The Church Fathers on this verse

Romans 14:23Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

But he that discerneth, if he eat, is condemned; because not of faith. For all that is not of faith is sin.

Douay-Rheims

ο δε διακρινομενος εαν φαγη κατακεκριται οτι ουκ εκ πιστεως παν δε ο ουκ εκ πιστεως αμαρτια εστιν (16:25) τω δε δυναμενω υμας στηριξαι κατα το ευαγγελιον μου και το κηρυγμα ιησου χριστου κατα αποκαλυψιν μυστηριου χρονοις αιωνιοις σεσιγημενου (16:26) φανερωθεντος δε νυν δια τε γραφων προφητικων κατ επιταγην του αιωνιου θεου εις υπακοην πιστεως εις παντα τα εθνη γνωρισθεντος (16:27) μονω σοφω θεω δια ιησου χριστου ω η δοξα εις τους αιωνας αμην

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

11 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

"But the one who doubts is condemned if he eats." Again the Apostle exhorts them to spare the weak man. What benefit is there in eating with doubt and condemning oneself? I approve the man who eats and eats without any doubt. Do you see how he leads him not only to eat, but to eat with a clean conscience? Then he explains why he is condemned, adding, "because it is not from faith." That is, he is condemned not because the food is unclean, but because it is not from faith. He was not assured that it was clean, but thought that he had touched something unclean. By this the Apostle teaches them how much harm they do when they compel others, before persuading them, to touch what they consider unclean. He wishes even by this to restrain them from rebuking those weak in faith.

Read more (1608 words)

