John Chrysostom
Do you see how he places virtue alongside the rewards? This too is the work of grace: to turn us away from earthly cares and raise us to heaven. Here he indicates two manifestations of Christ. Indeed there are two: the first is gracious, and the second is for recompense and judgment.
“Having renounced,” he says, “ungodliness and worldly desires.” Behold the foundation of every virtue. He did not say that we should avoid them, but that we should renounce them. Renunciation means greater withdrawal, greater hatred, greater aversion. With the same disposition and zeal with which we renounced idols, he says, let us also renounce ungodliness and worldly desires.
Read more (714 words)
For these too are idols, namely worldly desire and covetousness. He calls this also idolatry. Worldly desires are everything that benefits us only for the present life. Everything that disappears together with the present life is a worldly desire. Therefore we must have no part in it.
Christ came so that we might renounce “ungodliness.” By ungodliness he means impious teaching, and by worldly desires he means a vicious life.
“That we should live soberly, righteously, and piously in the present age.” Do you see that sobriety, as I always say, consists not only in abstaining from adultery, but also in being free from the other passions?
Consequently the covetous man is not sober. As the adulterer is attached to bodily pleasure, so the covetous man is attached to wealth. Indeed the latter is more incontinent than the former, insofar as the impulse governing him is weaker.
A rider is not considered especially weak because he cannot restrain a swift and untamed horse. Rather, he is weak if he cannot master a gentle and obedient horse. Is it really so? Is the passion for wealth weaker than the passion for bodily pleasure?
This is known to all and is evident from many things. First, the passion for bodily pleasure arises in us by necessity. Since it arises by necessity, it is restrained only with great labor, because it is implanted in us by nature.
Second, the ancients said little about the passion for wealth, but much about the passion for women, for the preservation of chastity. No one condemns a man who lives lawfully with his wife even into old age. But everyone condemns the greedy man. Even among the philosophers outside the Church, many despised wealth, but never women.
Thus this passion is stronger than that one. Yet because our word is addressed to the Church, let us bring proofs not from outside, but from the Scriptures.
Concerning covetousness, the blessed Paul speaks almost in the form of a commandment: “Having food and clothing, let us be content with these,” 1 Tim 6:8. Concerning wives he says: “Do not deprive one another, except by agreement for a time, that you may devote yourselves to fasting and prayer, and then come together again,” 1 Cor 7:5.
He often gives rules concerning lawful cohabitation. He permits this desire to be satisfied and allows a second marriage. He speaks of this matter with great care and nowhere imposes punishment for it. But everywhere he condemns those devoted to greed.
Likewise Christ often commanded concerning wealth that we flee the harm arising from it. He did not speak in the same way about abstaining from one’s wife. Hear what He says about wealth: “Whoever does not renounce all that he has,” Lk 14:33. But nowhere did He say: whoever does not renounce his wife. He knew what violence He would thereby impose.
The blessed Paul also says: “Let marriage be held in honor among all, and let the bed be undefiled,” Heb 13:4. But he nowhere calls concern for wealth honorable. Rather, he says the opposite.
He writes to Timothy: “Those who desire to be rich fall into temptation and a snare, and into many foolish and harmful desires, which plunge men into distress and destruction,” 1 Tim 6:9. He did not say, those who wish to acquire, but “those who desire to be rich.”
So that you may be convinced of this also from common judgments, we must offer such proofs as well. A man who has once lost wealth will not be troubled by passion for it, because nothing so arouses passion for wealth as possessing it.
The passion for bodily pleasure is not like this. Many, even after making themselves eunuchs, did not extinguish the inner fire that tormented them. This passion remains in the other members because it is implanted in us by nature.
Why have we said all this? To show that the covetous are more incontinent than adulterers, insofar as the passion troubling them is weaker. Most likely, in their case it does not come from passion, but from negligence toward spiritual goods.
There the desire is so natural that, even if a man does not approach a woman, nature acts and produces its own effect. Here it is not so.