The Church Fathers on this verse

Psalm 109 (108):2Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

O God, be not thou silent in my praise: for the mouth of the wicked and the mouth of the deceitful man is opened against me.

Douay-Rheims · Hebrew numbering, Septuagint numbering in brackets.

כִּ֤י פִ֪י רָשָׁ֡ע וּֽפִי־מִ֭רְמָה עָלַ֣י פָּתָ֑חוּ דִּבְּר֥וּ אִ֝תִּ֗י לְשׁ֣וֹן שָֽׁקֶר׃

Hebrew (Masoretic text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

8 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

Do you perceive intense wickedness? Do you recognize a malicious scheme? Do you notice wrongdoers? The Lord’s wrath is particularly stirred when an individual commits wrongs with intention, purposefully and with significant effort. When someone succumbs to temptation and desire, the circumstances differ; it is not the same when an individual, while engaging in wrongdoing, pretends as if they are performing a righteous act; however, the gravest transgression occurs when one inflicts harm upon another who is innocent of wrongdoing.

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

Anyone who diligently studies the Acts of the Apostles will recognize that this Psalm contains a prophecy about Christ; it clearly refers to Judas, the betrayer of the Lord, when it states, “let his days be short, and let another take his office.” Peter's role is significant in the Church as he symbolizes the primacy among the disciples, illustrated by the reference, “I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven” (Matthew 16:19). In contrast, Judas embodies those Jews who opposed Christ, fostering an ongoing lineage of enmity against Him. Therefore, it is easy to grasp both the straightforward meaning of the Psalm and the deeper implication regarding Judas himself.

Read more (1719 words)

The Psalm opens with a plea: “O God, be not silent to my praise; for the mouth of the wicked, yea, the mouth of the wicked is opened against me” (Psalm 107:1). This reveals that the condemnation from the wicked is deceitful while the praise that comes from God is genuine. For God is steadfastly true, whereas every man is prone to falsehood (Romans 3:4). Truth exists in those whom God speaks through. The highest form of praise belongs to the only begotten Son of God, who reveals His true nature. However, this truth was obscured during His suffering when the wicked opposed Him. His mouth was opened in response to the malignity that arose from deceitful hatred.

“They have spoken against me with lying tongues” (Psalms 108:2) captures how they misrepresented Him, especially when they falsely honored Him as a good Teacher through insincere flattery. In another place, it is said, “And they that praise me together swear against me.” During their furious cries of “Crucify Him, crucify Him” (John 19:6), they also encompassed Him with words of malice. Those who appeared to speak with affection were actually warriors against Him, engaging in unfounded hostility. Just as the righteous love Christ without reservation, the wicked detest Him for the same reason, seeking malevolence in their actions as freely as the best seek truth.

Instead of loving me, he stole from me (Psalm 107:3). There are six notable responses in this context, easy to recount: (1) answering good with good, (2) not responding to evil with evil, (3) returning good for good, (4) responding with evil to evil, (5) failing to answer good with good, (6) giving evil in return for good. The first two pertain to the righteous; the first being superior. The last two are actions of the wicked, with the last being the most contemptible. The middle two pertain to those of a less clear moral condition, leaning toward good and bad, respectively. This principle is evident in Scripture. Our Lord exemplifies returning good for evil, justifying the ungodly (Romans 4:5), as He expressed from the cross, “Father, forgive them; for they know not what they do” (Luke 23:34).

In saying, “Instead of loving me, they belittled me,” he continues, “But I gave myself to prayer.” He does not specify his request; nonetheless, it primarily relates to their actions. They utterly demeaned Him whom they crucified, ridiculing Him as if they had conquered Him. Yet from the Cross, He cried out, “Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do,” demonstrating that, while they devised evil in retaliation for His goodness, He responded with goodness even in the face of their malice. Thus, divine words through our Lord instruct us, when confronted with ingratitude—whether it’s receiving evil in response to good or no reward at all—we are called to pray. He intercedes for those who oppose Him, either through sorrow or danger in faith, while we must first seek to overcome our own desire for revenge when wronged, whether in our presence or when we are absent.

He then states, “Thus have I been repaid evil for good” (Psalm 107:4), prompting the question of what the evil was for. The answer reveals the hatred directed at his goodwill, underscoring their profound guilt. How could they inflict harm upon Him who willingly embraced His fate? The true offense lies in the malice of the persecutor, even if the sufferer offers voluntary atonement. His previous statement about having been forsaken speaks to their duty to love Him, not only as a moral obligation but also as a response to His love: “For my goodwill.” This love He mentions in the Gospel, where He laments, “How often have I gathered your children together, yet you would not” (Matthew 23:37).

