The Church Fathers on this verse

Matthew 4:22Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

And they forthwith left their nets and father, and followed him.

Douay-Rheims

οι δε ευθεως αφεντες το πλοιον και τον πατερα αυτων ηκολουθησαν αυτω

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

14 Church Fathers comment on this verse · 33 commentaries

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

He calls them while actually working at their employment, to shew that to follow Him ought to be preferred to all occupations. They were just then casting a net into the sea, which agreed with their future office.

To so great a promise they trusted, and believed that they should catch others by those same words by which themselves had been caught.

It is no small sign of goodness, to bear poverty easily, to live by honest labour, to be bound together by virtue of affection, to keep their poor father with them, and to toil in his service.

He made no promise to them when He called them, as He had to the former, for the obedience of the first had made the way plain for them. Besides, they had heard many things concerning Him, as being friends and townsmen of the others.

The operations of their secular craft were a prophecy of their future dignity. As he who casts his net into the water knows not what fishes he shall take, so the teacher casts the net of the divine word upon the people, not knowing who among them will come to God. Those whom God shall stir abide in his doctrine.

Before He spoke or did any thing, Christ called Apostles, that neither word nor deed of His should be hid from their knowledge, so that they may afterwards say with confidence, What we have seen and heard, that we cannot but speak. (Acts 4:20.)

Fishers of men, that is, teachers, that with the net of God’s word you may catch men out of this world of storm and danger, in which men do not walk but are rather borne along, the Devil by pleasure drawing them into sin where men devour one another as the stronger fishes do the weaker, withdrawn from hence they may live upon the land, being made members of Christ’s body.

These disciples did not follow Christ from desire of the honour of a doctor, but because they coveted the labour itself; they knew how precious is the soul of man, how pleasant to God is his salvation, and how great its reward.

These were their desires, for which they left all and followed; teaching us thereby that none can possess earthly things and perfectly attain to heavenly things.

Rightly did He thus build the foundations of the brotherhood of the Church on love, that from such roots a copious sap of love might flow to the branches; and that too on natural or human love, that nature as well as grace might bind their love more firmly. They were moreover brothers; and so did God in the Old Testament lay the foundations of His building on Moses and Aaron, brothers. But as the grace of the New Testament is more abundant than that of the Old, therefore the first people were built upon one pair of brethren, but the new people upon two. They were washing their nets, a proof of the extremest indigence; they repaired the old because they had not whence they should buy new.

Read more (41 words)

And what shews their great filial piety, in this their great poverty they deserted not their father, but carried him with them in their vessel, not that he might aid in their labour, but have the enjoyment of his sons’ presence.

We may not dare to consider the former disciples as more quick to preach, because they were casting their nets; and these latter as less active, because they were yet making ready only; for it is Christ alone that may know their differences. But perhaps we may say that the first were casting their nets, because Peter preached the Gospel, but committed it not to paper—the others were making ready their nets, because John composed a Gospel. He called them together, for by their abode they were fellow-townsmen, in affection attached, in profession agreed, and united by brotherly tenderness. He called them then at once, that united by so many common blessings they might not be separated by a separate call.

There are three things which we must leave who would come to Christ; carnal actions, which are signified in the fishing nets; worldly substance, in the ship; parents, which are signified in their father. They left their own vessel, that they might become governors of the vessel of the Church; they left their nets, as having no longer to draw out fishes on to the earthly shore, but men to the heavenly; they left their father, that they might become the spiritual fathers of all.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

Zebedee seemingly lacked faith, leading to his sons parting from him. One should depart from a parent when they hinder the pursuit of righteousness and holiness. Observing that the first disciples, Simon and Andrew, had chosen to follow Christ, Zebedee's sons quickly decided to follow Him as well, emulating their example.

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

Had one learned been chosen, he might have attributed the choice to the merit of his learning. But our Lord Jesus Christ, willing to bow the necks of the proud, sought not to gain fishermen by orators, but gained an Emperor by a fisherman. Great was Cyprian the pleader, but Peter the fisherman was before him.

He chose not kings, senators, philosophers, or orators, but he chose common, poor, and untaught fishermen.

