The Church Fathers on this verse

Psalm 109 (108):6Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

Set thou the sinner over him: and may the devil stand at his right hand.

Douay-Rheims · Hebrew numbering, Septuagint numbering in brackets.

הַפְקֵ֣ד עָלָ֣יו רָשָׁ֑ע וְ֝שָׂטָ֗ן יַעֲמֹ֥ד עַל־יְמִינֽוֹ׃

Hebrew (Masoretic text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

10 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

Great caution is required in this matter, as the statements made can easily confuse those who do not pay close attention. This entire psalm is laden with curses, reflecting an intense and fiery wrath from the speaker that does not merely target the wicked individual but also extends punishment to his children and parents, compounding one calamity upon another. Observe what is requested: "Set a sinner over him, and let the devil be at his right hand." This indicates that deceitful and malicious individuals should serve as his accusers, ensuring he cannot prevail against them. This is captured in the plea for him to be condemned when he is judged. Are we not startled by all of this (vv. 6-15)? Do you wish to identify the person so severely judged?

Read more (672 words)

When we hear anyone criticized, we tend to inquire about who is being referred to; thus, even more so should we seek to understand with reverence and a contrite spirit who this individual is, subjected to such immense wrath and who has grieved the Holy Spirit to the extent that such dire calamities are ascribed to him. Therefore, let us carefully read this psalm from the start, maintaining silence as I endeavor to explain it thoroughly. The matter at hand is significant.

Firstly, why, upon the condemnation of the sinner, must his family and parents share in the punishment? Secondly, who is the person cursed? Thirdly, how does the foremost of the apostles establish that this psalm pertains to Judas—more specifically, to a portion of it? "But in the book of Psalms it is written, Let his habitation be desolate, and let there be no one to dwell therein; and let another take his office” (Acts 1:20). Here, we encounter another question, as this citation does not all come from the psalm we are discussing; rather, it indicates a reference to the entire collection of psalms. The phrase "let his habitation be desolate" appears in another psalm (Psalms 68:26), along with "let another take his office," but Peter unites both into one testimony. Paul often employs this technique; for example, when he states, "A Deliverer shall come from Zion and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob. And this covenant shall be to them when I take away their sins" (Rom. 11:26, 27). Some may wonder whether this is a prophecy or a curse. It is a prophecy expressed in the form of a curse. This phenomenon can also be observed elsewhere; James utilizes similar expressions. Such prophecies are often designed to instill fear in listeners through their presentation.

It is noteworthy that stating someone will endure suffering differs significantly from delivering the same message with passion and indignation. This is not an unfounded claim; prophetic statements illustrate this well. When Jacob approached his death, he called his sons together to reveal to them what would happen in the days ahead (Gen. 49:1). In beginning his prophecy, one marked by anger, he uttered a curse upon Reuben: "Reuben, my firstborn, thou art my might, and the beginning of my strength, the preeminence of dignity and the preeminence of power; but you are unstable like water—you shall not excel” (Gen. 49:3, 4), foreshadowing his impending downfall in the guise of a curse. He also conveyed blessings in the form of a prayer (to Joseph): “May he bless you with the blessings of heaven above, blessings of the deep that lies beneath, blessings of the breasts and of the womb” (Gen. 49:27, 28)—this is prophetic in nature.

It is evident that such statements do not arise from mere human emotions. Jacob’s grandfather likewise prophesied a curse upon Canaan: "Canaan shall be a servant" (Gen. 9:26), illustrating God's protection of the wronged and punishment of the wrongdoers. Christ employed similar prophetic lamentations when He called people to Himself: "Woe to you, Chorazin! Woe to you, Bethsaida! And again, 'Jerusalem, Jerusalem! you who kill the prophets" (Luke 10:13; Luke 13:34). So, who is this psalm addressing? The Spirit foretold, through David, the fate of Judas in part, while other elements refer to different figures. Prophecy often manifests in this dual manner. We see this as well in the history of Israel's entrance into the promised land, where Joshua was commanded by God to divide the tribes and pronounce a mixture of blessings and curses—"Cursed shall you be in the city, and cursed shall you be in the field” (Deuteronomy 28:16), among numerous similar proclamations about the tribes.

