Cyrill of Alexandria
Similarly, the Tyrians, along with the citizens of Damascus, Azotus, Ascalon, and Accaron, who exceeded the limits of their iniquity and tested the patience of God, will face severe consequences as foretold in the prophecy. Their wrongdoing was the betrayal of Solomon’s captives in Idumea, neglecting the bond of brotherhood established among them. The nature of these captives has already been clarified by the Scriptures. It is essential to explain how the Tyrians captured these individuals in Idumea. They enslaved countless people from Judah and Jerusalem and sold them to the Idumeans.
Read more (512 words)
The Idumeans, who turned their own kin, once free members of the Jewish community, into prisoners of war, subjected them to the harsh bondage of slavery and forced them to abide by the customs of the Gentiles. In their misery, they effectively disdained the glory of God, as if He had failed to preserve their liberty and lacked the power to bestow upon them prosperity and well-being. Strongly condemning those who captured Solomon's people in Idumea, the Sovereign Lord, through the words of another prophet, declares, "And why do ye, to me, Tyre, and Sidon, and all Galilee of the foreigners, eat your recompense for me, or do ye grudge me keenly? And I will quickly recompense your recompense upon your heads. For my silver and my gold ye shall take, and my elect and my good shall be brought into your labours: and the children of Judah, and the children of Jerusalem, ye shall sell to the children of the Greeks, that I may be delivered from their borders” (Joel 3:4-6). The borders of the Israelites were essentially Judea, while their spiritual boundary lay within the Law, from which they were unjustly sold to the Greeks. The Tyrians acted in this manner, forgetting the sacred bond of brotherhood. This can be understood in three distinct ways. We shall explore who these brethren were and the nature of their covenant, guided by the Holy Scriptures. Hiram, who once ruled over the Tyrians, had a close friendship with the devout King David. Following David, he demonstrated a favorable disposition toward Solomon, forming a friendship that included mutual support and significant assistance, especially during the construction of the Holy Temple (3 Sam. 5:9, 11-14). He offered great gifts, even though he himself received even greater and more valuable ones in return. Thus, one interpretation suggests that the Tyrians engaged in conflict with the Israelites, disregarding their loving brotherhood and the bonds of favor and kindness that united them as one family. Alternatively, it may be understood that the Idumeans, though descended from Esau, were considered brothers to the Israelites, yet they turned against them, scorning the covenant of brotherhood. Esau had once harbored resentment toward Jacob due to issues surrounding their birthright. However, when Jacob left Laban's home to return to his own land with his wives and children, Esau met him as a brother; they embraced, kissed, and spoke kindly, setting aside their former enmity to establish a covenant of peace. This was the nature of their relationship. Yet the Tyrians, having forgotten their bond, quarreled with their kindred tribes and exploited their own kin, thereby enabling the Idumeans to become far stronger than their former rulers. A final perspective may emphasize the relationship with the Moabites, who descended from Lot, revealing the Tyrians’ betrayal of the covenant of brotherhood, which was founded between Abraham and Lot, especially when strife arose between their shepherds. Abraham, seeking peace, declared to Lot, “Let there be no strife between me and thee, and between my shepherds and thy shepherds, for we are brother men” (Genesis 13:8).