The Church Fathers on this verse

Acts 4:32Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

And the multitude of believers had but one heart and one soul. Neither did any one say that aught of the things which he possessed was his own: but all things were common unto them.

Douay-Rheims

του δε πληθους των πιστευσαντων ην η καρδια και η ψυχη μια και ουδε εις τι των υπαρχοντων αυτων αυτω ελεγεν ιδιον ειναι αλλ ην αυτοις απαντα κοινα

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

10 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

Do you see how, together with the grace of God, they were also distinguished by their own virtues? Everywhere one must observe that, together with God's grace, they showed their own virtues, as Peter also said: "Silver and gold I do not have" (Acts 3:6). What he said above, in the words "all who believed were together" (Acts 2:44), he expresses again here: "the multitude of those who believed had one heart and one soul." After saying that they were heard, he then speaks also of their virtue, since he is about to begin the account of Sapphira and Ananias. Therefore, wishing to show their transgression, he first speaks of the virtue of the others. But tell me: did love beget non-possession, or did non-possession beget love?

Read more (394 words)

It seems to me that love begot non-possession, and this strengthened love still more. Listen, then, to what the writer says: all "had one heart and one soul." Behold, heart and soul are one. Do you see how great the power of this virtue, the sharing of possessions, is, if it was needed even there? Indeed, it is the cause of blessings. He mentions it here a second time, instilling non-acquisitiveness in all. Above he said, "no one called anything of his possessions his own." Here he says, "there was no one among them who lacked anything" (Acts 4:34). That this came not only from signs, but also from their own will, Sapphira and Ananias show. "And no one called anything of his possessions his own, but they had all things in common." When the root of evils, I mean love of money, had been torn out, all blessings abounded. They were closely united with one another, since nothing divided them. That harsh expression, "mine and yours," which has produced countless wars in the inhabited world, was banished from that holy Church. They lived on earth as angels in heaven. The poor did not envy the rich, for there were no rich. The rich did not despise the poor, for there were no poor. "But they had all things in common; and no one called anything of his possessions his own." It was not then as it is now. Now those who possess property give to the poor. Then it was not so. They renounced ownership of their own wealth, laid it before all, and mingled it with the common property. Even those who had formerly been rich were no longer distinguishable. Thus, if any pride can arise from contempt for riches, it too was completely destroyed. Among them there was equality in everything, and all wealth was mingled together. Their piety may be seen not only from this, but also from the very manner in which they handed over their property. "There was," he says, "one heart and one soul." This does not mean that they all had only one soul. How could there be one soul in different bodies? Rather, it shows us their firm concord. "Among the multitude of those who believed there was one heart and one soul." Though the faithful were divided in body, they were one in mind.

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

If, in coming to God, many souls by the gift of love become one soul, and many hearts become one heart, then what does the very source of love do in the Father and the Son? Is not the Trinity there still more one God? Therefore, if the love of God poured out in our hearts by the Holy Spirit who was given to us makes many souls one soul, and many hearts one heart, how much more are the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit one God, one light, and one beginning?

Basil the Great

4th centuryChurch Father

Nothing that has been given to each on loan should be regarded as one's own property, or managed according to one's own will. Rather, one must care diligently for everything as belonging to the Master. Nothing should be neglected, even among what has been left unnoticed or disregarded, if such a thing occurs. Nor should one consider it to be under one's own authority. Rather, one must care for everything as given by God for service to brethren of one mind, and fulfill this service, each in his own order (1 Cor 15:23). Experience is necessary in order to distinguish the one who is truly in need from the one who asks only out of greed. Whoever gives to one in need gives to the Lord and will receive a reward from Him. But another throws something to every dog that runs past, because of its importunate shamelessness, not from compassion for its need.

Maximus the Confessor

7th centuryChurch Father

For great, and almost beyond numbering, is the multitude of men, women, and children who differ and are greatly distinguished from one another. They differ in race and kind, nationality and language, manner of life and age, disposition and craft, customs, ways, habits, knowledge, and social standing. They differ also in fortunes, characters, and qualities of soul. Yet when they are found in the Church, they are regenerated and recreated by the Spirit. She grants and communicates to all equally one divine form and name: to be, and to be called, Christ's own. Again, in accordance with faith, She grants them one simple, indivisible, and inseparable bond. This bond does not permit the many and countless differences of each to appear, even if they exist.

Read more (81 words)

It raises all to universality and unites them in it. Because of this, no one separates anything from the common good for himself. All grow together and are united with one another by the one simple and indivisible grace and power of faith. Scripture says, "They had one heart and one soul" (Acts 4:32). Thus all are, and appear to be, one Body made up of diverse members. This Body is truly worthy of Christ Himself, our true Head (Eph 4:15).

Cyprian of Carthage

3rd centuryChurch Father

This means truly becoming a son of God by spiritual kinship. This means imitating, according to the heavenly law, the impartiality of God the Father. For everything that belongs to God is common and placed at our disposal. No one is withheld from His mercies and gifts, since the whole human race is equally filled with divine goodness and generosity.

Fulgentius of Ruspe

6th centuryChurch Father

From this it follows that all created beings alike in nature can, by contrast, be divided, since they cannot exist whole in each separate place. For although even among them, by the grace of faith, it happens that "the multitude of those who believed had one heart and one soul," nevertheless they can be divided into individual persons by location, though not divided in the feeling of the heart. Some unbelievers can also come from believers and withdraw from fellowship with this single soul.

