It is reasonable to acknowledge Luke’s omission of the individual who arrived at the feast improperly dressed, as noted by Matthew. Likewise, the distinction between calling one a dinner and the other a supper does not concern me, since in ancient times a meal at the ninth hour was also referred to as a supper.
We can more clearly and reliably affirm that the Father arranged a wedding feast for His Son, intending to bind Him to the Church through the mystery of the Incarnation. The Virgin's womb, which bore Him, served as the nuptial chamber of the Bridegroom, as expressed by the Psalmist: He made the sun dwell in them, and it comes forth as a bridegroom out of his wedding chamber (Psalm 18:5-6). He truly emerged as a bridegroom from the marriage altar, as the incarnate God came forth from the Virgin's pure womb to join Himself to the Church. He then dispatched His servants to invite His friends to the banquet. This invitation was sent out twice: first through the prophets, and then through the apostles, who proclaimed the Incarnation of the Lord. The twofold invitation highlights how, via the prophets, He foretold the coming of His only Son, while the apostles declared that it had indeed occurred. When those first invited to the wedding feast declined the offer, in the second invitation He proclaimed: Behold, I have prepared my dinner; my oxen and fattened cattle are killed, and all things are ready. And who are these oxen if not the fathers of both the Old and New Testaments?