The Church Fathers on this verse

Acts 28:19Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

But the Jews contradicting it, I was constrained to appeal unto Caesar: not that I had anything to accuse my nation of.

Douay-Rheims

αντιλεγοντων δε των ιουδαιων ηναγκασθην επικαλεσασθαι καισαρα ουχ ως του εθνους μου εχων τι κατηγορησαι

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

7 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

Why then did they not release him? "But because the Jews objected," he says. Do you see how he softens their guilt? If he had wished to exaggerate, he could have spoken much more strongly.

Then he adds: "I was compelled to appeal to Caesar." All this deserves approval. Then, lest someone say, "What then? Did you do this in order to accuse them?" he rejects such an assumption, adding: "not that I had anything of which to accuse my nation."

That is, I demanded judgment from Caesar not in order to accuse you, but to avoid danger. And such was their audacity that, although even these could accuse me of nothing, they left me bound.

Read more (161 words)

"I was compelled," he says, "to appeal to Caesar, not that I had anything of which to accuse my nation." That is, I did this not in order to cause harm to others, but to deliver myself from harm. I did it not of my own will, but under compulsion.

See how full of love his words are. He does not count himself a stranger, but one close to them, saying, "my nation." Again he instills the teaching of love. He did not say, "I do not slander," but, "not that I had anything to accuse," though he had suffered so many evils from them.

He reminds them of nothing of the kind, so as not to make his words burdensome to them. Yet he does not flatter them either. Therefore he does not speak directly, but only by hint and in passing. His chief wish was to express that the Jews had delivered him to the Romans as a prisoner.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

Paul knew that it was wholly improper to go to law, especially before an unbeliever. Therefore he defends himself on both sides. He had not acted against the law. On the contrary, he himself had knowingly been condemned unjustly by the Jews. He had not appealed to Caesar of his own will, but because the Jews themselves gave him cause to do so. They did not think fit either to judge me according to the law of the Church, or to submit to the lawful judgment of the authorities. The authorities wished to release me. They did not release me because the Jews opposed it. What then? Did you appeal to Caesar in order to accuse the Jews? No, he says, but to escape danger.

Alexander Gorsky

19th centuryChurch Father

In presenting the teaching, he found it necessary to touch upon his own circumstances. He supposed that they were somewhat known to them and therefore needed to remove suspicion. But he learned that the Roman Jews had not heard of him.

When Paul declared that he was bound for the hope of Israel, they asked him to unfold his thoughts about this. They said, "We hear that this teaching is much disputed." Paul appointed a day and expounded to them the teaching about the Kingdom of God. He proved from Moses and the prophets that Jesus is the true Messiah.

But his preaching found faith in few, and he had to repeat Isaiah's rebuke to his contemporaries (Acts 28:26-28).

Bogolepow D.P.

19th centuryChurch Father

Using the freedom granted to him, Paul soon after his arrival in Rome began the work of preaching the Gospel to the inhabitants of that city. According to his custom, he first addressed this preaching to the sons of the people of the promise who lived in Rome.

Three days after arriving in Rome, Paul called to himself the leading men among the Jews. Since he was a prisoner, he could not visit their synagogue. He then opened a conversation with them.

Read more (334 words)

At his first meeting with the Roman Jews, the apostle tries beforehand to remove the prejudice he assumes they have toward him. This prejudice could have been planted in them by the hostile attitude of the Jews in Jerusalem toward him, which ended in his chains. It could also have come from his appeal to the judgment of the Roman pagan authority. Finally, it could have come from slanders against him, by letter or orally, from unbelieving Jews in the regions where he had already preached the Gospel, from Jerusalem as far as Corinth.

Therefore the apostle first affirms that he suffers innocently. The hostile attack upon him by the Jews in Jerusalem was unjust, for he had done nothing against the people or the customs of the fathers. This innocence of his was attested by the representative of Roman authority in Judea. Finding in him no guilt worthy of death, he had wished to release him.

The Jews themselves are also guilty of the fact that the apostle now stands before Caesar's judgment. It is true that the apostle himself demanded this judgment over himself. Yet he did so only because, when the procurator wished to release him as wholly innocent, the Jews opposed it. They demanded that the procurator hand the apostle over to them for their own judgment (Acts 25:7-12).