In this psalm, a similar phenomenon occurs: a prophecy is articulated as a curse, prefiguring the fateful events for Judah while simultaneously admonishing others—a stern warning against those who defy the divine priesthood, employing deception and unrighteousness against them. What is expressed serves as a cautionary tale for those who wrong their neighbors and rise with malice against the innocent.

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

Anyone who diligently studies the Acts of the Apostles will recognize that this Psalm holds a prophecy regarding Christ. It is clear from the words, “Let his days be short, and let another take his office,” that this is a reference to Judas Iscariot, the one who betrayed Christ. Peter’s insights into this Psalm may seem vague unless viewed through the lens of the Church, which he represented symbolically due to his leadership among the apostles. It is written, “I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven” (Matthew 16:19). Judas is emblematic of those Jews who opposed Christ and harbor ongoing enmity towards Him. The truth of this can easily be discerned not only from the explicit words of the Psalm but also from those directed towards Judah.

The Psalm proclaims, “O God, be not silent to my praise; for the mouth of the wicked, yea, the mouth of the wicked is opened against me” (Psalm 107:1). This indicates that the slander cast by the wicked is false, while the praise rendered by God is undeniable. As it states, “For God is true, but every man is a liar” (Romans 3:4). Truth can only be found in those who abide in the Spirit of God. The utmost praise belongs to the only begotten Son of God, affirming His divine identity. This was revealed at a time when His weakness was apparent and obscured by the accusations of the wicked. The deceitful among the wicked spoke against Him, as their malice was cloaked in falsehood.

“They have spoken against me with lying tongues” (Psalms 108:2), particularly when they feigned admiration, calling Him a good Teacher through deceitful flattery. Another account states, “And they that praise me together swear against me.” They shouted, “Crucify Him, crucify Him” (John 19:6), while enveloping Him in vitriol. The treacherous tongue disguised its hostility as love, surrounding Him with expressions not of affection, but of open hatred, attacking Him unjustly. Just as the righteous love Christ selflessly, the wicked nurture an unchecked animosity; the righteous seek truth independently of gain, while the unrighteous pursue what is evil. There is mention of a notorious individual who was cruel and wicked without cause.

Instead of love, they resorted to mockery (Psalm 107:3). There are six numbered behaviors to note: (1) responding to good with evil, (2) not replying with evil to evil, (3) responding to good with good, (4) responding to evil with evil, (5) not responding to good with good, (6) responding to evil with good. The first two pertain to the righteous, with the first being the highest; the last two belong to the wicked, with the latter being the worst. The middle pair applies to those of ambiguous morality, with the first edging towards righteousness and the second towards malevolence. Jesus exemplified this by repaying good for evil, justifying the unjust (Romans 4:5), as He was crucified yet proclaimed, “Father, forgive them; for they know not what they do” (Luke 23:34).

After indicating they malign Him instead of loving Him, He adds, “But I gave myself to prayer.” He did not specify His request but suggests that prayerful silence often speaks volumes about the condition of one’s heart. They denigrated Him with scornful mockery at the crucifixion, treating Him as if vanquished; from the Cross He pronounced, “Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.” Thus, while they repaid good with evil, He, in His goodness, returned good for evil. Divine instruction comes from Christ’s example, teaching us to pray in the face of others’ ingratitude, for they may wage a battle against us, whether overtly or not.

He further declares, “Thus have I been repaid evil for good” (Psalm 107:4). We must ask, what constitutes this evil? The answer lies in the hatred that arose despite His goodwill. This encapsulates their immense guilt. How could the persecutors inflict harm upon Him who willingly died, not through coercion? Their hatred represents the greatest sin of the persecutors, regardless of the sacrificial nature of the victim. The reference to “Instead of love to me” emphasizes that they were obliged to love Him, both as a duty and in light of His love, as He lamented, “How often have I gathered your children together, and you would not!” (Matthew 23:37).

