The Church Fathers on this verse

Romans 9:19Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

Thou wilt say therefore to me: Why doth he then find fault? For who resisteth his will?

Douay-Rheims

ερεις ουν μοι τι ετι μεμφεται τω γαρ βουληματι αυτου τις ανθεστηκεν

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

8 Church Fathers comment on this verse

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

The Apostle, as I have often said, strives in every way to prove that God’s dispositions and judgments are known to God alone.

Therefore everywhere he gathers many difficulties and does not offer solutions. By placing the hearer in difficulty, he persuades him that God’s dispositions and judgments are incomprehensible to man and surpass his reason.

The meaning of the present passage is as follows. The Apostle presents an objection and a perplexity. If God hardens whom He wills, why does He still accuse the sinner?

For who can withstand His will? He willed and hardened, and the hardened one sinned by necessity. How, then, can He accuse and punish him?

This is precisely the objection the Apostle presented, in order to show that God alone can resolve the perplexity about it.

For this reason he does not resolve it himself, but stops the mouth of the one who is perplexed, saying: “But who are you, O man, to answer back to God?”

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

Having drawn the conclusion in the previous verse, Paul sets forth an objection as a question: “You will say to me, ‘Why does He still find fault? For who has resisted His will?’”

He answers this question with emotion, so that we may understand that the first merits of faith and unbelief are revealed only to spiritual people.

They are not revealed to those who live according to the earthly man. The same is true of how God, in His foreknowledge, chooses those who will believe and condemns unbelievers.

God neither chooses on account of works nor condemns on account of them. Rather, He makes the faith of some capable of doing good, while He hardens the impiety of others, and they do evil.

Read more (59 words)

As I have said, such understanding is accessible only to spiritual people. It is far removed from the wisdom of the flesh.

Thus the Apostle answers the questioner so that he may understand that, first of all, he must lay aside the man of clay. Then he may deserve to examine all this with the help of the Spirit.

Ephraem the Syrian

4th centuryChurch Father

But before they could say to him, the Apostle Paul, "You are placing the blame for this on God," the Apostle himself hastened to say to them: "But perhaps you will say, 'Why then does He lay blame on another, when His will is being accomplished?'"

Ambrosiaster

4th centuryChurch Father

First Paul teaches that God cannot be resisted, because He is more powerful than all that exists. This is also because God is the Father of all, and therefore wishes evil to no one. God wills that what He has created remain unharmed.

Theodoret of Cyrus

5th centuryChurch Father

For if "He has mercy on whom He wills, and whom He wills He hardens," then the human disposition depends on His will. If this is truly so, He does not rightly impose punishments on those who sin, because it is impossible to resist what is pleasing to Him. Thus the Apostle, having increased the difficulty by many questions and set forth all the objections beforehand, added...

Michail Cheraskov

19th centuryChurch Father

In the third point the Apostle introduces a new objection in the following form: “You will say to me, ‘Why does He still find fault?’”

That is, why does God accuse and appoint to punishment those whom He rejects, such as Esau, Pharaoh, and the mass of the Hebrews, if everything in the world is ordered according to His will?

“Who has resisted His will?”; Rom 9:19-29.

First the Apostle suggests that, strictly speaking, man has no right to raise such questions because of his insignificance before God.

“But who are you, O man, that you dare to dispute with God? Will the thing formed say to Him who formed it, ‘Why have You made me thus?’

Does not the potter have authority over the clay, from the same lump to make one vessel for honorable use and another for low use?” Rom 9:20-21.

Read more (81 words)

Likewise, can one complain when the all-knowing and just God manifests some people as “vessels of wrath prepared for destruction,” for example, the rejected Jews?

And when He manifests over others the riches of His glory, as “over vessels of mercy, which He prepared beforehand for glory”; Rom 9:22-23?

That is, over us, the chosen, the Apostle adds, “whom He called, not only from the Jews, but also from the Gentiles,” according to the prophecies of Hosea and Isaiah; Rom 9:24-29.

Nikanor (Kamenski)

19th centuryChurch Father

Although the whole course of the Apostle’s thought clearly shows God’s justice in His predestination, some still could not grasp this distinctly.

Therefore he offers further striking examples of the all-good and all-wise will of God. This will appoints some to salvation and others to perdition.

He points to anyone who builds something according to a plan he has conceived, and especially to a potter. The potter makes vessels from the same clay for uses that differ completely in dignity.

In these examples, at first sight, only the authority of the one who appoints comes to the fore: the builder and the potter, that is, the Creator.

Yet at the same time the dignity of the one appointed is also indicated: the clay, that is, man.

Read more (452 words)

The Apostle later expresses this directly, saying in verse 22 that the Hebrews, by their quality, deserved only to be utterly destroyed, like defiled vessels.

Yet God spared them according to His mercy and in view of the higher purposes of the divine economy. In that economy the Gentiles were to receive a joyful share.

