John Chrysostom
Do you see his prudence? At first he says not what he wants, but something else, so that they would not think he began speaking about this deliberately.
Rather, beginning from another matter, he naturally comes to the needed subject. "In a great trial of affliction." He said the same in the epistle to the Macedonians.
"You became imitators of us and of the Lord, having received the word in much affliction, with joy of the Holy Spirit." And further: "So that you became an example to all the believers in Macedonia and Achaia.
For from you the word of the Lord sounded forth, not only in Macedonia and Achaia, but in every place your faith toward God has gone forth" (1 Thess 1:6, 8).
Read more (325 words)
What do the words mean: "in a great trial of affliction they abound in joy"? They mean that both things were abundant among them: affliction and joy.
And what is very strange, such abundant delight sprang up for them from such affliction. Affliction, and the heaviest affliction, not only did not produce sorrow in them, but became for them a cause of gladness.
In saying this, the Apostle intended to teach the Corinthians to be courageous and unshaken in afflictions. For the Macedonians did not merely suffer affliction.
In affliction they became more proven through patience. Yet he does not say "through patience," but what is far higher than patience: joy.
And not simply joy, but an abundance of joy. For their joy was truly great and ineffable.
"Their deep poverty abounded in the riches of their liberality." Again, both things are in abundance.
As great affliction produced great joy and an abundance of joy, so great poverty gave birth to a great wealth of almsgiving. This very thing the Apostle expressed by saying, "abounded in the riches of their liberality."
For generosity is valued not by the measure of the gift, but by the disposition of those who give. Therefore he nowhere says, "the riches of what was given," but "the riches of their liberality."
The meaning of his words is this. Poverty not only did not prevent them from being generous, but even became the cause of abundance, just as affliction became the cause of joy.
The poorer they were, the more generous they became, and the more zealously they gave. Therefore he greatly marvels at them, because in such poverty they showed such generosity.
"Their deep poverty," that is, great and unspeakable poverty, revealed their simplicity. Yet he did not say "revealed," but "abounded."
Likewise, he did not say "simplicity," but "the riches of simplicity," that is, simplicity equal to their destitution. Or rather, they showed a far greater preponderance of generosity.