The Church Fathers on this verse

Matthew 23:22Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

And he that sweareth by heaven sweareth by the throne of God and by him that sitteth thereon.

Douay-Rheims

και ο ομοσας εν τω ουρανω ομνυει εν τω θρονω του θεου και εν τω καθημενω επανω αυτου

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

10 Church Fathers comment on this verse · 12 commentaries

John Chrysostom

5th centuryChurch Father

The temple pertains to God’s glory, and to man’s spiritual salvation, but the gold of the temple though it pertains to the glory of God, yet does it more so to the delight of man, and the profit of the Priests. The Jews then pronounced the gold which delighted them, and the gifts which fed them, to be more holy than the temple, that they might make men more disposed to offer gifts, than to pour out prayers in the temple. Whence the Lord suitably reproves them in these words. Yet have some Christians at present an equally foolish notion. See, they say, in any suit if one swear by God, it seems nought; but if one swear by the Gospel, he seems to have done some great thing. To whom we shall say in like manner, Ye fools and blind! the Scriptures were written because of God, God is not because of the Scriptures. Greater therefore is God, than what is hallowed by Him.

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

The temple and altar we may also understand of Christ Himself; the gold and the gifts, of the praise and sacrifice of prayer which we offer in Him and through Him. For not He by them, but they by Him, are sanctified.

Jerome of Stridon

5th centuryChurch Father

As by making broad phylacteries and fringes they sought after the reputation of sanctity, and made this again a means of gain, so now He charges them with being teachers of wickedness by their fraudulent pretence of tradition. For when in any dispute or quarrel, or ambiguous cause, one swore by the temple, and was afterwards convicted of falsehood, he was not held guilty. This is what is meant by that, Whosoever shall swear by the temple, it is nothing, that is, he owes nothing, But if he had sworn by the gold, or by the money which was offered to the Priests in the temple, he was immediately compelled to pay down that by which he had sworn.

Again, if one swore by the altar, none held him guilty of perjury; but if he swore by the gift or the victims or the other things which are offered to God upon the altar, this they exacted most rigorously. And all this they did not out of fear of God, but out of covetousness. Thus the Lord charges them with both folly and fraud, inasmuch as the altar is much greater than the victims which are sanctified by the altar.

Origen of Alexandria

3rd centuryChurch Father

In like manner the custom which the Jews had of swearing by the Heaven He reprobates. For they did not, as they supposed, avoid the danger of taking an oath by God, because, Whose sweareth by heaven, sweareth by the throne of God, and by him that sitteth thereon.

Now an oath is in confirmation of somewhat that has been spoken. The oath here then may signify testimony of Scripture which we produce in confirmation of that word which we speak. So that Divine Scripture is the temple of God, the gold is the meaning which it contains. As the gold which is outside the Temple is not sanctified, so all thoughts which are without divine Scripture, however admirable they may seem, are not hallowed. We ought not therefore to bring any speculations of our own for the confirmation of doctrine, unless such as we can shew are hallowed by being contained in divine Scripture. The altar is the human heart, which is the chief thing in man.

Read more (158 words)

The offerings and gifts that are hid upon the altar, are every thing which are done in the heart, as to pray, to sing, to do alms, to fast. Every offering of a man then is sanctified by his heart, by which the offering is made. There cannot therefore be a more honourable offering than the heart of man, out of which the offering proceeds. If then one’s conscience does not smite him, he has confidence towards God, not by reason of his gifts, but so to speak because he has rightly ordered the altar of his heart. Thirdly, we may say that over the temple, that is over every Scripture, and over the altar, that is over every heart, there is a certain meaning which is called the Heaven, the throne of God Himself, in which we shall be able to see the things that are revealed face to face, when that which is perfect is come.

Hilarius of Poitiers

4th centuryChurch Father

For since Christ is come, reliance upon the Law is vain; for not Christ by the Law, but the Law by Christ, is sanctified, in whom it rests as on a seat or throne; so are they fools and blind, who, overlooking the sanctifier, pay honour to the things sanctified.

Alexander Gorsky

19th centuryCommentator

Following these events, the Lord departed from the temple, issuing a stern rebuke aimed at the Pharisees and the temple priests who were complicit in the people's corruption, accompanied by warnings of impending divine judgment. As He completed His earthly mission, He declared that He would persist in His work among them through His messengers. However, He foretold that the Pharisees would also persecute these messengers, just as they had mistreated the earlier witnesses of the truth. In doing so, they would further fill the cup of their ancestors' transgressions, ultimately leading to the revelation of God's judgment upon the iniquity of Jerusalem.

Bogolepow D.P.

19th centuryCommentator

The fourth point concerns the manipulation of the law through overly technical interpretations.

Gladkow B.I.

19th centuryCommentator

Woe to you, leaders who are spiritually blind, attempting to guide people toward the Kingdom of Heaven while failing to discern the true path from the false! In your ignorance, you instruct others that breaking oaths is permissible, as long as one is aware of which oath to select for this purpose. You believe that you can mislead others by swearing on the temple and its altar, feeling that fulfilling such oaths is merely optional; yet you insist that oaths made by those who swear on gold vessels and the offerings on the altar must be honored. Ignorant and sightless leaders! The temple is far more sacred than the gold that resides within it, for it is the temple that imparts sanctity to the gold.

