John Chrysostom
As if He should say, The present time is one of joy and gladness, sorrow must not then be mixed up with it.
And no man drinking old hath presently a mind to new: for he saith: The old is better.
και ουδεις πιων παλαιον ευθεως θελει νεον λεγει γαρ ο παλαιος χρηστοτερος εστιν
11 Church Fathers comment on this verse · 23 commentaries
As if He should say, The present time is one of joy and gladness, sorrow must not then be mixed up with it.
Alternatively, in their current state of weakness and not yet revitalized by the Spirit, they resemble worn-out furs and old garments. Consequently, they should not be tasked with an overly challenging lifestyle, just as one would refrain from sewing a new patch onto a frayed piece of clothing. Therefore, it can be seen that the apostles are compared to these aged furs, reflecting their fragility, while the Pharisees can be understood in a similar manner.
As soon as they have received the first answer from Christ, they proceed from one thing to another, with the intent to shew that the holy disciples, and Jesus Himself with them, cared very little for the law. Hence it follows, Why do the disciples of John fast, but thine eat, &c. (Lev. 15, prævaricationis.) As if they said, Ye eat with publicans and sinners, whereas the law forbids to have any fellowship with the unclean, but compassion comes in as an excuse for your transgression; why then do ye not fast, as they are wont to do who wish to live according to the law? But holy men indeed fast, that by the mortification of their body they may quell its passions. Christ needed not fasting for the perfecting of virtue, since as God He was free from every yoke of passion.
Nor again did His companions need fasting, but being made partakers of His grace without fasting they were strengthened in all holy and godly living. For when Christ fasted for forty days, it was not to mortify His passions, but to manifest to carnal men the rule of abstinence.
For the shewing forth of our Saviour in this world was nothing else but a great festival, (πανήγυρις) spiritually uniting our nature to Him as His bride, that she who was formerly barren might become fruitful. The children of the Bridegroom then are found to be those who have been called by Him through a new and evangelical discipline, but not the Scribes and Pharisees, who observe only the shadow of the law.
Having granted to the children of the Bridegroom that it was not fitting that they should be troubled, as they were keeping a spiritual feast, but that fasting should be abolished among them, He adds as a direction, But the days shall come when the Bridegroom shall be taken from them, and then shall they fast in those days.
Now Luke evidently relates that this was spoken not by men of themselves, but by others concerning them. How then does Matthew say, Then came unto him the disciples of John, saying, Why do we and the Pharisees fast; unless that they themselves also came, and were all eager, as far as they were able, to put the question to Him?
Now there are two fasts, one is in tribulation, to propitiate God for our sins; another in joy, when as carnal things delight us less, we feed the more on things spiritual. The Lord therefore being asked why His disciples did not fast, answered as to each fast. And first of the fast of tribulation; for it follows, And he said unto them, Can ye make the children of the bridegroom fast when the bridegroom is with them?
Now this which Luke alone mentions, Ye cannot make the children of the bridegroom fast, is understood to refer to those very men who said that they would make the children of the Bridegroom mourn and fast, since they were about to kill the Bridegroom.
As if He said, Then shall they be desolate, and in sorrow and lamentation, until the joy of consolation shall be restored to them by the Holy Spirit.
Or else, The gift of the Holy Spirit being received, there is a kind of fast, which is of joy, which they who are already renewed to a spiritual life most seasonably celebrate. Before they receive this gift, He says they are as old garments, to which a new piece of cloth is most unsuitably sewed on, i. e. any part of the doctrine which relates to the soberness of the new life; for if this takes place, the very doctrine itself also is in a measure divided, for it teaches a general fast not from pleasant food only, but from all delight in temporal pleasures, the part of which that appertains to food He said ought not to be given to men still devoted to their old habits, for therein seems to be a rent, and it agreeth not with the old. He says also, that they are like to old skins, as it follows, And no one putteth wine into old skins.
But the Apostles are compared to old skins, who are more easily burst with new wine, i. e. with spiritual precepts, than contain them. Hence it follows, Else the new wine will burst the skins, and the wine will be spilled. But they were new skins at that time, when after the ascension of the Lord they received the Holy Spirit, when from desire of His consolation they were renewed by prayer and hope. Hence it follows, But the new wine must be put into new bottles, and both are preserved.
The children of the Bridegroom also cannot fast, i. e. refuse nourishment to the soul, but live on every word which proceedeth out of the mouth of God.
For wine newly drawn forth, evaporates on account of the natural heat in the liquor, throwing off from itself the scum by natural action. Such wine is the new covenant, which the old skins because of their unbelief contain not, and are therefore burst by the excellence of the doctrine, and cause the grace of the Spirit to flow in vain; because into an evil soul wisdom will not enter. (Sap. 1:4.)
Or, That fast is not given up whereby the flesh is mortified, and the desires of the body chastened. (For this fast commends us to God.) But we cannot fast who have Christ, and banquet on the flesh and blood of Christ.
