The Church Fathers on this verse

Psalm 41 (40):7Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

And if he came in to see me, he spoke vain things: his heart gathered together iniquity to itself. He went out and spoke to the same purpose.

Douay-Rheims · Hebrew numbering, Septuagint numbering in brackets.

וְאִם־בָּ֤א לִרְא֨וֹת ׀ שָׁ֤וְא יְדַבֵּ֗ר לִבּ֗וֹ יִקְבָּץ־אָ֥וֶן ל֑וֹ יֵצֵ֖א לַח֣וּץ יְדַבֵּֽר׃

Hebrew (Masoretic text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

6 Church Fathers comment on this verse · 8 commentaries

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

The Coming and Departure of Judas Judas was near to our Lord, having entered to observe, not in search of faith but seeking an opportunity for betrayal. Had he remained within and embraced the truth, he would not have gone out to deceive. Being a traitor and an adversary, this is why he left and spread falsehoods. If you are part of the body of Christ, remain close to the Head and hold fast to Him.

The trials endured by Christ are mirrored in the experiences of the Church; what the Head of the body faced, the Members will also encounter. A disciple cannot surpass his Teacher, nor can a servant exceed his Master. (Matthew 10:24) If you are among the Members of Christ, delve deeper and unite with the Head. If you identify as wheat, accept the tares; if you are grain, endure the chaff. (Matthew 13:30) Bear with the unsatisfactory fish in the net if you are a good fish. Why do you desire to escape before the time of sowing? And why do you seek to uproot the grain from within yourself before the time of harvest? What compels you to tear your nets before reaching solid land? They venture forth and proclaim their findings.

Athanasius the Great

4th centuryChurch Father

He entered to observe and spoke insincerely. This refers to Judas, and the implication is that despite being among My disciples, he was deceitful and cunning. He ‘spoke insincerely,’ meaning there was no authenticity within him. His heart had accumulated wickedness. He had made the decision, declaring that he would betray Me to those who were envious. He then left and stated exactly this: ‘What you want to give me, I will also give to you’ (Matthew 26:15).

Ambrose of Milan

4th centuryChurch Father

Judas departed and began to communicate. He separated himself from the faith, distancing himself from the assembly of the apostles and removing himself from their fellowship; he left the communion of Christ to align himself with the forces of evil; he stepped away from divine grace and into the snare of death; he went out to engage in vain discussions before the unbelievers; he withdrew from the profound secrets of life; he left because he had failed to comprehend the deeper significance of Scripture.

The Psalmist conveys a pointed prophecy regarding the traitor Judas, stating: “And he came to see Me, speaking lies; his heart gathered unrighteousness in him, and he went out and spoke” (Psalm 40:7). This is how the Greek texts arrange the words. Judas approached with the intent to betray the Savior—seeking to observe His actions and words, aiming to catch Him in speech to relay to the Jews. Yet, he found nothing to report, for his understanding was lacking. Scripture rightly notes that Judas was not truly connected to Christ, having forsaken His teachings and abandoned His guidance. Although Judas sought to enter into communion, he was barred entry by his treachery.

Read more (356 words)