"Everything that is not from faith is sin." When, he says, a man is not persuaded and does not believe that it is clean, how can he avoid sinning? Paul says all this about the matter at hand, not in a universal sense. See how much care he takes not to offend another. Above he said, "If your brother is grieved because of food, you are no longer walking in love." If one must not grieve him, much less must one offend him. Again he says, "Do not destroy the work of God for the sake of food." If destroying a church is criminal and impious, much more is destroying a spiritual temple. A man is more honorable than a church, for Christ died not for walls, but for these temples. Therefore let us be cautious in everything on our part, and let us give no one even a small occasion to attack us. The present life is an arena. Everywhere it is necessary to have many eyes. We must not think ignorance is sufficient for our defense. It is possible, entirely possible, to be punished even for ignorance, when that ignorance is inexcusable. The Jews were ignorant, yet their ignorance was not accepted as an excuse. The Gentiles were ignorant, yet they too have no defense. When you do not know what it is impossible to know, you will not be accused. But when you do not know what you can easily know, you will undergo the severest punishment. In general, if we are not excessively careless but use every means that depends on us, God will extend His hand to us even in what is unknown. Thus Paul said to the Philippians, "If in anything you think otherwise, God will reveal this also to you" (Phil 3:15). But when we do not wish to do what lies within our power, we shall be deprived even of this assistance. This is what happened to the Jews. "Therefore I speak to them in parables," Christ says, "because seeing they do not see" (Mt 13:13). How did they see and not see? They saw demons being cast out, and said, "He has a demon." They saw the dead being raised, and did not worship Christ, but plotted to kill Him. Cornelius was not like this. Since he carefully did everything that depended on him, God added what remained. Therefore do not ask why God overlooked some Gentile who was good and just. First, it is impossible for men to know who is just. This is known to Him who formed the heart of each. Then one may also say that this Gentile often did not care or make any effort himself. But how, you say, could he do this, since he was a simple man? Look, however, at this simple and humble man in worldly affairs. You will see that there he uses great diligence. If he had chosen to use it in spiritual matters, he would not have failed, for the truth is clearer than the sun. Wherever a man turns, he will easily attain his salvation if he wishes to be attentive and does not consider salvation a trivial matter. Such things are not confined to Palestine alone. They are not shut up in one small corner of the world. Have you not heard what the prophet says: "They shall all know Me, from the least of them to the greatest" (Jer 31:34)? Do you not see that reality has proved this true? What excuse can those have who see that the teaching of truth has spread everywhere, yet do not inquire or care to learn it? You will say, "Do you demand this from a peasant and a barbarian?" Not only from a peasant and a barbarian, but even from one who proved rougher than the present barbarians. Tell me, whom do you consider simpler and rougher: Abraham's contemporaries, or yours? Clearly, Abraham's contemporaries. When was it easier to find piety, then or now? Clearly, now. Now the name of God has already been proclaimed to all. The prophets foretold, the events have already been fulfilled, and paganism has been exposed. But then most people remained without teaching. Sin reigned, the law was not yet a tutor, and there were no prophets, miracles, teaching, multitude of those who knew God, or anything of the sort. Everything lay as though in deep darkness, on a moonless winter night. Yet that wondrous and noble man, amid so many obstacles, came to know God, practiced virtue, and stirred many to the same zeal. He had no experience at all in secular wisdom. How and where could he have learned it, when even letters had not yet been invented? But because he did everything on his part, God also did not abandon him. Nor can one say that Abraham inherited religion from his fathers, for his father was an idolater. Yet, coming from such ancestors, being a barbarian, being raised among barbarians, and having no teacher in piety, he came to know God. He so surpassed all his descendants, who had both the law and the prophets, that it cannot be expressed. Why? Because he did not care too much for worldly things, but devoted himself entirely to spiritual things. Did not Melchizedek live in the same times? Did he not shine so brightly that he was called priest of God? It is impossible, utterly impossible, for one who is watchful ever to be despised. Let this not trouble you. Knowing that everything depends on disposition, let us attend to ourselves, so that we may become better. Let us not demand an accounting from God, nor investigate why He left one and called another. Otherwise we shall resemble the rejected servant who, with excessive curiosity, intruded into his master's household arrangements. Wretched and poor man! When you ought to care how you yourself will give account and appease the Master, you demand an account about what you yourself must answer for. You neglect the very things for which you will be punished. "What, then," you ask, "shall I say to the Gentile?" Say what has been said above. And care not only about what to say to the Gentile, but also about how to correct him. When he examines your life and is offended by it, then on that basis consider what you should say. For though he is offended, you will not give account for him. But for your own life, if it causes harm, you are in extreme danger. When he sees that you philosophize about the Kingdom, yet cling to the present life, fear Gehenna, yet tremble at earthly troubles, then take care. When he sees this and reproaches you, saying, "If you desire the Kingdom, why do you not despise the present? If you expect the dread Judgment, why do you not despise earthly misfortunes? If you hope for immortality, why do you fear death?" when he puts such questions to you, consider what you will answer. When he sees that you expect heaven, yet fear the loss of money, rejoice greatly over every small coin, and give up your soul for a little silver coin, then think. This, this precisely, offends the Gentile. Therefore, if you care for your salvation, prove it not by words but by deeds. No one has ever blasphemed God because of that question. But because of an evil life, countless blasphemies are heard everywhere. Therefore strive to correct it, for the Gentile will again ask you: "How am I to know that God commanded what is possible? You, being a Christian by birth itself and raised in this excellent religion, do none of these things." What will you say to this? Without doubt you will answer, "I will show you others who do them, namely monks dwelling in the deserts." But are you not ashamed to call yourself a Christian and refer him to others, as though you cannot prove by your own works that Christians act this way? The Gentile will immediately answer you: "Why must I go to the mountains and search the deserts? If it is impossible to practice wisdom while living in cities, this may be a great accusation against the Christian life, if it requires leaving cities and fleeing to deserts. Show me a man who has a wife, children, and a house, and yet lives piously." What shall we say to this? Shall we not have to lower our eyes and be ashamed? Christ did not command that. What, then, did He command? "Let your light so shine before men" (Mt 5:16), not in the mountains, not in deserts, not in impassable wildernesses. I say this not to reproach those who live in the mountains, but out of pity for city dwellers, who have driven virtue out of the cities. Therefore I beseech you to bring the wisdom of the desert-dwellers into the cities also, so that they may become true cities. This can correct the Gentile and guard him from countless occasions of offense. Therefore, if you wish to free him from offense and acquire countless rewards for yourself, correct your life and make it radiant in all things, "that men may see your good works and glorify your Father who is in heaven" (Mt 5:16). Then we shall also enjoy the ineffable and great glory to come. May we all be counted worthy to receive it, by the grace and love for mankind of our Lord Jesus Christ. With Him, to the Father and the Holy Spirit be glory, dominion, and honor, now and ever, and unto the ages of ages. Amen.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

He says that the one who doubts and eats without being convinced is condemned. Why? Not because the food is unclean, but because he was not convinced that it was clean. He thought he was touching it as something unclean. Whoever is not convinced and does not believe that the food is clean, yet eats it with a deceitful conscience, certainly sins.

