The Church Fathers on this verse

Matthew 27:44Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

And the selfsame thing the thieves also that were crucified with him reproached him with.

Douay-Rheims

το δ αυτο και οι λησται οι συσταυρωθεντες αυτω ωνειδιζον αυτον

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

16 Church Fathers comment on this verse · 26 commentaries

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

Having stripped and crucified Christ, they go yet further, and seeing Him on the cross revile Him.

And as beginning to extenuate His former miracles, they add, Save thyself; if thou be the Son of God, come down from the cross.

But He, on the contrary, does not come down from the cross, because He is the Son of God; for He therefore came that He might be crucified for us.

He trusted in God, let him now deliver him, if he will. O most foul! Were they therefore not Prophets or righteous men, because God did not deliver them out of their perils? But if He would not oppose their glory, which accrued to them out of the perils which you brought upon them, much more in this man ought you not to be offended because of what He suffers; what He has ever said ought to remove any such suspicion. When they add, Because he said, I am the Son of God, they desire to intimate that He suffered as an impostor and seducer, and as making high and false pretences. And not only the Jews and the soldiers from below, but from above likewise. The thieves, which were crucified with him, cast the same in his teeth.

At first both reviled Him, but afterwards not so. For that you should not suppose that the thing was arranged by any collusion, and that the thief was not a thief, he shews you by his wanton reproaches, that even after he was crucified he was a thief and a foe, but was afterwards totally changed.

d But attend to this speech of these children of the Devil, how they imitate their father’s speech. The Devil said, If thou be the Son of God, cast thyself down; (Matt. 4:6.) and they say now, If thou be the Son of God, come down from the cross.

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

It may seem that Luke contradicts this, when he describes one of the robbers as reviling Him, and as therefore rebuked by the other. But we may suppose that Matthew, shortly alluding to the circumstance, has used the plural for the singular, as in the Epistle to the Hebrews we have, Hare stopped the months of lions, (Heb. 11:33.) when Daniel only is spoken of. And what more common way of speaking than for one to say, See the country people insult me, when it is one only who has done so. If indeed Matthew had said that both the thieves had reviled the Lord, there would be some discrepancy; but when he says merely, The thieves, without adding ‘both,’ we must consider it as that common form of speech in which the singular is signified by the plural.

Jerome of Stridon

5th centuryChurch Father

They revile him because they passed by that way, and would not walk in the true way of the Scriptures. They wagged their heads, because they had just before shifted their feet, and stood not upon a rock. The foolish rabble cast the same taunt against Him that the false witnesses had invented, Aha! thou that destroyest the temple of God and rebuildest it in three days.

But unworthy of credit is that promise, And we will believe him. For which is greater, to come down while yet alive from the cross, or to rise from the tomb when dead? Yet this He did, and ye believed not; therefore neither would ye have believed if He had come down from the cross. It seems to me that this was a suggestion of the dæmons. For immediately when the Lord was crucified they felt the power of the cross, and perceived that their strength was broken, and therefore contrive this to move Him to come down from the cross. But the Lord, aware of the designs of His foes, remains on the cross that He may destroy the Devil.

Or it may be said that at first both reviled Him; but when the sun had withdrawn, the earth was shaken, the rocks were rent, and the darkness increased, one believed on Jesus, and repaired his former denial by a subsequent confession.

Or, in the two thieves both nations, Jews and Gentiles, at first blasphemed the Lord; afterwards the latter terrified by the multitude of signs did penitence, and thus rebukes the Jews, who blaspheme to this day.

Even the Scribes and Pharisees reluctantly confess that He saved others. Your own judgment then condemns you, for in that He saved others, He could if He would have saved Himself.

Ambrose of Milan

4th centuryChurch Father

Truly, I tell you, today you will be with Me in Paradise (Luke 23:43). This is a remarkable example of fervent transformation! The thief receives immediate forgiveness, and what is bestowed upon him far exceeds his request. The Lord generously provides beyond what is sought (Eph. 3:20). The thief asked to be remembered when the Lord entered His kingdom, and the Lord replied, “Truly I tell you, today you will be with Me in Paradise.” To dwell with Christ is to experience life, and there exists the kingdom where He reigns.

