Cyrill of Alexandria
For the Lord made an oath by His own name, declaring His disdain for all the disgrace associated with Jacob and His aversion to his towns. This emphasizes the unchanging nature of God's wrath, as He explicitly states His displeasure with Jacob's shame. It would be unwise to interpret this as a rebuke toward Jacob himself, considering that God cherished Jacob from the time he was in his mother’s womb, designating him as chosen even before his birth. The references made concern Jacob’s descendants, whose sinful pride was condemned. Isn’t it a form of arrogance when they turn away from honoring God, attributing the glory that rightfully belongs to Him to idols?
Read more (855 words)
They disregard the calls from the prophets, mistaking divine warnings as trivialities, while relying on numerous allies and altogether ignoring His compassion and assistance. It remains undebatable—God swore by Himself, as there was nothing higher by which to swear. The purpose of this oath is clear: He detests the disgrace, or pride, of Jacob, and thus, he will have no honor among his towns, which are devoid of individuals virtuous in righteousness. God would not be displeased if even a few had in their hearts what was acceptable to Him. As expressed through Jeremiah, “Search the paths of Jerusalem, and see, and know, and seek in its hills: if ye find a man that worketh judgement, and seeketh faith: and I will be merciful unto him, saith the Lord” (Jeremiah 5:1). Lacking good and God-fearing people, Jacob’s towns were consigned to ruin, and the cities fell along with their residents. Thus, the presence of saints is essential; they preserve cities and spare lands from impending disasters through the light of their lives, calming the fierce anger of God.
And I will cast out the city along with all its inhabitants. It shall happen that ten men will remain alive in a house, yet they shall die, and those who survive will be forced to carry out their own dead. The head of the household will inquire, "Do you have any more?" to which the response will be, "There are none left." Then he shall be instructed to be silent, not for the honor of the name of the Lord. Since He detests their towns and finds their pride intolerable, He pronounces that their cities will face destruction along with their people. Specifically, to those who have strayed, He declares, “I will reject any city I choose and annihilate it along with its residents.” Even if ten individuals from a single household evade the enemy’s sword by hiding in corners or rooms, they, too, will meet death—likely out of fear of leaving their hiding places. The pestilence will shift its focus, striking those who have taken refuge. When their kin eventually return to collect the remains, who will they carry them out for? Certainly, it will be for themselves, as it is unsettling and difficult to touch decaying bodies. Those who attempt to do so should brace themselves, as the odor is unbearable. They will be compelled to act with compassion for those who have perished from the plague by honoring their burials. Nonetheless, those gathering the remains will question the head of the household, asking if there is anyone else still alive or already dead. His answer will be a solemn "None remain," indicating total devastation. If the household leaders give this response, they will then hear, “Be silent, not for the sake of the name of the Lord.” This implies a significant meaning. Some claim that the inquirers will silence the leaders to prevent them from swearing by the name of the Lord, suggesting that the Ephraimites' hearts had become so hardened in their love for God that they cannot tolerate those invoking the name of the Almighty. However, such reasoning seems flawed and inappropriate. While it is undeniable that Ephraim had drifted away from divine love, one would expect that facing challenges would inspire fear and prompt a yearning for what is vital, rather than leading them to antagonize God's true reverence.
Moreover, was there any necessity for the heads of the household, upon being asked about the presence of anyone hidden—alive or deceased—to both respond and invoke an oath declaring that there was no one left? Thus, what does it mean when it is said, “not for the sake of the name of the Lord"? It is likely that the descendants of Israel considered this a form of blasphemy against God, wherein the commandments provide the basis for their behavior. In Leviticus, for instance, when a quarrel arose in the assembly, one man (the son of an Egyptian woman) blasphemed and was stoned. Following this incident, God established the law, stating, “Whosoever shall curse his God shall receive sin: but he that nameth the name of the Lord shall die by death” (Leviticus 24:15-16). Calling upon the Lord’s name has thus been associated with blasphemy, a term softened in the sacred texts. Yet, many, in times of distress, may voice complaints against God. Thus, if the head of the house replies in dire straits that he has no one, albeit under extreme hardship, he will restrain his words to avoid uttering anything disparaging against God. This reflects the serious judgment that does not punish without purpose and operates with necessity. It is indeed evident from the consequences that the punishment endured by some serves as a cautionary tale for those who remain, instilling in them the fear of further offending or inciting God’s anger through mere words, despite previously acting without apprehension and embodying a pride reminiscent of their ancestors. Consequently, it is far wiser for the truly good and discerning to pursue righteousness before facing divine wrath, seeking to eliminate vice and engage in endeavors that delight the most holy God.