The Church Fathers on this verse

Colossians 1:25Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

Whereof I am made a minister according to the dispensation of God, which is given me towards you, that I may fulfil the word of God:

Douay-Rheims

ης εγενομην εγω διακονος κατα την οικονομιαν του θεου την δοθεισαν μοι εις υμας πληρωσαι τον λογον του θεου

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

8 Church Fathers comment on this verse · 9 commentaries

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

Why, then, do you still introduce the mediation of angels here? "Of which I," he says, "became a minister." Why do you still introduce others here, the angels? "I" am "a minister."

Then he shows that he himself did nothing, although he is a minister. "Of which I became a minister," he says, "according to the divine economy of God, which was given to me for you, to fulfill the word of God."

"According to the divine economy." By this he either said this: He willed that, after His departure, we should become successors in the ministry of the divine economy, so that you would not be left abandoned.

He Himself suffered, and He Himself was also the messenger. Or he expressed this thought: to me, the fiercest persecutor of all, God permitted the persecution of Christ, so that I might become worthy of credibility in preaching.

Or he mentioned the divine economy in this sense: it required not works, or contests, or merits, but faith and baptism. Otherwise you would not have received His teaching.

"For you," he says, "to fulfill the word of God." He uses the word "fulfill" with reference to the Gentiles, showing that until then they were still wavering.

That the Gentiles could receive such lofty doctrines was not Paul's work, but the work of God's divine economy. "I myself," he says, "would not have had the power."

After pointing to the more important thing, namely that his sufferings are Christ's sufferings, he then presents what is easier to understand. The fact that he also "fulfills the word of God for you" is likewise God's work.

Here, though not plainly, he shows that the divine economy was also manifested in this, that you have now been recognized as capable of hearing the word of God.

This was not from neglect, but so that you might become capable of receiving it. God does not do everything all at once. In His great love for mankind He adapts Himself to us.

This is why Christ came now, and not in ancient times. So also in the Gospel, God shows that He first sent servants so that the Jews would not be moved to murder the Son.

If they were not ashamed before the Son when He came after the servants, much less would they have been ashamed if He had come before them.

If they did not obey the lesser commands, how would they have obeyed the greater? What, then, does he say? Are Jews and Gentiles not still in a worse condition than they were before?

This is finally the height of carelessness! After such a long time, after so many instructions, still to remain imperfect is extreme negligence.

Therefore, when the Gentiles ask why Christ came only now, we shall not allow them to say this. We ourselves shall ask: did He not accomplish His work?

If He had come from the beginning and had not accomplished His work, it would not have been enough, for His justification, to point to the time of His coming.

So now, when He has accomplished His work, it would be unjust for us to demand an account of the time of His coming.

No one will demand from a physician, who has healed a sickness and restored health to the patient, an account concerning the treatment.

No one will question a general, who has won a victory, about why he did it at this time and in that place. One might ask this if he had not done it. But if he has done it, one must accept it.

Tell me, what is more worthy of belief: your inventions and reasonings, or the accomplishment of the work itself? Tell me this: did He conquer, or not? Did He prevail, or not?

Did He bring to completion what He said, or not? This is what the account must consist in. Tell me, you surely confess that there is a God, even if you do not acknowledge Christ?

I ask you: is God without beginning? You will surely affirm this. Tell me, then: why did He not create men thousands of years earlier? Then they would already have lived longer.

If existence is a good, then to exist longer is a greater good. But have they suffered any harm for the time when they did not exist? No, they suffered no harm. Why this is so, He who created them knows.

Again I ask you: why did He not create all at once? Why did He arrange it so that the soul of one who was created first has existed so many years, while another soul, not yet born into the world, receives less time to live?

Why did He order it so that one comes into the world first and another last? Such things are indeed worth investigating, but not out of idle curiosity. The latter, by itself, is not even investigation.

But I shall show you the true reason for what I began to discuss, namely why Christ appeared late. Agree that human nature has its ages.

In the first times our race was in a state of infancy. In the times that followed it was in the condition of youth. In the times approaching old age, it was in the condition of an elder.

Finally, when the members of the body had grown weak and the battle had ceased, the soul grew strong. Then we reached philosophy. You will say: on the contrary, we teach children from early years.