Read more (288 words)

Christ extends His prompt forgiveness to the thief due to the immediacy of his repentance. This could elucidate the apparent discrepancy in the accounts of Matthew and Mark, who mention two thieves who spoke ill of Him, while Luke describes one who reviled and another who was penitent. Initially, both may have been scornful, but one was swiftly transformed. It is not surprising that the one who repented was granted absolution by the One who offered mercy even to His detractors. It is also conceivable that the Gospel writers used the plural form instead of the singular. For instance, we read: The kings of the earth took a stand, and rulers assembled together (Ps. 2:2), but according to Peter’s narration in the Acts of the Apostles, it was one king, Herod, and one governor, Pilate, who conspired against Christ (Acts 4:27). A similar usage appears in the Epistle to the Hebrews: They wandered about in goatskins, were sawn in two... and quenched the power of fire (Hebrews 11:37, 33). Yet, it is recognized that only Elijah wore such garments, only Isaiah was sawn in two, and only Daniel emerged unharmed from the lions (4 Kings 1:8; Dan. 6:16-23).

The transgression of the Jews in crucifying the Savior of all alongside criminals is indeed grievous! In a mysterious way, Christ is the Wise Thief. He tricked the devil to take back his instruments of destruction. The two thieves symbolize, in a deeper sense, the two sinful nations crucified with Christ in baptism. Their differences highlight the diversity of believers: one was situated at His right hand, and the other at His left. The words of scorn, however, foreshadow future temptations regarding the Cross (Galatians 5:11) even among the faithful.

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryCommentator

The devil incited not only the Jewish authorities but also the Roman soldiers against Jesus Christ, and even the criminals who were crucified alongside Him harbored animosity towards Him. The Gospel writers Matthew and Mark note that both robbers reviled Jesus (Mark 15:32). However, as stated by the Evangelist Luke (Luke 23:39-40), one robber mocked Him, while the other defended Him. Initially, in their cruelty and in their own suffering, both criminals jeered at Jesus, likely aiming to appease the Jewish leaders. Yet one robber eventually experienced a change of heart. He recalled the miracles performed by Jesus and His blameless life. Additionally, he recognized that Jesus even prayed for those who were executing Him, as noted by Luke (Luke 23:34). Furthermore, he observed the unnatural darkness that enveloped the sky.

Origen of Alexandria

3rd centuryChurch Father

The thief who was saved may be a sign of those who after many sins have believed on Christ.

Hilarius of Poitiers

4th centuryChurch Father

What forgiveness then for them, when by the resurrection of His body they shall see the temple of God rebuilt within three days?

That both the thieves cast in His teeth the manner of His Passion, shews that the cross should be an offence to all mankind, even to the faithful.

Rabanus Maurus

9th centuryChurch Father

Had He then been prevailed on by their taunts to leave the cross, He would not have proved to us the power of endurance; but He waited enduring their mockery; and He who would not come down from the cross, rose again from the tomb.

Remigius of Auxerre

9th centuryChurch Father

Aha! is an interjection of taunt and mockery.

Philaret (Gumilevski)

19th centuryChurch Father

One of the condemned criminals mocked Him, saying, ‘If You are the Christ, save Yourself and us (Luke 23:39). The sun shines equally on all of creation; it melts wax while causing clay to harden into stone. This wicked man's heart remained unyielding even before the very Source of truth, as everything he observed in Jesus had no redemptive impact on him. His reference to Jesus as the Christ reveals his Jewish identity, akin to that of Caiaphas. It is also clear that the influence of others and the example set by the authorities stirred within him only a chaotic response. Yet, it is apparent that he is a thoroughly hardened sinner.

