The Church Fathers on this verse

Acts 4:34Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

For neither was there any one needy among them. For as many as were owners of lands or houses sold them and brought the price of the things they sold,

Douay-Rheims

ουδε γαρ ενδεης τις υπηρχεν εν αυτοις οσοι γαρ κτητορες χωριων η οικιων υπηρχον πωλουντες εφερον τας τιμας των πιπρασκομενων

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

7 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

As in a father’s house all the sons have equal honor, so they too were in the same condition. One could not say that they fed others. They were fed by what was their own.

The marvelous thing is this: having renounced what was their own, they were fed in such a way that they seemed no longer to be fed from what was their own, but from what was common.

They did not give one part and keep another for themselves. Even when they gave everything, they did not consider it their own.

They drove inequality out from their midst and lived in great abundance. Moreover, they did this with great honor.

Thus they did not dare merely to hand it into the Apostles’ hands, nor did they give arrogantly. They brought it to their feet and allowed them to be the stewards.

Read more (707 words)

They made the Apostles masters, so that expenses were now made as from a common property, and not as from private property. This also protected them from vainglory.

If it were so now, we would live with greater pleasure, both rich and poor. It would be pleasant for the poor and for the rich.

If you wish, let us depict this at least in words, since you do not wish to show it in deed. From this alone we shall already receive pleasure.

True, this is very clear also from what happened then. Those who sold did not become poor, but made the poor rich.

But let us now depict it in words. Let all sell everything they have and bring it into the common midst. I am speaking only in words. Let no one be troubled, neither rich nor poor.

How much gold do you think would be gathered? I suppose, though it is impossible to say precisely, that if all men and women brought their money here, the amount would be great.

If they also gave fields, estates, and dwellings, and I am not speaking of slaves, for they did not have them then, or perhaps they set them free, then probably a thousand thousand pounds of gold would be collected.

Or rather, even two and three times as much.

Tell me, indeed, how many inhabitants are there now in our city altogether? How many Christians do you think there are in it? Do you think there are a hundred thousand, while the rest are pagans and Jews?

How many thousands of gold would be collected? And how great is the number of the poor? I do not think there are more than fifty thousand.

How much would be needed to feed them every day? With common support and a common table, of course, no great expense would be required.

What then, they will say, shall we do when we have spent our resources? Do you really think one could ever come to this condition?

Would not the grace of God be a thousand times greater? Would not the grace of God be poured out abundantly?

And what then? Would we not make the earth heaven? If among three thousand and five thousand this was accomplished with such glory, and none of them complained of poverty, how much more would it be so among such a multitude?

Even among outsiders, what person would not make an offering?

To see that division is linked with losses and produces poverty, let us imagine a house in which there are ten children, a wife, and a husband. Let us say she spins yarn, while he receives income from outside.

Tell me, when will they spend more: when eating together and living in one house, or when divided? Obviously, when divided.

If the ten children wish to divide, then ten houses, ten tables, ten servants, and the same number of other necessities will be required.

And where there are many servants, do they not all have a common table precisely so that expenses may be smaller?

Division always produces loss, while oneness of mind and concord produce profit. In monasteries they now live as the faithful once lived. Has anyone died of hunger? On the contrary, who has not been satisfied with great abundance?

But now people fear this more than throwing themselves into the immeasurable and boundless sea. Yet if we made the trial, then we would dare this work.

And what grace there would be! At that time there were no faithful except only three thousand and five thousand. All throughout the world were enemies of the faith. From nowhere could they expect consolation.

Yet they approached this work so boldly. How much more is this possible now, when, by the grace of God, the faithful are everywhere throughout the world?

Would anyone then remain a pagan? I, at least, think no one would. Thus we would incline and draw everyone to ourselves.

However, if we go this way, then, I trust in God, this too will happen. Only obey me, and let us order matters in this way. If God prolongs our life, I am confident that we shall soon lead such a way of life.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

"Nor was there anyone among them who lacked." Therefore there was great grace, because there was not a single poor person, that is, not one who was in need. This was due to the special generosity of those who gave up their possessions. They did not give only one part while keeping another part for themselves, but everything. And they gave everything not as their own, but as though it were not their own. All the believers were fed as though from one household.

Jerome of Stridon

4th centuryChurch Father

It is worthy of praise and comparable to the virtues of apostolic times, when believers sold their possessions, brought the money, and laid it at the feet of the Apostles, showing that greed must be trampled down.

John Cassian

5th centuryChurch Father

The apostle calls the last member of the sinful body covetousness, teaching that one must not only refrain from desiring another's goods, but must also magnanimously despise one's own. So acted the community of believers mentioned in the book of Acts, of which it is said: "The multitude of those who believed had one heart and one soul; and no one called anything of his possessions his own, but they had all things in common... For all who possessed lands or houses sold them, brought the price of what was sold, and laid it at the apostles' feet; and distribution was made to each as anyone had need" (Acts 4:32, 34-35). And lest it seem that this concerns only a few, the apostle testifies that covetousness is idolatry (Col 3:5), and rightly so.

Read more (41 words)

For whoever does not give what is necessary to the poor, and prefers his money, which he preserves through distrustful stinginess, to Christ's commandments, falls into the vice of idolatry. He prefers love for worldly substance to the love of God.

