The Church Fathers on this verse

Jude 1:9Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

When Michael the archangel, disputing with the devil, contended about the body of Moses, he durst not bring against him the judgment of railing speech, but said: The Lord command thee.

Douay-Rheims

ο δε μιχαηλ ο αρχαγγελος οτε τω διαβολω διακρινομενος διελεγετο περι του μωυσεως μωσεως σωματος ουκ ετολμησεν κρισιν επενεγκειν βλασφημιας αλλ ειπεν επιτιμησαι σοι κυριος

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

11 Church Fathers comment on this verse

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

Since the Apostle mentioned slander, he not only brings the blasphemers to chastity of mind, but persuades all people not to defile their tongues with such evil. He teaches them not to use it even against those who deserve it.

He says: “Michael the Archangel,” and so forth. It is as if he said: they hastily and uncontrollably slander everyone. But this must not be.

For it is unjust to slander even those who deserve slander, as is evident from the deed of Archangel Michael.

When he disputed with the devil concerning the body of Moses, he could have reproached the devil for shamelessness. Yet he did not do this, but only said to him: “May God rebuke you, devil!”

Read more (212 words)

Another explanation. If the Archangel acted in this way, then we too, in a dispute with a man, our brother and one of our own race, must not use slander.

The dispute about the body of Moses was this. It is said in the apocrypha that Archangel Michael ministered at the burial of Moses’ body.

The devil did not allow this, but accused Moses of the murder of the Egyptian. On account of such guilt, he declared Moses unworthy of burial.

The Apostle Jude recalls this in order not only to teach us not to be quick to slander. He also wishes to show us that, after departing from the body, all people must give account for everything.

He shows that the God of the Old and New Testaments is one and the same.

He also shows that, after our passage from this world, the devil with his evil demons rises against our souls, wishing to cut off their blessed journey.

The devil opposes them, and the good angels fight for them, as Saint Anthony saw. This could have happened then also.

Only Michael then repelled the devil by rebuking him, not by his own authority, but by leaving judgment to the Lord of all. He said: “May God rebuke you, devil!”

Clement of Alexandria

2nd centuryChurch Father

Here the Apostle affirms the assumption of Moses. Michael is named here because he disputed with the devil as an angel close to us.

Peter Chrysologus

5th centuryChurch Father

Angels assist Moses after his death. God Himself cares for the departed.

Andrew the Monk

6th centuryChurch Father

The Apostle shows that the Old Testament also agrees with the New, and that both were given by the one God.

For the devil objected, attempting to deceive, saying, as it were, “This body is mine,” as though he ruled over matter.

Michael, not having authority of his own, did not impose on him the punishment he deserved for blasphemy, but left him to the will of his Master.

For when the Archangel led Moses up to the mountain where the Lord was transfigured, the devil then said to Michael: God lied by bringing Moses where He had sworn that he would not enter.

It is said that Michael ministered at the burial of Moses’ body, and the devil hindered him.

Read more (83 words)

God permitted this because He wished, through the visible, to show the invisible to those who see only a little and are disposed toward material things.

After our departure from this world, when our souls go to the world above, the devil and the evil powers stand before them, wishing to bar our way.

They conquer those who have done vile deeds, but they are defeated by the righteous, to whom the Angels give aid. Blessed Anthony also beheld this in a vision.

Beda Venerabilis

7th centuryChurch Father

It is not easy to understand from what part of Scripture Jude took this testimony. Yet we may find something similar in the prophet Zechariah.

“And he showed me Joshua the great priest standing before the Angel of the Lord, and Satan standing at his right hand to oppose him.

And the Lord said to Satan: The Lord rebuke you, Satan. The Lord, Who has chosen Jerusalem, rebuke you” (Zech 3:1-2).

From this passage it is not hard to understand that Joshua the priest wished to lead the people of Israel out of captivity in Babylon and return them to their native land.

Satan opposed this, not wishing the liberation of the people of Israel and seeking to enslave them still more to enemies and Gentiles.