Read more (154 words)

Standing on the brink of eternity, where the fires of hell await him, he remains oblivious to his condition and fails to seek redemption from the suffering Savior. Alongside the cries of anguish from the wounds of the cross, he hurls blasphemies at the crucified Christ. What a tragic portrayal of evil this manifests! Regrettably, this is not an isolated instance. Countless individuals exhibit this same lamentable disposition. For instance, consider a man who has ascended to a significant status through unscrupulous means, only to be reduced to a state of despair by life's caprices. Shouldn't he reflect upon his eternal destiny? Shouldn't he seek to alleviate the burden of his sins through genuine repentance? Shouldn't he prepare for a more serene existence beyond the grave? Yet, what does he do? He remains preoccupied with his earthly pursuits and, frustrated in his efforts, maligns others while even questioning God’s providence with a discontented spirit.

Abbot Panteleimon about the Trinity

19th centuryCommentator

St. Matthew provides a succinct account, emphasizing that not only did Annas, Caiaphas, the scribes and Pharisees, Herod, and Pilate conspire against Our Lord, but also the sinners condemned to a disgraceful and agonizing execution did not show Him mercy. In contrast, St. Luke offers a more elaborate narration. He indicates that out of the two criminals crucified alongside Him, only one uttered blasphemies, challenging Jesus by saying, “if Thou art the Christ, save Thyself and us” (Luke 23:39). However, the other criminal, hanging on the right side of Christ’s cross, rebuked the blasphemer, asking, “Or do you not fear God, when you yourself are condemned to the same thing?

Read more (185 words)

And we are condemned justly, because we have received what we deserve for our deeds, but He has done nothing wrong” (Luke 23:40-41). Turning his mourning eyes towards Jesus, he expressed his heartfelt faith in a moving prayer, saying, “Remember me, Lord, when you come into your kingdom!” Jesus replied, “...Now you will be with me in paradise.” This demonstrated the reward for the faith, repentance, humility, and self-reflection of the wise thief. St. Gregory the Great observes that “he had” only his heart and mouth left unbound, and he offered to God the only gifts he possessed: his heart, believing in the truth, and his mouth, confessing his salvation.

In terms of ancient tradition, some legends assert that this thief was one of those who assaulted the Holy Family during their flight to Egypt. This story tells that he prevented his companions from harming the Mother of God, earning from Her a promise of favor from Her Divine Son. St. Demetrius of Rostov recounts that the Mother of God stood between the cross of Her Son and that of the robber, securing his redemption.

Bogolepow D.P.

19th centuryCommentator

In recounting the narrative of the Lord's agony on the cross, both Hebrews Matthew and Mark mention the same individuals who derided and scorned Christ: first, those who were passing by; second, the chief priests along with the scribes, elders, and Pharisees; and third, the thieves who were crucified alongside Him.

Gladkow B.I.

19th centuryCommentator

Even one of the criminals crucified alongside Jesus succumbed to the affliction of mockery, saying, “If you are indeed the Christ, save yourself and don’t forget to save us as well.” However, the other criminal rebuked his disrespectful companion, asking, “Do you not fear God, seeing that you are under the same sentence? We rightly suffer the consequences of our actions, but this man has committed no wrong.” This was the sole voice on Golgotha that publicly proclaimed Jesus’ innocence. The courage with which this declaration was made in front of the chief priests and elders illustrated that the speaker recognized Jesus as the Miracle Worker and the Just One. Furthermore, his following statements indicate a familiarity with Christ’s teachings and a belief in Him as the true Messiah.

