The Church Fathers on this verse

Romans 4:12Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

And he might be the father of circumcision; not to them only that are of the circumcision, but to them also that follow the steps of the faith that is in the uncircumcision of our father Abraham.

Douay-Rheims

και πατερα περιτομης τοις ουκ εκ περιτομης μονον αλλα και τοις στοιχουσιν τοις ιχνεσιν της πιστεως της εν τη ακροβυστια του πατρος ημων αβρααμ

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

8 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

Not of those who are of circumcision only. If Abraham is father of the uncircumcised not because he himself was uncircumcised, though he was justified in uncircumcision, but because the uncircumcised imitated him in faith, then all the more he will not be forefather of the circumcised by circumcision alone, unless faith is also added.

The Apostle says that he received circumcision so that both we and they might have him as forefather, and so that the uncircumcised would not drive out the circumcised. Do you notice how the uncircumcised were the first to have Abraham as their forefather? If circumcision is honorable because it proclaims righteousness, then uncircumcision also has no small advantage, since it attained righteousness before circumcision.

Read more (522 words)

Therefore you will be able to have Abraham as forefather when you walk in the steps of faith, and when you do not persist and argue in defense of the law. What faith, tell me? The faith which he had in uncircumcision. Again the Apostle lowers Jewish pride by recalling the time of righteousness. He rightly said “in the steps,” so that you, like Abraham, may believe in the resurrection of dead bodies, since in this also he revealed his faith.

Thus, if you reject uncircumcision, know clearly that circumcision will be of no benefit to you either. If you do not follow in the steps of faith, then even if you were circumcised a thousand times, you would not become a child of Abraham. He received circumcision precisely so as not to reject you, who remain in uncircumcision.

Do not demand this of him. This matter served as an aid to you, not to him. But you will say that circumcision serves as a sign of righteousness. This too was for your sake, though now it is no longer so, since then you needed bodily signs, while now there is no longer need of them.

You will ask again: could the excellence of his soul not have been known by Abraham’s faith? Of course it could. Yet you needed this addition as well. Since you did not emulate spiritual virtue and could not see it, sensible circumcision was given to you. Thus, by exercising yourself in this bodily sign, you might little by little be guided toward spiritual philosophy. Having received circumcision with all zeal, as the sign of the highest dignity, you would learn to imitate and honor the forefather.

God established this not only in circumcision, but also in all the rest, for example, in sacrifices, sabbaths, and feasts. Learn from the Apostle’s next words that Abraham received circumcision for your sake. Having said that Abraham received a sign and a seal, he also indicates the reason, saying: “that he might be the father of circumcision” (Rom 4:11). This is for those who also receive inward circumcision, because if you have only outward circumcision, you will receive no benefit from it.

Circumcision is a sign when the thing of which it is a sign is visible in you, that is, faith. Likewise, if you do not have faith, then the sign can no longer be a sign. Of what, indeed, will it be a sign, and of what a seal, when there is nothing sealed? It would be like showing us a money bag with a seal, when nothing has been placed inside. Circumcision is just as ridiculous when faith is not within.

If circumcision is a sign of righteousness, and you do not have righteousness, then you do not have the sign either. You received the sign so that you might seek the thing whose sign you possess. If you could find it without the sign, then you would have no need of the sign. Circumcision proclaims not righteousness alone, but specifically righteousness in uncircumcision. Therefore circumcision proclaims nothing other than this: there is no need of circumcision.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

He resolves an objection that naturally arises. Someone might object: if Abraham was justified before circumcision, why was he circumcised? The Apostle answers: he received the sign of circumcision in place of a seal, sealing the fact that he was justified by the faith which he had previously shown while uncircumcised.

Thus two things appear in relation to Abraham: uncircumcision and circumcision. Through uncircumcision he is shown to be father of the uncircumcised. But of which ones? Of those who believe as he did, so that righteousness may be reckoned to them also, that is, so that they also may be justified.

Read more (233 words)

On the other hand, through circumcision Abraham is shown to be father of circumcision, that is, of the circumcised. Yet he is father not only of those who have circumcision, but also of those who walk in the steps of the faith which he had in uncircumcision.