The guardian Angel of Israel rebuked Satan and strove to free the people even by force.

Read more (126 words)

But it is unclear when Michael’s dispute with the devil about the body of Moses took place.

Some people think that by the body of Moses the whole people of God is meant, since Moses was part of that people. Accordingly, they say that when Jude speaks of the body of Moses, he speaks of the people.

Yet whatever the case may be, and whenever the dispute of the Angel with the devil occurred, this is what we must understand.

If Archangel Michael himself, even in a dispute with the devil, did not curse him, but addressed him with gentle admonition, how much more must men beware of words of cursing.

They must fear lest by a foolish word they insult the majesty of the Creator.

Ivanov A.V.

19th centuryChurch Father

The Apostle Jude tells of Archangel Michael’s dispute with the devil over the burial of the body of Moses. The sacred books of the Old Testament say nothing about this dispute.

Deuteronomy says briefly: “Moses went up to Mount Nebo, and Moses, the servant of the Lord, died there in the land of Moab by the word of the Lord.

And they buried him in the land of Moab, near the house of Peor. But no one has known his burial place to this day” (Deut 34:1, 5-6).

But the Jewish rabbis exhausted their conjectures and filled their interpretations with various traditions and inventions concerning the death and burial of Moses.

Read more (369 words)

His death “by the word of the Lord,” in Hebrew “by the mouth of Jehovah,” is called the kiss of the Lord. The burial is attributed not to men, but to the Lord Himself, or, by His command, to Angels.

At the same time, according to the opinion that after the death of a sinner the devil receives power over his body, a dispute arose between the Angels burying Moses’ body and the devil.

The devil tried to prove his power over the body of Moses because Moses had killed the Egyptian.

Similar accounts were sometimes inserted into written interpretations, or targums, of the Old Testament. Sometimes they formed the contents of separate books.

Clement of Alexandria, Adumbrat. in ep. Jud., Origen, De princ. 3:2.1, Didymus of Alexandria, Enarr. in ep. Jud., Athanasius, in Synopsi, and others knew an apocryphal book called Άνάβασις or ἀνάληψις Μωισέως.

In it the burial of Moses and the dispute of Archangel Michael with the devil were narrated.

A fragment of this book in a medieval Latin translation was discovered in the Milan Library in 1861. But it does not contain the passage cited in the Epistle of Jude.

According to scholarly investigations, see Langen, Das Judenthum in Palaestina zur Zeit Christi, p. 102, the origin of the book Άνάβασις must be dated after the destruction of Jerusalem.

Therefore it is difficult to suppose that the Apostle Jude could have drawn any account from it. It is more natural to suppose that the Apostle Jude borrowed the passage he cites from oral tradition.

Some read “Joshua” instead of “Moses,” understanding Joshua the high priest, son of Jehozadak.

Indeed, in the vision of the prophet Zechariah (Zech 3:1-4), this high priest was shown in filthy garments, standing before the Angel of the Lord.

“And the devil stood at his right hand to oppose him. And the Lord said to the devil: May the Lord rebuke you, devil.”

But in order to accept this reading, one must understand the filthy garments as the body. One must see Archangel Michael in the Angel of the Lord, and must refer the rebuke not to the Lord but to Michael, as in Jude.

No manuscript has such a reading.

Michail (Lusin)

19th centuryChurch Father

“Michael the Archangel,” and so forth. What the Apostle Peter says about Angels in general, that they do not dare before the Lord to pronounce a reviling judgment against higher powers and dominions, the Apostle Jude says only about Archangel Michael.

He points to one definite case in which the thought is clearly expressed. The Angels, even the higher ones, such as Archangel Michael, do not pronounce a reviling judgment before the Lord even against a fallen angel.

Meanwhile, the false teachers fearlessly slander the highest powers or glories.

In the sacred books of the Old Testament nothing is said about what the Apostle Jude says here concerning Archangel Michael’s dispute with the devil over the body of Moses after his burial.