Read more (452 words)

The cross did not deter him, nor did it shake his conviction; he still held fast to the faith that Jesus, despite dying, was the King of Israel who would eventually restore His reign. Influenced by this faith, the penitent criminal had a moment of repentance; he openly acknowledged that he deserved crucifixion and did not resent his condemnation, nor did he plead for mercy from Jesus. Instead, he looked ahead and humbly prayed, “Jesus, remember me when You come into Your kingdom.” When the centurion from Capernaum expressed his belief that Jesus merely needed to say a word for his servant to be healed, Jesus remarked to the crowd, “I say to you, I have not found such great faith even in Israel” (Luke 7:9). The faith of the repentant criminal remained steadfast even in the face of the cross, leading Jesus to observe, “I have not found such faith even among My apostles.” Thus, Jesus turned to the criminal, assuring him, “Truly I tell you, today you will be with Me in paradise” (Luke 23:39-43). The term paradise has Persian origins and signifies a garden. In warm climates, a cool garden provides rest and peace; likewise, the afterlife for the righteous is likened to a garden or paradise. The abode of the deceased Jews, referred to as sheol, was divided into two regions: one known as paradise or Abraham’s bosom for the righteous, and the other, designated for the wicked, was called hell. When Christ forgave the repentant criminal's sins, He indicated that on the very day of his death, his cleansed soul would be with the righteous souls. Speaking in terms he could comprehend, Christ described paradise as the place where the criminal’s soul would go that same day. Luke the Evangelist records that one criminal spoke against Jesus while the other restrained him. However, Matthew and Mark mention that “the robbers who were crucified with Him also reviled Him” (Mark 15:32). This apparent contradiction is easily resolved; it is clear that a repentant individual could not revile Christ and simultaneously profess faith in Him. Therefore, it is accepted that one criminal hurled insults. Luke uniquely narrates how one criminal pacified the other, turning to Christ and receiving an answer from Him. Matthew and Mark, in listing those who insulted Jesus, included the criminals without focusing on whether one or both spoke ill of Him. They mentioned mockers such as the passersby (Matthew 27:39), the chief priests, scribes, elders, and Pharisees (Matthew 27:41), as well as the soldiers (Luke 23:36). While they could not ignore the derision from one of the criminals, they employed plural language in their accounts, stating: “The robbers who were crucified with Him reviled Him.”

Lopuchin A.P.

19th centuryCommentator

Christ stood above the despair of humanity, which was frantically reveling in the execution of their Redeemer, and remained silent. This holy silence spoke more profoundly to some hearts than any preached message. One of the criminals was particularly moved; he not only silenced the cruel mockery of the other two wretched men who mocked the Crucified One among them but also began to chastise his companion for his blasphemous words. A dramatic transformation took place within him. According to tradition, this ‘good thief’ had once protected the life of the Holy Child and the Virgin Mary during their escape to Egypt, and he likely had heard much about the Galilean Messiah, who welcomed all sinners and tax collectors.

Read more (63 words)

In witnessing the endlessly gentle and forgiving expression of the Crucified Lord, the best part of his spirit awakened, and he turned to Jesus, exclaiming: ‘Remember me, O Lord, when Thou comest into Thy kingdom.’ To this sincere plea from the repentant sinner, the silent Christ responded without delay: ‘Truly I tell you, today you will be with me in paradise’ (Luke 23:39-43).

Michail (Lusin)

19th centuryCommentator

The criminals also mocked Him. According to Luke, one of them derided Him, while the other acknowledged Him as the Messiah. It can be inferred that initially both mocked Him, but later one experienced repentance. Some early commentators suggested that both initially expressed blasphemy but later changed their stance, emphasizing that this transformation was genuine and not a mere pretense. The testimony of the scornful remarks affirms that, from the start, he was indeed a criminal and an adversary, but then underwent a profound change. Alternatively, it may be that, for the purpose of succinctness in the narrative, the details have been condensed and the actions of one individual are ascribed to both, similar to parallels found in other Gospel accounts.

Paul Matwejewski

19th centuryCommentator

Soon, one of the criminals crucified alongside Him joined in ridiculing the suffering Savior amidst the wicked crowd. Many onlookers at Golgotha derided the Lord, some out of spite and hardened hearts, while others acted thoughtlessly or to curry favor with the authorities. However, the mockery from the criminal, who was trapped in his death agonies, reveals that his heart had become utterly callous to evil and remained unyielding even in the presence of the very Sun of Righteousness (Malachi 4:2), with eternity unfolding before him. Devoid of hope in God's mercy and consumed by despair, this miserable soul yearned only for the freedom to persist in the malevolent acts for which he was condemned.