It might move enquiry, why John relates that near Jordan, not in Galilee, Andrew followed the Lord with another whose name he does not mention; and again, that Peter received that name from the Lord. Whereas the other three Evangelists write that they were call d rom their fishing, sufficiently agreeing with one another, especially Matthew and Mark; Luke not naming Andrew, who is however understood to have been in the same vessel with him. There is a further seeming discrepancy, that in Luke it is to Peter only that it is said, Henceforth thou shalt catch men; Matthew and Mark write that it was said to both. As to the different account in John, it should be carefully considered, and it will be found that it is a different time, place, and calling that is there spoken of.

Read more (203 words)

For Peter and Andrew had not so seen Jesus at the Jordan that they adhered inseparably ever after, but so as only to have known who He was, and wondering at Him to have gone their way. Perhaps he is returning back to something he had omitted, for he proceeds without marking any difference of time, As he walked by the sea of Galilee. It may be further asked, how Matthew and Mark relate that He called them separately two and two, when Luke relates that James and John being partners of Peter were called as it were to aid him, and bringing their barks to land followed Christ. We may then understand that the narrative of Luke relates to a prior time, after which they returned to their fishing as usual. For it had not been said to Peter that he should no more catch fishes, as he did do so again after the resurrection, but that he should catch men. Again, at a time after this happened that call of which Matthew and Mark speak; for they draw their ships to land to follow Him, not as careful to return again, but only anxious to follow Him when He bids them.

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryCommentator

Consider their faith, which led them to disregard their father; prioritizing Christ above parents is essential. Their ability to endure hardship with grace, to gather their own sustenance, to be united in love, to care for their father, and to serve him demonstrates their commendable character. It is likely that they learned from Peter and Andrew about Christ's promise to transform His disciples into fishers of men.

Hilarius of Poitiers

4th centuryChurch Father

By this that they left their occupation and their father’s house we are taught, that when we would follow Christ we should not be holden of the cares of secular life, or of the society of the paternal mansion.

Or, the number that was to be of the Evangelists is figured.

Gregory the Great

6th centuryChurch Father

Peter and Andrew had seen Christ work no miracle, had heard from him no word of the promise of the eternal reward, yet at this single bidding of the Lord they forgot all that they had seemed to possess, and straightway left their nets, and followed Him. In which deed we ought rather to consider their wills than the amount of their property. He leaves much who keeps nothing for himself, he parts with much, who with his possessions renounces his lusts. Those who followed Christ gave up enough to be coveted by those who did not follow. Our outward goods, however small, are enough for the Lord; He does not weigh the sacrifice by how much is offered, but out of how much it is offered. The kingdom of God is not to be valued at a certain price, but whatever a man has, much or little, is equally available.

Hereby we are also silently admonished, that he who wants affection towards others, ought not to take on him the office of preaching. The precepts of charity are two, and between less than two there can be no love.

Rabanus Maurus

9th centuryChurch Father

The sea of Galilee, the lake of Gennesareth, the sea of Tiberias, and the salt lake, are one and the same.

Remigius of Auxerre

9th centuryChurch Father

Of these fishermen the Lord speaks by Jeremiah. I will send my fishers among you, and they shall catch you. (Jer. 16:16.)

Saw, that is, not so much with the bodily eye, as spiritually viewing their hearts.

Mystically, by the sea is figured this world, because of its bitterness and its tossing waves. Galilee is interpreted, ‘rolling’ or ‘a wheel,’ and shews the changeableness of the world. Jesus walked by the sea when He came to us by incarnation, for He took on Him of the Virgin not the flesh of sin, but the likeness of the flesh of sin. By the two brothers, two people are signified born of one God their Father; He saw them when He looked on them in His mercy. In Peter, (which is interpreted ‘owning,’) who is called Simon, (i. e. obedient,) is signified the Jewish nation, who acknowledged God in the Law, and obeyed His commandments; Andrew, which is interpreted ‘manly’ or ‘graceful,’ signifies the Gentiles, who after they had come to the knowledge of God, manfully abode in the faith.

