Anyone who diligently examines the Acts of the Apostles will discern that this Psalm serves as a prophecy regarding Christ. Clearly, the phrase ‘let his days be short, and let another take his office’ predicts Judas, the traitor of Christ. While this may allude to Peter, the interpretations remain ambiguous unless viewed through the lens of the Church, which Peter symbolically represents due to his leadership among the disciples. It is written, ‘I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven’ (Matthew 16:19 and similar passages). Thus, Judas signifies those Jews who opposed Christ—those who despised Him in the past and continue their legacy of enmity today. From this context, we can plainly understand not only the message of the psalm but also the more direct references to Judah himself.
The psalm begins with the cry, "O God, be not silent to my praise; for the mouth of the wicked, yea, the mouth of the wicked is opened against me” (Psalm 107:1). Here, it becomes clear that the slander from the deceitful is unfounded, whereas the praise bestowed by God is genuine. For God is truthful, but every man is a liar (Romans 3:4). Truth exists only in those who allow God to speak through them. The highest expression of praise belongs to the only begotten Son of God, affirming His true identity. This essence was hidden until His weakness was revealed, allowing the wicked to cast their slanders against Him. Thus, the evil spoken arose from a hate cloaked in deceit.
They have spoken against me with deceitful tongues (Psalm 108:2), primarily when they falsely flattered Him as a righteous Teacher. This notion is echoed elsewhere, where it states that those who praise me conspire against me. Moreover, when they loudly chanted, "Crucify Him, crucify Him" (John 19:6), it is likewise written, “They surrounded me with words of hatred.” Those who, with treachery veiled as affection, spoke against me with words of feigned love, yet beneath it all, waged open hostility without cause. Just as the righteous love Christ freely, so the wicked also hate Him freely. Just as virtuous individuals seek the truth purely for its own sake, without ulterior motives, the most depraved seek malevolence for its own sake, as secular writers assert that a truly wicked man is cruel without justification.
He laments, “Instead of loving me, they belittled me” (Psalm 107:3). There are six categories of responses to others: responding good for evil, refraining from responding evil to evil, responding good for good, responding evil for evil, refraining from responding good to good, and responding evil for good. The first two belong to the righteous, with the first being the higher virtue; the last two are of the wicked, with the latter being the worst; the two in the middle describe a transitional group, the first leaning towards good, the second towards evil. We find this reflected in the Scriptures. Our Lord Himself offers good in response to evil, justifying the unrighteous (Romans 4:5). Even from His cross, He implored, Father, forgive them; for they know not what they do (Luke 23:34).
Following this, he states, “Instead of loving me, they belittled me; but I gave myself to prayer.” He does not specify what he prayed for, but the implication is clear. They grievously belittled the One they crucified as if they had overcome Him. From the Cross, He prayed, “Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.” Thus, while they repaid His goodness with malice, He returned their malice with goodness.
Divine words instruct us, through the example of our Lord, that when we perceive ingratitude from others—who not only fail to reward our good but also respond to our goodness with animosity—we should approach prayer. Indeed, He is there for those in rebellion against Him, whether in anguish or in faith; however, our first obligation is toward ourselves, seeking by God's grace to conquer our own desires for revenge when we are wronged, whether openly or in absence.
He continues, “Thus have I been repaid evil for good” (Psalm 107:4). When pondering what this evil entails, it resolves to hatred for my goodwill. This encapsulates their tremendous guilt. How could the persecutors have harmed Him, who willingly laid down His life, not coerced? The gravity of hatred for the persecutor constitutes a greater offense, despite the voluntary sacrifice of the one who suffered. Moreover, the phrase 'instead of love to me' implies that they should have felt compelled to love—not only as an obligation but reciprocally for His love. He alludes to this in the Gospel when He laments, “How often have I gathered your children together, and you did not” (Matthew 23:37).
He then begins to foretell the consequences of this egregious offense, outlining their fate as if expressing a desire for retribution. Some, misunderstanding this prophetic utterance, mistakenly equate hatred with hatred, suggesting that ill intentions yield just results. However, only a few possess the insight to see how the retribution of the wicked aligns with the accuser's wish to extinguish malice, contrasting with how a just judge punishes sins. The former seeks revenge, while the latter, by administering justice, seeks to rectify wrongs. Thus, He chastises not to revel in another's plight, which would be evil for evil, but to restore justice, which is good for evil.