Read more (246 words)

Most likely the Apostle Jude speaks not of a written tradition, but of an oral tradition preserved among the Jews. It was undoubtedly true, for an Apostle of Christ could not cite an untrue or corrupted tradition as proof of his lofty thought or teaching.

An echo of this tradition, apparently already somewhat altered and not entirely pure, is seen in one apocryphal book later in origin than Jude’s epistle. Clement of Alexandria, Origen, and Athanasius the Great mention it in their writings.

A similar passage in thought is found in the prophet Zechariah (Zech 3:1-4). It says that the prophet saw in a vision Joshua, the son of Jehozadak, the high priest, standing with the Angel, and with them the devil, the accuser.

The Lord said to him: “The Lord rebuke you, Satan. The Lord rebuke you.” In this case also the Angel of the Lord did not pronounce a reviling judgment upon the devil.

He said only what Archangel Michael said to the devil in the dispute over the body of Moses, according to the account of the Apostle Jude: “May the Lord rebuke you, Satan.”

But the false teachers fearlessly slander the higher dominions and powers. Thus they slander what they do not understand, what is unknown to them, and what is hidden from their intellectual and moral sight.

It is hidden in the ways of the Lord and in the higher order and plan of God’s governance of the world (cf. Theophylact).

Michail Cheraskov

19th centuryChurch Father

Second, the Apostle then foretells for the corrupters of Christians contemporary with him the same bitter fate as in the examples given above. He compares them in tendency and way of life with the Sodomites, with Cain, Balaam, and Korah (Jude 8-11).

“Just so it will be with these dreamers,” who invent from their fantasy various shameful false teachings.

They “defile the flesh,” by corruption like the Sodomites and Gomorrahites; cf. 1 Cor 1:9, 18; Rom 1:27. They “reject dominions and revile exalted powers,” especially rejecting the authority of spiritual powers and the hierarchy; Jude 8; cf. 2 Pet 2:10.

When and in what respect did the body of Moses become the occasion for a dispute between Archangel Michael and the devil?

Read more (402 words)

When and in what respect did the body of Moses become the occasion for a dispute between Archangel Michael and the devil?

The Old Testament Scripture, and especially Deuteronomy, narrates the death of Moses on Mount Nebo. It makes a deliberate note that the place where Moses’ body was buried was unknown (Deut 34:1, 5, 6).

Yet it is completely silent about what the Apostle Jude says in his epistle.

Meanwhile, according to the testimony of the earliest Fathers and writers of the Church, in Apostolic times there was an apocryphal book, The Burial or Assumption of Moses. A fragment of it has come down to our time.

In it there is, among other things, an account of how the devil, at the place of Moses’ death, claimed rights over his body because Moses had once allegedly killed an Egyptian.

It also tells how the devil intended to arrange for Moses to be splendidly buried before everyone in a known place. Later he wished to make him an object of worship among the Jews, who were inclined to idolatry.

Archangel Michael, the protector of the Jewish people, did not permit the devil to do any of this.

Supposing that Jude’s epistle borrowed from this apocryphal book the account of Archangel Michael’s dispute with the devil, some even rejected the authenticity of the epistle itself.

They said that a divinely inspired Apostle could not have borrowed from an apocryphal book.

Meanwhile, according to scholarly investigation, the above-mentioned apocryphon about Moses appeared as a separate book only after the destruction of Jerusalem. Consequently, it appeared after Jude wrote his epistle.

Therefore the Apostle could not have borrowed anything from the apocryphon about Moses.

How then should we explain the origin of his account of Archangel Michael’s dispute with the devil?

If we take into account that some biblical events and persons did not enter the sacred Hebrew books, but were preserved by tradition in the mouth of the Jewish people, then this becomes clear.

There is evidence for this even in the sacred books themselves. For example, the names of the Egyptian magicians who disputed with Moses are not recorded in Exodus, but they appear in the Epistle of the Apostle Paul, 2 Tim 3:8.

