the women and the two disciples who had encountered the risen Christ? They did not even trust their own eyes but were convinced of His resurrection only when they touched His tangible body, His bones, and His wounds. The reality of Jesus eating fish and honey in their sight further reinforced their certainty.

This disbelief, along with their demand for concrete evidence, underscores God’s divine plan in this moment. It was God’s intention for the Apostles to gradually arrive at a conscious and profound faith in Jesus Christ, the Son of God; to venture forth into the world, proclaiming His teachings, possessing unshakeable faith, which was meant to be embraced by all humanity through them and their successors. Present-day believers may hold onto blind faith since doubts have been addressed and the truth of Christ’s divine humanity established. However, during the time of the Apostles, when the message of the cross was a stumbling block for both Jews and Greeks, mere blind faith would not have enabled them to achieve such extraordinary feats. They required a deliberate faith, one that engaged both their hearts and minds, forged through their earlier doubts and ongoing skepticism.

Lopuchin A.P.

19th centuryCommentator

As feelings of joy, awe, and doubt mingled within them, He inquired if they had anything to eat. To reassure them further, He consumed some of the grilled fish while they watched. Then, reiterating His message, He proclaimed, “Peace be with you! Just as the Father has sent me, so I send you.” He breathed on them and continued, “Receive the Holy Spirit. If you forgive anyone's sins, they are forgiven; if you withhold forgiveness from anyone, it is withheld.”

Michail (Lusin)

19th centuryCommentator

They were in attendance to Him; the meal had likely just concluded, the dishes cleared away, and they remained seated, continuing to discuss everything that had transpired when, all of a sudden, Christ manifested before them. At the behest of the Lord, He was presented with a piece of cooked fish and a honeycomb, and He partook of them in the presence of His disciples, ‘consuming the poison by some divine power’ (Theophilus).

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 5 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  2. λαβὼν
    labōn
    I receive
    G2983 · λαμβάνω
  3. ἐνώπιον
    enōpion
    before the face of
    G1799 · ἐνώπιον
  4. αὐτῶν
    autōn
    he
    G846 · αὐτός
  5. ἔφαγεν
    ephagen
    I eat
    G5315 · φαγεῖν