True, we teach them, but only unimportant subjects, and perhaps only how to speak correctly, developing in them the gift of speech. Even that we do only when they begin to grow older.

See, God acted in exactly the same way with the Jews. Just as with children, He set over the Jews a teacher of letters, Moses.

He led them, as we lead children, toward the gradual learning of written characters, setting them forth on a tablet. "The law has a shadow of the good things to come, and not the very image of the things" (Heb 10:1).

As we buy treats for children and give them money, asking only one thing from them, that they go immediately to school, so God at that time sent the Jews abundance and prosperity.

In return for such care for them, He wished to receive only this, that they would listen to Moses. For this reason He entrusted them to a teacher, so that they would not neglect him, but would look upon him as a tender father.

And see, they feared him alone. They did not ask, "Where is God?" but, "Where is Moses?" By his mere presence he inspired fear in them.

When they behaved badly, see how he punished them. God wished to reject them, but Moses did not allow it. More precisely, all this was God's work.

He uttered threats as a father does. Moses, like a teacher, entreated Him and said, "Leave them to me. From now on I take them into my own hands."

Thus the wilderness was a true school. As children, after spending some time in lessons, try to run away, so they at that time constantly longed for Egypt.

They wept and said, "We are lost, we are ruined, we have perished." Moses also broke the tablet on which he had written for them, as it were, the names of things.

He acted exactly like a teacher who takes a tablet, sees bad writing on it, and throws it down, wishing thereby to show strong anger.

Even if he breaks it, the father will not be angry, because the teacher made the effort and wrote, while they were not looking at him. They were only gazing around and misbehaving.

As children strike one another during their lessons, so he at that time commanded some to strike and kill others. And again, he punished them like a teacher who gives lessons and, on questioning them, finds them unprepared.

I shall give an example of what lessons these were. There were letters that pointed to the power of God manifested in Egypt.

Yes, you say, but these letters told of the Egyptian plagues, that God punishes enemies, and contained a lesson very instructive for the Jews.

What else was the punishment of enemies for you, if not a benefaction? He also benefited you in other ways.

It is just as if someone claimed that he knew the letters, but when he was questioned out of order, he could not answer and was punished for it.

So they said that they knew the power of God, but when they were required to show this knowledge in various circumstances, they were not found able to answer and were punished for it.

Do you see water? You should remember the water of Egypt. He who turned water into blood can do this also. It is just as we often say to children: when you see the letter "A" in a book, remember that it is the same sign as on your tablet.

Do you see hunger? Remember that He destroyed in Egypt everything that had grown. Do you see wars? Remember the flood. Do you see that strong nations inhabit the land?

They are not stronger than the Egyptians. He who took you out from among them can much more easily save you when you are not in their hands.

But they did not know how to answer, out of order, all the questions concerning their alphabet, and for that they were punished. They knew only how to eat, drink, and riot.

Having suffered harm from pleasures, they should not have sought them in the manna. They acted exactly as if the son of free parents, when being sent to school, wanted to live with slaves and serve them.

It was as though, while receiving everything necessary for a free man's upkeep and having a place at his father's table, he found the disorderly and noisy table of slaves pleasant for himself.

So they all longed for Egypt, though they said to Moses: "Yes, Lord, all that You have spoken we will do, and we will be obedient" (Ex 24:7).

As happens with very unruly children, whose father sometimes wants to kill them while the teacher constantly entreats him for them, so the same occurred then.

But why has this been told to us? Because we are no different from children. Do you wish to hear further about their teaching, to see how much of it is childish?

"An eye for an eye," it says, "and a tooth for a tooth" (Lev 24:20). This is natural. Nowhere is the inclination to revenge so strong as in a child's soul.

Since vindictiveness is the most irrational passion, and irrationality and lack of deliberation are especially characteristic of that age, it is understandable why anger has unlimited dominion over children.

The rule of anger is so strong that they often throw themselves on the ground. Then they leap up and strike their own knees in rage, or overturn benches.

Only after this does the tormenting passion begin to subside in them and their frenzy cool. God acted in this way when He permitted them to pluck out an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.

He acted so also when He struck the Egyptians and Amalekites for the wrongs they inflicted on the Jews. God grants permission to act in this way, as a father does when some little one says, "Father, so-and-so hit me."