He then reveals the outcomes they will face for their heinous acts, articulating their fate as though hoping for vengeance. Some misunderstand this prophetic approach, suggesting malice drives hatred, an eye for an eye. Yet, few appreciate that the consequences render satisfaction to the accuser while the judge enacts justice from a place of righteousness. The former repays evil for evil; the latter administers justice devoid of vengeful pleasure, motivated instead by love for what is just and good.

“Set the wicked ruler over him; and let Satan be at his right hand” (Psalm 108:5). Initially, the complaint refers to many, but the Psalm now addresses one individual, particularly Judas, who was destined for punishment as indicated in the Acts of the Apostles (Acts 1:20). This implies he would be met with malignancy, receiving the devil as his closest advisor due to his refusal to submit to Christ. Those who choose worldly pleasures over God are festooned with blessings—yet penalized for not embracing them.

“Let him be judged and condemned, and let his prayer be turned into sin” (Psalm 107:6). Prayer is righteous only through Christ, whom he betrayed in his grievous transgression; prayer lacking Christ cannot atone for sin and instead transforms into sin itself. It may be asked if there was a moment when Judas could have prayed in a manner that rendered his prayer sinful. Perhaps before he betrayed the Lord, as he entertained the thought of such betrayal, rendering him incapable of praying through Christ. Had he asked for forgiveness post-betrayal through Christ, he would have found hope and mercy, which could have spared him from despair and death.

“Let his days be short” (Psalm 108:7) refers to the brevity of his apostleship, as his offenses culminated in demise before Christ’s Passion. Addressing the sacred number of twelve—designed to encompass the first Apostles—He states, “Let another take his office,” suggesting that Judas’s punishment be proportionate to his actions, enhancing and replacing his number.

“Let his children be orphans, and his wife a widow” (Psalm 108:8). Following his demise, his offspring were left without a father, and his spouse, bereft of a husband. “Let his children be wanderers, seeking bread” (Psalm 107:9), indicating those who lost their way and lack sustenance. “Let them be driven from their homes,” elucidating what transpired with his wife and children through the ensuing lines.

“Let the extortioner search all his possessions, and let strangers spoil his labor” (Psalm 108:10). No individual shall stand to protect his lineage, thus his orphaned offspring lack compassion from others. Since even orphans might survive amidst hardship, “Let his posterity be destroyed” (Psalm 108:12), indicates a total extermination of his legacy in the next generation, allowing his name to vanish.

What follows? “Let the wickedness of his fathers be remembered before the eyes of the Lord, and let the sin of his mother not be blotted out” (Psalm 108:13). Could this suggest that his ancestors’ sins impact him? They are not visited upon those transformed in Christ, breaking the lineage of the wicked without replicating their deeds (Ezekiel 18:4, 20). The Lord states, “I will punish the sins of the fathers upon the children” (Exodus 20:5), implying that the children replicate their fathers' hatred; thus, as good actions improve one's legacy, so do evil actions burden descendants with shared guilt.

“Let them always be against the Lord” (Psalm 108:14), meaning constantly exposed to God’s sight. Interpreters have varied in their renditions, suggesting that this grave offense shall lack pardon both here and in the life to come. “Let the memory of them disappear from the face of the earth” reflects the notion that Judah and his heirs were obliterated within one generation, leaving no subsequent line to remember their legacy.

This occurred because “he remembered not to show mercy” (Psalm 108:15), whether pertaining to Judah or the people at large. It is reasonable to consider the latter; had they killed Christ, insight into their actions should inspire remorse and compassion for His persecuted followers. This sentiment reinforces the statement, “And they persecuted the poor and the needy” (Psalm 108:16). This notion also applies to Judas, for Jesus became impoverished that we may be enriched through His humility (2 Corinthians 8:9). How can we ignore the term ‘beggar’ when He asked for a drink from the Samaritan woman (John 4:7) and later claimed, “I thirst” (John 19:28)?

His followers then persecuted the righteous, “the poor man and the beggar,” intending to destroy Him, for some interpret this claim to mean the wounded in heart. Such expressions are often tied to past guilt and conversion, reminiscent of those who, upon hearing the Apostles after the Ascension, were moved to repentance.

