The Church Fathers on this verse

Acts 4:13Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

Now seeing the constancy of Peter and of John, understanding that they were illiterate and ignorant men, they wondered: and they knew them that they had been with Jesus.

Douay-Rheims

θεωρουντες δε την του πετρου παρρησιαν και ιωαννου και καταλαβομενοι οτι ανθρωποι αγραμματοι εισιν και ιδιωται εθαυμαζον επεγινωσκον τε αυτους οτι συν τω ιησου ησαν

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

10 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

But how, you will say, did unlearned men overcome both them and the high priests in eloquence? It was because they were not the ones speaking, but the grace of the Spirit through them.

Here is another proof, no less than the former. "They recognized them," it says, "that they had been with Jesus." The Evangelist did not place these words without purpose.

He wished to show where they had been with Jesus, namely, at the Passion. Indeed, they alone were then with Christ, and at that time they had been seen as humble and abased.

For this reason the priests were especially amazed at this sudden change. Annas and Caiaphas with their attendants had also been there, and the apostles had stood before them.

Read more (196 words)

Now they were astonished at their extraordinary boldness. The apostles showed that they cared nothing for being judged over such matters, or for the extreme danger threatening them.

They showed this not only by words, but by appearance, voice, look, and everything else. Before the people they displayed boldness while they spoke.

The priests perhaps marveled because the apostles were unlearned and simple men. A man may be unlearned and yet not simple, or simple and yet not unlearned.

By this the writer shows that both qualities were united in the apostles. "They marveled," it says. At what? At what they said.

Peter speaks few words, but by the very expression and composition of the speech he shows boldness. The priests would have accused the apostles if this man, the lame man, had not been with them.

"They recognized them," it says, "that they had been with Jesus." From this they came to the conviction that they had learned this from Jesus, and that they did everything as His disciples.

The miracle and sign itself uttered a voice no less loud than the apostles' voice. It was precisely this that most of all stopped their mouths.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

It is possible to be unlettered and not simple, and simple yet not illiterate. But here both things coincided, that is, both lack of learning and simplicity.

Therefore the Jews marveled when Peter and John spoke and discoursed. But whence did they obtain this knowledge, namely that Peter and John were such men?

From the words of Peter and John themselves. For Luke does not simply say, "they recognized them," but, "they recognized that they had been with Jesus" during His Passion.

At that time they alone had been with Him. The Jews had then seen them humble and abased.

Read more (41 words)

This very thing, the unexpected change, especially struck them. For the man who then could not endure the look of a questioning maidservant now comes into the midst of the chief priests themselves and into the Sanhedrin, and speaks with boldness.

Jerome of Stridon

4th centuryChurch Father

The Pharisees are struck by the Lord's learning, and they marvel at how the apostles Peter and Paul know the law without having studied.

For what others had to acquire by labor and daily meditation in the law was revealed to the apostles by the Holy Spirit. According to the words of Holy Scripture, they were θεοδίδακτοι, taught by God.

But can we call Peter or John uneducated? Each of them could say of himself, "Though I am unskilled in speech, yet not in knowledge" (2 Cor 11:6).

John was uneducated, a fisherman, unlearned. But tell me, please, whence comes this saying: "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God" (Jn 1:1)?

Read more (284 words)

The Greek word λόγος has many meanings. It means word, reason, reckoning, and the cause of anything through which something comes to be. All this we truly see in Christ.

Learned Plato did not know this. Eloquent Demosthenes did not understand this. "I will destroy," Scripture says, "the wisdom of the wise, and the understanding of the prudent I will reject" (1 Cor 1:19).

True wisdom will destroy false wisdom. And although in the teaching of the Cross there is the foolishness of preaching, yet the Apostle Paul says, "We speak wisdom among the perfect.

Yet not the wisdom of this age, nor of the rulers of this age, who are passing away. But we speak the wisdom of God, hidden in a mystery, which God ordained before the ages" (1 Cor 2:7).

The wisdom of God is Christ. Christ is the power of God and the wisdom of God (1 Cor 1:24). This wisdom was hidden in a mystery.

Therefore the superscription of the ninth psalm says, "Concerning the mysteries of the Son." In Him all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge are hidden. He Himself was hidden in mystery, ordained before the ages.

He was also prefigured and foreshadowed by the law and the prophets. Therefore the prophets are called seers, because they saw Him Whom others did not see.

Abraham saw His day and rejoiced (Jn 8:56). For Ezekiel the heavens are opened, though they were closed to the sinful people.

"Open my eyes," says David, "and I shall understand the wonders of Thy law" (Ps 118:18). For the law is spiritual, and revelation is needed so that we may understand it and behold the glory of God with unveiled face.

John Cassian

5th centuryChurch Father

This true, spiritual knowledge differs so greatly from worldly learning, which is defiled by the impurity of fleshly vices, that we know it has sometimes flourished wondrously even in men ignorant of languages and almost illiterate.