Read more (172 words)

He called us His people when He sent the preachers into the world, saying, Follow me; that is, leave the deceiver, follow your Creator. Of both people there were made fishers of men, that is, preachers. Leaving their ships, that is, carnal desires, and their nets, that is, love of the world, they followed Christ. By James is understood the Jewish nation, which through their knowledge of God overthrew the Devil; by John the Gentile world, which was saved of grace alone. Zebedee whom they leave, (the name is interpreted flying or falling,) signifies the world which passes away, and the Devil who fell from Heaven. By Peter and Andrew casting their net into the sea, are meant those who in their early youth are called by the Lord, while from the vessel of their body they cast the nets of carnal concupiscence into the sea of this world. By James and John mending their nets are signified those who after sin before adversity come to Christ recovering what they had lost.

Also, the four principal virtues are here designed; Prudence, in Peter, from his confession of God; Justice, we may refer to Andrew for his manful deeds; Fortitude, to James, for his overthrow of the Devil; Temperance, to John, for the working in him of divine grace.

Philaret of Moscow (Drosdow)

19th centuryChurch Father

But she departed from the vessel and her father and accompanied him (Matthew 4:22). In the Gospel we encounter as described in Hebrews: The Gospel reveals to us... Suddenly, four individuals, who had placed great value in everything they owned and cherished in life, left it all behind to follow Jesus Christ, who had no place to lay His head. This is a remarkable demonstration of the divine influence inherent in the words of Christ! With a single command, ‘Come follow Me’ (Matthew 4:19), Peter, Andrew, James, and John were drawn to Him by an invisible yet compelling force, much like a magnet draws iron to itself through an unseen power.

Read more (1408 words)

