The Church Fathers on this verse

Titus 1:15Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

All things are clean to the clean: but to them that are defiled and to unbelievers, nothing is clean: but both their mind and their conscience are defiled.

Douay-Rheims

παντα μεν καθαρα τοις καθαροις τοις δε μεμιασμενοις και απιστοις ουδεν καθαρον αλλα μεμιανται αυτων και ο νους και η συνειδησις

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

15 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

Therefore foods are not clean or unclean by their own nature, but according to the disposition of the one who receives them.

Do you see why the preceding words were spoken? “To the defiled and unbelieving,” he says, “nothing is clean.” Consequently, even the swine is a clean animal.

Why then was it forbidden to eat it as unclean (Lev 11:7)? It was not unclean by nature, because by nature all things are clean.

Otherwise nothing would be more unclean than fish, which feeds even on the human body. Yet it was permitted for food and was considered clean.

Likewise, nothing would be more unclean than the chicken, which eats worms. The same would be true of the deer, which, they say, is called elaphos because it eats snakes, opheis. Yet all these were eaten.

Read more (1172 words)

Why then were the swine and certain similar animals forbidden? Not because they were unclean, but in order to restrain gluttony more strongly.

If God had said this directly, the Jews would not have obeyed. But by the fear of uncleanness He restrained them.

Tell me, what is more unclean than wine, if one examines it? What is more unclean than water, by which they were chiefly purified? They would not touch the dead, yet they purified themselves by dead things in sacrifices.

For what has been slaughtered is dead, and by it they were purified. Truly their teaching was childish.

Look again. Does wine not receive its composition from manure? The vineyard draws moisture both from the earth and from the manure lying upon it.

In general, if we wish to examine things in detail, everything is unclean. But if we decide not to make such examinations, nothing is unclean, and everything is clean.

God created nothing unclean. There is nothing unclean except sin alone, because it touches the soul and defiles it. The rest is human prejudice.

“But to the defiled,” says the Apostle, “and unbelieving, nothing is clean; their mind and conscience are defiled.” Can there be anything unclean among the clean? But whoever has an unhealthy soul defiles everything.

If such a disposition takes possession of him, constantly examining what is clean and what is unclean, then perhaps he will touch nothing at all. According to such people’s notion, nothing will be clean, neither fish nor anything else.

“Their mind and conscience are defiled,” he says, and therefore everything is unclean. Yet the Apostle did not speak in this way. How then did he speak? He attributed everything to the people themselves.

There is nothing unclean, he says, but they themselves are unclean. Their mind and conscience are unclean, and nothing is more unclean than these.

What then is unclean? Sin, malice, covetousness, and wickedness. “Wash yourselves,” says the prophet, “make yourselves clean; remove your evil deeds from before My eyes” (Isa 1:16).

“Create in me a clean heart, O God” (Ps 50:12). “Depart, depart, go out from there; touch no unclean thing” (Isa 52:11).

Those Old Testament purifications were figures of true purification. “You shall not touch their carcasses,” says Scripture (Lev 11:8). Sin is likewise a stinking dead thing.

“The priest,” it says, “when he sees living flesh, shall pronounce him unclean; the living flesh is unclean: it is leprosy” (Lev 13:15). Sin is also something mottled and varied.

That this is what is indicated here is clear from what follows. If the leprosy remains constantly and over the whole body, the man is clean. But if it is on one part, he is not.

Do you see that what is varied and changeable becomes unclean?

Again, “one who has a discharge is unclean” in soul (Lev 15:4). By the one who emits seed is meant one who casts out seed. Likewise, the “uncircumcised” is unclean (Gen 17:14).

Do you see that these are not allegories, but figures? Here is meant one who does not cut away evil in his soul. The one who works on the Sabbath is stoned, that is, the one not constantly devoted to God perishes.

Do you see how many kinds of uncleanness there are? “If a woman gives birth,” it is said, “she is unclean” (Lev 12:2). Why, tell me? Did not God Himself create seed and birth?

Why then is such a woman unclean? Was something else not intended here? What was it? Through this God implanted chastity in the soul and drew it far away from adultery.

