The Church Fathers on this verse

Acts 23:10Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

And when there arose a great dissension, the tribune, fearing lest Paul should be pulled in pieces by them, commanded the soldiers to go down and to take him by force from among them and to bring him into the castle.

Douay-Rheims

πολλης δε γενομενης στασεως ευλαβηθεις ο χιλιαρχος μη διασπασθη ο παυλος υπ αυτων εκελευσεν το στρατευμα καταβηναι και αρπασαι αυτον εκ μεσου αυτων αγειν τε εις την παρεμβολην

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

7 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

The tribune fears that Paul will be torn apart, once he has said that he is a Roman. Therefore this was not without danger. Do you see that he rightly called himself a Roman? Otherwise the tribune would not have become afraid even now. But the soldiers take him away. Seeing that everything had failed, these wicked men begin to act on their own, as they had wished before, but had been hindered. Thus malice never rests, despite any obstacles. Yet how many circumstances here disposed them to calm their anger and come to their senses! Nevertheless they persist. Even this was enough to instruct them: the man they wished to tear apart is taken from them and escapes such dangers. See: the tribune hears that the Pharisees acknowledge him innocent. He then takes his side and removes him with great boldness.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

"The commander, fearing..." He feared that they would tear Paul apart, since Paul had said that he was a Roman. The matter was not far from danger. At last the soldiers snatched him away, I think, as their own possession.

Bogolepow D.P.

19th centuryChurch Father

From the way the trial began, the Apostle clearly saw that direct defense at this trial was unthinkable. It was impossible to expect justice here. Therefore he began to strive only that the trial should end in nothing.

For this, he used the fact that the Sanhedrin consisted of men from two opposing and irreconcilably hostile parties, the Pharisaic and the Sadducean.

He had in mind that the Sadducees denied the resurrection of the dead, as well as the existence of angels and of the souls of departed men. The Pharisees confessed both.

This was the chief point of disagreement between the named parties. Therefore the Apostle cried out with a loud voice in the Sanhedrin: “Men and brethren, I am a Pharisee, the son of a Pharisee.”

Read more (601 words)

“For the hope of the resurrection of the dead I am on trial.” Περὶ ἐλπίδος καὶ ἀναστάσεως νεκρῶν ἐγὼ κρίνομαι: for hope and the resurrection of the dead I undergo judgment (verse 6).

The Russian translation, “for the hope of the resurrection of the dead I am on trial,” takes the conjunction καὶ in the sense “namely.” If the Apostle’s words are understood in this latter sense, he points here to the most essential and final point.

This is the final point of apostolic preaching and Christian faith (1 Cor 15:13-19). In relation to it, the faith of the Pharisees was, in essence, the same as that of the Christians.

If the Apostle’s words are understood according to the Slavonic translation, then two objects of the Apostle’s preaching and faith are indicated here. They are the hope of Israel, the Messiah, and the resurrection of the dead.

The Pharisees also connected the hope of the resurrection with the hope of the Messiah. I am accused of opposition to the Law, yet by birth itself I belong among the most ardent zealots of the Law, the Pharisees.

I am not on trial for teaching against the Law. The true cause is my faith and preaching concerning the Messiah and the resurrection of the dead.

By speaking thus, the Apostle intended to awaken some sympathy for himself among the Pharisees. He declared his agreement with them on one of the chief dogmas of their faith, thereby drawing them to his side, if only temporarily.

The Apostle’s plan succeeded. A quarrel arose among the judges. The scribes of the Pharisaic side were not disposed toward Paul and were even hostile to him.

Yet simply to oppose their enemies, the Sadducees, they took his side and said: “We find nothing evil in this man.” In these words they acknowledged the defendant’s lack of guilt.

But the Pharisees did not stop there. Intensifying their struggle against the Sadducees, they went on to suppose that perhaps justice might even be on Paul’s side.

“What if a spirit or an angel has spoken to him,” namely, what he believes and preaches? The words “Let us not fight against God” (verse 9) are absent from many ancient codices.

Without them, the phrase, “If a spirit or an angel spoke to him,” clearly has the sense of a question. The answer is understood by itself, namely: “Let us not fight against God.”

And this is entirely possible. In that case, by going against him, we shall turn out to be opponents of God. Let us therefore not fight against God.

Let us leave his affair to its own course. If it is not pleasing to God, then sooner or later it will perish. But if it is the work of God, no human efforts can end or stop it.

This reflection of the Pharisees has the same meaning as Gamaliel’s counsel in the Sanhedrin concerning the persecution of Christians (Acts 5:34-39). It was plainly caused by their struggle against the Sadducees.

The Sadducees denied the existence of angels and, in general, the existence of the spiritual world. The discord among the judges increased so much, and the arguments between Pharisees and Sadducees became so heated, that the commander became afraid.

He feared that the disputants might rush upon Paul, some attacking him and others defending him. In this way they might tear Paul, a Roman citizen, to pieces, for which he could be held responsible before his government.

Therefore he ordered the soldiers to take Paul from the midst of the judges and lead him back again into the fortress.

Lopuchin A.P.