This illustrates the faith with which the Apostles embraced Christ’s word; as noted by another Apostle, the word would be of no value had it remained merely ‘a word heard’ and not been ‘activated by the faith of those who hear’ (Hebrews 4:2)! Although the Lord strengthened His call with a magnificent promise to transform the fishermen into ‘fishers of men’ (Matthew 4:19), this promise was as challenging for them to comprehend and accept as it was to forsake their modest possessions, which seemed necessary for their existence, and the comforts that seemed inextricably linked to human nature. Yet, is it merely astonishment we are meant to experience upon witnessing such extraordinary commitment in the Gospel? Are we to be passive observers of these steadfast followers of Christ, or ought we to also follow Him, who is their sole Leader and Shepherd? Shouldn't we too ‘leave something behind’ to truly become disciples of Christ? - Let us contemplate this, but not for long. It is vital to grasp the fundamental reason that motivated the holy Apostles to leave everything behind so resolutely in their commitment to Christ. Might we assert that it was the immense power of Christ’s word? Indeed, the word of Christ, as the Word of God, possesses boundless authority; nonetheless, it does not operate excessively: thus, this inquiry does not yet present a resolution but transitions to another question: why did Christ’s word exert such a profound effect on the Apostles, leading them to detach from everything to which they felt bound out of necessity, even by nature and divine law? Further, should we affirm that this was particularly imperative for the Apostles, tasked with spreading the Gospel to all creation, that no earthly concern might distract them or hinder their mission, which encompasses the salvation of the entire world? This is indeed valid; however, would it be just for those men, whose service was to reclaim the whole world for God, to be condemned to forsake everything while the rest of us, who are less useful to His Kingdom, are granted the privilege of holding onto the world? Does not our conscience rise against this rationale? And does this not lead us to conclude that if the elect, the saints, companions, friends, siblings, and co-redeemers of Christ had to renounce everything of this world, to lose, to reject, to scorn, to detest, and to forget in order to possess Christ alone, how much more so must we, His undeserving servants, who are rarely esteemed, strive to offer a similar, though perhaps less complete and perfect, sacrifice of faith in Him, love for Him, and adherence to His word and commandments? If there is any uncertainty regarding the correctness of this conclusion, let us put aside our thoughts, along with all else we must relinquish for Christ, and attend to Christ’s own word, which must never be abandoned. He states: ‘If any man come unto Me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be My disciple’ (Luke 14:26). Should you think that this stringent declaration applies only to a specific disciple or Apostle, the holy Evangelist clarifies that it was directed to the crowds: ‘And there went great multitudes with Him; and He turned, and said unto them’ (Luke 14:25). Thus, this pronouncement is not limited to a select few but applies universally; one cannot be a true disciple of Christ if he does not ‘renounce’ or ‘hate’ all that is naturally cherished, meaning, one must overcome and surpass the love for all that is loved outside of God through a strong love for Him. For what are these sacrifices of deprivation for God, who gains nothing from them? Indeed, God, being all-sufficient and entirely good, has nothing to lose, as He demands nothing; He Himself grants everything and gives freely to all. However, He does not require any deprivation for Himself: yet humanity must undergo such sacrifices to gain the ultimate good. The Gospel clearly illustrates this pattern. The Lord does not command the Apostles, ‘Abandon the sea, leave the vessel, and forsake your father’: He merely invites them; He simply states, ‘Come after Me.’ But when they seek to fulfill this call and follow this mandate, it becomes evident that they must first detach from their boats, their vessels, and their fathers. Had they not forsaken their ship, their possessions, and their father, they would not have followed Jesus. Anyone wishing to embark must first untie, or, in haste, cut the rope by which his boat is tethered to the shore. For those who earnestly desire to journey towards Heaven, it is necessary to either gradually resolve to do so with care and effort, or, if one fears stagnation and feels sufficiently strong, to decisively sever all passionate, earthly attachments. It is essential to be liberated from the desires of the flesh to yield to the yearnings of the spirit. One must trample upon earthly matters to ascend to the wisdom that comes from above. It is imperative to expel the world from one’s heart to create space for boundless love for the infinite God. Here, dear Christians, lies one of the foundational doctrines of the Gospel, presented to us almost at the outset of the Gospel narratives surrounding the acts of Christ and at the beginning of the Apostles’ Gospel journey. Therefore, we do not require much if we prompt you to examine your own consciences about your progress in this teaching. I do not dare to inquire how many among us, in the strictest sense, have truly ‘forsaken all’ (Matthew 19:27; Mark 10:28; Luke 18:28) for the sake of following Jesus Christ. Acknowledging my imperfections and unworthiness, I do not claim the right to interrogate what the Lord asks only of some, under the condition of perfection: ‘If thou wilt be perfect, go and sell that thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come and follow Me’ (Matthew 19:21). If we have not relinquished everything for Christ in action, do we at least partially fulfill this in intention and desire? Does your heart ever whisper: ‘How much more do I possess in this world compared to what is necessary for my temporary existence! How overwhelmed I am with concerns! How immersed I am in pleasures! O Lord, who have made me poor for Your sake! Grant me the grace to partake of Your holy and saving poverty, to forsake my anxieties, to leave behind my fleeting delights! How vividly do I still cherish this transitory world, and how often am I ensnared, sometimes by burdensome ties of love, at other times by golden chains of love that bring reciprocity and well-being, and how both these bindings embolden me on my path to divine love! O Lord, who love us so deeply that you laid down Your life for us. Help me, in the name of love for You, to moderate my earthly affections, to put to death my divided loyalties, to despise the part of my soul that does not love You sufficiently, so that the pure love of Your Holy Spirit may ‘give me wings like a dove, and I shall fly and be at rest’ (Psalm 54:7) with You, and in You alone! But lest these very feelings entice you through mere illusion or an uncertain impulse to detach from worldly concerns, look around and see if you have truly relinquished anything for God, especially that with which your predominant inclination is most tempted. ‘Abraham was very rich’ (Genesis 13:2), and he neither denied nor squandered his wealth: but when, out of love for God, he did not spare his beloved son, it was clear that he was prepared to offer for God all that he had, without hesitation. Conversely, if you, propelled by your eagerness to serve God, and expressing your willingness to sacrifice everything for Him, have yet to actually give up anything that holds your heart captive to material possessions, then your readiness and desire are indeed questionable. If you have not yet forsaken anything in this world, it is certainly true... Lord, call us with Your all-powerful word to follow You, and instill within us a sincere disposition to leave all things for Your sake, that we may find everything in You and discover our true selves in Your love. Amen.