Therefore the Holy Apostle Jude could of course have borrowed his account of Archangel Michael from popular tradition, being assured by divine inspiration of the truth of this tradition.

Nikanor (Kamenski)

19th centuryChurch Father

Archangel Michael, called the great commander in the Book of Daniel (see Dan 12:1, 10, 13), is given as an example of how even the higher persons do not slander other great powers.

They do not do so even if those powers are not good and are unjust, as the evil spirits were unjust when they demanded for their own portion the body of Moses, subject to corruption.

The fate of Moses, who died on Mount Nebo (see Deut 34:3-7), was generally the subject of many discussions among the Jews, since the place of his burial remained unknown.

They asserted that Moses had been buried by Angels. To this Jude adds, together with tradition, that there was a struggle by the Angel over the body of Moses.

Read more (159 words)

In this struggle the Archistrategos of the heavenly hosts said nothing in reproach of the evil spirits, but left judgment to God.

The judgment ended in the triumph of the good Angels, for we know that Moses appeared on the Mount of Transfiguration together with Elijah, whose body did not undergo corruption.

The triumph of the Angels may also have consisted in this: the Jews could not deify Moses, as might have happened if the location of Moses’ body had been known.

Applying the example of Archistrategos Michael to the heretics, the Apostle especially indicates that Archistrategos Michael knew he was dealing with evil powers, and yet did not blaspheme them.

The heretics, however, treat with contempt and blasphemy what they do not properly understand. All Christian dogmas are inaccessible to their arrogant reason.

They do not even relate properly to what they see, that is, to their own body. They abuse its natural impulses through sins against nature.

Philaret of Moscow (Drosdow)

19th centuryChurch Father

"Yet Michael the Archangel, when contending with the devil, disputed about the body of Moses, did not dare to bring a reviling judgment, but said, 'The Lord rebuke you'" (Jude 1:9).

An assembly of earthly warriors, gathered with their chief commander and appearing in ordered ranks and solemn array, presents to us either war itself, or at least a military exercise by which soldiers are trained for war.

The sight of war should stir men to deeds for the safety of the fatherland. The spectacle of military exercise should show examples to those who wish to serve as soldiers and nourish the hope of the fatherland.

If this is not so, the spectators are frivolous, and the spectacle is useless.

Today the Church has called us to behold the assembly of the heavenly host with its commander. What shall we see, and what consequence should this vision have for us?

We must ask this if we do not wish to be frivolous spectators, and if the spectacle is not to remain useless for us.

Shall we see some heavenly war? We shall, if we look with the eyes of John, the seer of heaven. Look at what he sees.

"And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon, and the dragon and his angels fought. And they did not prevail, nor was a place found for them any longer in heaven. And the great dragon was cast down, that ancient serpent, called the devil and Satan, who deceives the whole world. He was cast down to the earth, and his angels were cast down with him" (Rev 12:7-9).

Let us not be curious. Let us not dare to enter into a detailed investigation of what mysterious war the seer of mysteries beholds and shows us.

But let us be cautious. Let us think of our own safety.

It is dangerous when war is nearby. The heavenly realm, in which we see the battle, borders upon the realm of those born on earth.

It is more dangerous when the enemy did not hesitate to attack a realm stronger than ours. He dared to raise war even against heaven, which is certainly more unapproachable and more powerful than earth.

It is still more dangerous when war is already within our borders. The heavenly battle is indeed continued by the enemy cast down from heaven within our earthly borders.

True, he was cast down to us already defeated in heaven. But that is joy only for heaven. For the earth it is a new terror, as the heavenly voice announces to the seer of mysteries.

"Therefore rejoice, O heavens, and you who dwell in them. Woe to those who dwell on the earth and the sea, for the devil has come down to you in great wrath, knowing that he has little time" (Rev 12:12).

The war lost in the higher realm turned ancient enmity into wrath. The swift course of the judgments being accomplished upon earth threatens him with a new casting down into the abyss.

This brings his wrath to the final degree of frenzy. "The devil has come down, having great wrath, knowing that he has little time."

