The Church Fathers on this verse

1 Corinthians 9:10Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

Or doth he say this indeed for our sakes? For these things are written for our sakes: that he that plougheth, should plough in hope and he that thrasheth, in hope to receive fruit.

Douay-Rheims

η δι ημας παντως λεγει δι ημας γαρ εγραφη οτι επ ελπιδι οφειλει ο αροτριων αροτριαν και ο αλοων της ελπιδος αυτου μετεχειν επ ελπιδι

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

11 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

After saying, “Is it for oxen that God cares?” he continues: “Or is it certainly for our sake that He says it?” (1 Cor 9:10). He did not place the word “certainly” without purpose, but so as not to give the hearer occasion to object.

Meanwhile he continues the metaphor and says: “Yes, for our sake it was written. For he who plows ought to plow in hope.” That is, the teacher must receive recompense for his labors.

“And he who threshes ought to thresh in hope of receiving what is expected.” See his wisdom. From sowing he passes to threshing, and by this again indicates how great are the labors of teachers, who themselves both plow and thresh.

Read more (83 words)

Since the one who plows cannot yet gather anything, but must only labor, he grants him hope. But to the one who threshes he already grants the use of the fruits.

“He who threshes,” he says, “receives what is expected in hope.” Then, lest someone say, “Is this the recompense for such labors?” he adds, “in hope,” that is, of the future.

Thus the law about not muzzling the mouth of the ox means nothing other than this: laboring teachers must receive recompense.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

Or, certainly, is it said for our sake? Yes, it was written for our sake. He used the word “certainly,” πάντως, as concerning an acknowledged matter, so as to give the hearer no occasion to object.

For he who plows ought to plow in hope. That is, the teacher must cultivate the field of hearts and labor in hope of recompense and reward.

And he who threshes ought to thresh in hope of receiving what is expected. He passed from sowing to threshing, in order by this also to express how many labors the Apostles have. For they both plow and thresh.

Since the one who plows only hopes, while the one who threshes already partly enjoys, he said that the one who threshes receives what he expects.

Read more (52 words)

But lest someone say, “What then? For such great labors of the Apostles, do you assign them only the reward of receiving sustenance?” he added, “in hope,” that is, of future blessings.

Thus one must hope for those blessings also, and in addition eat and drink at the expense of the disciples.

Basilios Michailowski

19th centuryChurch Father

Of course, the commandment of the Mosaic Law also speaks in relation to us, to men. More than this, the Law of Moses sets forth in detail the means of support for the Old Testament Jewish clergy. There God's commands concerning this are shown.

Such was the income of the Jewish priesthood before the Nativity of Christ. The first source of income was the tithe from every fruit of the earth (Deut 14; Num 18). The second was the tithe from every kind of livestock (ibid.). The third came from various dues (Lev 7; Num 15; 2 Esdr 9; 2 Chr 33). The fourth came from various offerings from the vegetable kingdom, according to zeal and vow (Lev 22; Num 15; Deut 12).

Read more (323 words)

The fifth was income received three times a year from those who dwelt in the house of God (Deut 16; Lev 23; Ex 30; 4 Kings 12; 2 Chr 24). This income remained even to the days of Christ.

The sixth was monetary income, in coin. The seventh was that every firstborn animal was given to the priests (Ex 13), while the firstborn of men was redeemed and paid for with money (Num 18). The eighth concerned Levites whom some laymen kept in their own houses. The Lord commanded that they be maintained in full sufficiency, and for this He promised blessing to the houses of those laymen (Deut 14:27, 29).

The ninth came from every animal offered in sacrifice, even for a whole burnt offering. For if an animal was appointed even for a whole burnt offering, its flesh was burned, but the skin remained for the priests' benefit (Lev 7). From other sacrificial animals, one part was offered in sacrifice, while another part remained by law for the priests (Lev 2, 6, 5). The tenth came from the Nazarenes (Num 6). The eleventh came from the forty-eight cities appointed by God for the Old Testament clergy (Josh 21). The twelfth came from houses and lands given to the Jewish clergy by testament (Lev 27; Num 18).

See then, Christians, how securely the clergy was provided for by God's command in the Old Testament. On the basis of these statutes, did not the holy Apostle have the right to require support from the laity, the shepherd from those shepherded? Certainly he had the full right, although he asked nothing for himself.