She left the boat and her father and went after Him (Matthew 4:22). The Gospel reveals the authority with which our Lord Jesus Christ summoned the chosen disciples to follow Him into the apostolic vocation. This also highlights the obedience and sacrifices with which they responded to His calling. The might of the Caller demonstrates the power of God within Him, while the obedience of those called serves to instruct us in our Christian responsibilities.

On the shores of the Sea of Galilee, four fishermen were occupied with their work. Two were casting their nets, while the other two were mending their nets, evidently torn in the process of fishing. As they went about their tasks, a man approached them and called out to the first two, "Follow me, and I will make you fishers of men." Peter and Andrew recognized in this man the One whom John the Baptist had pointed out at the Jordan as the Lamb of God (John 1:29). At their initial encounter with Simon, He not only addressed him by name but also bestowed upon him the name Peter, which at that moment held an enigmatic significance. This memory should have stirred in Peter and Andrew a reverence for the words of Jesus.

However, they could not ignore that the Caller was a wanderer, seemingly without a residence, riches, or social prestige. What could compel them to follow someone without any apparent means of support? Peter and Andrew had a humble dwelling, a boat, and fishing gear; how could they relinquish these for a man who possessed none? He would make them "fishers of men" (Matt. 4:19), but what could this possibly signify? Traditionally, men exert influence over others through power, authority, wealth, or worldly skills, yet neither the Caller nor the called had any of these attributes.

What did Jesus rightfully expect from Peter and Andrew? If not outright refusal, perhaps uncertainty, reflection, hesitation, and a struggle between the allure of the extraordinary and their attachment to ordinary life, between the hope for the unknown and the fear of losing the familiar without gain. Yet the response was quite the opposite—swift determination and readiness, as they did not even pause to secure their nets lest they be lost or taken by a predator. They cast their nets aside without hesitation.

Jesus advanced further along the shore, calling out to the other two fishermen, James and John. The effect of this call mirrored that of the first, possibly with even greater astonishment. The Gospel narrative does not indicate that James and John were as forewarned about Jesus as were Andrew and Peter, making their prompt acceptance of His call all the more remarkable. To follow Jesus, James and John were required to leave behind something far more precious than fishing equipment—their father. Yet even the bond of filial love, along with other conflicting emotions and thoughts, could not stand against the authority of Jesus' words.

Read the full text in the app

Anonymous Commentary (Opus Imperfectum)

4th centuryCommentator

It is recorded that Peter and Andrew abandoned their nets, while James and John departed from their father and their boat. To follow Christ, one must primarily relinquish three key aspects: the deeds of the flesh, material possessions, and earthly parents. Leaving the fishing nets symbolizes the renunciation of sinful actions, while the boat signifies the forsaking of worldly goods, and the father represents the detachment from all earthly familial ties. Notice that the sequence is first the nets, then the boat, and finally the father. It is essential to abandon worldly concerns first, as they hinder spiritual growth. Next comes the relinquishment of possessions; although having material things is not inherently detrimental, attachment to them can be harmful.

Read more (65 words)

Lastly, although familial relationships may also pose challenges, their impact is lesser compared to the attachment to riches or the pursuits of this world. Thus, they left the boat to steer the vessel of the Church; they abandoned the nets to catch not fish for earthly sustenance, but souls for heavenly glory; and they departed from one father to become the spiritual guides for all.

Abbot Panteleimon about the Trinity

19th centuryCommentator

AND THEY IMMEDIATELY LEFT THE BOAT AND THEIR FATHER AND FOLLOWED HIM. It is important to observe that the Lord does not instruct the apostles to abandon the boat and their father directly; rather He invites them to “Follow Me” (Mark 1:17). However, in their desire to obey this command, it becomes evident that they must first forsake both the boat and their father. Therefore, anyone truly seeking the path to salvation must be willing to renounce all worldly attachments and anything that stands in the way of the soul's salvation. The blessed Theophylact notes, “this is the case” when one must forsake their father if he obstructs the pursuit of virtue and the pleasing of God.