For if a woman who gives birth is unclean, much more is the adulteress. If to touch one’s own wife is not altogether clean, much more is it unclean to mingle with another man’s wife.

“One who takes part in a burial,” it is said, “is not clean” (Lev 21:1). Much more is one who takes part in murder and war.

One can find many kinds of uncleanness if one lists them all. But this is not what is now required from us. Everything has now been transferred to the soul.

The bodily is nearer to us. Therefore God formerly instructed people by means of it. But now it is no longer so, because one should not always remain with figures and shadows, but receive the truth and hold to it.

Sin is uncleanness. Let us avoid it and abstain from it. “If,” says the Wise Man, “you approach it, it will bite you” (Sir 21:2). There is nothing more unclean than covetousness.

How is this evident? From its very actions. What does it not defile? It defiles the hands, the soul, and the very house in which the stolen goods are kept.

Among the Jews this is counted as nothing. Yet among them Moses carried the bones of Joseph, Samson drank from the jawbone of an ass and ate honey from a lion’s jaws, and Elijah was fed by ravens and a widow.

And tell me, if one had to examine this in detail, are not the very skins of the books of Scripture more unclean than anything? For they too come from dead animals.

Thus not only the fornicator is unclean, but others are even more so. The adulterer too is unclean. Yet both are unclean not from the union itself.

Otherwise, for the same reason, one who touches his own wife would also be unclean. They are unclean because of the violation of right and because of greed, by which one has seized from his brother what is most necessary.

Do you see that vice is unclean? One who had two wives was not unclean. David, who had many wives, was not unclean. But when he took one wife unlawfully, then he became unclean.

Why? Because he committed injustice, because he seized what belonged to another.

The fornicator too is unclean, not because of the union itself, but because of the character of his act. He insults womanhood. So do those who make a woman common, insulting one another and perverting the laws of nature.

For she ought to be the wife of one man. “Male and female,” says Scripture, “He created them” (Gen 1:27), and again, “the two shall be one flesh” (Gen 2:24).

Not many, but two in one flesh. Thus injustice occurs here, and therefore this is a vicious act.

So too anger, when it exceeds measure, makes a man unclean, not because of the stirring itself, but because of its quality. Therefore it is added: “whoever is angry,” not simply, but “without cause” (Mt 5:22).

Thus the movement toward excess is everywhere unclean. Uncleanness is born from greed and insatiability.

Let us then be watchful, I exhort you. Let us be clean with true purity, that we may be found worthy to see God, in Christ Jesus our Lord, with Whom to the Father, together with the Holy Spirit, be glory, dominion, and honor, now and ever, and unto the ages of ages. Amen.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

Therefore foods are not clean or unclean by their own nature, but according to the disposition of those who eat them. If they are clean and pious, they know that all things are clean as God's creation, and that sin alone is unclean. If the Law regarded something as unclean, it did not do so without purpose. It did so to restrain lack of self-control, knowing that the Jews, being gluttonous, would not obey it without compulsion. Certainly, if those who eat are clean and pious, all things will be clean for them. How so? If one reasons otherwise, fish that devour men, and birds considered clean though they feed on worms, ought to seem unclean. Thus an unclean thought, turned toward evil, itself defiles what is not such by nature.

Read more (61 words)

In the same way, one with a sick stomach thinks foods unpleasant, though they may be pleasant. To one afflicted with dizziness, the firmly standing earth seems to move. Such suspicion depends on his sickness. This applies to the Manichaeans, the Marcionites, and the newly arisen heretics from them, called Galatians by most. According to another reading, they are called Gavatians.

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

Therefore, if an evil man offers sacrifice to God and a good man receives it from him, it will be for each according to what he himself is. For Scripture also says concerning this: "To the clean all things are clean."

No one is compelled to endure hardships he cannot bear. Nothing is laid upon anyone that he rejects. Nor do the rest condemn him because he acknowledges himself unable to imitate them. They remember how highly love is praised throughout Scripture. They remember that "to the clean all things are clean," and that "what enters your mouth does not defile you, but what comes out" (Mt 15:11). Therefore each man applies his effort, not to refusing food as though it were unclean, but to restraining desire and preserving brotherly love.

