John Chrysostom
Tell me, what are you saying? If you preach the Gospel, there is no boast for you, but if you teach the Gospel without payment, then there is? Does this mean the latter is greater than the former? By no means. But in another respect the latter has an advantage, namely that the first is a commandment, while the latter is a work of my own choice.
What is done beyond the commandment deserves a great reward. What is done according to the commandment is not like this. In this respect the latter is greater than the former, not in the very essence of the deed.
For what, indeed, can compare with preaching? It makes them like Angels. Yet since preaching is for them an obligation and duty, while unpaid preaching is a work of voluntary zeal, in this respect the latter is greater than the former.
Read more (339 words)
Explaining exactly what I have now said, he says: "For if I do this willingly, I have a reward; but if unwillingly, I have only been entrusted with a stewardship." He uses the words "willingly" and "unwillingly" in the sense of commanded and not commanded.
Likewise, the words "for necessity is laid upon me" must not be understood as though he did this against his will. May it not be so. Rather, it means that an obligation lies upon him, in contrast to the freedom either to receive or not to receive.
Therefore Christ also said to the disciples: "When you have done all that was commanded you, say, We are unprofitable servants, because we have done what we were obliged to do" (Lk 17:10).
"What then is my reward? That, in preaching the Gospel, I may proclaim Christ without charge." Tell me, does Peter then have no reward? Who could receive such a reward as he? And the other Apostles likewise?
Why then did he say, "If I do this willingly, I have a reward; but if unwillingly, I have only been entrusted with a stewardship"? Note his wisdom here also. He did not say, "If unwillingly, I have no reward," but, "I have only been entrusted with a stewardship."
He thereby shows that in this case also there is a reward, but such as one receives who has fulfilled a command. It is not such as one receives who has shown his own zeal and done more than was commanded.
For what then is such a reward? "That, in preaching the Gospel," he says, "I may proclaim Christ without charge, not using my authority in the Gospel." Do you see how everywhere he uses the word "authority," to show, as I have often repeated, that those who receive are not deserving of blame?
He adds the phrase "in the Gospel" both to designate the Gospel itself and to prevent use of this right in everything. For one who teaches may receive, but not one who is idle.