Read more (89 words)

One must trust that the heavenly Father, in response to your obedience to His will, will not only guide you toward heaven but can also draw your earthly father, who stands in opposition, to salvation through your faith. Consequently, the newly called apostles, who were fishermen, responded to the voice of the Lord by leaving behind their lake, their former vocation, and their father to follow Him. Thus, it may be said that the fishing boat served as the cradle of Christianity, and the fishing nets became its midwives.

Gladkow B.I.

19th centuryCommentator

Jesus’ Teaching by the Lake The news of the Messiah’s arrival spread rapidly throughout Galilee, drawing large crowds eager to hear His teachings. Each individual among the multitude yearned to draw closer, fixated on Him in silence. One day, while He stood by the lakeshore, the people pressed so closely that He had to step into a boat to continue His message. The Miraculous Catch of Fish After concluding His lesson, Jesus instructed Simon to venture into deeper waters and cast his net for a catch. The seasoned fisherman, who had toiled through the night without success, doubted that he would fare any better this time. Nevertheless, he submitted to Jesus’ command. To the astonishment of Peter, James, John, and the others assisting them, the haul was astonishing.

Read more (713 words)

While those unfamiliar with fishing might have rejoiced at such a bountiful catch, the experienced fishermen understood that under the current conditions, no fish could have been caught without divine intervention. Peter, overwhelmed by the realization of this miracle, fell to his knees before Jesus, exclaiming, “Come out from me, Lord, for I am a sinful man” (Luke 5:8). In this heartfelt plea, Peter acknowledged the greatness and sanctity of Jesus and humbly recognized his own unworthiness to be in His presence. At that moment, Peter was unaware that Jesus had come to call sinners to repentance; like others of his time, he believed that the Righteous One could only associate with the righteous. As Jesus called Peter, Andrew, James, and John, He reassured Peter by saying, “Do not be afraid. Following Me now, you will afterwards draw men's minds and hearts to you by My word; no longer a fisherman, you will become a fisher of men; from now on you will be a fisher of men” (Luke 5:10). Upon hearing this invitation, Peter, along with Andrew, James, and John, brought their boats ashore, abandoning their nets and the fish to follow Jesus. The Evangelists Matthew and Mark narrate this same calling of the disciples but omit the miraculous catch of fish that preceded it, leading to a slight inconsistency with Luke's account. For comparison, we refer to the accounts of the first two Evangelists: Matthew 4:18-22: “But as He was passing near the sea of Galilee, He saw two brothers, Simon, called Peter, and Andrew his brother, casting their nets into the sea, for they were fishermen, and He said to them, ‘Follow Me, and I will make you fishers of men.’ And they immediately left their nets and followed Him. And when He went on from there, He saw the other two brothers, James the son of Zebedee and John his brother, in the boat with Zebedee their father, mending their nets, and He called them. And they immediately left the boat and their father and followed Him.” Mark 1:16-20: “But as they were passing near the sea of Galilee, He saw Simon and Andrew his brother casting their nets into the sea, for they were fishermen. And Jesus said to them, ‘Follow me, and I will make you fishers of men.’ And immediately they left their nets and followed Him. And when He had traveled a little way, He saw James Zebedee and John his brother, also in the boat mending their nets; and immediately He called them. And they, leaving their father Zebedee in the boat with the laborers, followed Him.” A comparison of these harmonious accounts from Matthew and Mark with Luke's narrative indicates that the disciples’ calling took place at the lakeshore while they were in their boats with nets. The only difference suggests that Luke states Peter and his companions were called after the miraculous catch, while Matthew and Mark report that the call happened while Peter and Andrew were casting their nets and James and John were mending theirs. There is no reason to assume that Matthew and Mark are referencing different events than Luke as it would be unlikely for Jesus to call the same disciples twice under such similar circumstances. Therefore, the perceived discrepancies in the Evangelists’ narratives can be understood as Matthew and Mark focusing solely on how Jesus called Peter, Andrew, James, and John to leave everything behind and follow Him, possibly omitting the preceding miracle as they saw the call itself as paramount. This calling of the disciples, as recounted by the three Evangelists, could have been regarded as the first call of Peter, Andrew, James, and John to follow Jesus as His disciples, had the Evangelist John not provided an account of an earlier calling involving Andrew, Peter, John, James, Philip, and Nathanael, which occurred after John the Baptist’s profound testament to Jesus as the Messiah, the Son of God (John 1:35-51). By examining these two calls along with their contexts, it is reasonable to conclude that after the initial call, Jesus' disciples did not consistently accompany Him on His travels and sometimes returned to their former professions. However, following the second call, they became His steadfast companions and subsequently emerged as the chosen apostles among the twelve.