Look around, you who dwell on the earth and the sea. Do you not already perceive this wrath in its very action around you?

Do you not notice how the enemy has so often brought infernal warfare into the heavenly realm of the Church?

He did this with the weapons of heresies and schisms, false teachings and scandals, superstitions and ignorance.

So often he was repelled by the Angels of the Churches and by the company of those who believe rightly and firmly.

He could not shake "the firm foundation of God," which until now "stands" unshaken, having this seal: "The Lord knows those who are His," and "Let everyone who names the name of the Lord depart from unrighteousness" (2 Tim 2:19).

Do you not see how that enemy came down to earth and rushed to disturb and destroy earthly societies?

He does this with varied weapons: unbelief, false philosophy, forgetfulness of the soul and of the life to come, unbridled luxury, untamed self-will, perjured plots, desperate audacity, lawlessness, and evil deeds.

Pagan commonwealths themselves would have been ashamed and horrified at these things.

And what terrible successes he has gained in a little time! If you do not have enough attention to perceive the growing "increase of lawlessness" (Mt 24:12), consider at least one thing.

People who have known the world only for a few days, so as not to trouble themselves to become better than it now is, gladly assure themselves and one another that it has always been so.

Can you fail to notice even that one thing which should strike even the inattentive?

Can you fail to perceive how clearly before our eyes a crime has been accomplished which, within Christianity, one could scarcely have imagined possible?

I mean the second crucifixion of our Lord in the very midst of Christianity.

For a people called Christian did exactly with His faith what the Jewish people did with His person.

By a public and solemn judgment they condemned it, betrayed it, rejected it, mocked it, and would have destroyed it, if by its eternal nature it were not bound to rise from death itself.

Truly, "Woe to those who dwell on the earth and the sea! The devil has come down!"

Therefore, "Take heed how carefully you walk. Be sober, be watchful, for your adversary the devil walks about like a roaring lion, seeking whom he may devour" (Eph 5:15; 1 Pet 5:8).

Yet, lest the contemplation of this dangerous battle frighten you more than is fitting on a day when we celebrate and rejoice in our heavenly and earthly defenders against visible and invisible enemies, let us turn our eyes to a less dreadful spectacle.

It too is instructive in its own way. It will show us not war itself, but a certain exercise in warfare; not a battle, but a duel; not the enemy's rage, but the victor's skill.

"Yet Michael the Archangel, when contending with the devil, disputed about the body of Moses, did not dare to bring a reviling judgment, but said, 'The Lord rebuke you.'"

"Did not dare!" How is this? Michael does not dare? The commander of the heavenly powers does not dare?

He does not dare "when contending with the devil"? He does not even dare to utter a threatening word against the devil?

Where then is the authority of the commander? Where is the courage of him who, before the eyes of the seer of mysteries, was once to gain the decisive victory over the devil?

This is indeed strange and incomprehensible to people unskilled in spiritual warfare, or still led by the audacity of the flesh.

Let them learn from Michael the Archangel, both in struggles against the devil and in dealings with offensive or disobedient people.

Let them learn to conquer rage, not by stronger rage, but by perfect meekness; pride by humility; audacity by modesty; injustice by magnanimous patience.

In a word, let them learn to "overcome evil with good" (Rom 12:21).

"Michael the Archangel, when contending with the devil, disputed." What a distance lies between those who dispute here!

On one side stands Michael the Archangel, pure, pleasing and beloved to God. He is not a simple Angel, but an Archangel, that is, one who rules over many Angels.

Moreover, he is not from among those Archangels who rule the order of Angels nearest to men, the lowest of the nine ranks of the heavenly hierarchy.

He is one of the seven supreme Angels who stand above all the heavenly ranks and directly before the throne of the Tri-hypostatic Godhead.

On the other side is the devil, an unclean spirit who angered God by sin and was condemned, though the sentence of this judgment has not yet been proclaimed throughout the whole kingdom of God or executed in its full force.

