The Church Fathers on this verse

Acts 9:1Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

And Saul, as yet breathing out threatenings and slaughter against the disciples of the Lord, went to the high priest

Douay-Rheims

ο δε σαυλος ετι εμπνεων απειλης και φονου εις τους μαθητας του κυριου προσελθων τω αρχιερει

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

7 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

The writer fittingly recounts Paul's zeal, in order to show that he was carried away precisely by zeal.

Not yet sated with the murder of Stephen, and not satisfied with the persecution and scattering of the Church, he comes to the high priest.

Here the words of Christ to the disciples are fulfilled: “Whoever kills you will think that he offers service to God” (Jn 16:2).

This is how he acted, though not as the Jews did. Far be it. He acted from zeal, as is clear from the fact that he went even to foreign cities.

They did not even care about what was taking place in Jerusalem. They sought only one thing, to enjoy honor.

Why did he go to Damascus? It was a great city, a capital. He feared that believers might penetrate even there.

And see his eagerness and zeal, and how he acted according to the law. He does not come to the governor, but to the high priest.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

Luke explains Paul's frenzy against the faithful and against the Church. He shows that Paul was carried away by an impure zeal, μεσος. For in him was fulfilled what Christ said: whoever kills you will think he offers service to God, Jn 16:2. He did not act as the other Jews did. May it not be so! That he did this from zeal is evident from his going even to foreign cities. They paid no attention even to those in Jerusalem. They cared only about one thing: enjoying honor.

Bogolepow D.P.

19th centuryChurch Father

The spread of Christianity in Samaria and the conversion to Christ of the proselyte, the eunuch of the Ethiopian queen, marked the beginning of the Gospel preaching beyond the limits of Judaism in its strict sense.

Soon afterward, according to the plan of God's divine economy, the apostles were to extend the realm of Gospel preaching still farther by carrying it into the Gentile world.

And so the Lord chooses for Himself a vessel to proclaim His name in that world. The Lord discerned this vessel, useful for the Gospel, in His fiercest enemy, Saul.

This same Saul had taken such an active part in the murder of the protomartyr Stephen and in the persecution of Christians that began afterward in Jerusalem (Acts 7:58; 8:1, 3).

Read more (100 words)

Not content with this, he resolved to carry his malicious persecutions of the Lord's disciples beyond the borders of Jerusalem.

Since he was a private individual, and needed legal authority for this, he obtained from the high priest a letter to the synagogues in Damascus.

By virtue of these letters, the synagogues were to give Saul every assistance in persecuting the Jews who had followed the teaching of Christ.

He directed his way to Damascus, rather than to some other city, probably because reports had reached him and the Sanhedrin about a large number of Christians among the Jews there.

Innocentius of Kherson

19th centuryChurch Father

The successes of the scattered Christians, who wherever they went proclaimed the name of Christ, gave Saul occasion to extend the persecution of them beyond the borders of Palestine.

Still breathing threats and murder, he requested letters from the high priests to the synagogues of Damascus (Acts 9:2), so that he might bind the Christians there and bring them to Jerusalem.

Damascus, very abundantly populated by Jews, appeared to Paul as a most extensive field for his action.

The Roman authority, which did not tolerate such events as the killing of Stephen, had no power there. Damascus had shortly before been conquered by Aretas, king of Arabia (2 Cor 11:32).

Read more (169 words)

Its new ruler favored the Jews. The letters of the high priest, already respected in foreign synagogues, were bound to have the force of law and complete success in Damascus. This indeed followed, but in quite another form.

One may ask what authority the high priest had over a foreign synagogue, that of Damascus.

From the works of Josephus it is evident that foreign synagogues voluntarily obeyed the supreme Jerusalem Sanhedrin, especially in matters concerning religion, such as discerning false teaching, false prophets, and the like.

It is also evident that Roman provincial governors did not oppose this custom, which among the Jews had the form of a kind of national law.

How numerous the Jews were in Damascus may be inferred from Josephus's testimony. In the reign of Nero, the inhabitants of Damascus suddenly seized ten thousand Jews and put them to death.

Since the daughter of Aretas was married to Herod Antipas, some even conclude that he was a Jewish proselyte, one newly converted to their faith.

Lopuchin A.P.

19th centuryChurch Father

The very course of the Gospel’s spread already showed that its preaching was not to be limited to the Jewish people, even if all the sons of the Dispersion, schismatics such as the Samaritans, and proselytes of both kinds were included.