Therefore the present passage must be read thus: he became father of the circumcised, not for those who resemble him only in circumcision, but for those who walk in the steps of his faith. That is, they believe as he did in the resurrection of dead bodies. For in old age and deadness he believed that God could make his seed fruitful and give him a son.

The full thought is this. Abraham, while uncircumcised, believed and was justified, so that in this way he might become father of believing uncircumcised people. On the other hand, he received circumcision, the seal and sign of the faith which he had in uncircumcision, so that he might become father of the circumcised who, of course, walk in the steps of the faith which he had before he was circumcised.

When this faith is absent, circumcision boasts in vain. It imitates someone who displays a purse to which only a seal has been attached, but in which there is nothing. Thus the Jew is a purse sealed by circumcision, but without the faith of which circumcision is the seal.

Ephraem the Syrian

4th centuryChurch Father

Yet he did not despise it or consider it uselessly given. He set it as a crown completing the victory. The crown is not the victory, but confirms the victory. He established circumcision as a sign in order to condemn the justification that was in uncircumcision. That is, it was the justification he received in uncircumcision, so that he might be the father of all who believe in uncircumcision. Thus, as to him, so also to them, faith would be reckoned as righteousness. He would be called the father of circumcision for those who follow the paths of Abraham's faith in uncircumcision.

Ambrosiaster

4th centuryChurch Father

Paul speaks in this way because, by believing, Abraham became the father of circumcision, but of circumcision of the heart (cf. Rom. 2:29; Deut. 10:16; Deut. 30:6; Jer. 4:4). This applies not only to those who descend from him, but also to the nations that believe as he did. According to the flesh he is the father of the Jews, but according to faith he is the father of all believers.

Theodoret of Cyrus

5th centuryChurch Father

“That he might be the father of all those who believe in uncircumcision, that righteousness might be reckoned to them also, and the father of circumcision.” Here one must place a stop, for the thought is complete. The Apostle shows that the patriarch is, first, father of those who believed in uncircumcision, because he himself, while still uncircumcised, brought God the gift of faith. Then he is also father of the Jews, since they received circumcision with him.

Read more (352 words)

He makes this very point clearer in the words added: “not to those only who are of the circumcision. But also to those who walk in the steps of the faith which our father Abraham had in uncircumcision.” If anyone who comes from the Gentiles and has not received circumcision walks in the steps of the patriarch’s faith, which he showed before circumcision, he will not be alien to kinship with him.

For the God of all, foreseeing as God that He would gather one people from Gentiles and Jews and grant them salvation through faith, prefigured both things in the patriarch Abraham. He showed that Abraham acquired righteousness from faith even before circumcision, and that after circumcision he lived not under the guidance of the Mosaic law, but remaining under the guidance of faith.

He called him father of nations, so that, looking to him, Jews and Greeks would strive not one group for circumcision and the other for uncircumcision, but both for faith. For divine Scripture called neither circumcision nor uncircumcision righteousness, but faith.

Thus, having proved that faith is older and more honorable than the law, he also proves that the law is later than the promise given to Abraham. He confirms that grace is older than the law. For the promises concerning it were given to Abraham, and God promised to bless all nations in his seed. The promise was brought to fulfillment by the Master Christ.

If anyone who comes from the Gentiles and has not received circumcision follows that faith of the forefather which he showed before circumcision, such a person will not be excluded from kinship with him. For the God of all, knowing beforehand as God that He would gather one people from Gentiles and Jews, and that He would bring them salvation through faith, signified both things beforehand in the forefather Abraham.

He showed that Abraham found righteousness through faith even before circumcision, and that after circumcision he lived not according to the law of Moses, but remained on the path of faith. Therefore He called him father of nations (see Gen 17:4-5).

Michail Cheraskov

19th centuryChurch Father

Fourth section. Justifying faith is not the destruction of the law. On the contrary, it was and always is the constant and universal means of justification. This is proved by the example of Abraham and the testimony of David, and by the greatness of the fruits of our justification and of God’s love, which do not correspond to our sinfulness (Rom 4-5:11).