Yes, says the Apostle, these statutes were written also for us. For he who plows should certainly plow in hope, and he who threshes threshes in hope of receiving the expected fruit. So also the Lord commanded that those who preach the Gospel should live from the Gospel (1 Cor 9:14).

Ephraem the Syrian

4th centuryChurch Father

But clearly, through the oxen He made a symbolic foretelling concerning us, when He first showed care for the oxen.

Ambrosiaster

4th centuryChurch Father

Through the image, by analogy, everything said is related to us.

Theodoret of Cyrus

5th centuryChurch Father

The Apostle does not mean that God has no care for oxen. For God cares for them also, but He cares for them for our sake, since He created them for our sake. Therefore blessed David also said: "He makes grass grow on the mountains, and green plants for the service of men" (Ps 146:8).

Nicephoros (Theotokis)

18th centuryChurch Father

The plowman prepares the earth with the plow for receiving seeds. The Apostle, by preaching, disposes the soul to receive the dogmas of the faith.

The thresher, by rubbing the ears of grain, prepares grain for himself. The Apostle, by continual teaching given to the faithful, produces the fruits of good works.

The plowman plows in hope of gathering ears of grain. The thresher “partakes of his hope,” seeing in his hands the grain he expected.

The Apostle imparts teaching, hoping to receive fruit from it. When those being instructed, moved by his continual exhortations, bear fruits, then he already enjoys his hope, seeing the fruits of faith.

Thus the plowmen and threshers here are called the Apostles and teachers of the faith, according to the likeness of their duties.

Read more (144 words)

These apostolic words serve as an interpretation of the word said above: “You shall not muzzle an ox while it treads out the grain” (1 Cor 9:9).

Without doubt, he says, this word is not for our sake in vain, since justice requires that the one who teaches the faith should hope to receive a reward for it. He receives it when he sees the fruit of his teaching.

Here one must also note the Apostle’s wisdom. Since he said, “to partake of his hope,” lest anyone think that he has only the hope of bodily enjoyment, he added, “in hope.”

By this he shows that, while having the right to receive an earthly reward, he also has the hope of receiving a heavenly recompense.

After this proof founded on the law, he offers another, taken from the comparison of spiritual and bodily things.

Kochomski S.W.

19th centuryChurch Father

Deut 25:4. Why was it forbidden to muzzle the ox that treads out the grain? So that the ox would not be deprived of the opportunity to eat the ears of grain it was threshing. "Is it for oxen that God cares? Or is it certainly said for our sake?" In giving the above prohibition, the Lord wished to cultivate compassion and sympathy in the Israelites toward everyone who works. Thus they would not deprive such laborers, above all apostles and presbyters who labor in word and teaching, of what they need (1 Tim 5:17).

Michail Cheraskov

19th centuryChurch Father

Third, according to the typological meaning of the Mosaic law’s ordinance not to muzzle the ox that treads out the grain. That is, the ox walking over the sheaves and trampling out the grain with its feet (1 Cor 9:8-10). "Is it for oxen that God cares? Or is it certainly said for our sake? It was written for our sake," for us laborers in the word concerning Christ.

Nikanor (Kamenski)

19th centuryChurch Father

While proving in detail his right to receive support from the disciples, the Apostle refers to the customs of life and uses various comparisons. Some of these are taken from the Sacred Scripture of the Old Testament.

Yet all these arguments are brought only to show that he has the right to use this support, and nevertheless did not use it. Such use could have harmed the work of many people’s salvation.

It could also have deprived him of the dignity of the ascetic feat of abstinence, for which he expects a crown.

The Apostle’s examples and comparisons are very diverse. He compares the Apostles with soldiers, shepherds, and gardeners, all of whom receive possible maintenance for their labor: pay, milk, and fruits.

Read more (134 words)

Preachers of the truths of the faith must likewise have their recompense. This natural right is proved by the law, according to which oxen had to be fed as they walked over a threshing floor spread with sheaves of wheat.

By doing this, they threshed it (Deut 25:4), and at the same time they could eat.