But, says the apostle, I demanded judgment from Caesar not in order to accuse my people of anything. I did it only to avoid a wholly undeserved condemnation from the Jews. This would inevitably have followed if he had been handed over to their judgment.

For this reason, the apostle says in conclusion, since I neither formerly did anything against my people, and in particular against you, nor now harbor any hostility toward you, I have called you to see you and speak with you. For I am bound with these chains for the hope of Israel, not because of enmity against Israel. I am not your enemy, but your friend.

Lopuchin A.P.

19th centuryChurch Father

Having become accustomed to his new situation in Rome, the Apostle Paul wished first to address the preaching of the Gospel to his kinsmen according to the flesh, the Jews. He summoned to himself the chief representatives of the Jewish population of the capital. Addressing them as brethren, he tried to explain his position to them.

He assured them that he was not hostile to their people and was not destroying their institutions. Nevertheless, he had been seized in Jerusalem and handed over to the Roman authorities. Yet the Romans, after investigating the case, declared him entirely innocent and were ready to release him. Only the opposition of the Jews forced him to transfer his case to Caesar's decision.

Read more (44 words)

The apostle tried in every way to make them understand that he had by no means intended to set the Roman authority against his own people. The cause of his chains was faith in the fulfillment of that messianic hope which all Israel cherished.

Michail (Lusin)

19th centuryChurch Father

They wished to release him, but the Jews objected. These details complete the writer of Acts' account of Paul's trial before Festus in chapter 25. Comparing them with that account shows that, after Paul's words before Festus (Acts 25:8), the procurator expressed a desire to release him. The Jews opposed this (Acts 28:19). Then Festus proposed that Paul be tried in Jerusalem (Acts 25:9). In response, Paul demanded judgment before Caesar (Acts 25:11).

Read more (63 words)

However, the apostle adds, I did not demand Caesar's judgment in order to accuse my people of anything before Caesar. I did not do so with a hostile aim against my people, but solely for self-defense. "That is, I did this not to cause evil to others, but to deliver myself from evil, and not of my own will, but under compulsion" (Chrysostom).

Nikanor (Kamenski)

19th centuryChurch Father

Unfolding his case gradually, the apostle speaks briefly about how he was tried and how they wished to release him, but some opposed it. This moved the apostle to demand the higher judgment of Caesar, so that before him he might be fully vindicated.

Then the apostle also explains the most important purpose for which he called the leading men of the Jews to himself. It was to unfold before them the essential matter for which he was tried. He speaks of this matter veiledly as the hope of Israel, that is, the Messiah, whom all true sons of Israel await (see Acts 26:6).

Read more (125 words)

"Since some of the hearers would probably have said, 'How can you prove that you were handed over without guilt?' he adds: the Roman authorities who tried me and wished to release me are witnesses to this. Why then did they not release him? Because the Jews objected, he says. Do you see how he softens their guilt? Then, lest someone say, 'What then? Did you not do this in order to accuse them?' he rejects such an assumption, adding: 'not that I had anything of which to accuse my nation.' That is, I demanded judgment from Caesar not in order to accuse you, but to avoid danger. I am so far from enmity toward you that I am even bound with chains for you."

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 15 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. ἀντιλεγόντων
    antilegontōn
    I speak or say in opposition
    G483 · ἀντιλέγω
  2. δὲ
    de
    but
    G1161 · δέ
  3. τῶν
    tōn
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  4. Ἰουδαίων
    ioudaiōn
    Jewish
    G2453 · Ἰουδαῖος
  5. ἠναγκάσθην
    ēnankasthēn
    I force
    G315 · ἀναγκάζω
  6. ἐπικαλέσασθαι
    epikalesasthai
    I call by an additional name
    G1941 · ἐπικαλέω
  7. Καίσαρα
    kaisara
    Caesar
    G2541 · Καῖσαρ
  8. οὐχ
    ouch
    no
    G3756 · οὐ
  9. ὡς
    hōs
    as
    G5613 · ὡς
  10. τοῦ
    tou
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  11. ἔθνους
    ethnous
    a race
    G1484 · ἔθνος
  12. μου
    mou
    I
    G1473 · ἐγώ
  13. ἔχων
    echōn
    I have
    G2192 · ἔχω
  14. τι
    ti
    any one
    G5100 · τις
  15. κατηγορεῖν
    katēgorein
    I accuse
    G2723 · κατηγορέω