The father answers, "He is a bad man. We shall not love him." In the same sense God also says, "I will be an enemy to your enemies, and I will hate those who hate you."

And again, when Balaam prayed, the same condescension was shown to them as to children.

With children it happens that when they see something that in itself is not at all frightening, such as wool or something similar, they suddenly become afraid.

In order that this thing not terrify them, we bring it near to them and put it in their hands, or have the nurse show it to them. God acted in the same way.

Since the diviner was frightening to them, He turned their fear into boldness. And as children being weaned from the breast are given a horn for consolation, so God refused the Jews nothing and sent them full abundance.

But even after this the child still asks for the breast. So they also kept seeking Egypt and Egyptian meat.

Thus a man would not be mistaken if he called Moses their teacher, educator, and guide. And this man was very wise.

It is not the same thing to guide people already capable of mature reasoning and to govern irrational children. If you wish, one may say something further.

As an educator says to a child, "When you go for a natural need, be careful and guard your clothing while you are sitting," so Moses also acted.

As all passions rule in children, who do not yet have a charioteer, vainglory, self-will, irrationality, anger, envy, so all these passions ruled over the Jews.

They spat upon Moses and struck him. As a child lifts a stone against someone, and all of us cry, "Do not throw it," so they also lifted stones against their father, though he escaped them.

Read the full text in the app

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

"Of which I became a minister." He says: I am a minister and do nothing by myself. But if I am a minister, how do you set forth angels as ministers?

"According to the divine economy of God, which was given to me for you, to fulfill the word of God." By the words "according to the divine economy of God," he either says that the Lord, after ascending to heaven, sent us to preach so that you would not be abandoned and fall into despair.

Or he says this: He permitted me to persecute the Church chiefly so that I might become worthy of trust when preaching.

Or again: He did not seek works and virtue, but faith and baptism. In this lies the greatest divine economy of God. For who could be saved if works were required?

Read more (169 words)

Or by the words "according to the divine economy of God, which was given to me for you," that is, for people belonging to the Gentiles, he simply speaks of the grace and power God gave him to enlighten the Gentiles.

For to persuade darkened, foolish, and disobedient men to accept such doctrines is not a work of Paul's power, but of God's divine economy.

As he called his own sufferings Christ's, so also he says that the spreading of this teaching among them is God's work. By the word "fulfill" he shows that something is lacking for them.

Notice also the divine economy of God in this: the mystery was told to them now, when they had become able to receive it. For God orders all things providently. Of course, He also did this providently, that the mystery was revealed now, when men could receive it more readily.

Therefore those who take offense at the words that the Son will bring us in the last days are unreasonable.

Ephraem the Syrian

4th centuryChurch Father

Of which I became a minister, not according to my works, but according to the mystical divine economy of the Godhead, Who called me from the road to Damascus. It was given to me for you, that is, to fulfill the word of Christ among you.

Theodoret of Cyrus

5th centuryChurch Father

The salvation of the Church has been entrusted to me, and the ministry of preaching has been committed to me, so that I may "fulfill" the divine teaching for all of you. By the word "you," the Apostle means not only the Colossians, but the faithful throughout the whole universe. From this it is clear that, having seen them, he wrote the epistle. For if they too had been entrusted to the Apostle, he could not have passed them by when he came to Phrygia and afterward to the leading people among the Laodiceans. The Apostle also explains the very manner of God's dispensation.

Michail Cheraskov

19th centuryChurch Father

That this being made holy and this reconciliation are truly not unconditional, the Apostle adds: “if indeed you continue firm and steadfast in the faith, and do not fall away from the hope of the gospel.”

As for the Apostle himself, despite his bonds, he only “rejoices in his sufferings” (Col 1:24). He suffers for the Colossians, or better, for the body of the whole Church of Christ. He suffers according to the divine economy, as a minister of the word of God and preacher of that very mystery of salvation and of the calling of the Gentiles to glory, which he has just explained to the Colossians.

Read more (49 words)

For this purpose, that is, to bring all to this glory through Christ, our universal Reconciler with God, the Apostle writes: “that we may present every man perfect in Christ Jesus. For this I also labor and strive, according to His power which works mightily in me” (Col 1:28-29).