Read more (232 words)

The Jews learned that some animals may be eaten, while from others one must abstain (cf. Lev 20:25; Acts 10:14). The Apostle Paul clearly shows that they received the Law as a symbol of a future state of things (cf. Rom 14:13-26).

When you abstain from some kind of food, even lawful and permitted food, for the purification of the body, remember that "to the clean all things are clean." Count nothing unclean except what is defiled by unbelief. "But to the defiled and unbelieving," says the Apostle, "nothing is clean" (cf. Mt 15:11; Rom 14:14). Truly, when the faithful bring their bodies into subjection (cf. 1 Cor 9:27), everything taken away from bodily pleasure benefits spiritual salvation.

One must also abhor those who deny that our Lord Jesus Christ had Mary as His Mother on earth. This divine economy honored both sexes, male and female. It showed that God's care extends not only to Him Whom He assumed, but also to her through whom He assumed, since a woman carries and gives birth to a man. [...] Let no such reflection on the womb of a woman weaken our faith, so that this origin of our Lord seems to be rejected because the base consider it base. For "the foolishness of God is wiser than men" (1 Cor 1:25). Truly, "to the clean all things are clean," as the Apostle says.

Gregory the Theologian

4th centuryChurch Father

As in the Old Testament there was concern for outward matters, so in the New Testament speech is not so much about the outward. Rather, they think upon the inward and watch with intense attention that punishment may follow according to a just judgment.

Athanasius the Great

4th centuryChurch Father

All God's creatures are good and clean, because the Word of God created nothing useless or unclean. Yet the devil's arrows are various and manifold. He throws simple people into confusion and hinders the brethren from remaining in their customary exercises. He sows in them unclean and foul thoughts. Therefore, by the grace of our Savior, let us in a few words repel the deceit of the evil one. Tell me, beloved and most reverent one, what sin or uncleanness is there in any natural emission? Would anyone blame the mucus that comes from the nostrils, or the saliva from the mouth? You may also point to something still more important, the evacuations of the belly, which are necessary for a living creature's preservation.

Read more (56 words)

Moreover, if we believe, according to the divine Scriptures, that man is the work of God's hands, could any defiled work have come from a pure power? [...] When some natural emission takes place apart from our will, then, as we have already said, we endure this also by natural necessity, together with our other necessities.

Ephraem the Syrian

4th centuryChurch Father

“All things are pure,” that is, all foods are pure for the pure. But for the Jews, whose intentions are impure and who do not believe the word of our Lord, who said, “Not what enters into a man defiles him” (Mt 15:11; Mk 7:15), nothing is pure except what is written in their Law. They are defiled both in mind and in conscience: in conscience with respect to marriage, and in mind with respect to foods.

Jerome of Stridon

4th centuryChurch Father

Here the Apostle is not intending to argue about what is sacrificed to demons. Rather, he speaks against the Jews, who follow the prohibition of the abolished Law and consider some things clean and others unclean.

Ambrosiaster

4th centuryChurch Father

Since everything God created is good, there should be no doubt that it is also pure. Those who do not understand are themselves unclean.

Theodoret of Cyrus

5th centuryChurch Father

The patriarch Abraham and the beacons of piety who lived before him received no law about foods. God gave the Jews a law about this while preparing something else through it. This is not the time to speak of that, because at present we have undertaken the labor of interpretation, not of accusing the Jews. The divinely wise Paul also said of them, “They profess to know God, but by their works they deny Him, being abominable and disobedient and unfit for every good work.”

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryChurch Father

"All things are clean to the clean." Everything is clean that people may touch. Everything is God's creation, for nothing created by God is unclean by its own nature. Scripture says, "And God saw everything that He had made, and behold, it was very good" (Gen 1:31). There is only one uncleanness in the world, namely sin, which the devil planted among men so that it might fasten upon their souls. But why, then, did God of old give the Jews a law by which some animals were counted clean and others unclean? God established this for various reasons, and among them to restrain their love of the flesh. The Jews, having learned from the Egyptians, were gluttonous and insatiable.

