They resist Christ the Lord and persecute and kill His Apostles. Yet among this same people, in every place, there are those who sincerely believe in the Lord.
They cleave to Him with all their heart and serve Him with all their soul. These, properly speaking, are the people of God.
They are God’s own, preserved by Him for Himself, foreknown before, and now called. Through the calling they have been chosen from the people.
As then only those seven thousand were God’s own, while all the rest were strangers to Him, so now the whole people, when viewed as a whole, is alien to Christ and our God.
Only these believers are His own. They seem to vanish amid the common mass of the people, yet in fact they constitute the true people of God.
Blessed Theodoret writes: "As then, out of countless thousands, only seven thousand remained free from impiety, so now the unbelievers are more numerous, while those who have believed and benefited from divine grace are fewer."
The force of the comparison between these circumstances lies in this. Then the whole people as a whole fought against God, while the seven thousand hidden among them honored God, and God called them His own.
So now the whole people as a whole fights against Christ. But the believers moving among them believe in Christ and worship Him. These are the very ones whom God has as His own.
This remnant has come into being according to God’s election. God chose and chooses it from the midst of the people by the gospel, by faith, and by grace.
From this everyone should conclude that all now taking place is in harmony with the will and intentions of God and is not contrary to His promises. Therefore it cannot be said that God has rejected His people.
Chrysostom explains at length other features of similarity in these circumstances. "The meaning of these words is this: God has not rejected the people. For if He had rejected them, He would have received no one.
But if He received some, then He did not reject them. Yet if He did not reject them, you say, does that mean He received all? By no means.
For even in Elijah’s time no more than seven thousand were saved. And now, besides those who believe openly, there are probably many who have believed secretly.
It is not surprising if you do not know them. The prophet Elijah, so great a man, did not know this either. But God was ordering His own affairs, though the Prophet did not know it.
So also now He secretly orders His work of faith. Notice the Apostle’s prudence, how, while proving what he had set out to prove, he imperceptibly increases the guilt of the Jews.
He recalled this whole testimony in order to reveal their ingratitude more solemnly and to show that they have been such from ancient times.
If he had not had this intention, but wished only to prove that not many constitute the people, properly God’s own, he would have said only that in Elijah’s time seven thousand remained.
But now he brings the whole testimony from the beginning, because he strove in every way to prove that the Jews’ actions toward Christ and the Apostles are not at all strange or new.
They are customary for them and have become their habit. So that they might not say, we killed Christ as a deceiver and persecute the Apostles as seducers, the Apostle brings forward a testimony.
In it it is said: Lord, they have killed Thy prophets and dug down Thy altars. This meant that then they killed not false, but true Prophets.
So now they killed not a false, but the true Savior, and persecute not seducers, but true preachers.
But the Apostle, so as not to grieve them too much by his word, does not express this openly. He presents another reason for bringing this testimony.
It is as though he brings it not chiefly in order to reproach them, but with the aim of proving something else, namely that not many properly constitute the people of God.
Meanwhile he deprives them of every excuse for the deeds that preceded, the crucifixion of the Lord and the persecution of the Apostles.
See how the reproof gains special force from the person who reproves. It is not Paul, nor Peter, nor James, nor John who reproves.
It is the one whom the Jews admired more than any other, the head of the Prophets and friend of God. What then does he say?
Lord, they have killed Thy prophets and dug down Thy altars. I alone am left, and they seek my life.
What could be more savage than such ferocity? They ought to have prayed over sins already committed, but instead they intended to kill yet another Prophet.
And this was not during famine, but when fruitfulness had already come. All this makes them completely without excuse.
But as it was then, so they act now. When the demons have been put to shame and the power of God has been manifested in Christ Jesus, they dare this crime against Him.
They pass from murders to murders and put to death the teachers and correctors of their morals. What can they say against this reproof in their own defense?
Were those Prophets also deceivers? Did they not know where they came from? They grieved you, but they spoke what was profitable.
Understand the same concerning the Apostles. And the altars? Did the altars also grieve them? Did they also offend?
It is evident that they did all this because they fought against God; see Blessed Theodoret. Such examples of stubbornness and evil disposition the Jews always displayed.
Therefore Paul also says elsewhere, writing to the Thessalonians: you suffered the same things from your own countrymen as they did from the Jews, who killed the Lord and His prophets, and drove us out, and did not please God, and opposed all men (cf. 1 Thess 2:14-15).
Likewise here he says that the Jews dug down the altars and killed the Prophets, in order to show that they always resist God.
But what does the divine answer say to him? I have left for Myself seven thousand men who have not bowed the knee to Baal.
You ask whether this applies to the present time. It applies very much. By this it is proved that God always customarily saves the worthy, although the promise was given to the whole people.
The Apostle proved the same above when he said: though the number of the sons of Israel be as the sand of the sea, the remnant shall be saved. And again: if the Lord of Sabaoth had not left us a seed, we would have become like Sodom.
He proves the same here. Therefore he added: so then, at the present time also, there is a remnant according to the election of grace.
See how each word in the Apostle retains its force, expressing both the grace of God and the irreproachability of those being saved. By the word election the Apostle showed the dignity of those being saved.
By the word grace he indicated the gift of God."