Nikanor (Kamenski)

19th centuryChurch Father

In opposition to the false teachers, the Apostle points to the universal character of Christian preaching. He confirms, by his own testimony, the teaching delivered to the Colossians through Epaphras. At the same time, he speaks of his calling to the ministry of the divine economy of salvation for all people in general, and for the Colossians in particular.

He partly relates his sufferings to them, as sufferings undertaken for participation in the sufferings of Christ in His new body, which is the Church.

According to the explanation of St. John Chrysostom, “St. Paul again brings the Colossians themselves as witnesses, and then the whole world. He did the same at the beginning, wishing by the testimony of many to strengthen the Colossians.”

Read more (339 words)

According to Bishop Theophan, the Apostle speaks as though saying: “You are not the only ones who have heard this gospel. All creation under heaven has heard and received it.” By this creation he means, of course, rational creation, that is, men.

After reading this, everyone could not fail to draw this conclusion: “If, as I have heard and believed, so everywhere it has been preached and believed. And this by God’s command and ordering, then it would make no sense for me to allow myself to depart in any way from the teachings of faith, or to move from the foundation on which I stand.”

As for the sufferings for Christ, of which the Apostle speaks very briefly and profoundly in verse 24, the most suitable understanding is this: “The afflictions of Christ are understood as afflictions which Christ endured, not in Himself personally, but in the person of the faithful. In the present passage, He endures them in the person of St. Paul.

“The application of the work of redemption to men requires suffering. Christ endures this in the body of the Church, according to His mystical yet living union with her as Head” (Bishop Theophan).

Joining the thought of suffering with the thought of Paul’s mission to preach to the Gentiles, during which he endured many afflictions for the benefit of the Church. Blessed Theophylact says: “After the Apostle said, ‘I became a minister of the gospel, from which I beseech you not to depart,’ he now shows that it is so true that he even suffers for it. And not only does he suffer, but he rejoices in these sufferings.”

These sufferings were undertaken by the Apostle for the good of the Church from among the Gentiles, among whom he includes the Colossians. Compare Eph 3:1.

In Bishop Theophan’s opinion, “the Apostle deliberately mentioned God’s special ordering concerning him: I am your Apostle by God’s providence. Why, then, do you admit others to yourselves? Such a reminder revived conviction in the truth of his preaching.”

Rosanow N.P.

19th centuryChurch Father

That he, and not someone else, must drain what remained in the cup of Christ’s afflictions, the Apostle proves by the fact of his calling to preach the gospel to the Gentiles.

The Apostle became a minister of the Church in the office of preacher, entrusted to him by God Himself, κατά τήν οικονομίαν τού θεού. His purpose was to bring the word of God, or the gospel, to fullness through its universal spread.

He was to fulfill the mystery hidden from mankind in all ages, that is, God’s decree concerning the calling of the Gentiles into the Church of Christ. Before the Apostle Paul, this decree was not known to mankind in all its fullness. Only now, through the apostolic preaching, has it been made known, έφανερώθη, to all the saints, that is, to Christians.

To express still more fully his affection for Philemon, the Apostle asks him to prepare lodging for his arrival.

Theophan the Recluse

19th centuryChurch Father

Of which, that is, of the Church of God, for which, out of love for the Lord and His work, he suffered so much and bore such privations.

I became means I was made and appointed a minister. Earlier he said that he was appointed a minister of the Gospel. Here he says that he was appointed a minister of the Church.

At first there was no Church. There were only those chosen and supplied with everything necessary to build it. They were supplied with the word of the Gospel and with grace: Go, teach, baptizing.

The Gospel gathered the material for building the Church. Grace worked this material, fitted it to the building of the Church, and placed it in its position in the building itself.

Read more (735 words)

Then the Gospel refreshed, enlivened, and strengthened the Church that had already been formed. Thus ministry to the Church did not and does not exist without ministry to the Gospel.

Therefore Saint Paul says here that he was appointed a minister of the Church, to fulfill the word of God. He places the chief work of his ministry in this fulfillment.

To me, he says, the salvation of the Church has been entrusted, and the ministry of preaching has been committed, that I might fill all of you with divine teaching, says blessed Theodoret.