If we imagine one of a king's foremost friends and one of the lowest servants, convicted of a crime and condemned, the difference between them is still small.

It is small in comparison with the difference between Michael the Archangel and the devil.

How much would a nobleman allow a condemned criminal in his presence? Yet Michael the Archangel allows the devil to dispute with him.

When the narrator of this dispute notes that Michael "did not bring a reviling judgment," this lets us understand that the devil even uttered a reviling judgment.

And Michael? He did not dare to answer the fool according to his folly.

People who assume lofty titles should look upon this angelic dispute, though their titles are still no higher than earthly.

They should remember how they sometimes deal with people whom they consider beneath themselves.

How often, even without fault and without dispute, they humiliate those like themselves with insulting and reviling names.

They distort and deform the names of saints, with which the Church adorns each of us at our very birth or Baptism.

They do this in order to graft contempt onto these names, and so onto their brothers in Christ.

"What is he worth?" So thinks the rich man of the poor man, though the rich man can value and buy many human bodies, yet does not know the value of a Christian soul.

What is he worth? He is worth exactly as much as you and I.

He has truly been bought for a price higher than anything on earth or in heaven. He has been bought by the blood of the Son of God.

The one who, disregarding public order, pronounces an audacious or reviling judgment upon those above him reveals a rebellious devilish quality.

In the Apostle's words, such a one "rejects authority and reviles glories" and "does not tremble" (Jude 1:8).

Yet neither is the man inspired by an angelic or Christian spirit who nourishes pride within himself, or shows contempt for those beneath him in deed or word.

Let us turn again to Michael and listen as far as we can to what his dispute with the devil concerns.

"Contending with the devil, he disputed about the body of Moses." The narrator does not explain exactly what the dispute about the body of Moses consisted in.

It is difficult to supplement this brevity with a satisfactory conjecture.

One Orthodox interpreter of Holy Scripture writes: "They say that Michael the Archangel served at the burial of Moses, and the devil opposed him, bringing an accusation concerning the killing of the Egyptian. He claimed that Moses was guilty in this matter and therefore unworthy of honorable burial."

If someone asks what advantage the devil would gain by contesting the burial of Moses, let him remember how often malice raves in its stubbornness.

Moreover, if the enemy had managed to show the Hebrews the body of their former wonder-working leader cast down, or even mutilated and torn by wild beasts, this could have plunged them into extreme despondency.

It could also have harmed their faith and welfare.

However anyone may reason about the subject of this dispute, no one will doubt that perfect right was on Michael's side, and perfect injustice on the side of his opponent.

Nevertheless, the devil disputes, and Michael the Archangel does not dare.

We also have guardian Angels who, without doubt, contend and battle many times with the devil for us, to preserve us not according to our worth, but according to their heavenly love for mankind.

Do we imitate, in our earthly disputes, the patience and meekness of our heavenly defenders?

Do we endure even when we are completely certain of the injustice of those who dispute with us? Do we preserve meekness even before open insolence?

Do we not often, on the contrary, dispute with stubbornness and bitterness over things whose justice we ourselves are not sure of?

Do we not even seek through judgment and lawsuits what we have no lawful right to possess?

Do some not strive by evil and cunning inventions to prolong lawsuits without end and to turn the very sanctuary of justice into dens of plunder and robbery?

According to the Apostle's reasoning, this alone is shameful for Christians, that they have lawsuits at all, even if these were entirely just.

"It is already a complete shame for you that you have lawsuits among yourselves. Why not rather be wronged? Why not rather be deprived?" (1 Cor 6:7).

What would you say, righteous reprover, if you looked upon Christians of the present day?

You would see that many of them have not only failed to learn to be wronged and deprived, that is, patiently to endure injuries and the taking of property.

Read the full text in the app

Vissarion (Nechaev)

19th centuryChurch Father

Warning the faithful against blasphemers of authority, the Apostle Jude rebukes the latter by pointing to the example of Archangel Michael. He did not blaspheme even the devil when he disputed with him about the body of Moses.

