The Church Fathers on this verse

1 Corinthians 3:2Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

I gave you milk to drink, not meat: for you were not able as yet. But neither indeed are you now able: for you are yet carnal.

Douay-Rheims

γαλα υμας εποτισα και ου βρωμα ουπω γαρ εδυνασθε αλλ ουτε ετι νυν δυνασθε

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

13 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

After exposing external, pagan wisdom and casting down all the pride that comes from it, the Apostle passes to another subject.

The Corinthians might have said: if we were preaching the teaching of Plato, Pythagoras, or some other philosopher, you would rightly say so much against us.

But if we preach about spiritual things, why do you refute external wisdom? Listen to how he answers this: "And I, brethren, could not speak to you as to spiritual men."

Even if you were perfect in spiritual matters, he says, you still ought not to be exalted. For you preach not what is your own, nor what you yourselves have attained.

But now you do not even know this as it should be known. You are still only disciples, and indeed the last of all.

Read more (798 words)

Therefore, if you boast in external wisdom, it not only means nothing, as has already been proved, but also hinders us in the knowledge of spiritual things.

If you boast in spiritual knowledge, you are still very imperfect even in this and stand among the last. Therefore he says, "And I, brethren, could not speak to you as to spiritual men."

He did not say, "I did not speak," lest they think this came from envy. Instead, he casts down their arrogance in two ways.

First, they do not know spiritual things perfectly. Second, they themselves are the cause of this ignorance. To these he adds, third, that even now they still cannot know them.

If they could not at the beginning, perhaps this depended on the nature of the matters themselves. Yet even this excuse, as he has shown, they cannot offer.

They did not fail to receive lofty truths because they could not receive them, he says, but because they were fleshly.

At the beginning, however, this was not yet so blameworthy. But not to have attained knowledge of perfect things over such a long time is a sign of extreme negligence.

The Apostle reproves the Hebrews for the same thing, but not with the same force. They, he says, were such because of sorrowful circumstances, but these because of their corrupt inclinations.

The two cases are not the same. To the former he speaks the same truths for edification. To the latter he speaks them to awaken them.

To these he says, "Even now you are not able." To the former he says, "Therefore, leaving the elementary doctrine of Christ, let us press on to perfection."

And again, "We are confident of better things concerning you, things that accompany salvation, though we speak in this way" (Heb 6:1, 9).

But how does he call fleshly those who received so many gifts of the Spirit and whom he praised so highly at the beginning of the epistle?

In the same way those were fleshly to whom the Lord said, "Depart from Me; I do not know you, you workers of lawlessness" (Mt 7:23), although they cast out demons, raised the dead, and uttered prophecies.

Consequently, even one who performs signs can be fleshly. Thus God also acted through Balaam and revealed the future to Pharaoh and Nebuchadnezzar.

Caiaphas prophesied, not knowing what he said. Others cast out demons in His name, although they themselves were not with Him.

All this happens not for those who perform it, but for others. Often it was accomplished even through the unworthy.

And why is it surprising that this happens through unworthy men for others, if God also acts through saints for others?

Thus Paul says, "Whether Paul, or Apollos, or Cephas, or life, or death, all are yours" (1 Cor 3:22). And again: "He gave some as Apostles, some as prophets, and some as pastors and teachers, for the perfecting of the saints, for the work of ministry" (Eph 4:11-12).

If this were not so, all would fall into perdition unhindered. It happens that rulers are evil and incontinent, while those under them are good and continent.

Laymen live piously, while priests live wickedly. If grace always sought the worthy, there would be neither baptism, nor the celebration of the Body of Christ, nor offerings.

But now God acts even through the unworthy, and the grace of baptism suffers no harm from the life of the priest. Otherwise the one receiving it would also suffer harm.

Although this happens rarely, nevertheless it happens. I say this so that no one among those present, observing the life of the priest, may be scandalized concerning the mysteries performed by him.

Man contributes nothing in them from himself. Everything is the work of the power of God. God acts upon you in the mysteries.

"And I, brethren, could not speak to you as to spiritual men, but as to fleshly men. I fed you with milk and not with solid food, for you were not yet able."

He had said above, "the spiritual man judges all things," and again, "he himself is judged by no one," and again, "we have the mind of Christ."

So that they might not think he said these things from vainglory, and so that he might cast down their pride, see what Paul says.

I kept silence, he says, not because I was unable to tell you anything more, but because you are fleshly.