Rom 4:1-25. “What does the Scripture say” about Abraham? “Abraham believed God, and it was reckoned to him as righteousness” (Rom 4:3). “So David also calls the man blessed to whom God reckons righteousness apart from works” (Rom 4:6).

Read more (166 words)

Looking more deeply into the history of Abraham, the Apostle asks: “When was it reckoned” to Abraham? Was it after circumcision or before circumcision? It was not after circumcision, but before it. For Abraham received the announcement of the birth of a son and believed it while he was still uncircumcised. “And he received the sign of circumcision as a seal of the righteousness through faith which he had in uncircumcision” (Rom 4:10-11).

In this event, that is, in the institution of circumcision only after Abraham had manifested faith concerning God’s promise to him, the holy Apostle sees a deliberate purpose of God. It was to show in Abraham a universal model of faith, both for the circumcised and for the uncircumcised. It was also so that he might be not the fleshly, but the spiritual father of all believers, “that righteousness might be reckoned to them also,” as to those “who walk in the steps of the faith which he had in uncircumcision” (Rom 4:12).

Nikanor (Kamenski)

19th centuryChurch Father

Likewise, not by works but by the mercy of God, those are blessed who, according to David, receive forgiveness of sins from God. Their sins, as though covered by the mercy of God, are not reckoned to them as guilt (Ps 31:1-2).

The words of David’s prophetic psalm apply more to the people of the New Testament, whose sins are covered by the sufferings of Christ the Savior. Yet the Hebrews could think that they referred only to the people of the Old Testament. Thus they might take them as confirmation of their opinion about justification by works. Therefore the Apostle again returns to the example of Abraham.

Read more (207 words)

Returning to Abraham’s example, the Apostle draws two conclusions from the fact that his justification by faith took place long before circumcision, fourteen years before it, and before the birth of his son. First, circumcision was only the seal of that justification which had come through faith. Second, Abraham was father of all believing uncircumcised and circumcised people, provided they are guided by the same living faith by which Abraham lived.

Saint John Chrysostom writes: “If Abraham was justified and crowned before circumcision, it follows that he is first the father of the uncircumcised, and only afterward father of the circumcised. Therefore circumcision appeared later than faith. It is not only later, but far inferior to it, as much as a sign is inferior to the thing it signifies. Thus, for example, military clothing is inferior to the soldier. Circumcision is then a sign when the very thing of which it is a sign is visible, that is, when faith is visible in you. You received the sign so that you might seek the thing of which you have the sign. But if you find the thing without the sign, you have no need of the sign. Therefore circumcision proclaims only this: that circumcision is not needed.”

Theophan the Recluse

19th centuryChurch Father

The uncircumcised have Abraham as father when they believe, because in that case faith is also imputed to them as righteousness, just as it was imputed to Abraham while uncircumcised. The circumcised also have Abraham as father, not merely because they descend from him and receive circumcision, but because of faith. This is so when they believe and walk in the steps of the faith Abraham showed while still uncircumcised.

Read more (830 words)

Thus circumcision, as something added afterward, has no influence on justification, which depends entirely on faith. Blessed Theodoret writes: “If someone, coming from the Gentiles and not receiving circumcision, walks in the steps of that faith of the patriarch which he showed before circumcision, he will not be alien to kinship with him. The God of all, foreseeing as God that He would gather one people from Gentiles and Jews, and would grant them salvation through faith, prefigured both in the patriarch Abraham. He showed that even before circumcision Abraham acquired righteousness from faith. After circumcision he lived, not guided by the law of Moses, but remaining under the guidance of faith. Therefore He called him the father of the nations, so that, looking to him, Jews and Greeks would not contend, the one for circumcision and the other for uncircumcision, but both for faith. For divine Scripture called neither circumcision nor uncircumcision righteousness, but faith.”