They proved to be vessels just as fit for the higher purpose as those Jews who were directly prepared for the great honor of being chosen believers in Christ.

The Apostle’s basic thought here is the same as in the earlier examples, especially in the last one. Everything is under the authority of God.

No one can resist this authority, nor even object to it. The creature must submit in silence and reverence to its Creator and Provider.

According to Chrysostom, the Apostle seeks here no other goal than to persuade the hearer to submit to God in all things, and to demand no account from Him in anything.

“As the potter makes what he wishes from the same lump, and no one contradicts him, so do not question or inquire of God why He punishes some and rewards others.

This is true even though they are people of one and the same nation. Instead, reverence Him and imitate the clay.

As it is submissive to the potter’s hands, so you should submit to the decree of the Ruler of the universe. He does not act without purpose, nor at random, though you do not comprehend the mysteries of wisdom.

Yet it does not depend on the potter alone that from the same lump one thing comes out for honorable use and another for low use. Rather, it depends on the use made by those who use the object.

So here also the matter depends on free choice. As Pharaoh became a vessel of wrath by his own lawlessness, so those who were saved became vessels of mercy by their piety.

If the greater part belongs to God, we nevertheless contribute something small from ourselves. Although one must both will and struggle, one must not rely on one’s own struggles.

Rather, one must rely on God’s love for mankind. As the Apostle also said about himself elsewhere: ‘not I, but the grace which was with me’; 1 Cor 15:10.

Why, then, do some become vessels of wrath and others vessels of mercy? By their own free choice.

Yet God, according to His immeasurable goodness, shows mercy to both. He had mercy not only on those being saved, but also on Pharaoh, as much as possible.

Both those being saved and Pharaoh enjoyed the same longsuffering. If Pharaoh was not saved, this was entirely by his own will.”

Theophan the Recluse

19th centuryChurch Father

Explaining that the promise has not failed, despite the alienation of many Jews from the promised blessings of the Savior, the Apostle set forth a firm proof. It is this: “not all who are from Israel are Israel.”

By this he showed that two agents are involved in deciding the fate of persons and nations: the will of God and human free choice.

When the latter agrees with the former, God’s decree is fulfilled in the people who manifest this agreement. When it does not agree, the decree is not fulfilled.

In other words, the promise is fulfilled in the worthy and is not fulfilled in the unworthy.

Yet in the last two examples concerning the decision of human destiny, the Apostle, according to his purposes, fixed attention chiefly on the first agent, that is, God’s will.

Read more (288 words)

He did this in such a way that he did not conceal the second agent, human free choice. This choice is worthy, according to its disposition, of mercy or wrath. On the contrary, he let it be clearly understood.

Nevertheless, the proposed question arose by itself, especially after the concluding statement: “He has mercy on whom He wills, and whom He wills He hardens.”

If everything is from God, even dispositions of will that do not please Him, then why does He still reproach? For who can resist His will?

It follows that the one disapproved is not guilty when God makes him such, for he is not such by himself.

“If He has mercy on whom He wills and hardens whom He wills, then the human disposition depends on His will.

If this is truly so, then He does not justly impose punishment on those who sin. For it is impossible to resist what is pleasing to Him”; blessed Theodoret.

“He willed and hardened, and the hardened one sinned by necessity. How, then, can He accuse and punish him?”; blessed Theophylact.

This objection follows from the Apostle’s preceding words only in appearance. As has been noted, in the last verses he chiefly referred everything to God’s will.

Yet he did this while allowing the participation of human free choice, or the worthiness and unworthiness of men, to be understood.

Therefore he could have said: you have misunderstood my speech. But he grants something to the objectors. Let everything depend on the will of God, which no one can resist.

From this very fact it follows that you do not dare object. For the creature must submit to God in silence. How, then, do you dare to object?

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 13 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. Ἐρεῖς
    ereis
    to say
    G2036 · ἔπω, ἐρῶ, εἶπον
  2. μοι
    moi
    I
    G1473 · ἐγώ
  3. οὖν
    oun
    therefore
    G3767 · οὖν
  4. Τί
    ti
    who
    G5101 · τίς
  5. οὖν
    oun
    therefore
    G3767 · οὖν
  6. ἔτι
    eti
    still
    G2089 · ἔτι
  7. μέμφεται
    memphetai
    I blame
    G3201 · μέμφομαι
  8. τῷ
    tō
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  9. γὰρ
    gar
    for
    G1063 · γάρ
  10. βουλήματι
    boulēmati
    will
    G1013 · βούλημα
  11. αὐτοῦ
    autou
    he
    G846 · αὐτός
  12. τίς
    tis
    who
    G5101 · τίς
  13. ἀνθέστηκεν
    anthestēken
    I take a stand against
    G436 · ἀνθίστημι