Beyond them lay the boundless world of the Gentile nations. They had no contact at all with the Jewish people, did not know the Old Testament law, and in their life were guided by natural reason.

The Jews looked upon these nations with arrogant contempt, as condemned to destruction. Yet they too were sons of Adam. The guilt of ancestral sin weighed upon them just as upon the Jews, and even to a greater degree.

Read more (1642 words)

They had been left to their own powers and did not have the beneficent guidance from above. Therefore the work of redemption now had to extend to them also, and even more fully, according to their greater spiritual need.

But for the Gospel to be spread among them, a special preacher was required, one who had not yet appeared among the Apostles. He had to be equally acquainted with the Jewish and Gentile worlds, and had to grasp in the highest degree the mystery of Christianity as a new and universal religion.

Such a preacher appeared in the person of the Apostle Paul. His history gives a striking example of how the providence of God, for every spiritual need, raises up great workers, sometimes calling them from the very midst of the hardened enemies of truth.

At the dreadful martyrdom of Saint Stephen, the tormentors who stoned him laid their garments “at the feet of a young man named Saul.” This was the great chosen vessel of God.

Although he himself apparently did not take part in stoning the protomartyr, he was so embittered against the great preacher of Christianity that “he approved of his killing” (Acts 8:1).

Even after that bloodthirsty deed, he did not calm down. He “made havoc of the Church, entering house after house, and dragging off men and women, committed them to prison.”

This furious persecutor of Christianity was a Jew, born in Tarsus of Cilicia. He therefore belonged to the Jews of the Dispersion.

Yet he came from a family that prided itself on the purity of its Jewish blood. It remembered its descent from the tribe of Benjamin and gave its son his very name in honor of the king from that tribe, Saul.

Thus, being “a Hebrew of Hebrews” (Phil 3:5), Saul at the same time possessed a very important civil right. This was the right of a free Roman citizen, which guaranteed the inviolability of his person throughout the vast expanse of the Roman Empire.

This right had probably been acquired by his father for some service to the Romans during the civil wars, and from him it passed to his son.

Tarsus, located on the banks of the Cydnus in a narrow, fertile plain between the Mediterranean Sea and the snowy heights of Taurus, was a large commercial and industrial city. It was a depot for goods involved in trade between the East and Asia Minor.

But the inhabitants’ special craft was the production of woolen fabrics, carpets, and tents from goat’s hair, which was famous throughout the East. Saul was trained by his parents in this craft, namely as a tentmaker.

This does not mean that his parents were poor and unable to prepare their son for some higher social position. It was simply a common custom among the Jews to accustom their children to some trade.

They did this to give them the ability to earn bread amid all the reversals of life. Saul indeed more than once had cause to remember his parents with gratitude, when he had to resort to his craft for sustenance.

After teaching their son a craft, his parents then gave him a good general education. Since Greek was the common language in such a large city as Tarsus, Saul knew it perfectly.

He was so familiar with Greek literature that he freely cited Greek poets (Acts 18:28; Titus 1:2), and even deeply understood the very spirit of Hellenism.

This high education made him an especially suitable instrument for the aim for which providence was preparing him, namely to be the “Apostle of the nations.” But this was only one side of his education.

After giving their son a general classical education, his parents also took special care to give him a higher Jewish education. For this purpose Saul was sent to Jerusalem, where various higher schools flourished.

There he was “brought up at the feet of Gamaliel,” the most famous jurist of his time. Gamaliel was distinguished not only by the depth and breadth of his learning, but also by a remarkable spirit of tolerance toward opinions differing from established views.

In the school of this great teacher, Saul was “carefully instructed in the ancestral law” and was zealous for God (Acts 22:3).

All this extensive education, joined to lofty natural gifts, made Saul a very notable person. Already in Jerusalem, among the Pharisees, he enjoyed great renown, not only for his learning, but also because he “lived as a Pharisee according to the strictest sect of the Jewish religion” (Acts 26:5).

After completing his education, Saul surely returned to Tarsus. But that city had now become too narrow for the highly learned and ardent young man. His soul longed for a broader field, and he soon appears again in Jerusalem.

There he first had to encounter new preachers, who were successfully preaching some new teaching unknown to him. The highly learned Pharisee from Tarsus did not fail to listen to these new preachers.

To his horror and indignation, he learned that they were preaching the abolition of the Mosaic law. In its place they were teaching the doctrine of some obscure Galilean, Jesus of Nazareth.