It is known that Moses died without witnesses in the land of Moab and was buried in the valley near Peor. But Holy Scripture does not say by whom he was buried.

The place of his grave was unknown even in the days of Joshua the son of Nun (Deut 34:6).

It is rightly supposed that the remains and grave of Moses were hidden so as not to give Israel an occasion for superstition and idolatry.

The whole life of Moses had been spent turning the Israelites away from every service except the service of the one true God.

Read more (344 words)

If the grave of Moses had been known, it could have attracted a people inclined to superstition and become a place of idolatrous worship.

The devil was displeased by the removal of this danger. And so he resolved to take possession of the body of Moses and make his grave known and accessible to all.

But Archangel Michael, the guardian of the Jewish people, did not allow the devil to triumph. He did not permit him to lead the people into superstition.

All this is known from tradition. The Apostle Jude has this tradition in mind, concerning the Archangel’s opposition to the devil, when he says that the Archangel disputed with the devil about the body of Moses.

How did he conduct himself in this dispute? Burning with zeal for the glory of God, did he lose self-control? Was he carried away into mockery of the devil and into reproach of him, as commonly happens in disputes?

Certainly the ancient enemy of God and men fully deserved such reproach. But the Archangel did not act so.

However bold the claims of the evil spirit were in his dispute with the good and pure spirit, the latter “did not dare to bring a reviling judgment.”

He thought of the devil’s former dignity. He thought that although the devil is a being fallen away from God and rejected by God, he still preserved the high intellectual powers given him by God at his creation.

To insult him with blasphemy seemed to the Archangel an act of bold presumption, and he did not resolve to do it.

What then did he do? He only said to him: “May the Lord rebuke you,” that is, may the Lord punish you.

This means that the Archangel left judgment or punishment over him to the Lord alone.

The Angel of the Lord said the same thing to Satan in the vision of the prophet Zechariah. Satan was plotting against Joshua the high priest, who had been called with Zerubbabel to restore the Jerusalem temple destroyed by the Chaldeans (Zech 3:2).

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 24 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. ὁ
    ho
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  2. δὲ
    de
    but
    G1161 · δέ
  3. Μιχαὴλ
    michaēl
    Michael
    G3413 · Μιχαήλ
  4. ὁ
    ho
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  5. ἀρχάγγελος
    archangelos
    a ruler of angels
    G743 · ἀρχάγγελος
  6. ὅτε
    hote
    when
    G3753 · ὅτε
  7. τῷ
    tō
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  8. διαβόλῳ
    diabolō
    slanderous
    G1228 · διάβολος
  9. διακρινόμενος
    diakrinomenos
    I distinguish
    G1252 · διακρίνω
  10. διελέγετο
    dielegeto
    I converse
    G1256 · διαλέγω
  11. περὶ
    peri
    about
    G4012 · περί
  12. τοῦ
    tou
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  13. Μωϋσέως
    mōyseōs
    Moses
    G3475 · Μωϋσῆς, Μωσῆς
  14. σώματος
    sōmatos
    body
    G4983 · σῶμα
  15. οὐκ
    ouk
    no
    G3756 · οὐ
  16. ἐτόλμησεν
    etolmēsen
    I dare
    G5111 · τολμάω
  17. κρίσιν
    krisin
    judging
    G2920 · κρίσις
  18. ἐπενεγκεῖν
    epenenkein
    I bring forward against
    G2018 · ἐπιφέρω
  19. βλασφημίας
    blasphēmias
    abusive or scurrilous language
    G988 · βλασφημία
  20. ἀλλὰ
    alla
    but
    G235 · ἀλλά
  21. εἶπεν
    eipen
    to say
    G2036 · ἔπω, ἐρῶ, εἶπον
  22. Ἐπιτιμήσαι
    epitimēsai
    I rebuke
    G2008 · ἐπιτιμάω
  23. σοι
    soi
    you
    G4771 · σύ
  24. Κύριος
    kyrios
    lord
    G2962 · κύριος