Lopuchin A.P.

19th centuryCommentator

In response, an uplifting message was delivered: "Do not be afraid; from now on you will be fishers of men." The Redeemer, as was His custom in all teachings, tapped into the deeper significance of the context. Surrounding them in the boat were bountiful catches from the lake, yet these were beginning to diminish—foreshadowing the eternal stillness of death. From this moment, this repentant individual, having been cleansed and redeemed, was called to a higher mission: to seek the souls that, drawn in by the net of the Gospel, would be granted eternal life. His brother and fellow workers were also destined to become fishers of men.

Paul Matwejewski

19th centuryCommentator

The initial act of Christ the Savior in Capernaum involved calling Simon, Andrew, and the sons of Zebedee to become His disciples. As the Lord moved along the lakeshore, He observed two boats moored there, from which fishermen had emerged—some were washing their nets while others were repairing them. One of these boats belonged to Simon and his brother Andrew, while the other, positioned slightly farther away, belonged to Zebedee, who was out fishing with his workers and his sons, James and John. Crowds gathered around the Lord, eager to hear His teachings, and He climbed into Simon's boat, asking him to move away from the shore. From there, He imparted His wisdom to the throng.

Read more (289 words)

After concluding His message, He instructed Simon, “Launch out into the deep, and let down your nets for a catch.” To this, Simon replied, “Master, we have toiled all night and caught nothing; nevertheless at Your word I will let down the net.” The more Simon doubted their chances of success, the more astonishing must have been the miracle that the Lord performed, which indicated that all their previous struggles could be more than compensated by His command. In obedience, Simon cast down the net and, far exceeding expectations, they caught a vast number of fish, so much so that their net began to break. They signaled their partners in the other boat, who joined them in the effort, filling both boats to the point of sinking. This miraculous catch astonished Simon and all who were with him, evoking feelings of both wonder and fear. Unlike the previous miracles they had witnessed, this phenomenon, in which they had personally participated, struck closer to home. Overwhelmed by deep emotion, Simon fell to his knees before Jesus, exclaiming, “Depart from me, for I am a sinful man, O Lord.” To this heartfelt confession of sin, the All-Knowing One responded with words of encouragement and a call to a higher purpose: “Do not be afraid; from now on you will catch men.” He then turned to Simon's companions, inviting them, “Follow Me, and I will make you fishers of men.” The fishermen eagerly heeded this call, exemplifying the words of St. Philaret of Moscow with their swift resolve, complete readiness, and unwavering commitment, not hesitating for an instant. After bringing both boats to shore, they forsook everything to follow the Lord Jesus, with James and John even leaving their father Zebedee behind.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 12 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. οἱ
    hoi
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  2. δὲ
    de
    but
    G1161 · δέ
  3. εὐθέως
    eutheōs
    immediately
    G2112 · εὐθέως
  4. ἀφέντες
    aphentes
    I send away
    G863 · ἀφίημι
  5. τὸ
    to
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  6. πλοῖον
    ploion
    a ship
    G4143 · πλοῖον
  7. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  8. τὸν
    ton
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  9. πατέρα
    patera
    father
    G3962 · πατήρ
  10. αὐτῶν
    autōn
    he
    G846 · αὐτός
  11. ἠκολούθησαν
    ēkolouthēsan
    I accompany
    G190 · ἀκολουθέω
  12. αὐτῷ
    autō
    he
    G846 · αὐτός