Bogolepow D.P.

19th centuryChurch Father

The active love of the first Christians and the danger of its distortion into hypocrisy. Ananias and Sapphira (4:32-5:11). After the previously described clash of the apostles Peter and John with the council, the Christians enjoyed outward peace for a time. Yet at this time, within the society itself, a danger to its inner state and development was revealed and removed by the God-enlightened attention of the apostles. For that reason it was a greater danger than outward persecutions from the Church's enemies. The state of Christ's Church at this time remained the same as before. The same union of Christians among themselves characterized the first Christian society even now. This was union and agreement not only in matters of faith, but also in all thoughts and moral dispositions.

Read more (202 words)

Thus, according to the writer of Acts, "the multitude of those who believed had one heart and one soul." The same communion of love characterized them, by which no one called anything of his possessions his own, but they had all things in common (v. 32). Amid this assembly of saints, the apostles stand forth with special majesty. Among their own, they are guides, teachers, and household stewards. Outside the Church, they bear the mighty and powerfully active word concerning the resurrection of the Lord Jesus Christ. However great the number of believers was, there was no one among them in need (v. 34). This was achieved precisely through the mutual brotherly assistance of the Christians. Moved by love for their Christian brethren, the more prosperous members of the Apostolic Church brought their means to the apostles for their disposal. The apostles then gave to each according to his need. As an example of this self-denying love, freely and without compulsion renouncing its own property for the society's benefit, the writer of Acts points to the deed of Joses-Barnabas. In his homeland, the island of Cyprus, he owned land. He sold it and brought the money for the apostles to dispose of.

Lopuchin A.P.

19th centuryChurch Father

The apostles continued their work with still greater zeal. The assembly of believers was distinguished still more by its virtues and by its incomparable concord. "The multitude of those who believed had one heart and one soul; and no one called anything of his possessions his own, but they had all things in common." This does not mean that the first Christians adopted a dreamy and practically unrealizable theory known as communism. Its essence consists in the rejection of all personal property. Communism presupposes the compulsory abolition of all personal property. Among the first Christians, however, the sharing of possessions was only an expression of the inner spirit of self-denial with which they approached works of philanthropy.

Read more (73 words)

They sold everything in order to form, as it were, a fund for helping needy brethren. Hence this sharing of possessions was clearly not obligatory. If certain persons, such as Barnabas, a Levite from the island of Cyprus, even sold his field and brought the proceeds to the apostles' feet, this case is marked out as exceptional. Then another case, that of Ananias, clearly proves that such sharing of possessions was not obligatory.

Michail (Lusin)

19th centuryChurch Father

The fifth feature is the absence in the society of the poor, of those lacking anything necessary for outward life. This was the result, on the one hand, of the brotherly sharing of possessions (v. 32). On the other hand, it resulted from the establishment, under the apostles' oversight, of a common treasury from which the needs of the needy were met. "For all who possessed" and so forth: strictly, "whoever" (ὅσοι) possessed. The expression does not contain the thought that absolutely everyone sold. The example presented further, and it is one example, seems to speak against the universality of this custom. Probably each person, by his own good will (cf. Acts 5:4), either sold or did not sell his property.

Read more (135 words)

But since the spirit of this first society was very high, there were probably many who sold. From the money obtained in this way the common treasury was formed. "Selling them": just as it is not clear from the text that all sold their possessions, so it is not clear that those who sold sold everything they had, leaving nothing in their own possession. Probably everyone who wished to contribute to the common treasury sold whatever he wished from his property. Thus whether to sell or not to sell, and how much to sell, was a matter of each person's good will and conscience. It was determined by the measure of each one's brotherly love. Since this love was strong, many sold much, and from this treasury each needy person was given what he needed.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 20 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. Οὐδὲ
    oude
    neither
    G3761 · οὐδέ
  2. γὰρ
    gar
    for
    G1063 · γάρ
  3. ἐνδεής
    endeēs
    in need
    G1729 · ἐνδεής
  4. τις
    tis
    any one
    G5100 · τις
  5. ἦν
    ēn
    I am
    G1510 · εἰμί
  6. ἐν
    en
    in
    G1722 · ἐν
  7. αὐτοῖς
    autois
    he
    G846 · αὐτός
  8. ὅσοι
    hosoi
    how much
    G3745 · ὅσος
  9. γὰρ
    gar
    for
    G1063 · γάρ
  10. κτήτορες
    ktētores
    a possessor
    G2935 · κτήτωρ
  11. χωρίων
    chōriōn
    a place
    G5564 · χωρίον
  12. ἢ
    ē
    or
    G2228 · ἤ
  13. οἰκιῶν
    oikiōn
    a house
    G3614 · οἰκία
  14. ὑπῆρχον
    hypērchon
    I am
    G5225 · ὑπάρχω
  15. πωλοῦντες
    pōlountes
    I sell
    G4453 · πωλέω
  16. ἔφερον
    epheron
    I carry
    G5342 · φέρω
  17. τὰς
    tas
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  18. τιμὰς
    timas
    a price
    G5092 · τιμή
  19. τῶν
    tōn
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  20. πιπρασκομένων
    pipraskomenōn
    I sell
    G4097 · πιπράσκω