Next, he begins to foretell the consequences they will face for such wickedness; describing their fate might seem vengeful, yet it reflects the truth that punishment meets its merits. Many may misinterpret such prophecies as born of ill-will, failing to discern that the judge—unlike the accuser who seeks to satisfy his malice—issues justice with righteousness. While the former desires vengeance, the latter delivers justice with love for goodness.

“Set the wicked ruler over him; and let Satan be at his right hand” (Psalm 108:5). Here the focus shifts from many to one, symbolizing the traitor Judas. As described in Acts of the Apostles, he is destined for retribution. This suggests that a wicked man should rule over him and names Satan explicitly as being close by. A man who resisted Christ merited domination by evil and became subject to the devil. It is also noted that those who prioritize worldly delights over God have their right hand aligned with iniquity.

“When he is judged, let him be condemned; and let his prayer be turned into sin” (Psalm 107:6). Prayer is only just when offered through Christ, whom Judas betrayed in grievous sin. A prayer that lacks connection to Christ cannot atone for sin and, instead, risks becoming sinful itself. Consider the possibility of Judas praying before his act of betrayal; once he had committed the act, redemption through prayer would have invoked forgiveness, leading to hope and mercy—otherwise despair would consume him.

“Let his days be short” (Psalm 108:7). This refers to the brief duration of his apostleship, which ended with his offense and demise before our Lord’s Passion. This raises the question of the significance of the sacred number twelve, which our Lord intentionally selected for His first apostles. He continues, “Let another take his office,” implying that Judas’ punishment corresponds with his actions and fills his place.

“Let his children be orphans and his wife a widow” (Psalm 108:8). Following his demise, both his offspring lost their father and his spouse became bereft. They wander and are driven from their homes, lacking guidance and support, which is explicated in the succeeding verses. “Let the extortioner search all his possessions, and let strangers spoil his labor” (Psalm 108:10), illustrating that no one is left to protect his descendants; thus, they do not receive compassion.

Yet, even orphaned children may withstand strife and maintain their heritage. Thus, he proclaims, “Let his posterity be destroyed; and let his name be wiped out from the earth” (Psalm 108:12)—meaning that whatever he bore will cease to exist and quickly fade away.

He adds, “Let the wickedness of his fathers be remembered before the Lord, and let the sin of his mother not be blotted out” (Psalm 108:13). This suggests that the sins of his fathers weigh upon him, yet for those transformed in Christ, the consequences are nullified if they no longer emulate such behavior (Ezekiel 18:4, 20). When it is stated, “I will punish the sins of the fathers upon the children” (Exodus 20:5), it indicates a pattern where those who hate Him follow in the footsteps of their forebears.

“Let them always be against the Lord” (Psalm 108:14) expresses that this offense remains unrelenting both now and in the life to come; thus the memory of him and his family will vanish, as they will leave no successor to carry their legacy.

This disappearance is linked to the fact that “He remembered not to show mercy” (Psalm 108:15); this likely extends to the people themselves—not just Judas. Had they acknowledged their actions against Christ, perhaps they could have repented and shown compassion toward those they persecuted. The following statement, “And they persecuted the poor and needy” (Psalm 108:16), can refer to Judas, as the Lord embraced poverty that we might gain wealth from His sacrificial love (2 Corinthians 8:9).

How can one conceptualize “the beggar” without recognizing Jesus’ words to the Samaritan woman, “Give me a drink” (John 4:7) or His declaration “I thirst” (John 19:28)? As for the concept of persecution, it is evident in the treatment of the Savior, who was pursued and harmed by Judas.

The Psalm continues: “He enjoyed cursing, and it will happen to him” (Psalm 107:17). Judas reveled in swearing, both while stealing and in delivering Christ over to death, echoed in the crowd’s declaration, “His blood be upon us and our children” (Matthew 27:25). He detested blessings, thus they remain distant from him. While Judas shunned Christ—the source of eternal blessing—the Jewish people further denied His light when offered the opportunity to follow Him (John 9:27). He clothed himself with a curse, both him and the nation, and it infiltrated him like water and entered his essence like oil in his bones, displaying his pleasure in evil and hoarding eternal condemnation; yet, in blessings lies eternal life.

“To him, let it be as a cloak covering him” (Psalm 107:18). Why the repetition? Just as he spoke of being clothed with a curse akin to a garment—there’s unity in the acknowledgment of guilt before men. The imagery of being girded indicates readiness: a person girt is prepared for tasks, reflecting the nature of someone equipped to execute premeditated malevolence rather than acting on impulse.