Read more (559 words)

Hearing the jeers directed at the crucified Lord, he echoed their taunts with bitter malice and arrogantly demanded a miracle for his own benefit: “If thou art the Christ, save thyself and me.” This request for a miracle was futile; it was not in accordance with the Divine Providence. Yet, a magnificent miracle of God's grace was granted to the other criminal crucified with Him as a lesson for the hardened thief and as a testament to the mocking adversaries of the Lord. In an instant, God's grace illuminated the heart of the other criminal, which still held remnants of goodness, transforming him from an adversary into a friend of God. Before his waning sight hung the innocent and Righteous One, enduring the mockery of His enemies and even praying to His heavenly Father for their forgiveness in their ignorance.

Witnessing this poignant scene, the robber, whom the holy Church honors in her hymns as ‘prudent,’ felt his heart stirred. Fully aware of his sins' weight, he turned to his condemned companion and admonished him: “Do you not fear God, seeing that you are in the same condemnation? We are indeed justly condemned, for we are receiving the due reward of our actions; but this man has done nothing wrong.” The prudent thief, seized by God's mercy at the very brink of destruction, suddenly recognized and confessed in the crucified Christ his Savior, becoming an enduring example of heartfelt repentance and reconciliation with God. Ignoring his companion's fate, he looked upon the Divine sufferer and voiced the heartfelt plea, “Remember me, O Lord, when thou comest into thy kingdom.” As he faced imminent death, his thoughts were not of earthly kingdoms or temporal rewards; rather, he feared separation from Christ in eternity. He repented and humbly implored the acceptance of his contrition, believing in the Savior's mercy and holding hopeful expectation of receiving his request. It was as if he said to the Lord: “Leave this blasphemer; his mind is clouded. Remember me, not for my deeds, of which I am ashamed, but remember me as your companion. I do not say, ‘Remember me now,’ but ‘when you come into your kingdom’” (St. Cyril of Jerusalem).

It was a joy to hear the repentant words of the transformed thief, who by a ‘marvelous transformation’ became the first ‘confessor of Christ.’ The Redeemer, who purifies all sins with His blood (1 John 1:7), promised him something far greater than what he asked: “Amen, I say to you, today you will be with Me in paradise.” Such a promise, as St. Leo the Great noted, surpasses human limitations; it originates not just from the Tree of the Cross but from the throne of power. By opening with the Cross the gates of paradise, which were shut by ancestral sin, the Lord declared to the repentant thief with authority, assuring him that He, the Lord of heaven and hell and master of all dominion (Matt. 28:18), would undoubtedly fulfill his promise, and it would be accomplished today. Thus, as a church hymn reflects, “the robber, having uttered a small voice from the cross, found great faith, was saved in an instant, and was the first to enter paradise.” By the wondrous design of God, he became the initial fruit and beginning of the redemption brought about by the Lord on the cross.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 12 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. Τὸ
    to
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  2. δ᾽
    d
    but
    G1161 · δέ
  3. αὐτὸ
    auto
    he
    G846 · αὐτός
  4. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  5. οἱ
    hoi
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  6. λῃσταὶ
    lēstai
    a robber
    G3027 · λῃστής
  7. οἱ
    hoi
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  8. συσταυρωθέντες
    systaurōthentes
    I crucify together with
    G4957 · συσταυρόομαι
  9. σὺν
    syn
    with
    G4862 · σύν
  10. αὐτῷ
    autō
    he
    G846 · αὐτός
  11. ὠνείδιζον
    ōneidizon
    I reproach
    G3679 · ὀνειδίζω
  12. αὐτόν
    auton
    he
    G846 · αὐτός