Basil the Great

4th centuryChurch Father

What belongs to faith? An undoubting assurance of the truth of the words inspired by God, shaken by no thought, whether natural necessity suggests it or it hides itself under the appearance of piety. What belongs to the faithful man? To be disposed in such assurance by the power of what has been said, and not to dare either to reject anything or to add anything. For if "whatever is not from faith is sin," as the Apostle says (Rom 14:23), and "faith comes from hearing, and hearing by the word of God" (Rom 10:17), then everything not found in divinely inspired Scripture, being not from faith, is sin.

Gregory of Nyssa

4th centuryChurch Father

Everything that does not direct its gaze toward Christ, whether word, deed, or thought, looks toward something wholly opposed to Christ. For it is impossible that what is born outside the light and outside life should not remain in complete darkness and death. One born outside Christ thinks, does, and says whatever he does in darkness and death.

Ephraem the Syrian

4th centuryChurch Father

But in order to restrain the unstable man, so that he not go far in this matter, he said: "But he who reasons," that is, who doubts, "is condemned if he eats, because he does not eat from faith." And to restrain the believers themselves he adds further (Rom 15:1).

Ambrosiaster

4th centuryChurch Father

It is true that the one who ought not to eat, yet eats, is condemned. He condemns himself by doing what ought not to be done. "For it is not from faith." The man who thinks it is not permitted and yet eats does not eat from faith. "And whatever is not from faith is sin." Paul rightly calls sin what is not done as it ought to be done. See Jn 8:9; 1 Tim 1:5; Heb 13:18; Sir 14:2.

Theodoret of Cyrus

5th centuryChurch Father

And he shows the reason for this: "Because it is not from faith; and whatever is not from faith is sin." For the believer eats without harm. But the one who eats with some doubt pronounces sentence upon himself.

Constantius

5th centuryChurch Father

If someone judges another and says, "If he ate, he is truly condemned," then he has no faith and is condemned, because it is not from faith. For it is not from faith if you condemn another because you fast while he eats.

Michail Cheraskov

19th centuryChurch Father

Fourth, in questions about eating, when the perfect adapt themselves to those weak in faith, they do not lower their own faith, but preserve the weak from sin (Rom 14:22-26). "Do you have faith," that is, faith not constrained by questions about food? "Have it to yourself before God. Blessed is he who does not condemn himself in what he approves. But he who doubts, if he eats, is condemned, because he does not eat from faith; and whatever is not from faith is sin." The Holy Apostle accompanies this instruction with a prayerful appeal to "the only wise God, through Jesus Christ," who is able to establish the Roman Christians whom he instructs. But is condescension toward the imperfect and immature notions of the weak in faith not hypocrisy? "No," Saint Chrysostom answers. "Your action is not hypocrisy. On the contrary, it will serve for the building up and preservation of the brother."

Nikanor (Kamenski)

19th centuryChurch Father

Having said that food is not an essential matter, the Apostle indicates wherein the essential matters of Christian life consist: holiness, mutual concord, and spiritual joy. All the care of Christians must be directed toward these chief matters of Christian life, since in them the Kingdom of God is found. It gradually takes up its dwelling in the hearts of Christians as they advance in attaining the blessings indicated. Therefore, if anything at all, including difference over food, becomes a cause of violating someone's holiness or peace, and instead of joy implants division, grief, and the heaviness of enmity, it must in every way be set aside. By such difference the inward establishment of the Kingdom of God within us is destroyed.