The Psalm proceeds to state, “He enjoyed cursing, and it will happen to him” (Psalm 107:17). Though Judas reveled in swearing, both through theft and betrayal, the populace’s explicit call for the blood of Christ illustrates a greater disdain. He who rejected blessing shall be far removed from it. Judas exemplified this rejection, and the Jewish people, too, displayed a refusal of the blessing when the enlightened sought their discipleship (John 9:27). He donned a curse as a garment, penetrating deeply into his being, externally like clothing, and internally like water. Thus, he placed himself before the judgment of Him who has the authority to condemn both body and soul (Matthew 10:28). His actions elicit delight in evil, amassing eternal punishment, for true blessing equates to eternal life. Currently, his wicked deeds are his delight, flowing within him like water and settling in his bones like oil; it is termed a curse because God has destined torment for such individuals.

“Let it be to him as a cloak covering him” (Psalm 107:18). Even after mentioning a cloak, the repetition raises the question of why. Having stated he had clothed himself in sin, does the garment differ from the cloak? Each person bears the chiton and is cloaked in their transgressions, signifying their pride in wickedness. The girdle illustrates one always prepared for labor, unencumbered by excessive clothing. Thus, one who girds themselves with curses is a deliberate wrongdoer, crafting evil meticulously rather than impulsively.

“This is the case of those who slander me before the Lord” (Psalm 108:19). Here, he speaks not of “their reward” but rather “their work,” reflecting that beneath the garment, covering, water, oil, and girdle, he depicts actions that lead to eternal condemnation. This relates to many, not solely Judas, as it speaks to those “who slander me before the Lord.” When Herod’s adversaries died, the angel announced, “Those who sought the life of the child have died” (Matthew 2:20).

Who slanders Christ more in the presence of God than those who deny His divine prophecies and assertions, such as His power to rise from the dead? While He states, “I have power to lay down my life, and I have power to take it again” (John 10:18), do not disbelieving hearts match the slanders?

“But do Thou with me, O Lord God” (Psalm 108:20). Some may interpret this as a call for mercy; others add to it, but the more credible texts retain, “But do Thou with me, O Lord God, for Thy Name’s sake.” Thus, we should understand this as an address by the Son to the Father, emphasizing the unity of their work. Whichever interpretation arises, it is a plea for assistance—“Work with me” conveys the essence of divine engagement towards mercy. This idea resonates with us in daily interactions, suggesting collaborative efforts that yield good. The Father and Son together diligently uplift the vessels of mercy (Romans 9:23).

Read the full text in the app

Athanasius the Great

4th centuryChurch Father

Consider Article 1. Place the sinner upon him. The sinner is none other than Satan, the originator of sin. The term 'set' is used rather than 'shall be set.' Upon whom is this placed if not on Judas, the betrayer? The adversary will stand at His right. Zechariah states: ‘And the Lord showed me Jesus the great priest standing before the face of the angel of the Lord, and the devil stood at His right hand to resist Him’ (Zechariah 3:1). Yet, the devil does not oppose Judas.

Jerome of Stridon

4th centuryChurch Father

Because I called for them while on the cross and they witnessed My wounds. I gave them the opportunity to turn back, yet they chose not to repent and refused My reign over them. Let the adversary be their king. If they rejected My sovereignty, let Barabbas rule them instead. His name means ‘son of the father,’ referring to the adversary. Who was he? A rebel and a thief. Indeed, Barabbas became their ruler, a persistent troublemaker who harmed even his own people. This violent thief was apprehended prior to the Lord's crucifixion, before His execution by the Jewish leaders. They turned away from Christ and freed Barabbas. From that moment, Barabbas gained influence among them.

