The Church Fathers on this verse

Psalm 55 (54):15Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

Who didst take sweetmeats together with me: in the house of God we walked with consent.

Douay-Rheims · Hebrew numbering, Septuagint numbering in brackets.

אֲשֶׁ֣ר יַ֭חְדָּו נַמְתִּ֣יק ס֑וֹד בְּבֵ֥ית אֱ֝לֹהִ֗ים נְהַלֵּ֥ךְ בְּרָֽגֶשׁ׃

Hebrew (Masoretic text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

7 Church Fathers comment on this verse

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

And you, He says, are in agreement, my advisor and companion. At times, you have offered wise counsel, and at other times you have paved the way for me, sharing valuable insights: together we were part of God’s Church. And you... who shared delightful moments with me. What are these delightful moments? Not everyone knows their significance; yet, let those unaware not feel disheartened, so they may eventually invite others to experience, "Taste and see that the Lord is good.” We approached the House of God in unity. So, why the discord? You, who once stood with me, have taken a position apart. We walked together in the House of God in harmony; yet you established another place separate from it. For what reason was that sacred bond abandoned, the one in which we shared delightful moments?

Athanasius the Great

4th centuryChurch Father

You who have shared the same table with me. Alternatively, you who have been privileged to dine with me on multiple occasions. In the presence of God, we journey together in unity. He states this because he has visited the temple alongside him on more than one occasion.

Ambrose of Milan

4th centuryChurch Father

The one who adheres to the commandments of the Lord truly deserves the title of friend. A friend is one who is in agreement with others, for friendship is built upon unity, and there is no one more despised than one who harms that bond. The Lord denounced the treachery of the traitor, regarding it as exceptionally serious that he failed to reciprocate goodwill, tainting the fellowship with the venom of malice. The Scriptures declare, "You are a man of one accord with Me, you are My leader and My known, who has always tasted sweet food with Me" (Psalm 54:14-15). This can be interpreted as follows: it is intolerable that you, sharing a common mind, have turned against one who has been good to you.

Read more (108 words)

If an enemy were to speak ill of me, I could endure it; however, from one who harbors hatred, I would take flight (Psalm 54:13). While one may evade an enemy, it is impossible to escape a friend whose intention is to slander. We tend to fear those we cannot trust with our thoughts, whereas we do not fear those in whom we have placed our trust. In underscoring the abhorrence of this sin, He did not refer to him merely as a servant or an apostle, but emphasized that he was one with Him, indicating that the betrayal was primarily of oneself, for their souls were united.

Theodoret of Cyrus

5th centuryChurch Father

It appears to be deeply regrettable if an individual who has only a fleeting acquaintance with me, who shares in the same thoughts and partakes of the same bread, acts as an adversary despite having been a companion in the pursuits of both God and humanity. In these expressions, the prophetic gift has vividly illustrated the traitor Judas, whom King Christ appointed as ruler, in accordance with the scripture, ‘You shall make me princes over all the earth’ (Psalm 44:17). Judas was a participant in His feast and the profound truths shared but ultimately became a tool for wickedness.

Read more (92 words)

Instead of addressing Him as ‘my lord,’ Symmachus referred to him as ‘shortly known to me.’ However, this does not pertain to the esteemed David, who faced no betrayal from those close to him throughout his trials at the hands of Saul; neither Doeg nor Ahimelech were fleeting companions. This prophecy, however, corresponds with the record in the Gospel, which states, ‘He that eateth bread with Me, lifteth up his heel against Me’ (John 13:18). Therefore, the Prophet, having predicted the act of betrayal, also foretells the swift demise of the betrayer.

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryCommentator

You, who shared joy with me in our union, have now spoken against me, declares Judas. You, who were alongside me, reveled in communion, or perhaps prepared the feast, for a meal that is served brings delight. The nourishment could also refer to the teachings delivered in the gospel that sustain the souls of the faithful, and Judas, as one of the apostles, not only cherished this but also aligned himself with Christ. Simmachus, in his translation, chose to say "my household" instead of "my sovereign," and instead of "my soul also known," he preferred "one and familiar." Theodoret comments that he finds it easier to endure insults from adversaries since they come from those outside. Moreover, confronting an overt enemy can be somewhat manageable.

Read more (111 words)

However, the betrayal from a close associate, one who shared my table and partook of both divine and earthly matters, feels most grievous, as it mirrors the actions of foes. Even today, we witness such repeated treachery and violence, as past events attest. It is not only during shared meals that some betray their providers, but also while participating in sacred and mysterious rites; they not only deceive one another but also conspire to bring about destruction through their oaths. In the temple, we walk in unity. Judas states that together we entered the house of God with a shared purpose; how deeply I have regarded you as a faithful companion!

Irenaeus (Klementjewsky)

18th centuryCommentator

David, upon presenting a grievance concerning the entire city and its inhabitants, specifically addresses one particular traitor—possibly Ahithophel, who was both his loyal friend and primary advisor, or another noble closely allied with David in friendship. First, David identifies this individual as a man of indifference, implying that he was the most agreeable companion, sharing a like-heartedness with David. This observation intensifies the gravity of the betrayal. Additionally, he refers to him as his lord or leader, highlighting the relational hierarchy. Moreover, he recalls sharing a meal together, symbolized by the act of eating bread at one table. Lastly, he notes that they jointly attended the house of God and prayed together.

Read more (94 words)

In this lamentation, David expresses his sorrow at being forsaken by one who was not only a partner in worldly matters but also a fellow participant in sacred worship, which binds individuals through the most profound affection and camaraderie. Considering all these elements, David succinctly conveys his anguish at being encircled by not just open adversaries, but also hidden and immediate foes, leaving him with no means of defense. This reveals that Satan not only persecutes the church through violence and bloodshed but also fosters internal enemies who assault it with deceit and flattery.

Psalter with Commentaries (Cave Monastery in Kiew)

19th centuryCommentator

This psalm, inspired by the Holy Spirit and penned by David, was entrusted to Asaph, the leader of his choir, for it is meant to be sung meaningfully by all. The essence of this psalm culminates in Christ, particularly through His pure Passion. The entire world exists in darkness, and every person is deceitful; however, the Lord came to redeem the first Adam. Let us implore God to grant us the Holy Spirit so that we may turn to Him, honor Him, and silence the destructive forces—the sin dwelling within both our souls and bodies. He renders this salvation elusive to those who endlessly seek and yearn for Him.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.