This Jesus, for His rebelliousness and blasphemy, had been condemned to death and crucified between two criminals.

To Saul, as an ardent zealot for the law and at the same time a highly educated expert in it, all this could appear only as outrageous madness. It would not have deserved the slightest attention if the preachers of this new teaching had been only illiterate villagers.

Such were those who had followed the Founder of the teaching in crowds. But now the preachers included educated Hellenists such as Stephen. Clearly, this teaching had already put down deep roots and could not be ignored.

These preachers had to be refuted and struck down. Saul did indeed come forward against Stephen and was undoubtedly one of those “from Cilicia” who entered into dispute with Stephen (Acts 6:9).

The dispute between such opponents could only have been most heated. Saul saw to his horror that, despite all his learning, he “could not withstand the wisdom and the Spirit by which” his opponent spoke.

Then his zeal took on a bloodthirsty character. He could wash away the shame of his defeat only with Stephen’s blood, and he approved his killing.

The circumstances accompanying this terrible martyrdom could not pass without leaving a trace in such an ardent man as Saul. A dreadful feeling of regret and repentance stirred in his soul, because in his zeal he had gone so far.

At the same time, a spark of doubt about his own rightness was kindled. But this was a heavy feeling. It had to be suppressed.

This could be achieved only by new and intensified zeal in defense of the Mosaic law and in persecution of its enemies.

If such a highly educated and heroic preacher of it as Stephen had been destroyed, then the mass of his followers no longer deserved any pity. They had to be annihilated, and then the hated teaching would be uprooted.

With such thoughts and feelings, Saul, contrary to the instructions of his great teacher Gamaliel, positively began to “make havoc of the Church” and persecuted its members “to the death” (Acts 8:3; Acts 22:4).

This persecution brought terror upon the Christians. Before the face of the formidable persecutor, they scattered and disappeared. Jerusalem apparently was completely cleansed of them.

There was no longer preaching or miracles at Solomon’s Porch. Crowds no longer gathered in the streets waiting for the shadow of the Apostles Peter and John to pass by.

In the house of Mary, the mother of Mark, there were no longer large assemblies. If Christians gathered, they gathered only with fear and in secret, in small numbers.

The agape meals, if they were still held at all, probably took place as in the first days after the Resurrection, behind locked doors for fear of the Jews.

Some Christians endured cruel suffering for their faith. Less devoted members of the Church undoubtedly fell away from it. The majority fled at once, even before the storm of persecution broke.

Such success in the matter must have greatly rejoiced the high priests and Jewish elders. At last they could hope for the complete extermination of the sect that had caused them so much trouble.

They would even have been satisfied with what had already been done. But Saul wanted to bring the matter to an end. “In excessive rage against them, he persecuted them even to foreign cities” (Acts 26:11).

He had heard that there were especially many Christians in Damascus, where they had made themselves a nest under the authority of the Arabian prince Aretas.

And so, in order to destroy this nest also, Saul turned to the high priest. He asked him to give letters of authority to Damascus, so that he might set up a tribunal there.

With these letters he would bring in chains from there to Jerusalem all Christians he could find, both men and women. The purpose was to subject them to the highest court.

For them, the fate of Saint Stephen could serve as an example of that court’s justice and mercy.

And so, having received the letters, he set out on the road, “breathing threats and murder against the disciples of the Lord.” Yet by the inscrutable designs of God’s providence, this road led him to an outcome utterly unexpected by him.

He left Damascus not as a fearsome persecutor, with a whole group of Christians bound in chains and trembling for their fate. He left as a humbled and broken Nazarene, a follower of that very Jesus of Nazareth.

Until then, the very name of Jesus had sounded to him with contempt and had stirred in him an ineradicable hatred.

Michail (Lusin)

19th centuryChurch Father

“But Saul, still breathing threats,” and so forth. While the Lord's disciples, scattered after Stephen's death because of the persecution raised against them, were spreading the Gospel preaching in the countries neighboring Judea (Acts 8:1, 4 and following), Saul continued his fanatical actions against the Lord's disciples.

He had ravaged the Church at the beginning of this persecution (Acts 8:3), and now he was “still breathing,” that is, continuing to breathe.

It seems that no very brief time passed between the beginning of this persecution and the event of Saul's conversion, which the writer then narrates.

During this time, the passion of Saul's actions against Christians not only did not weaken, but grew stronger and stronger.

Read more (276 words)

This is indicated by the intense expression, “breathing threats and murder,” and also by the undertaking he conceived, to go to Damascus.