According to Saint John Chrysostom, “The Apostles were soldiers, husbandmen, and shepherds. They dealt not with earth, not with irrational animals, not with sensible enemies, but with rational souls and demonic armies.”

“From sowing the Apostle passes to threshing. By this he indicates how great are the labors of teachers, who both plow and thresh.”

The law about not muzzling an ox while it treads out the grain means nothing other than this: laboring teachers must receive recompense.

Theophan the Recluse

19th centuryChurch Father

Or, he says, does the law speak about us under the image of oxen? Or certainly about us? “Certainly” is inserted so that the question itself may already point to the answer, decisively affirmative and allowing no objection (Chrysostom).

Then he nevertheless adds: yes, this was written about us. There is no doubt that it is about us. What, then, was written?

Not what follows, “for he who plows ought to plow,” and so on, but what was said earlier: “You shall not muzzle an ox while it treads out the grain.”

Here, after “it is written,” there is given the typological interpretation of that law, again not in simple speech, but by metaphor (Chrysostom).

Read more (358 words)

Instead of saying, “Yes, this was written about us, with the thought that we should cultivate your souls, sow in them the seeds of truth, and then direct you in every way to bear fruit, without being anxious about our own support,” he speaks more briefly.

He could have said, “Just as the one who cultivates the earth cultivates it in hope that it will give him fruit, and the one who threshes threshes in full assurance that he will taste bread.”

Instead of describing his thought so fully, the Apostle takes one final comparison and sets it forth. He lets the readers themselves understand that by these images he means the preachers of the word.

“By the words, ‘He who plows ought to plow in hope,’ the Apostle said the same thing as this: the teacher must receive recompense for his labors” (Chrysostom).

By including both plowing, the beginning of the work, and threshing, almost its end, he showed the continuity of the Apostles’ labor over the faithful.

They do not act in such a way that they sow the word and have done everything by that alone. No, they continue to watch over them and labor, so as to draw out from them all that is good and winnow away all that is not good.

“From sowing he passes to threshing, and by this he indicates how great are the labors of teachers, who both plow and thresh” (Chrysostom).

The last words, “and he who threshes,” and so on, may be read thus: “and he who threshes threshes in hope of partaking of his hope.”

That is, he hopes to partake of what he had expected from the time he began to plow and sow. The matter is nearing its end, and the time is near when he will taste the fruit of his labors.

“Thus the law about not muzzling an ox while it treads out the grain means nothing other than this: laboring teachers must receive recompense” (Chrysostom).

“Here is the fourth proof that sustenance must be supplied to teachers” (Chrysostom). The argument is taken from the very nature of the work of preaching.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 23 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. ἢ
    ē
    or
    G2228 · ἤ
  2. δι᾽
    di
    through
    G1223 · διά
  3. ἡμᾶς
    hēmas
    I
    G1473 · ἐγώ
  4. πάντως
    pantōs
    entirely
    G3843 · πάντως
  5. λέγει
    legei
    I say
    G3004 · λέγω
  6. δι᾽
    di
    through
    G1223 · διά
  7. ἡμᾶς
    hēmas
    I
    G1473 · ἐγώ
  8. γὰρ
    gar
    for
    G1063 · γάρ
  9. ἐγράφη
    egraphē
    I write
    G1125 · γράφω
  10. ὅτι
    hoti
    that
    G3754 · ὅτι
  11. ὀφείλει
    opheilei
    I owe
    G3784 · ὀφείλω
  12. ἐπ᾽
    ep
    on
    G1909 · ἐπί
  13. ἐλπίδι
    elpidi
    hope
    G1680 · ἐλπίς
  14. ὁ
    ho
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  15. ἀροτριῶν
    arotriōn
    I plow
    G722 · ἀροτριάω
  16. ἀροτριᾶν
    arotrian
    I plow
    G722 · ἀροτριάω
  17. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  18. ὁ
    ho
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  19. ἀλοῶν
    aloōn
    I thresh
    G248 · ἀλοάω
  20. ἐπ᾽
    ep
    on
    G1909 · ἐπί
  21. ἐλπίδι
    elpidi
    hope
    G1680 · ἐλπίς
  22. τοῦ
    tou
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  23. μετέχειν
    metechein
    I participate in
    G3348 · μετέχω