Read more (247 words)

Thus all things are clean for the clean, just as all things are pleasant to those who are strong in body and sound in thought. Everything is reckoned clean or unclean according to the soul's disposition and its choice. Therefore every food is unclean or clean, not in itself, but according to human prejudice. "But to the defiled and unbelieving nothing is clean." So also to the sick and to those with a corrupted taste nothing is pleasant, because their health is gravely disordered. "But both their mind and their conscience are defiled." The mind is defiled by sin, and the conscience likewise is defiled through participation and communion with it. The Apostle did not say directly that no food is clean for them. He said that no part of their being is clean. He spoke thus because they themselves serve as the source of uncleanness. Among the other parts of their being, he says, their mind and conscience are chiefly defiled. For one inwardly assured that there is no immoderation in his enjoyment boldly touches food. He knows only that every creation of God is clean by nature, as was said above. But one who senses this immoderation in himself becomes exceedingly fastidious and capricious, for sin is possessed by fear. One whose mouth is infected with decay thinks the food he receives is spoiled. So it is with those defiled by sin. Their prejudice has arisen from sinful passion, not from a difference in foods.

Severian of Gabala

5th centuryChurch Father

God created everything pure. If anything is unclean, then an accusation is raised against the Creator.

Patericon of the Monks of the Skete

6th centuryChurch Father

Abba Poemen said, “If a man reaches the state of which the Apostle spoke, ‘To the pure all things are pure’ (Tit 1:15), he will see that he himself is worse than every creature.” A brother asked the elder. “How can I think of myself as worse than a murderer?” The elder answered, “If a man reaches the state indicated by the Apostle and sees someone who has committed murder, he will say, ‘He committed this sin once, but I kill every day.’”

Ignatij (Briantchaninow)

19th centuryChurch Father

If a man reaches that state of which the Apostle said, "All things are clean to the clean" (Tit 1:15), said Poemen the Great, he will see that he is worse than every creature. A brother asked the elder, "How can I think of myself as worse than a murderer?" Poemen answered, "If a man reaches the state indicated by the Apostle and sees a man who has committed murder, he will say, 'He committed this sin once, but I kill myself daily.'" The brother repeated Poemen's words to another elder. The elder answered, "If a man reaches such purity and sees his brother's sins, his righteousness will swallow up that sin." The brother asked, "What is his righteousness?" The elder answered, "Constant self-accusation."

Behold the true hearers and doers of the evangelical Law. Having driven judgment and scandal from their hearts, they were filled with holy love for their neighbor. They poured mercy upon all and healed sinners by mercy.

Ivanov A.V.

19th centuryChurch Father

“To the pure all things are pure.” Jewish traditions chiefly concerned the distinction between clean and unclean animals, and the keeping and defilement of Sabbaths and feast days. The Savior had already uttered the profound and deeply significant truth that not what enters the mouth defiles a man, but what comes out of the mouth; Mt 15:11. Defilement proceeds from the heart; Mt 15:18. Now the Apostle repeats and proves the same thing.

Theophan the Recluse

19th centuryChurch Father

Verses 15 and 16 indicate, as if by example, certain points or sides of the false teaching that circulated among the Cretans. They may be connected with what precedes in this way: how absurd this teaching is need not even be said.

Take what it says about the distinction of foods, as though there were some food which by its nature could make the one who eats it unclean. Simple sense is enough to know that food cannot make one either clean or unclean.

Purity or impurity depends on the heart. Whoever is pure in heart remains pure, whatever food he uses, even if it appears unclean. Everything is pure for him, and food does not make him unclean.

Read more (688 words)

By contrast, whoever is unclean in heart is not made clean by any food considered clean. He remains wholly unclean. No nourishment makes the first unclean, and no nourishment makes the second clean. Or, the nourishment of the first is always clean, and the nourishment of the second is always unclean.

Here the Apostle teaches the same thing the Savior taught: it is not what enters the mouth that defiles a man, but what comes out of the heart (see Mt 15:11-19).

