John Chrysostom
Among us the wife is justly subject to the husband, because equality of honor could produce enmity, and also because in the beginning deception came from the wife.
She was not subjected immediately after creation. When God brought her to the man, she heard nothing of this from God, and the man expressed nothing of the sort to her.
Rather, he said that she was bone of his bones and flesh of his flesh (Gen 2:23). He said nothing to her about authority and submission.
But when she abused her authority, became a deceiver instead of a helper, and ruined everything, then she justly heard the words: “Your desire shall be for your husband” (Gen 3:16).
Read more (442 words)
What, however, does this have to do with women today? Very much, he says. The male sex has been endowed with a greater advantage: it was created first.
And in another place he sets it still higher when he says: “Nor was man created for woman, but woman for man” (1 Cor 11:9).
Why does he say this? In order to grant primacy to the man on many grounds. The man, he says, must have primacy, first because he was created first, and second because of what happened afterward in time.
Once a woman taught her husband, and she overturned everything and made him guilty of disobedience. For this God subjected her, because she used authority, or rather equality of honor, for evil.
“And to your husband,” it is said, “shall be your desire” (Gen 3:16). Before this event, these words had not been spoken.
How, then, was Adam not deceived? Does it follow that he did not transgress the commandment, if he was not deceived? Listen carefully.
The woman says, “The serpent deceived me” (Gen 3:13). Adam, however, does not say, “The woman deceived me,” but, “She gave me of the tree, and I ate” (Gen 3:12).
It is not the same thing to be deceived by one of the same race and kin as by a beast, a slave, and a subordinate. Therefore the latter is properly deception.
Thus only in comparison with the woman does the Apostle say of him that he was not deceived, because she was deceived by a slave and subordinate, while he was persuaded by a free person.
Again, it is not said of Adam, “And she saw that the tree was good for food” (Gen 3:6), but of the woman, and that she ate and gave to her husband.
Thus he transgressed the commandment not because he was carried away by passion, but only by obeying his wife.
A woman taught once, and overturned everything. Therefore the Apostle says: let her not teach.
But how does this apply to other women, if one woman did this? It applies very much, because this sex is weak and light-minded.
On the other hand, here he is speaking generally about the whole female sex. He did not say that Eve was deceived, but “the woman,” and this name refers rather to the whole sex than to her alone.
Did the whole female sex become guilty because of her? Just as the Apostle said of Adam, “according to the transgression of Adam, who is a type of the One to come” (Rom 5:14), so here he says that the female sex transgressed the commandment, and not the male.