"Nor are you able even now." Why did the Apostle not say, "You do not wish," but, "You are not able"?

He set the latter in place of the former, since they were unable because they did not wish. This serves as an accusation against them and as a defense for the teacher.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

In the mysteries of Christ, he says, you are still infants. Therefore I gave you milk to drink, that is, the simplest teaching, and did not set before you solid food, that is, more perfect teaching. Why? Because you were not yet able to receive it. And to cast down their pride, he adds: and even now you are still not able, for you still think of fleshly things. Do you see? They cannot receive such teaching because they do not want to be spiritual, but remain fleshly.

Ambrose of Milan

4th centuryChurch Father

In the beginning, those who are still weak, nourished by the milk of the law and led by the path of the law toward grace, hear what is in the law, so that by following the law they may pass beyond the law. Afterward the Church, already established, is not fed with milk, but nourished with solid food (cf. Heb 5:12), because the strengthening food is love. Of these three chief things, faith, hope, and love, love is the greatest (1 Cor 13:13).

Ambrosiaster

4th centuryChurch Father

"For you were not yet able, and even now you are not able." Although you had been born anew in Christ, you were not ready to receive spiritual things.

You had received faith already as a seed, but not yet as fruit. Therefore you were not worthy of the perfect word, nor able to make it your own.

Like little children, you stretched toward the reception of imperfect spiritual food.

The Apostle Paul, a man of God, is also a spiritual physician. He handed things on to each according to his strength.

He did this so that no one, through imperfection or inexperience, would suffer scandal concerning heavenly things.

He clearly shows that they should not have heard what is spoken to the strong. "And even now you are not able," that is, even now you are carnal.

Read more (117 words)

Thus he also answers those who impatiently asserted that they had long heard nothing spiritual.

His meaning is that even now they are not yet worthy to hear spiritual things.

The false apostles, because of their hypocrisy, handed on their teaching indiscriminately to all, without distinguishing among persons and without caring whether what was said could be received.

Yet it is known that our Lord and Creator, Christ, spoke differently to all and differently to His disciples.

Even among the apostles He used differing measures of intimacy. To three of His disciples He revealed His glory on the mountain, commanding them to be silent about it until the day of His resurrection from the dead (Mt 17:9).

Theodoret of Cyrus

5th centuryChurch Father

"I fed you with milk, and not with solid food, for you were not able." I measured the teaching, he says, according to the weakness of your hearing. I imitated a father who offers newborn infants food suited to their age. "And even now you are still not able."

Irenaeus of Lyon

2nd centuryChurch Father

If someone says, "Could God not have presented man as perfect from the beginning?" let him know that God is always one and the same, without beginning.

With respect to Himself, all things are possible to Him. But created beings, since they received their beginning later, must be less than Him Who created them.

For what only recently came into being could not be uncreated. Since they are not uncreated, they do not possess perfection.

Since they are recent beings, they are therefore in an infant state. They are untaught and still untrained in relation to the perfect way of life.

A mother can provide perfect food for an infant, but he cannot yet receive the food of an older age.

Read more (379 words)

So God could have granted man perfection in the beginning, but man could not receive it, for he was still an infant.

Therefore our Lord also, in the last times, recapitulating all things in Himself, came to us not as He was able, but as we were able to see Him.

He could have come to us in His ineffable glory, but we could not have endured the greatness of His glory.

Therefore He, the perfect bread of the Father, presented Himself to us infants as milk. Such was His human coming.

This was so that, as though nourished from the breasts of His flesh, and through such milk-giving accustomed to eat and drink the Word of God, we might contain within ourselves the bread of immortality, which is the Spirit of the Father.

For this reason Paul says to the Corinthians: "I fed you with milk, not solid food, for you were not yet able to receive such food."

That is, you have known the coming of the Lord as man, but the Spirit of the Father does not yet rest upon you because of your weakness.

For he says, "If there is envy, strife, and divisions among you, are you not carnal? Are you not walking according to human custom?" (1 Cor 3:2-3).

This means that the Spirit of the Father was not yet with them because of their imperfection and their weakness in life.

The Apostle could give food, for those on whom the apostles laid their hands received the Holy Spirit, Who is the food of life.

Yet they were unable to receive Him, because their psychic senses were still weak and unaccustomed to converse with God.

So too God could have given perfection to man in the beginning. But man, having only just received being, could not receive Him.

