Theophylact of Bulgaria
Wishing to restrain them from such audacity, he says: whereas even angels, who surpass them in strength and power, do not bring against them a reviling judgment before the Lord.
The apostle, as we have noted, says the same thing as the Apostle Jude. For he also restrains those who are bold with the tongue and persuades them by this same example.
Yet Jude speaks more fully: “Michael the Archangel did not dare to pronounce a reviling judgment” (Jude 1:9). Peter now wishes to say something similar.
These wicked men have no restraint at all in blaspheming glories. Yet angels, who surpass these filthy men in strength and power, do not bring a reviling judgment against them, that is, against authorities, before the Lord.
Read more (94 words)
And since the devil participates in a certain glory, because he is the beginning of the Lord’s creation (Job 40:14), the Archangel did not pronounce a reviling word against him.
If one more worthy of blasphemy, that is, the devil, did not receive blasphemy from Michael before the Lord, because he participated in glory, then those who hastily blaspheme authorities are very unreasonable. They themselves are far below the dignity of angels.
By authorities he means the divine powers, or also the church authorities against whom they rise up and whom they continually revile.