This is clearly proved by the example of the apostles and many holy men. They were not distinguished by the vain verbosity of philosophers, but brought forth the true fruits of spiritual knowledge.

Of them it is written in the Acts of the Apostles: "Seeing the boldness of Peter and John, and perceiving that they were unlearned and simple men, they marveled" (Acts 4:13).

Therefore, if you strive with burning desire to attain spiritual knowledge, first labor with all effort to acquire from the Lord purity of chastity.

For no one in whom fleshly passions still rule, especially the passion of fornication, can acquire spiritual knowledge.

For wisdom rests in a good heart, and he who fears God will find knowledge with righteousness (Prov 14:33).

Beda Venerabilis

7th centuryChurch Father

The unlearned are sent to preach, so that no one may think that the faith of those who believed was produced by eloquence and learning, and not by the power of God. As the Apostle also says, "not with wisdom of words, lest the Cross of Christ should be made of no effect" (1 Cor 1:17).

Alexander Gorsky

19th centuryChurch Father

Thus the community of believers, which also had members in other parts of Palestine, in Samaria and Galilee (Acts 9:31), increased daily in Jerusalem. Soon even the Jewish priests began to pass over into it (Acts 6:7).

The Sanhedrin no longer wished to leave the matter of Christianity without attention. Peter and John had healed the lame man at the temple. Afterward they preached to the people about Christ crucified and risen, by Whose power they had performed the healing.

Then the priests, together with the followers of the Sadducean sect, took them into custody. They intended to present them to the Sanhedrin in the morning. The next day they were indeed brought before the Sanhedrin, together with the man who had been healed.

Read more (192 words)

There sat the same Annas and Caiaphas who had also judged Jesus. The apostles were asked, "By what power, or by whose name, have you done this?" Perhaps they did not expect them to dare speak before the Sanhedrin as openly as before the common people.

Yet the apostles declared without hesitation that the lame man who had lain at the temple had been raised up by them in the name of Jesus. He had been crucified by them, that is, according to the Sanhedrin's decree.

They added that this Jesus, as He Himself had declared to them, is truly the stone rejected by the builders, yet become the head of the corner.

They recognized them. John was known to one of the chief priests. Their boldness amazed the members of the Sanhedrin. Yet the miracle could not be denied. The people were on their side, since they were not disposed toward the Sadducees.

Therefore they resolved only to forbid them to preach any more to anyone "in this name." Peter and John answered that they must obey God rather than men. They were only threatened and released with the same command.

Bogolepow D.P.

19th centuryChurch Father

The courage and decisive, firm confidence with which the apostles offered their testimony concerning Christ already made such an impression on the judges that they marveled. At first they did not know what to say.

Their amazement increased when they noticed that the accused were unlearned and simple men. Among such men the teachers of the people were not accustomed to meet opposition.

Looking attentively at the accused, and considering in their minds what this might mean, they finally remembered that these very persons belonged, among others, to the close circle of Christ's disciples.

Probably this surmise clarified the whole matter before them in its true form. Of course, their malice toward the name of Jesus now boiled up again, and with still greater force.

Read more (313 words)

But the healed man, who was there with the apostles, stood as a silent and irrefutable confirmation of the truth of apostolic testimony.

Then, after sending the accused out, they took counsel about what to do. Christ's opponents openly admitted to themselves that the truth was on the side of the accused.

Nevertheless, after calling the apostles back, they strictly forbade them to speak and teach in the name of Jesus. But the apostles answered: "Judge whether it is right before God to listen to you rather than to God.

We cannot but speak of what we have seen and heard" (vv. 19-20). The apostles had received directly from Christ Himself the appointment to be His witnesses in all the world, and first of all in Jerusalem.

Yet Christ Himself once said, "The scribes and Pharisees sit on Moses' seat. Therefore whatever they tell you to observe, observe and do" (Mt 23:2-3).

Thus, not only in the name of their former purely Jewish notions and beliefs, but also on the basis of this teaching of the Lord, the apostles owed obedience to the Sanhedrin.

For the Lord had taught that the Old Testament order of things would continue for a time, even at the opening of the New Testament. The Sanhedrin was the guardian of this order.

Thus the apostles were required to fulfill two duties at the same time. These duties stood in such relation that by fulfilling one, they would violate the other.

The apostles, however, did not hesitate over how to escape this difficulty. Calmly and firmly they declared that in this case they could not obey.

They had to fulfill the higher command, the command of God Himself. On the other hand, their own conscience did not allow them to keep silent, or to hide the truth about that of which they were firmly and undoubtedly convinced by experience.

Lopuchin A.P.

19th centuryChurch Father

The extraordinary boldness and fluency of the speech was all the more striking because it came from the mouths of plainly uneducated men. It left the council in no doubt that these were worthy followers of Jesus. The presence of the healed man made it impossible to deny the miracle.

Michail (Lusin)

19th centuryChurch Father

The impression produced by Peter's speech upon the members of the Sanhedrin was one of amazement and confusion. They did not know what to do or what to decide.