“Set a wicked ruler over him; and let Satan be at his right hand” (Psalm 108:5). Previously, the grievance pertained to many, whereas now the psalm focuses on one. Here, it speaks of the traitor Judas, who, as stated in the Acts of the Apostles, was to receive due punishment (Acts 1:20). This implies letting a malevolent figure preside over him, referring explicitly to the adversary named in the subsequent verse. Consequently, the one who refused to submit to Christ deserved the devil as his ruler and became subservient to evil.
Furthermore, it is stated about those who prioritize worldly pleasures over God, referring to those who deem the fortunate blessed: “their right hand is the right hand of iniquity.”
“When he is judged, let him be condemned, and let his prayer be turned into sin” (Psalm 107:6). Prayer can only be deemed righteous through Christ, whom Judas betrayed through avarice. Yet, a prayer made void of Christ cannot absolve sin and conversely transforms into sin itself. One might question what circumstances could lead Judas to pray in a manner that rendered his prayer sinful. Perhaps it was during his plotting against the Lord, as he could no longer pray through Christ. Had he sought forgiveness after his betrayal, he would have embraced hope; with hope, the prospect of mercy; thus, by looking for mercy, he would not have resorted to despair and taken his own life.
“Let his days be short” (Psalm 108:7). Here, it refers to the fleeting days of his apostleship, which concluded in his grave offense and demise preceding the Passion of our Lord. This raises the question: what about the sacred number twelve, which our Lord deliberately designated for His closest disciples? He answers swiftly: “Let another take his office.” This indicates that he must be punished in accordance with his deeds, resulting in an expansion of the apostolic number.
“Let his children be orphans, and let his wife a widow” (Psalm 108:8). Following his death, both his offspring were left fatherless, and his wife was bereft of her husband. “Let his children be wanderers, seeking bread” (Psalm 107:9). Wanderers describes those lost without direction, devoid of support. Let them be expelled from their homes. Here, the explanation of how this fate befell his family is clarified in subsequent verses.
“Let the extortioner search all his possessions, and let strangers plunder his labor” (Psalm 108:10). “Let there be no man to help him” (Psalm 107:11); meaning, no guardian for his children, hence, his fatherless offspring merit no pity.
Yet, even orphans can, without guardians, manage to survive amidst struggle, preserving their lineage through descent. Therefore, it is stated, “Let his posterity be destroyed, and in the next generation, let his name perish” (Psalm 108:12). This signifies that what he produced should cease, rapidly passing away.
What follows? “Let the wickedness of his fathers be remembered before the Lord, and let not the sin of his mother be blotted out” (Psalm 108:13). Should we interpret this as punishment for the sins of his ancestors? For those transformed in Christ do not inherit condemnation without emulating their actions (Ezekiel 18:4, 20). The words, “I will punish the sins of the fathers upon the children” (Exodus 20:5) apply only to those who detest Me, as they emulate the hatred of their forebears. Consequently, while goodness can erase even the most heinous sins, the following of the wicked leads men to bear the iniquities of both their own actions and those they have imitated.
“Let them always be against the Lord” (Psalm 108:14). Being 'against the Lord' implies being visible in His sight. This line is translated by others as “Let them always be in the sight of the Lord,” while some suggest, “Let them always be before the Lord.” As it states, “Thou hast shown our wrongs before Thee.” The term 'always' indicates that this grave offense is without pardon, both in this life and the next. “Let the memory of them, that is, of his father and mother, vanish from the earth.” This memory signifies that which is retained through subsequent generations; according to this prophecy, it shall disappear, as neither Judah nor his sons, who embodied memories of their lineage, bore any posterity and faced extermination within a single generation.
This demise ensues if he “remembered not to show mercy” (Psalm 108:15), whether referring to Judas or the people. However, ‘remembered not’ is best understood in the context of the people; since they crucified Christ, it would have been prudent for them to recall their sins in repentance and show grace to those they relentlessly pursued. Thus it is stated, “And they persecuted the poor and the needy” (Psalm 108:16). This may indeed refer to Judas; the Lord willingly became impoverished so that we might prosper through His humility (2 Corinthians 8:9). How can we interpret the term 'beggar,' if not as exemplified when He asked the Samaritan woman for a drink (John 4:7) and proclaimed on the cross, “I thirst” (John 19:28)?
As for what comes next, it may be challenging to think solely of Christ—the Head of His body, who was assailed by Judas. By labeling Him as “the persecuted poor man and the beggar” the intent is to express a desire to kill Him; some have translated this to mean “He who was wounded in heart.” This phrase typically refers to the agonizing guilt and sorrow linked to past sins and regrets, akin to those who, upon hearing the Apostles after our Lord's ascension, were moved to repentance even though they were guilty of His death.