Read more (382 words)

This malevolent spirit, who had been expelled from humanity and his lineage, wandered in desolation and found no resting place, then returned bringing seven spirits even more wicked than himself, and entered the congregation, making the final state of that assembly worse than the first (see Luke 11:26). Before the crucifixion, though sinful, the Jewish synagogue was only influenced by one demon. When the Lord was crucified, eight demons of that kind infiltrated it. Thus, the fulfillment of prophecy occurred: ‘Put a wicked one over him.’ ‘And the adversary shall be at his right hand.’ As he became placed at his right hand, it is evident why the right side of the synagogue was withered, as documented in the Gospel (see Luke 6:6). Let us pray that the Lord stands at our right hand, instead of the adversary. It is written in Zechariah: ‘And he showed me Jesus, the high priest, standing before the angel of the Lord, and Satan standing at his right hand to oppose him’ (Zechariah 3:1). Now, if the adversary stood at the right hand of the Lord, how can the psalmist say of Judas, ‘And the adversary shall be at his right hand’? Observe the implications of this statement. The adversary stood at the right of Jesus to oppose Him, to contend with His authority. It does not indicate that he sought to fight per se, but that he had already triumphed over Judas. In that case, the adversary wished to contest the Lord’s right hand, but here he exercises dominion over Judas’s right hand. One must reflect further on this point. At that time the adversary positioned himself to oppose when the garments of Jesus were unclean. For it is written, ‘And the garments of Jesus were stained’ (Zechariah 3:3). When the garments of the Lord Jesus bore defilement, the adversary stood at His right hand. While He bore our transgressions, Satan confronted Him with those very sins. When it states in Zechariah, ‘Remove his filthy garments and clothe him with pure garments’ (Zechariah 3:4), Jesus responds to the adversary, ‘May the Lord rebuke you, Satan; may the Lord who has chosen Jerusalem rebuke you’ (Zechariah 3:2). All of this has been stated because it is written, ‘And the adversary shall be at his right hand.’

Ambrose of Milan

4th centuryChurch Father

Let's examine the following verse: "All day long my shame is before me, And the shame of my face hath covered me" (Psalm 43:16). This psalm appears to be addressed from an individual voice to a collective audience. What is its implication? At the psalm's outset, the perspective is plural: "God, with our ears we have heard" (Psalm 43:2). It later shifts to a singular expression: "Thou Thyself art my King and my God" (Psalm 43:5). It returns to the plural with: "With Thee we deliver our enemies by the horns" (Psalm 43:6), and then shifts again: "I will not trust in my bow" (Psalm 43:7). The psalm concludes with the plural: "Of God let us boast every day" (Psalm 43:9) and "All day long my shame is before me" (Psalm 43:16). What do these variations signify?

Read more (684 words)