Or, having received Him, he could not contain Him. Or, having contained Him, he could not hold Him.

Therefore the perfect Son of God became a fellow infant with man. He did this not for His own sake, but because of man's infancy.

He became accessible in the measure in which man could receive Him. Thus incapacity and poverty are not in God, but in newly created man, because he was not an uncreated being.

Isidore of Pelusium

5th centuryChurch Father

You ask: if the law, as given to infants, is something infantile, why is the initial teaching about Christ again infancy?

This is according to the Apostle's word: "I fed you with milk, and not with solid food, for you were not able." Therefore listen.

The gospel word, having received infants from the law, could not impart to them pure and all-perfect knowledge.

Nor could it show in fullness the truth revealed in it, the truth of mysteries that surpass the mind.

For example, how could it show those who considered both hypostasis and essence in God to be one that the divine Essence abides in Unity but is revealed in Trinity?

Therefore the Gospel again uses the law for the confirmation and persuasion of those whom it teaches.

From the law it presents testimonies concerning perfect dogmas.

Thus the Apostle Paul feeds the newborn people of the Lord with milk, wisely teaching them perfection through the infancy of the law.

Severian of Gabala

5th centuryChurch Father

"I fed you with milk, and not with solid food." The Apostle also figuratively calls milk the instruction of the Gentiles and belief through signs, while solid food is the proclamation of divine teachings.

Caesarius of Arles

6th centuryChurch Father

"I fed you with milk, and not with solid food." Not by chance, beloved brethren, did our elders resort to the analogy of cows. Just as the udder of a cow has two parts by which she feeds her calf, so our fathers must nourish the Christian people from two sources, the Old Testament and the New.

Ivanov A.V.

19th centuryChurch Father

By milk the Apostle means the initial teaching, usually set forth in the catechism, or still more briefly in the Symbol of Faith (Heb 5:12; Heb 6:1ff.).

Michail Cheraskov

19th centuryChurch Father

After reasoning about the spiritual and psychic man, the holy Apostle Paul directly calls the Corinthians not spiritual, but carnal and foolish babes.

He does this because they are agitated and divided over teachers, who are merely God's fellow-workers in God's field (1 Cor 3:1-9).

"And I, brethren, could not speak to you as to spiritual men, but as to carnal, as to babes in Christ.

For when one says, 'I am of Paul,' and another, 'I am of Apollos,' are you not carnal? Who is Paul? Who is Apollos?

They are only ministers through whom you believed. I planted, Apollos watered, but God gave the increase.

He who plants and he who waters are one. For we are God's fellow-workers. You are God's field, God's building."

Nikanor (Kamenski)

19th centuryChurch Father

Besides their incorrect view of the power of Christian preaching, the Corinthians also had an incorrect view of the dignity of preachers.

Having distinguished spirit and soul in man in chapter 1, verses 14-15, the Apostle here speaks of the action in people of the third part of their complete composition, namely the flesh.

The flesh very often leads man into sin. The Apostle finds that the Corinthians are not only psychic, but also carnal, and therefore still very unspiritual.

Apparently some of the Corinthians, guided by their usual views, did not value apostolic preaching highly when it was delivered simply, without rhetorical and philosophical adornments.

Read more (316 words)

On the contrary, they valued more highly the preaching distinguished by eloquence (Acts 14:18). Perhaps the Apostle partly had this in mind when he called the Corinthians carnal.

In general, however, the Corinthians were carnal because of their sinfulness.

They were also carnal because not all of them at once received Christianity in the full breadth of its teaching and holiness of life.

But so that this might not seem a humiliation to the newly converted, the Apostle calls them babes in Christ.

He says that, in keeping with their new beginning in the Christian faith, he offered them teaching proportionate to their weak capacity.

In this he acted like a tenderly loving mother, or like a very experienced tutor.

The Corinthians' shortcomings were envy, disputes, and divisions. For their sake the Apostle called them carnal.

This is clear from the following reference to disputes about the superiority of teachers of the faith. These disputes arose from the Greeks' customary attitude toward teachers.

St. John Chrysostom here resolves the question: "How does the Apostle call the Corinthians carnal, when they had so many spiritual gifts and he himself praised them so much at the beginning?"

He answered: "In exactly the same way as those were carnal of whom the Lord said, 'Depart from Me, I do not know you, you workers of iniquity' (Mt 7:23).