Beda Venerabilis

7th centuryChurch Father

They completely left this world and in no way exalted themselves over one another by boasting of noble birth. Rather, as though they had come forth from the womb of one and the same Mother, the Church, they all rejoiced in one and the same brotherly love.

Bogolepow D.P.

19th centuryChurch Father

The active love of the first Christians and the danger of its distortion into hypocrisy. Ananias and Sapphira (4:32-5:11). After the previously described clash of the apostles Peter and John with the council, the Christians enjoyed outward peace for a time. Yet at this time, within the society itself, a danger to its inner state and development was revealed and removed by the God-enlightened attention of the apostles. For that reason it was a greater danger than outward persecutions from the Church's enemies. The state of Christ's Church at this time remained the same as before. The same union of Christians among themselves characterized the first Christian society even now. This was union and agreement not only in matters of faith, but also in all thoughts and moral dispositions.

Read more (202 words)

Thus, according to the writer of Acts, "the multitude of those who believed had one heart and one soul." The same communion of love characterized them, by which no one called anything of his possessions his own, but they had all things in common (v. 32). Amid this assembly of saints, the apostles stand forth with special majesty. Among their own, they are guides, teachers, and household stewards. Outside the Church, they bear the mighty and powerfully active word concerning the resurrection of the Lord Jesus Christ. However great the number of believers was, there was no one among them in need (v. 34). This was achieved precisely through the mutual brotherly assistance of the Christians. Moved by love for their Christian brethren, the more prosperous members of the Apostolic Church brought their means to the apostles for their disposal. The apostles then gave to each according to his need. As an example of this self-denying love, freely and without compulsion renouncing its own property for the society's benefit, the writer of Acts points to the deed of Joses-Barnabas. In his homeland, the island of Cyprus, he owned land. He sold it and brought the money for the apostles to dispose of.

Lopuchin A.P.

19th centuryChurch Father

The apostles continued their work with still greater zeal. The assembly of believers was distinguished still more by its virtues and by its incomparable concord. "The multitude of those who believed had one heart and one soul; and no one called anything of his possessions his own, but they had all things in common." This does not mean that the first Christians adopted a dreamy and practically unrealizable theory known as communism. Its essence consists in the rejection of all personal property. Communism presupposes the compulsory abolition of all personal property. Among the first Christians, however, the sharing of possessions was only an expression of the inner spirit of self-denial with which they approached works of philanthropy.

Read more (73 words)

They sold everything in order to form, as it were, a fund for helping needy brethren. Hence this sharing of possessions was clearly not obligatory. If certain persons, such as Barnabas, a Levite from the island of Cyprus, even sold his field and brought the proceeds to the apostles' feet, this case is marked out as exceptional. Then another case, that of Ananias, clearly proves that such sharing of possessions was not obligatory.

Michail (Lusin)

19th centuryChurch Father

The healing of the lame man and the apostles' great moral victory over the council, at its first attack on the new society, was a great event in the first Christian Church. The society had more than doubled, perhaps tripled, compared with what it had been after the day of Pentecost. Therefore the writer of Acts considered it necessary, as after the narrative of Pentecost, to make general observations about the inner state of this enlarged society (vv. 32-37). As the first characteristic feature, he points out that, despite the increase of the new society's members, there was complete oneness of mind and brotherly love among them. They had "one heart and one soul," a perfect union in thought, feeling, will, faith, and the whole order of spiritual life.

Read more (78 words)

Truly a wondrous phenomenon in a sinful and self-loving world. The second feature is the full sharing of possessions; see the note on Acts 2:44. This was not a law binding on all, still less a compulsion. It was a voluntary movement of brotherly love and moral unity. "No one called anything his own": though property existed, it was offered in brotherly fashion for the use of others. Thus each could make use of what belonged to all.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 25 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. Τοῦ
    tou
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  2. δὲ
    de
    but
    G1161 · δέ
  3. πλήθους
    plēthous
    a multitude
    G4128 · πλῆθος
  4. τῶν
    tōn
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  5. πιστευσάντων
    pisteusantōn
    I believe
    G4100 · πιστεύω
  6. ἦν
    ēn
    I am
    G1510 · εἰμί
  7. καρδία
    kardia
    the heart
    G2588 · καρδία
  8. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  9. ψυχὴ
    psychē
    the soul
    G5590 · ψυχή
  10. μία
    mia
    one
    G1520 · εἷς
  11. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  12. οὐδὲ
    oude
    neither
    G3761 · οὐδέ
  13. εἷς
    heis
    one
    G1520 · εἷς
  14. τι
    ti
    any one
    G5100 · τις
  15. τῶν
    tōn
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  16. ὑπαρχόντων
    hyparchontōn
    I am
    G5225 · ὑπάρχω
  17. αὐτῷ
    autō
    he
    G846 · αὐτός
  18. ἔλεγεν
    elegen
    I say
    G3004 · λέγω
  19. ἴδιον
    idion
    one's own
    G2398 · ἴδιος
  20. εἶναι
    einai
    I am
    G1510 · εἰμί
  21. ἀλλ᾽
    all
    but
    G235 · ἀλλά
  22. ἦν
    ēn
    I am
    G1510 · εἰμί
  23. αὐτοῖς
    autois
    he
    G846 · αὐτός
  24. πάντα
    panta
    all
    G3956 · πᾶς
  25. κοινά
    koina
    common
    G2839 · κοινός