John Chrysostom
You do not reproach a physician who resorts to amputation to prevent decay from spreading throughout the body; how, then, can you label as cruel the person who chose to intervene decisively against a far worse affliction, one that was ravaging the entire community? Such reasoning reflects the folly of an unwise judge. The leader of a people known for their cruelty and lawlessness should have acted early on to contain the wickedness before it could proliferate further. Yet, you might ask whether he failed to intervene when the earth opened to consume Dathan and Abiron. What do you say?
Read more (75 words)
Was it justifiable to overlook the desecration of the priesthood, the breach of divine law, and the destruction of the very foundations that uphold all things—the sacred ministry—thereby permitting the unchecked trampling of the holy space and the dismantling of all order? To turn a blind eye to such rampant evil, sparing only a few while allowing countless others to suffer, would not be an act of gentleness but rather one of inhumanity and brutality.