Read more (321 words)

In such a case, when others are scandalized by it, it is better for the man who eats meat or drinks wine not to do so. In himself, of course, he does not sin, since he does not regard this eating as sin. Yet he sins by scandal. But if someone is directly convinced that this or that eating is forbidden by God or by the Church, then he sins even in himself. He eats against conviction or against conscience. He also sins against others, leading them into scandal. Although this teaching of the Apostle about food referred most immediately to the first Roman Christians, who were in particular circumstances, in its essential point, that is, concerning non-condemnation, it concerns all Christians in general. We too must not be divided because of food, although the Church has now already clarified what may be eaten and what may not, when one must fast and when one may eat without prohibition. Likewise, as before, so now the man who eats and drinks contrary to the prohibition of the Church's law and conscience sins. Moreover, he sins both for himself and for others, leading them into scandal and giving occasion for condemnation. According to the word of Saint John Chrysostom, "It is not foods that make a man unclean, but the disposition with which he eats. Therefore, if you do not correct the disposition, all your labor is vain and harmful. It is one thing to consider something unclean, and another to eat what you consider unclean. In the latter case you sin doubly. By your dispute you strengthen the prejudice and compel him to eat what is unclean," that is, what is considered such against conscience. "Until you have persuaded him, do not compel him. On the contrary, abstain yourself for his sake, your brother's sake. Abstain not as from something unclean, but because he is scandalized, and he will love you more."

Theophan the Recluse

19th centuryChurch Father

You are blessed whether you eat or abstain, because you can do either with a peaceful conscience. But unhappy is the man who is not convinced that he may eat this or that, but instead thinks that perhaps he ought not do so, and nevertheless eats not from faith. He acts without the assurance of his conscience that this is permissible. His conscience is troubled, deprives him of peace, and does not allow him to taste the blessedness that belongs to those whom conscience does not condemn for their actions. Consequently, you do him evil. "Again he exhorts them to spare the weak man. What profit is there in eating with doubt and condemning oneself? I approve the man who eats, and eats without any doubt. But the man who eats while doubting is condemned.

Read more (286 words)

The reason is this: because it is not from faith. He is condemned not because the thing is unclean, but because he does not act with faith. He was not certain that it was clean, but thought he was touching what was unclean. By this the Apostle teaches how much harm is done when people compel the unpersuaded to touch what, in their opinion, is unclean. He wishes at least by this to restrain them from reproaching the weak in faith" (Saint Chrysostom). "And whatever is not from faith is sin." This is a general principle for all cases, on which all Saint Paul's instructions are based. From this it follows that everyone is obliged to have a clear conscience concerning what he undertakes and does. Everything must be done with clear awareness of the rightness of the deed. Saint Chrysostom teaches: "The present life is an arena. At every step one must have many eyes, and one must not think that ignorance is sufficient for justification. You will be punished, certainly punished, even for ignorance, if it is inexcusable. The Jews were in ignorance, yet their ignorance was not counted as an excuse for them. The Gentiles also were in ignorance, yet they have no justification. When you do not know what it is impossible to know, you will not be guilty. But when you do not know what can easily be known, you will bear the severest punishment. Moreover, if we are not exceedingly careless, but use every possible measure, God will give us His hand even in what is difficult to know. Thus Paul said to the Philippians, 'If in anything you think otherwise, God will reveal even this to you'" (Phil 3:15).

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 18 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. ὁ
    ho
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  2. δὲ
    de
    but
    G1161 · δέ
  3. διακρινόμενος
    diakrinomenos
    I distinguish
    G1252 · διακρίνω
  4. ἐὰν
    ean
    if
    G1437 · ἐάν
  5. φάγῃ
    phagē
    I eat
    G5315 · φαγεῖν
  6. κατακέκριται
    katakekritai
    I condemn
    G2632 · κατακρίνω
  7. ὅτι
    hoti
    that
    G3754 · ὅτι
  8. οὐκ
    ouk
    no
    G3756 · οὐ
  9. ἐκ
    ek
    from out
    G1537 · ἐκ
  10. πίστεως
    pisteōs
    faith
    G4102 · πίστις
  11. πᾶν
    pan
    all
    G3956 · πᾶς
  12. δὲ
    de
    but
    G1161 · δέ
  13. ὃ
    ho
    who
    G3739 · ὅς, ἥ
  14. οὐκ
    ouk
    no
    G3756 · οὐ
  15. ἐκ
    ek
    from out
    G1537 · ἐκ
  16. πίστεως
    pisteōs
    faith
    G4102 · πίστις
  17. ἁμαρτία
    hamartia
    a sin
    G266 · ἁμαρτία
  18. ἐστίν
    estin
    I am
    G1510 · εἰμί