To understand these statements fully, one must have in mind not kinds of food, but nourishment itself or eating. For one man, nourishment is clean because it is received with a pure heart. For another, it is unclean because it is received with an unclean heart.

A pure heart is one that, having detached itself from every form of self-pleasing, directs everything to the glory of God, even if it eats and drinks. Therefore everything is pure for it.

But a heart filled with self-pleasing is unclean. By this self-pleasing it makes every action and movement of its own unclean, because everything in it is done according to self-pleasing. This is so even when something appears outwardly self-denying and directed toward God.

Of such people the Apostle says: “Their mind and conscience are defiled.” The mind is defiled by false notions, which it accepts without discernment through the mere attraction of the heart, by being carried away by customs, or through vainglory and vain wisdom.

The conscience is defiled when a man acts according to those false notions against conscience. It is also defiled when he acts without attending to conscience, or with a doubtful conscience.

Such a state is inevitable in those whose heart is filled with self-pleasing and entirely possessed by certain objects that feed and satisfy it. Here they not only do not listen to the mind and conscience, but even force them to judge and determine things for their own pleasure, either indulgently or crookedly.

In every way they strongly arouse within themselves the thought that they act rightly, or at least tolerably, although inwardly they hear a certain reminder that does not approve them.

Chrysostom says that in the Old Testament certain foods were forbidden, “not because they were unclean, but in order better to curb indulgence of the flesh.

“God created nothing unclean. There is nothing unclean except sin, because it touches the soul and defiles it. Everything else is considered unclean because of human prejudice.

“Therefore the Apostle attributed everything to the people themselves. There is nothing unclean, he says, but they themselves are unclean, their mind and conscience. Nothing is more unclean than these. This is what impurity consists in: they themselves are not clean.

“One must be discerning about what defiles the soul. This is truly impurity, this is defilement, and all the rest is not. Those whose taste is corrupted think that what they receive is unclean, but this comes from their disease.

“Therefore one must know firmly what is pure by nature and what is unclean. What is unclean? Sin, malice, deceit, greed, and wickedness. ‘Wash yourselves,’ says the Prophet, ‘and be clean. Remove wickedness from your souls’ (cf. Is 1:16).

“Those Old Testament purifications were images of true purification. Now this external thing is not required of us, but everything is referred to the soul. The bodily is nearer to us, and therefore God first turned us away from it. But now it is not so.

“One ought not always to remain with images and cling to shadows, but to receive the truth and hold to it. Impurity is sin. Let us flee from it and restrain ourselves from it. ‘If you approach it,’ says the Wise One, ‘it will bite you’ (cf. Sir 21:2).”

The Apostle mentioned this side of the teaching because it stood out especially, and its absurdity was so obvious that it did not require lengthy refutation. He says to them, as it were: see what this point of theirs is like. But as this one is, so are all the others. Now look at what their teachers are like.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 20 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. Πάντα
    panta
    all
    G3956 · πᾶς
  2. καθαρὰ
    kathara
    clean
    G2513 · καθαρός
  3. τοῖς
    tois
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  4. καθαροῖς
    katharois
    clean
    G2513 · καθαρός
  5. τοῖς
    tois
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  6. δὲ
    de
    but
    G1161 · δέ
  7. μεμιαμμένοις
    memiammenois
    I stain
    G3392 · μιαίνω
  8. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  9. ἀπίστοις
    apistois
    unbelieving
    G571 · ἄπιστος
  10. οὐδὲν
    ouden
    no one
    G3762 · οὐδείς
  11. καθαρόν
    katharon
    clean
    G2513 · καθαρός
  12. ἀλλὰ
    alla
    but
    G235 · ἀλλά
  13. μεμίανται
    memiantai
    I stain
    G3392 · μιαίνω
  14. αὐτῶν
    autōn
    he
    G846 · αὐτός
  15. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  16. ὁ
    ho
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  17. νοῦς
    nous
    the mind
    G3563 · νοῦς
  18. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  19. ἡ
    hē
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  20. συνείδησις
    syneidēsis
    the conscience
    G4893 · συνείδησις