The Apostle Paul reminds us that “no whoremonger, or any stole, or unclean person, who is an idolater, has inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and God” (Eph. 5:5). Judas not only failed to enter but also desired to see yet remained blind. Jesus communicated in parables, but Judas did not comprehend. Not every individual who thinks they are receptive to God's word genuinely hears it; if everyone had indeed heard, Jesus would not have proclaimed, “He who has ears to hear, let him hear!” (Lk. 8:8). Thus, because Judas was incapable of hearing or understanding, he spoke deceit in place of the truth, believing he could mislead Jesus with his words about the ointment. His concern was for his own deceitful gain rather than for the welfare of the poor. Despite addressing Jesus as rabbi and teacher, he strayed from the path of Christ’s teachings, allowing the devil to infiltrate his heart, compounding his wickedness. Judas inflicted harm upon himself; he was unjust to his own soul, sinning against himself when he nurtured an offense he could not hide. He thought he could deceive Christ, who, knowing the truth, proclaimed, “One of you will betray Me” (Matthew 26:21). Judas revealed his own guilt through the inquiry, “Is it not I, Rabbi?” to which the Lord replied, “Thou hast said” (Matt. 26:25). Judas failed to grasp that the Lord was aware; had he comprehended this, he would not have carried out the betrayal. The scripture again states, “and yet he went out and spoke” (Psalm 40:7), illustrating those who disclose secrets. It is aptly noted that having gone out signifies the realm of wolves and thieves. Within rests Moses amidst the cloud with Jesus, while outside stands the crowd of Jews. Within, the priest Zechariah ministers in the temple, while outside lurks the throng. The Holy Spirit within our hearts calls out to the Father, whereas outside prowls our adversary like a roaring lion ready to devour. Out there dwell the unfaithful, while the faithful reside within. Consequently, God will judge those outside (1 Corinthians 5:13), but those who are within will find salvation through Christ.

Theodoret of Cyrus

5th centuryChurch Father

The sacred Evangelists convey that Judas approached the Jewish leaders, asking, "What will you give me if I hand Him over to you?" and thus he sought an opportunity to betray Him (Matthew 26:15-16). The prophecy similarly acknowledges this betrayal. Judas entered with ill intent and left to conspire. Through his movements among the Jews, he devised a plan for the Savior's demise. The Prophet then predicts this malicious scheme of theirs.

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryCommentator

Judas, a friend and disciple, entered the place where I was without restraint, driven by a wicked intent to find an opportunity to betray me, as noted by the holy Cyril. The Evangelist recorded, "From that time he looked for an opportunity to betray Him" (Matthew 26:16). The traitorous heart of Judas, as it is said, spoke emptiness, contemplating betrayal within himself as he sought to determine if it was a suitable moment to turn against me. In vain, he attempted to disguise his intentions, hypocritically addressing me as "rabbi" or teacher, while I, who know all hearts, understood his treachery and his desires toward me. This pursuit of wickedness only led Judas to acquire iniquity for himself, as his schemes were aimed at his own Master and Redeemer.

Read more (107 words)

Some scholars suggest a pause after the phrase "speaking in vain," indicating that Judas spoke to me with false tranquility, while harboring hostile and deadly thoughts in his heart. However, the initial interpretation holds stronger significance. Then, he departed and conspired with others. The Evangelist John also illustrates this when he states, "he (Judas), having taken the bread, immediately went out" (John 13:30). The phrase "went out" indicates that Judas joined with my adversaries—the Jews—and conspired with them, asking, "What will you give me, and I will betray him to you?" (Matthew 26:15). The divine Evangelists make it abundantly clear that all these events came to pass.

Irenaeus (Klementjewsky)

18th centuryCommentator

The term "decisive" here illustrates the wickedness of adversaries, and by citing them, the speaker seeks to invoke God's compassion, recognizing that the more ruthlessly and mercilessly foes treat His faithful, the more likely He is to extend His aid to the afflicted. In this manner, he encourages us through his own experience to cultivate hope, demonstrating that as the injustice of our adversaries intensifies, so too should our pleas for God’s grace. The depth of enmity against David is clearly attested by the very expressions of their malice; these foes could only be subdued by complete destruction, resorting to the utmost humiliation. Their desire was for his very legacy to vanish alongside him. When will his name be forgotten?

Read more (90 words)

This reflects the sentiment he articulates concerning those adversaries who harshly pursued him. Furthermore, he brings forth a grievance regarding those who approached him under the guise of friendship, only to later betray him with their venom. Such rivals pose a greater threat as their malice is cloaked in deceit, allowing them to infiltrate and cause harm. In lamenting these individuals, he asserts, “If anyone comes to see or visit me, he speaks falsely; and when he leaves, he repeats the same to others: he hides iniquity in his heart.”

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.