19th centuryChurch Father

The Jews, even these distinguished hierarchs and rabbis, again showed a complete inability to govern themselves. Even within the sacred bounds of the Sanhedrin there arose such a powerful disturbance that the Apostle Paul was once more in danger of being torn to pieces. This time the danger came from the hands of learned and distinguished men. Lysias grew more and more amazed at the wildness of the Jews. First they had attacked Paul in the temple with such unanimity. Now in the Sanhedrin, half of them seemed to be fighting in his defense. He resolved not to surrender his fellow citizen to the disgraceful fate awaiting him. He ordered the soldiers to take him from the Sanhedrin. And there, in the barracks of foreign conquerors, the Lord again appeared to His courageous Apostle and said to him: 'Take courage, Paul. For as you have testified concerning Me in Jerusalem, so you must also testify in Rome.'

Michail (Lusin)

19th centuryChurch Father

'Lest they tear Paul apart.' Both sides were so excited and argued so hotly that the tribune began to fear Paul might become a victim of the parties' mutual irritation. One party, the Sadducean party hostile to him, might in anger rush violently upon the Apostle to insult him. The other party, the Pharisaic party temporarily disposed toward him, might rush to defend him from the hostile attack. Thus they might literally tear Paul apart. 'He commanded the soldiers to go down' from the Antonia fortress to the place where the Sanhedrin was sitting. This may have been the Court of the Gentiles by the temple, where Roman soldiers could enter. Paul was brought out to them there, so that he might be taken back into the fortress. The tribune now had a double obligation to care for Paul's safety.

Read more (46 words)

First, he was guardian of public order. Second, he was protector of a Roman citizen, something Lysias had learned from Paul himself (Acts 22:25 and following). For violence done to a Roman citizen in his presence, as commander, he could be held responsible under Roman law.

Nikanor (Kamenski)

19th centuryChurch Father

The Apostle Paul's deliverance from the Sanhedrin was carried out by soldiers sent by their commander. He feared that Paul's enemies would tear him apart, taking advantage of the general confusion with which the disorderly session of the Sanhedrin had ended. If the Apostle could have been torn apart, one understands how many outward horrors and deathly agonies he had to endure. From this one understands how consoling was the Lord's appearance to him on the following night. Then the Lord approved his patient and wise witness to Him in Jerusalem. He also revealed that Paul must bear witness in Rome as well. From this, of course, Paul understood that his departure from Jerusalem would sooner or later take place without obstruction. St.

Read more (109 words)

John Chrysostom explains Paul's deliverance by the commander's fear of insulting Paul's Roman dignity. From this he concludes that Paul had rightly called himself a Roman. Otherwise the tribune would not have become afraid even now. Concerning the Lord's appearance to Paul, blessed Theophylact remarks: 'The Lord stood before him because He is the Comforter in sorrows. But He did not appear to Paul before the latter had fallen into danger. After His appearance, He was pleased to save his life through human means.' 'Paul believed, but while believing he did not sleep. He did not fail to do what could be done with the help of human wisdom.'

Theophan the Recluse

19th centuryChurch Father

By stirring up a dispute among the judges themselves, he gave the commander occasion to take him and lead him to a safe place. The Apostle also used a similar means when he recalled that he was a Roman. In this same circumstance, he made use of it when they wished to scourge him (Acts 22:25-29). In Philippi too he brought it forward to bring the disturbance against him there to a final quieting (Acts 16:37-39).

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 27 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. πολλῆς
    pollēs
    much
    G4183 · πολύς
  2. δὲ
    de
    but
    G1161 · δέ
  3. γινομένης
    ginomenēs
    I come into being
    G1096 · γίνομαι
  4. στάσεως
    staseōs
    standing
    G4714 · στάσις
  5. φοβηθεὶς
    phobētheis
    I fear
    G5399 · φοβέω
  6. ὁ
    ho
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  7. χιλίαρχος
    chiliarchos
    a military tribune
    G5506 · χιλίαρχος
  8. μὴ
    mē
    not
    G3361 · μή
  9. διασπασθῇ
    diaspasthē
    I tear apart
    G1288 · διασπάω
  10. ὁ
    ho
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  11. Παῦλος
    paulos
    Paul
    G3972 · Παῦλος
  12. ὑπ᾽
    hyp
    by
    G5259 · ὑπό
  13. αὐτῶν
    autōn
    he
    G846 · αὐτός
  14. ἐκέλευσεν
    ekeleusen
    I command
    G2753 · κελεύω
  15. τὸ
    to
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  16. στράτευμα
    strateuma
    an army
    G4753 · στράτευμα
  17. καταβὰν
    kataban
    I go down
    G2597 · καταβαίνω
  18. ἁρπάσαι
    harpasai
    I seize
    G726 · ἁρπάζω
  19. αὐτὸν
    auton
    he
    G846 · αὐτός
  20. ἐκ
    ek
    from out
    G1537 · ἐκ
  21. μέσου
    mesou
    middle
    G3319 · μέσος
  22. αὐτῶν
    autōn
    he
    G846 · αὐτός
  23. ἄγειν
    agein
    I lead
    G71 · ἄγω
  24. τε
    te
    and
    G5037 · τε
  25. εἰς
    eis
    into
    G1519 · εἰς
  26. τὴν
    tēn
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  27. παρεμβολήν
    parembolēn
    a camp
    G3925 · παρεμβολή