They were amazed by Peter's boldness, while also observing the lack of learning and simplicity of both apostles. Peter confessed Jesus as the Messiah directly and decisively before the whole Sanhedrin.

He exposed them in the killing of Christ. He passed from the position of the accused, subject to the Sanhedrin's judgment, into the position of accuser of the Sanhedrin in its whole composition.

This boldness in unlearned and simple men amazed them. "Unlearned" (ἀγράμματοι) means men who had not received education in the Jewish rabbinic schools.

Read more (292 words)

The members of the Sanhedrin could easily notice the apostles' lack of rabbinic schooling from their simple and guileless speech. Rabbinic education taught artificiality and intricate weaving in speech.

"Simple" (ἰδιώται) means men from the common people, who were always considered dark and ignorant.

"It is possible to be unlettered and not simple, and simple yet not unlettered. But here both coincided. Therefore the members of the Sanhedrin marveled when Peter and John spoke and discoursed" (Theophylact).

"They recognized them," and so forth: the Lord and His disciples often visited the temple in Jerusalem. There the members of the Sanhedrin, at least some of them, could have seen them.

Now, looking closely at them, they truly recognized in them Jesus' disciples. By this they became certain that these men truly continued their Teacher's work.

That work was so hateful to the whole Sanhedrin, especially to its chief members, who had delivered the Lord to death.

Their amazement would probably have resulted in an accusation of the Lord's disciples for a religious and political crime. Yet the presence of the healed lame man together with the apostles sealed their lips with silence.

They could say nothing against the explanation of this miracle offered by the apostle, namely, that the miracle had been done in the name of Jesus the Messiah.

How did the healed man come into the Sanhedrin? Probably by order of the authorities themselves. They hoped somehow to force from him a denial of the miraculous character of his healing.

They had done the same with the man born blind, whom the Lord healed (Jn 9). But now, as then, the members of the Sanhedrin not only erred in their calculations.

The presence of those healed served to their own harm.

Nikanor (Kamenski)

19th centuryChurch Father

The Apostle Peter's bold and deeply meaningful speech visibly struck the hearers. They marveled at the apostles, seeing their general simplicity and lack of learning.

Many began to take interest in them and personally inquire about them. Then they learned that they had been with Jesus Christ when He was judged.

This was all the more so because Peter had once been in the high priest's courtyard with one of the disciples, who was known to the high priest (see Jn 18:15).

Perhaps someone also remembered Peter's timidity and fearfulness at that time, especially in comparison with his present boldness. It had made him, from the accused, the accuser of the whole Sanhedrin.

Read more (119 words)

The apostles' simplicity and commonness were visible in their clothing and general condition. Their lack of learning was evident in their speech, for Galileans differed from educated Jerusalemites, who tried to speak ornately and in scribal fashion.

All this together cast the judges into perplexity. What were they to do with the accused, in whom there was no guilt, and who bore themselves so boldly and confessed Christ so convincingly and powerfully?

Following the previous example, they might crucify the innocent. But now no one had been prepared for this. On the contrary, the people were visibly on the apostles' side.

This was proved especially clearly by the five thousand who had been converted to Christ the day before.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 25 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. Θεωροῦντες
    theōrountes
    I behold
    G2334 · θεωρέω
  2. δὲ
    de
    but
    G1161 · δέ
  3. τὴν
    tēn
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  4. τοῦ
    tou
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  5. Πέτρου
    petrou
    Peter
    G4074 · Πέτρος
  6. παρρησίαν
    parrēsian
    freedom
    G3954 · παρρησία
  7. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  8. Ἰωάννου
    iōannou
    John
    G2491 · Ἰωάννης
  9. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  10. καταλαβόμενοι
    katalabomenoi
    I seize tight hold of
    G2638 · καταλαμβάνω
  11. ὅτι
    hoti
    that
    G3754 · ὅτι
  12. ἄνθρωποι
    anthrōpoi
    a man
    G444 · ἄνθρωπος
  13. ἀγράμματοί
    agrammatoi
    uneducated
    G62 · ἀγράμματος
  14. εἰσιν
    eisin
    I am
    G1510 · εἰμί
  15. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  16. ἰδιῶται
    idiōtai
    an amateur
    G2399 · ἰδιώτης
  17. ἐθαύμαζον
    ethaumazon
    I wonder
    G2296 · θαυμάζω
  18. ἐπεγίνωσκόν
    epeginōskon
    I come to know
    G1921 · ἐπιγινώσκω
  19. τε
    te
    and
    G5037 · τε
  20. αὐτοὺς
    autous
    he
    G846 · αὐτός
  21. ὅτι
    hoti
    that
    G3754 · ὅτι
  22. σὺν
    syn
    with
    G4862 · σύν
  23. τῷ
    tō
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  24. Ἰησοῦ
    iēsou
    Jesus
    G2424 · Ἰησοῦς
  25. ἦσαν
    ēsan
    I am
    G1510 · εἰμί