Therefore even one who performed signs could be carnal. If grace always sought the worthy, there would be neither Baptism, nor the consecration of the Body of Christ, nor offerings.

God acts even through the unworthy, and the grace of Baptism suffers no harm from the life of the priest.

Man contributes nothing of himself in them, that is, in the mysteries. All this is the work of God's power. He acts upon us in the mysteries."

The Apostle unfolds further this view of Christ's ministers as instruments of divine providence.

Theophan the Recluse

19th centuryChurch Father

By milk the Apostle means the beginnings of Christian teaching. By solid food he means the full imparting of the wisdom of God, hidden in mystery.

The first is fitting for babes in Christ, and the second for perfect men.

Since you are still babes, I gave you only the beginnings of teaching. I fed you with it as children are fed with milk.

"I measured the teaching," he says, "according to the weakness of the hearing, and imitated a father who offers newborn infants food proportionate to their age" (Theodoret).

What are milk and solid food in Christian teaching? One interpreter answers that milk is the factual side of the ordering of salvation.

Read more (503 words)

Solid food is the ascent to the foundations, explaining why it is so, and the tracing of consequences, showing what follows from it. This can be accepted.

For the believer who approaches the Lord must believe that God, worshiped in the Trinity, created the world and providentially cares for it.

He must believe that God created man according to His image and likeness, and placed him in paradise for a blessed life.

He must believe that man fell, and that from his fall he is raised up only by the incarnate Son of God.

He must believe that the Son of God, having become incarnate, died on the Cross and thereby saved fallen man.

He must believe that the one who believes and is baptized enters into communion with this death and receives new life.

In this life, with the help of grace, amid sorrows and deprivations, he struggles against passions and lusts.

By remaining faithful to the Lord through fulfilling His commandments, he becomes worthy of being glorified by the Lord with Himself in the Kingdom of Heaven after the Second Coming.

St. Paul often gives such outlines of the whole divine economy of salvation in his epistles.

One may suppose that this served him as a symbol, which he imparted to all when he first instructed them in the call to faith and salvation.

This, of course, he also imparted to the Corinthians, and he now calls it milk.

Here all the facts are truly contained, both those already accomplished and those yet to be accomplished.

When Christian contemplation deepens into them, reaches their foundation, and passes through to their consequences, then solid food of spiritual wisdom is obtained.

From imparting this the Apostle refrained in Corinth. "You were not able." That they were not able then is not surprising, for they had only just approached the Lord.

But that even now, when the epistle was written, they were not able, makes one suppose great obstacles to spiritual progress in the patterns of ordinary Corinthian life.

Perhaps they were the same as in every capital and, in general, every large city: an excessive development of carnal, self-pleasing life.

They advanced in external wisdom but lagged behind in spiritual wisdom. Was this not because the one does not dwell together with the other?

They had been Christians for five years, and were still children.

Since the Apostle says this, we must suppose that it was so. The Corinthians both could not and still could not, at the time of writing, receive the lessons of God's spiritual wisdom.

St. Chrysostom says: "If they were unable at the beginning, perhaps this depended on the nature of the subjects themselves.

Yet, as he proved, they cannot offer even this excuse. For he says that the subjects were incomprehensible to them because they themselves were carnal.

At the beginning, however, this was not yet so blameworthy. But not to attain knowledge of perfect subjects over so long a time is already a sign of extreme carelessness."

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 13 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. γάλα
    gala
    milk
    G1051 · γάλα
  2. ὑμᾶς
    hymas
    you
    G4771 · σύ
  3. ἐπότισα
    epotisa
    I cause to drink
    G4222 · ποτίζω
  4. οὐ
    ou
    no
    G3756 · οὐ
  5. βρῶμα
    brōma
    food of any kind
    G1033 · βρῶμα
  6. οὔπω
    oupō
    not yet
    G3768 · οὔπω
  7. γὰρ
    gar
    for
    G1063 · γάρ
  8. ἐδύνασθε
    edynasthe
    I am powerful
    G1410 · δύναμαι
  9. Ἀλλ᾽
    all
    but
    G235 · ἀλλά
  10. οὐδὲ
    oude
    neither
    G3761 · οὐδέ
  11. ἔτι
    eti
    still
    G2089 · ἔτι
  12. νῦν
    nyn
    now
    G3568 · νῦν
  13. δύνασθε
    dynasthe
    I am powerful
    G1410 · δύναμαι