The expression suggests a wild beast of prey, panting with carnivorous passion. Threats and murders had become, as it were, the air Saul breathed, the necessary element of his life.

Thus the expression characterizes a passion that had developed into extreme fanaticism against Christians. This was wholly natural in such a position and in such a character as Saul's.

The passion of hatred, when it continues for a considerable time and finds satisfaction, grows and intensifies. It becomes, as it were, identified with a person's character and drags him irrevocably farther and farther. This is especially true in fanaticism.

That Saul had reached precisely this degree is shown by the fact that he was no longer satisfied with raging against Christians in Jerusalem and Judea. He conceived the plan of going to Damascus.

“He came to the high priest”: it is difficult to say exactly who was high priest at that time, since the year of Saul's conversion may be determined in different ways.

If this event took place no later than A.D. 36, the high priest was still Joseph Caiaphas, who in that year was removed from office by Vitellius, the Roman proconsul of Syria.

Caiaphas's place was taken by Jonathan, son of the former high priest, the father-in-law of Caiaphas, known from the Gospel history as Annas. But in A.D. 37 he too was removed and replaced by his brother Theophilus, another son of Annas.

It is more probable that this last man was the high priest at the time in question.

Nikanor (Kamenski)

19th centuryChurch Father

Saul appears to have been a persecutor for only a short time. Being very lively and, so to speak, inflamed in his zeal, he evidently hastened to seek new victims, not finding them in Jerusalem, from which the Christians had scattered.

The city of Damascus was the chief city of Antioch and very populous. Saul knew that many Jews of the dispersion were there. Under Nero, ten thousand Jews were killed there.

It was therefore natural to think that Christians also might have appeared there among the proselytes, since Damascus was no more than two hundred versts from Jerusalem.

The scattered Christians, passing through Antioch, could have gone there (see Acts 11:19).

Read more (305 words)

And so Saul asks the high priest, Caiaphas, or the sons of his father-in-law, Jonathan and Theophilus, who were high priests in those troubled years, A.D. 36-37, that an order be issued and given to him for delivery to the synagogues.

They were to search for Christians from among the Jews and send them, bound like criminals against the faith, to ecclesiastical judgment in Jerusalem.

Saul's desire was excessively daring, for by it every right of the person was trampled. Yet the high priest did not hesitate to issue such an authorization to him, and not one only, but many.

Perhaps they were not entirely strict official decrees, but only letters (έπιστολάς). Yet these could have greater significance in the eyes of the representatives of the synagogues.

According to blessed Theophylact, “Saul was carried away by unclean zeal. In him was fulfilled what Christ said: ‘The time is coming when whoever kills you will think that he offers service to God’ (Jn 16:2).

“But he did this not as the other Jews did. They cared only for one thing, to enjoy honor. Saul goes to Damascus because it was a great and royal city, and he feared that it might be carried away by the Christian preaching.”

Theophylact then notes that Saul did not want to name the Christians before the high priest, but spoke of them as people “of this Way.” In this expression he sees Saul's contempt for Christians, as people who had strayed from the path, people without a proper way.

“From the civil authority in Damascus, evidently, no obstacles were expected to such treatment of Christians from among the Jews.

“The Roman civil authority, under which Damascus then stood, had taken from the Sanhedrin the right of capital punishment. In other matters of faith, however, it left authority to the Sanhedrin.”

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 16 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. Ὁ
    ho
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  2. Δὲ
    de
    but
    G1161 · δέ
  3. Σαῦλος
    saulos
    Saul
    G4569 · Σαῦλος
  4. ἔτι
    eti
    still
    G2089 · ἔτι
  5. ἐμπνέων
    empneōn
    I breathe
    G1709 · ἐμπνέω
  6. ἀπειλῆς
    apeilēs
    a threatening
    G547 · ἀπειλή
  7. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  8. φόνου
    phonou
    murder
    G5408 · φόνος
  9. εἰς
    eis
    into
    G1519 · εἰς
  10. τοὺς
    tous
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  11. μαθητὰς
    mathētas
    a learner
    G3101 · μαθητής
  12. τοῦ
    tou
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  13. Κυρίου
    kyriou
    lord
    G2962 · κύριος
  14. προσελθὼν
    proselthōn
    I come near
    G4334 · προσέρχομαι
  15. τῷ
    tō
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  16. ἀρχιερεῖ
    archierei
    high priest
    G749 · ἀρχιερεύς