Read more (148 words)

Similarly, the altar, which sanctifies the offerings placed upon it, holds greater significance than the offerings themselves. How can you fail to see that swearing by the altar encompasses everything upon it; and that swearing by the temple involves not only the gold contained within but also the Divine presence that dwells within it, much like swearing by heaven signifies an oath to its ever-present Creator! Blessed Theophylact explains that anyone who swore by a golden vessel or a sacrificial animal and subsequently broke their vow was required to make restitution to the temple for what was sworn. The Pharisees tended to prioritize gold and sacrifices over the temple itself, seeking personal gain from the sacrificial offerings. Since it was unfeasible to demand restitution from one who swore by the temple should they break their oath—lacking any profit from such a transgression—they permitted the breaking of those oaths.

Michail (Lusin)

19th centuryCommentator

He who takes an oath by the altar indicates that such an oath carries greater holiness and obligation than one taken by the offering on the altar. This is illustrated by the understanding that an oath by the altar encompasses the offerings made upon it. Furthermore, an oath by the temple holds even greater sanctity and responsibility compared to an oath by the altar, as swearing by the temple involves invoking the presence of God, who resides within. The temple serves as the abode of His unique presence among His people. In the initial temple constructed by Solomon, God’s special presence was manifested above the ark of the covenant in the Holy of Holies, which was visibly represented by a cloud (1 Kings 8:10-13, Psalm 81:1).

Read more (169 words)

Although the second temple lacked the ark, the Lord nonetheless made His presence known in a distinct manner, with only the high priest allowed to enter the Holy of Holies once each year, bearing the blood of the atoning sacrifice (Hebrews 9:7). When one swears by the temple, it is akin to swearing by heaven (as noted in Matthew 5:34-35), for to swear by the throne of God is to acknowledge heaven as the site of His profound presence, where His glory is revealed; thus, the throne of God is where He reigns in supreme majesty and unapproachable light. Through these statements, the Lord illustrates that to swear by anything ultimately means to invoke God, as an oath devoid of this reference holds no significance. The crux of an oath lies in calling upon God as a witness to the integrity and truthfulness of the one taking the oath; without this, the oath is meaningless. For additional reflections on the nature of oaths, see the commentary on Matthew 5:33.

Paul Matwejewski

19th centuryCommentator

The fourth woe addresses spiritual blindness and the distortion of the true significance of oaths. The scribes and Pharisees, having permitted oaths by created things—such as heaven, earth, the sun, Jerusalem, and the temple—categorized these oaths into greater and lesser ones. Out of selfish motives, they ranked the treasures of the temple and sacrificial offerings among the most significant and sacred oaths. Jesus Christ had previously highlighted how these misguided interpreters of the law prioritized sacrificial vows over the unchanging commandment of God to honor one’s father and mother (Matthew 15:4-6). During this time, He strongly condemned the willful absurdity into which the blind guides of the people had fallen: Woe to you, leaders of the blind!

Read more (219 words)

You say that whosoever swears by the church is of no consequence, but whosoever swears by the gold of the church must be held accountable. Blind leaders, which is of greater significance: the gold or the church that consecrates the gold? And whosoever swears by the altar shall gain nothing, but whosoever swears by the gift upon it shall partake. Blind ones, what is more important, the gift or the altar that sanctifies the gift? According to the teaching of the Pharisees, explains the blessed Theophylact, one who swore by a golden vessel or an animal designated for sacrifice and subsequently broke that oath was required to bring what he had sworn by to the temple, thus demonstrating a preference for the gift over the altar for personal gain from the sacrifices. The essence of an oath, however, is to call upon the all-knowing and ever-present God as a witness to the truth. Therefore, to restore the true meaning of an oath, the Lord remarked: If anyone swears by the altar, he swears by it and by Him who is upon it; if anyone swears by the church, he swears by it and by Him who resides within it; and if anyone swears by heaven, he swears by the Throne of God and by Him who is seated there.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 18 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  2. ὁ
    ho
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  3. ὀμόσας
    omosas
    I swear
    G3660 · ὄμνυμι
  4. ἐν
    en
    in
    G1722 · ἐν
  5. τῷ
    tō
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  6. οὐρανῷ
    ouranō
    the sky
    G3772 · οὐρανός
  7. ὀμνύει
    omnyei
    I swear
    G3660 · ὄμνυμι
  8. ἐν
    en
    in
    G1722 · ἐν
  9. τῷ
    tō
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  10. θρόνῳ
    thronō
    a throne
    G2362 · θρόνος
  11. τοῦ
    tou
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  12. Θεοῦ
    theou
    God
    G2316 · θεός
  13. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  14. ἐν
    en
    in
    G1722 · ἐν
  15. τῷ
    tō
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  16. καθημένῳ
    kathēmenō
    I sit
    G2521 · κάθημαι
  17. ἐπάνω
    epanō
    on the top
    G1883 · ἐπάνω
  18. αὐτοῦ
    autou
    he
    G846 · αὐτός