But when are those days, in which Christ shall be taken away from us, since He has said, I will be with you alway, even unto the end of the world? But no one can take Christ away from you, unless you take yourself away from Him.
Lastly, it is spoken of the fast of the soul, as the context shews, for it follows, But he said, No man putteth a piece of a new garment upon an old. He calleth fasting an old garment, which the Apostle thought should be taken off, saying, Put off the old man with his deeds. (Col. 3:9.) In the same manner we have a series of precepts not to mix up the actions of the old and new man.
The weakness of man’s condition is exposed when our bodies arc compared to the skins of dead animals.
In this, it is evident that one who is used to the old covenant struggles to embrace the freshness of the gospel right away. This is because, through habit, he believes that the law holds greater value.
For as long as the Bridegroom is with us we both rejoice, and can neither fast nor mourn. But when He has gone away through our sins, then a fast must be declared and mourning be enjoined.
Inasmuch as wine refreshes us within, but garments cover us without, the garments are the good works which we do abroad, by which we shine before men; wine, the fervour of faith, hope, and charity. Or, The old skins are the Scribes and Pharisees, the new piece and the new wine the precepts of the Gospel.
But to every soul which is not yet renewed, but goes on still in the old way of wickedness, the sacraments of new mysteries ought not to be given. They also who wish to mix the precepts of the Law with the Gospel, as the Galatians did, put new wine into old bottles. It follows, No man also having drank old wine straightway desireth new, for he saith, the old is better. For the Jews, imbued with the taste of their old life, despised the precepts of the new grace, and being defiled with the traditions of their ancestors, were not able to perceive the sweetness of spiritual words.
Embarrassed by this response, they sought to retaliate against both the teacher and His followers, criticizing them for the apparent leniency of His doctrines. By demonstrating such tolerance towards sinners, they argued that the teacher’s disciples were no different from those they looked down upon in their fasting and prayers. Although fasting and prayer are foundational practices for the purification of sins and the attainment of holiness, these practices held little value for them. To fortify their arguments, the Pharisees called over the disciples of John who were present, pointing to John’s esteemed example and their own, indicating that those whom He humbles could ask: Why do your disciples not fast and pray like we do or like John’s disciples do?
The Lord responded to this inquiry, and His answer is not surprising. First, it is essential to recognize the differing circumstances of these disciples, and second, to understand how this requirement aligns with the broader principles of My teachings. Fasting signifies sorrow; when one is sorrowful, thoughts of food are absent. Its foundation lies in mourning for the loss of something dear. My disciples have no reason for sorrow while I am present with them, akin to the friends of the bridegroom who do not mourn while the bridegroom is among them. The disciples of John can and ought to engage in fasting now, for their bridegroom is not with them (he is imprisoned). The Pharisees, preferring to remain neutral between John and Jesus, always have grounds for fasting, although their fasting lacks the significance in God’s eyes that they attribute to it. Nevertheless, a time will come when My disciples will also experience such a period of sorrow. Even then, when tribulations arise for My followers, this practice, as an external ritual, must align with other external observances and correspond to new spiritual principles. To merely imitate John’s disciples, effectively altering only one aspect of their way of life, would be to put a new patch on old clothing, thus enlarging the tear. Conversely, to emulate the Pharisees and cling to all traditional forms would result in pouring new wine into old wineskins, causing both to be lost. Everything has its rightful time and proportion. As a result, the Pharisees’ attempts to impose their rules upon Jesus were dismissed, serving instead to clarify for the Lord’s disciples their understanding of their relationship with the Pharisees and with the disciples of John, from whom some of them originated. From that moment, the scribes and Pharisees recognized that the Lord was unwilling to conform to their perspectives and regulations; He sought to operate with complete autonomy.
"And no one drinking old wine," etc.: this statement is part of the same discourse, as recorded exclusively by the Evangelist Luke. Wine, specifically grape wine, matures over time; the longer it is stored, the richer in aroma, complexity, and flavor it becomes. In contrast, new wine has a sharper and more intense taste, leading one who has recently enjoyed old wine to be reluctant to savor young wine. The essence of this final declaration in connection with the earlier ones is as follows: You wish to impose upon my disciples the demanding and rigorous requirements of the ancient law, yet they are being transitioned into a new reality under the fresh covenant of grace.
They have just begun to experience the delightful essence of the gospel and are not yet equipped to endure its challenges fully. There will come a time when they too will engage in fasting and rigorous practices, not bound by the external obligations of the old covenant but guided by the internal and renewed spirit. However, that moment has not arrived; they are unprepared, and the timing is not appropriate: at present, the bridegroom is among them, and they ought to rejoice as one does at a wedding feast. To insist that they lead a disciplined ascetic life akin to those who follow the rigid John is akin to patching a worn-out garment with new fabric, pouring fresh wine into old wineskins, or consuming inferior wine after the finest. It is both distasteful and counterproductive.
Passages read together with this verse.
Greek text, 12 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.