Chrysostom carries his conclusions further, always in favor of the uncircumcised, that is, of us: “Do you see how the Apostle proved that it is more correct to call the Jews those received by mercy than to say that those in uncircumcision have been joined to the Jews? If Abraham was justified and crowned before circumcision, then received circumcision, and only afterward the Jews appeared, it follows that Abraham is first the father of the uncircumcised, who have kinship with him by faith, and only afterward the father of the circumcised. For he is forefather of two generations. Do you see the splendor of faith? As long as there was no faith, the patriarch was not justified. Do you see that uncircumcision is no hindrance at all? Abraham was uncircumcised, and this did not prevent him from being justified. Therefore circumcision appeared later than faith. Not only is it later, but it is far lower than faith, as a sign is lower than the thing it signifies, just as military dress is lower than the soldier.

But why, you ask, did Abraham need a seal? So that he might become the common father of believers, both in uncircumcision and in circumcision, and not simply of the circumcised, not only of those from circumcision. If Abraham is father of the uncircumcised not because he himself was uncircumcised, though he was justified in uncircumcision, but because the uncircumcised imitated him in faith, then still less will he be forefather of the circumcised by circumcision alone, without faith added to it.

He received circumcision so that the uncircumcised would not drive out the circumcised, but both might have Abraham as their father. You will be able to have Abraham as forefather when you walk in the steps of his faith, and when you cease being stubborn and zealously standing for the law. If you do not walk in the steps of faith, then even if you are circumcised a thousand times, you will not become a son of Abraham.

Abraham received circumcision so that, if he had remained uncircumcised, he would not reject you. Do not seek in him the cause of circumcision. It was performed on him as an aid to you, not to him. You needed bodily signs. Since you did not imitate spiritual courage and could not see it, sensible circumcision was given to you. Thus, reflecting on this bodily sign, you might gradually ascend to spiritual philosophy. Receiving circumcision with all zeal, as the sign of the highest dignity, you would learn to imitate the forefather in the thing signified, that is, in faith.

With this intention God established not only circumcision, but all the rest as well. I mean sacrifices, sabbaths, and feasts. That Abraham received circumcision for your sake you can see from the Apostle’s next words. Having said that Abraham received a sign and seal, he adds the reason, saying: that he might be the father of circumcision, for those who receive inward circumcision through faith. For if you have outward circumcision alone, you gain nothing by it.

Circumcision is a sign when the very thing of which it is a sign is visible in you, that is, when faith is visible in you. If you do not have faith, then the sign can no longer be a sign. Of what will it be a sign, and of what a seal, when there is nothing sealed? It would mean that you show us a purse with a seal attached, but with nothing inside. Circumcision is just as ridiculous when there is no faith within.

If circumcision is a sign of righteousness from faith, and you do not have such righteousness, then your sign is not a sign. You received the sign so that you would seek the thing of which you have the sign. But if you find the thing without the sign, then you have no need of the sign. Circumcision proclaims not only righteousness, but specifically righteousness in uncircumcision. Therefore circumcision proclaims only this: circumcision is not needed.”

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 22 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  2. πατέρα
    patera
    father
    G3962 · πατήρ
  3. περιτομῆς
    peritomēs
    circumcision
    G4061 · περιτομή
  4. τοῖς
    tois
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  5. οὐκ
    ouk
    no
    G3756 · οὐ
  6. ἐκ
    ek
    from out
    G1537 · ἐκ
  7. περιτομῆς
    peritomēs
    circumcision
    G4061 · περιτομή
  8. μόνον
    monon
    only
    G3441 · μόνος
  9. ἀλλὰ
    alla
    but
    G235 · ἀλλά
  10. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  11. τοῖς
    tois
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  12. στοιχοῦσιν
    stoichousin
    I walk
    G4748 · στοιχέω
  13. τοῖς
    tois
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  14. ἴχνεσιν
    ichnesin
    a track
    G2487 · ἴχνος
  15. τῆς
    tēs
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  16. ἐν
    en
    in
    G1722 · ἐν
  17. ἀκροβυστίᾳ
    akrobystia
    foreskin
    G203 · ἀκροβυστία
  18. πίστεως
    pisteōs
    faith
    G4102 · πίστις
  19. τοῦ
    tou
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  20. πατρὸς
    patros
    father
    G3962 · πατήρ
  21. ἡμῶν
    hēmōn
    I
    G1473 · ἐγώ
  22. Ἀβραάμ
    abraam
    Abraham
    G11 · Ἀβραάμ