“This characterizes those who slander me before the Lord” (Psalm 108:19). He speaks not of “their reward” but of “their work,” illustrating that beneath the layers of covering, water, and oil lies the very activity that secures eternal doom. Thus, it can apply to many; this encompasses those who misrepresent Christ’s words, claiming He is not the fulfillment of the Law and the Prophets while denying His resurrective power, despite His assertion, “I have power to give my soul, and I have power to take it again” (John 10:18).

“But do Thou with me, O Lord God” (Psalm 108:20). Some interpret this as an appeal for mercy; yet, the most accurate texts omit this element. The phrase indicates an intention for God’s action to coincide with His nature. Understanding “work with me” resonates with the everyday experience of mutual labor and benefit; this phrasing conveys divine collaboration where the Father aids the Son, reflecting their unison in mercy, as seen in Romans 9:23, where the Father and Son jointly create vessels of mercy.

Furthermore, “deliver me, for I am poor and needy” (Psalm 108:21) emphasizes the state of need and dependence that led to crucifixion (2 Corinthians 13:4). The inner turmoil referenced parallels His own declarations as He approached His Passion, “My soul is troubled even unto death” (Matthew 26:38).

Athanasius the Great

4th centuryChurch Father

The lips of the transgressor and the lips of the sycophant have turned against Me. The "lips of the transgressor" refer to the devil, who is indeed a true sinner. The "lips of the sycophant" signify Judas, as both raised their voices against Christ.

Jerome of Stridon

4th centuryChurch Father

Let us reflect on how Judas, the one who betrayed, approached the Lord. He came to Jesus to enact his treachery, calling Him "Rabbi" (see Matthew 26:49), meaning Teacher. Here we see the lips of a sinful and treacherous individual. In His compassion, Christ sought to redeem him, greeting him with a kiss in hopes of overcoming Judas' malevolence. Yet, Judas persisted in his wickedness, choosing to betray the Savior. This act can be understood as a prophecy specifically concerning Judas, but also generally reflecting on the Jewish people. In the moment when they shouted, "Crucify, crucify him" (John 19:6), the mouth of the sinner was again raised against the Lord. The broader implications for all Jews can be gleaned from the subsequent lines. What does the psalmist proclaim?

Ambrose of Milan

4th centuryChurch Father

Let us consider the following verse: All day long my shame is before me, and the shame of my face has covered me (Psalm 43:16). This psalm addresses many from a singular perspective. What does this imply? At its outset, the psalm speaks in the plural: God, with our ears we have heard (Psalm 43:2) and continues with Thou Thyself art my King and my God (Psalm 43:5). It then refers again to the collective: With Thee we deliver our enemies by the horns (Psalm 43:6), followed by the individual declaration: I will not trust in my bow (Psalm 43:7), and concludes with: Of God let us boast every day (Psalm 43:9). Then comes the singular remark: All day long my shame is before me (Psalm 43:16). What do these transitions signify? Such variations are not uncommon in the psalms.

Read more (682 words)

For instance, in the one hundred and eighth psalm: O God, to my praise be not speechless. For the mouth of the sinner and the mouth of the flatterer have opened against me (Psalm 108:1-2). Here, the singular is used, followed by the plural: They have spoken against me with a flattering tongue, and have repaid my love with hatred (Psalm 108:2, 5), and then reverting to the singular: Put a sinner over him (Psalm 108:6). It is likely that in this psalm some phrases refer to the Jewish people while others refer specifically to the traitor Judah: the plural pertains to the community, whereas the singular relates to Judah. In the psalm we are examining, we could also interpret the plural as referring to the faithful, and the singular to our Lord Jesus Christ. We may understand that He speaks through the prophet both for the many and for Himself, thus proclaiming: My shame is before me. The Greek text employs the term έντροπή, which is used when one individual intends to shame another into abandoning their intentions. This is evident in phrases like: Let him now come down from the cross—and let us believe in him! He has trusted in God—let Him now deliver Him! (Matthew 27:42-43). The phrase all day long is particularly poignant. Our Lord Jesus Christ illuminated the world through His incarnation. He refers to the day of His coming when He says: Walk while there is light (John 12:35)—and: Abraham saw My day (John 8:56). Thus, this shame carries a weight of humiliation. Therefore, Simmachus translates it as: All the day long My shame is before Me. What could the shame of Christ entail? It is certainly related to the cross on which He was crucified in a state of humiliation. The phrase ‘All day long’ is fitting, as darkness enveloped the land from the time of His crucifixion until the ninth hour; yet at the ninth hour, light broke through once again, illuminating until evening. This day marks the first day of the Triduum. It is possible that the choir of saints speaks in both plural and singular because, while they are a collective, they also represent one body. For instance: This people honors Me with their lips, but their heart is far from Me (Isaiah 29:13). But what shame could encompass the Lord Jesus? For it is sins that breed shame—these are what cover the sinner—and Christ committed no sin. Just as there exists shame that leads to sin (Sirach 4:25), there is also shame that eradicates sin. This is precisely the nature of the shame borne by our Lord Jesus Christ on the cross, through which we are purified from our transgressions. Any disgrace we may encounter for the sake of Christ is noble. It brings us great honor, especially during persecution when laws are enacted that may lead to Christians facing beatings, removal from positions, and imprisonment; although this shame may not be dignified, it undoubtedly brings glory to those who stand firm in their faith. Furthermore, there is also the shame of Christ, as He Himself stated: He that is ashamed of Me before men, of him will I also be ashamed before My Father which is in heaven (Matthew 10:33). Therefore, this shame holds value. However, for many—particularly unbelievers—this shame can be bitter; yet for believers, it is a source of joy. Thus, the shame of Christ can have dual meanings: either it relates to His cross, which was deemed disgraceful by the Jews who mocked Him, believing that Christ would feel ashamed of such a humiliating execution that sought salvation for all; or, it may originate from the slander and reproach uttered by the offender, reflecting the disdain of enemies and persecutors (Psalm 43:17). The essence is that He felt shame for His chosen people who misstepped, and He was ashamed before the Father for those whose judgment was imminent. The Father was always present with the Son—they are inseparable—and so He heard the Son address the Jews with: Behold, your house is left to you desolate (Matthew 23:38).