This pattern often appears in the psalms. Take Psalm 108 as another example: "O God, to my praise be not speechless. For the mouth of the sinner and the mouth of the flatterer have opened against me" (Psalm 108:1-2). Here, the initial statement is singular, followed by a plural observation: "They have spoken against me with a flattering tongue, and have repaid my love with hatred" (Psalm 108:2, 5). Then, it returns to the singular: "Put a sinner over him" (Psalm 108:6). It seems that in this psalm, some words pertain to the Jewish people as a whole, while others refer specifically to the traitor Judah: the plural addresses the people, and the singular addresses Judah. In our current psalm, we can also interpret that the plural references the saints, while the singular pertains to our Lord Jesus Christ. One might conjecture that He speaks through the prophet on behalf of both the collective and Himself, thus stating, "My shame is before me." The Greek term used here, έντροπή, describes a circumstance where one individual attempts to humiliate another into abandoning their intentions. An example of this could be the taunts directed at Christ: "Let him now come down from the cross - and let us believe in him! He has trusted in God - let him now deliver Him" (Matthew 27:42-43). The use of "all day long" is particularly poignant. Our Lord Jesus Christ indeed brought light into the world through His incarnation. This is the significance of the day of His Incarnation when He proclaimed, "Walk while there is light" (John 12:35) and "Abraham saw My day" (John 8:56). Thus, this shaming entails considerable disgrace. Simmachus translates it as: "All the day long My shame is before Me." What could embody the shame of Christ? It is certainly linked to the cross upon which He was exposed. It is appropriate that it is stated "All day long," as darkness enveloped the land from His crucifixion until the ninth hour, when light re-emerged, lasting until evening. This day signifies the first of the triduum. It is also conceivable that the assembly of saints shifts between the plural and singular forms, akin to one entity while encapsulating many. For instance, it is stated: "This people honors Me with their lips, but their heart is far from Me" (Isaiah 29:13). But what shame could the Lord Jesus possibly carry? Shame arises from sin, which covers the sinner; yet Christ was without sin. Just as there exists shame that leads to sin (Sirach 4:25), there is also a shame that eradicates sin. Such was the shame of our Lord Jesus Christ's crucifixion, through which we are absolved of our sins. Any shame we bear for the sake of Christ is commendable. In times of persecution, for example, if laws are enacted that subject Christians to humiliation, dismissal from duties, disenfranchisement, or imprisonment, such shame may not be esteemed, but it undeniably brings honor to a genuine testimony. Additionally, Christ Himself remarked on this shame: "He that is ashamed of Me before men, of him will I also be ashamed before My Father which is in heaven" (Matthew 10:33). Therefore, this kind of shame is virtuous. However, this shame of Christ is bitter for many, particularly unbelievers; yet for believers, it is a source of joy. Thus, the shame of Christ can denote two interpretations. It may refer to His cross, which the Jews saw as a disgrace. They scorned Him, believing that He would feel humiliated by the very execution through which He intended to secure salvation for all. Alternatively, it may reflect the shame stemming from the taunts of the adversary and the accusations of the enemy (Psalm 43:17). The essence of this is that He felt a sense of shame towards His chosen people for their grievous errors. Furthermore, He experienced shame before the Father for those whose end was imminent. The Father was present with the Son, for He is never separate from Him, which is why the Son addressed the Jews, saying, "Behold, your house is left to you desolate" (Matthew 23:38).

Theodoret of Cyrus

5th centuryChurch Father

It is expressed that one should substitute "shall put" with "put" and "shall stand" with "let it stand." This truth has been made evident to us by the divine Evangelist. For the astute John inquired, “Who is the betrayer?” And the Lord responded, “I will give him the morsel after I have dipped it.” Once he had dipped the morsel, it is recorded that he handed it to Judas. By taking the morsel, Satan entered into him (John 13:25-27), having discovered the pathways that were laid bare for his influence; for Judas, of his own volition, approached the Jewish leaders and conspired with them to betray. Subsequently, many, despite being showered with blessings, chose ingratitude. Thus, he willingly invited an adversary into his circle.

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryCommentator

The phrase "put the sinner upon him" and similar expressions may appear to convey a directive or wish; however, these statements should be understood as prophetic and indicative of future events, rather than implying that something will rule or occur, as noted by Theodoret and Athanasius. Thus, the term "sinner" refers to the devil, indicating that he will dominate Judas, as it is recorded, "Satan entered into him" (John 13:27). Alternatively, the notion of "put" should be interpreted as permitting rather than merely allowing to remain over him, reflecting a pattern in Scripture where permission is often framed as an action.

Read more (320 words)

Isychias observes that just as God is termed righteous and depicted as rejoicing in righteousness—"for righteous, saith the Lord, and loving righteousness"—the devil is called a sinner, as one who continually sins and leads others to do the same. His aim is to exert control over Judas, treating him as he does the demons, since the betrayer has aligned himself with them. Consequently, the devil will position himself at Judas's right hand, indicating proximity. This placement signifies closeness, much like the righteous are celebrated by being at the right hand of God.

There is an additional interpretation that suggests the devil will be at Judas's right side to pervert his righteous deeds, as noted by Basil and Eusebius, who express that he seeks to undermine his virtuous actions. While Scripture also references the devil standing at the right hand of Jesus, the context was one of opposition: "and the Lord showed me Jesus, the great hierarch, standing before the face of the angel of the Lord; and the devil stood at his right hand to oppose him" (Zechariah 3:1), meaning that the devil took a position to obstruct his just actions.