Theodoret of Cyrus

5th centuryChurch Father

The lips of the transgressor and the lips of the sycophant have risen up against Me. Through the mouth of the transgressor and the sycophant, He identified Judas, who covertly conspired with the Jews for treachery. They uttered slander against Me with deceitful words. From Judas, He shifts to address the doubts harbored by the Jews, as they, bound by jealousy, sought to bring about an unjust execution.

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryCommentator

The mouths of both the sinner and the deceiver have risen against me. Theodoret and Eusebius suggest that these refer to Judas, who spoke out against Christ the Redeemer and conspired with the religious leaders regarding His betrayal. Isychias identifies Judas, whose speech reveals him first as a sinner and then as one who betrays the Lord. As a transgressor, he approached the Jews and asked, "What will you give me? I will deliver Him to you." Then, as a betrayer, he addressed Jesus with, "Greetings, Rabbi," while giving a kiss as a sign of treachery to those who sought to arrest Him. They have spoken against me with flattering words.

Psalter with Commentaries (Cave Monastery in Kiew)

19th centuryCommentator

At the culmination of the law, which is Christ the Lord (Rom. 10:4), this psalm was bestowed upon David by the Holy Spirit. Within it, amidst deep afflictions and profound anguish, he brings down his tormentors with harsh declarations, imploring God's aid. The figure of David's enemies serves as a reflection of the adversary and betrayer of Christ the Savior - the malevolent Judas, alongside other ungrateful Israelites, and every persecutor of Christ and His Church, for whom the prophet proclaims severe judgment (Chrysostom, Athanasius, Theodoret).

Read more (278 words)

This is a tribute to the Passion of Christ, during which He Himself cried out to God the Father, ‘Now glorify Me, Father.’ The voice of the sinner is that of the devil; the deceptive words arise from Judas regarding the betrayal leading to the death of the innocent Christ. The Jews asserted, ‘We have found Him who forbids Caesar to pay tribute.’ They hurled hateful remarks at Christ: ‘Crucify, crucify Him!’ and leveled false accusations against Him: ‘This man is misleading the people,’ while Christ interceded, ‘Father, forgive them.’ Such humility, gentleness, and reverence of spirit stand as the mightiest weapon and an unyielding intercession (Chrysostom).

Christ harbored love for the Jews, desiring their salvation, yet they rejected the light of truth, favoring darkness instead. The devil, a sinner, entered Judas through the act of sharing bread and led him astray. Though Judas confessed, ‘We have sinned by betraying the innocent,’ he was eternally condemned to Gehenna, succumbing to despair and taking his own life. Gradually, Judas distanced himself from Christ, gradually met his demise, and his apostleship was conferred upon Matthias (Acts 1:23). This fate befell not only Judas but all unfaithful Israelites. Among those who had opposed Him, some faced destruction while others were taken into captivity. The honor once held by them was bestowed upon Christians (Theodoret, Epiphanius). The intentions of Judas withered away from God’s grace, and his spirit was left desolate, having turned away from the Lord. His efforts transformed into wickedness, driven by avarice, leading to the spiritual ruin of the Jews throughout the world. The devil infused malicious intent into Judas, stripping away his desire for salvation through demonic influence.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.