Basil the Great remarks that the devil's presence at the right hand signifies the subversion of righteousness, as he aims to spoil good works. He not only challenges those weaker aspects of our actions but also seeks to undermine those that are commendable and virtuous. Isychias adds that Judas could not be forgiven for betraying such a Master, especially given that Christ, in His compassion, placed a box of money in his charge to prevent the traitor from being in want. Didyma further clarifies that what constitutes righteousness varies; for the diligent, their deeds reflect wisdom and virtue, while for the negligent, they result in sensuality and vice. Therefore, in the righteous acts of the saint, God is present, whereas in the undertakings of the sinner, the devil resides.

Theophan the Recluse

19th centuryChurch Father

The passages from Psalm 108:6-13 convey their meaning clearly. Who are they addressing? In Psalm 108:8, St. Peter in Acts (Acts 1:20) identified Judas. This can be understood in this way: Through the wickedness of individuals who repaid David’s goodness with malevolence, the Holy Spirit inspired the Psalmist to foresee that a similar fate awaited the promised Messiah from his lineage. Thus, he is filled with a profound awareness of God's righteous indignation, expressing what should have occurred to the betrayer had he acted with integrity, articulating it in the voice of one who specifically wronged him. There is little further to elaborate.

Read more (40 words)

The Holy Spirit stirs David’s indignation and empowers his words against adversaries within the Psalms, allowing the unrighteous across generations to recognize their true worth and reflect on the fate that would befall them were it not for God’s mercy.

Irenaeus (Klementjewsky)

18th centuryCommentator

Up to this point, David has expressed his distress over numerous foes; however, in this instance, he appears to focus on a single adversary. Nevertheless, it is also valid to interpret his words as addressing all enemies as one, while it is equally likely that he is preparing himself against a specific individual, who stands out as the primary adversary among them. Some connect this passage to Doeg the Edomite, who, as is known, deceitfully turned against David, leading to devastation not only for David but also for the faithful priests (1 Sam. 22:18). The holy Apostle Peter references these words in regard to the betrayer Judas in Acts 1:20; however, it seems more fitting to apply this passage to one of David's closest allies, such as Ahithophel, and notably Saul.

Psalter with Commentaries (Cave Monastery in Kiew)

19th centuryCommentator

At the culmination of the law, which is fulfilled in Christ our Lord (Rom. 10:4), this psalm was inspired by the Holy Spirit for David. In it, out of deep affliction and intense sorrow, he implores God for assistance against his tormentors, who are sworn enemies. These adversaries reflect the true adversary and betrayer of Christ the Savior—the wicked Judas, along with other ungrateful Jews, and all who persecute Christ and His Church, to whom the prophet proclaims impending judgment (Chrysostom, Athanasius, Theodoret). The Passion of Christ is celebrated here, wherein He cried out to God the Father, "Now glorify Me, Father." The voice of sin—of the devil; the voice of deceit—of Judas, concerning the betrayal of the innocent Christ.

Read more (236 words)

The Jews accused Him, saying, "We have found this man who forbids to pay tribute to Caesar." They uttered hateful demands against Christ: "Crucify Him, crucify Him!" They spoke lies, saying, "This man misleads our nation," while Christ pleaded, "Father, forgive them." This reflects His humility, gentleness, reverence, and the strength of His soul, which serves as an invincible plea (Chrysostom). Despite Christ's love for the Jews and His desire for their salvation, they preferred the darkness over the light of truth. Satan entered Judas through the act of sharing bread, and then cast him aside. Judas recognized his sin in betraying the innocent, yet he was condemned to everlasting punishment, for in despair he took his own life. Gradually, Judas distanced himself from Christ, ultimately leading to his demise, while Matthias was called to take his place as an apostle (Acts 1:23). This fate applied not only to Judas, but also to all disloyal Jews. Among those who opposed Him, some faced destruction while others were taken into captivity. Their honor was conferred upon Christians (Theodoret, Epiphanius). Judas's thoughts were severed from God's grace, leaving his soul desolate and estranged from the Lord. His endeavors turned to malice, consumed by the love of money, as the Jews faced judgment for their wickedness throughout the world. The devil instilled in Judas a malevolent spirit and exploited his intentions, leading him away from any hope of salvation.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.