Our other interpreters make this inference here: I am a minister and do nothing of myself, but fulfill what was commanded not by men, but by God.

Therefore you must obey without contradiction the minister appointed by God. Why then do you bring in angels here? I did not give you a commandment about this. See Saint Chrysostom, blessed Theophylact, and Oecumenius.

According to the dispensation of God given to me for you. According to the dispensation, κατα την οικονομιαν, means according to God's economy, according to God's divine economy.

The house of God is the holy Church. The Master of this house is Christ the Lord, with God the Father and the Holy Spirit.

The stewards and overseers are the holy Apostles. Each of them was given his own work. Saint Paul also was given his own work.

Having ascended into heaven, the Lord left us as successors of the ministry in the work of the divine economy of the Church, say Saint Chrysostom, Oecumenius, and blessed Theophylact.

The Apostle speaks here about this distribution of ministries according to the divine economy of the Church. He indicates next what exactly was entrusted to him: to fulfill the word of God among you, that is, among the Gentiles.

At this point, both in the Apostle and in his readers who knew him, the memory could not fail to arise of how this was entrusted to him.

In the present case this was so important that one cannot but suppose that the Apostle intentionally mentioned God's special arrangement concerning him.

I am your Apostle according to God's dispensation. Why then do you admit others to yourselves? Such a reminder of the Apostle's special election revived conviction in the truth of his preaching and made this question still stronger: why?

Saint Chrysostom makes this inference here, and after him our other interpreters do the same.

The word of God means the word concerning salvation in the Lord Jesus Christ. To fulfill means either to fulfill, or to bring to completion, the work of preaching about this salvation.

Or it means to fill the whole universe with it, as the Apostle of the Gentiles, with whom the whole universe was filled.

Joining the word fulfill with according to the dispensation, we receive the inference that the Apostle wished to suggest this: if this is according to God's dispensation, then know that it is only by God's grace.

By this grace, just as I appear sufficient to enlighten you with the word, so also you appear capable of receiving this enlightenment. Without this grace, I could not persuade you.

You were so darkened and plunged into such ignorance. Nor could you receive such lofty dogmas. This work is not of Paul's power or yours, but of God's power, of God's dispensation.

See Saint Chrysostom and blessed Theophylact.

For you is placed by the Apostle in such a combination that it can be referred both to the ministry given for you and to fulfilling the word of God among you.

The thought is the same wherever this phrase is referred. The ministry given for them is the fulfillment of the word of God, and the fulfillment of the word among them is the accomplishment of the ministry given.

The range of the phrase among you is this: either among you, all the Gentiles, or among you, the Colossians, as some of the Gentiles.

One need not strain to establish one definition, because this is not the main point. Both thoughts are fitting.

Blessed Theodoret does not miss the opportunity here to draw the inference that the Apostle himself saw the Colossians. From this it is clear, he says, that he wrote the Epistle after seeing them.

But by the words among you, blessed Theodoret understands not only the Colossians, but the faithful throughout the whole universe.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 19 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. ἧς
    hēs
    who
    G3739 · ὅς, ἥ
  2. ἐγενόμην
    egenomēn
    I come into being
    G1096 · γίνομαι
  3. ἐγὼ
    egō
    I
    G1473 · ἐγώ
  4. διάκονος
    diakonos
    a waiter
    G1249 · διάκονος
  5. κατὰ
    kata
    down from
    G2596 · κατά
  6. τὴν
    tēn
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  7. οἰκονομίαν
    oikonomian
    stewardship
    G3622 · οἰκονομία
  8. τοῦ
    tou
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  9. Θεοῦ
    theou
    God
    G2316 · θεός
  10. τὴν
    tēn
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  11. δοθεῖσάν
    dotheisan
    I offer
    G1325 · δίδωμι
  12. μοι
    moi
    I
    G1473 · ἐγώ
  13. εἰς
    eis
    into
    G1519 · εἰς
  14. ὑμᾶς
    hymas
    you
    G4771 · σύ
  15. πληρῶσαι
    plērōsai
    I fill
    G4137 · πληρόω
  16. τὸν
    ton
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  17. λόγον
    logon
    a word
    G3056 · λόγος
  18. τοῦ
    tou
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  19. Θεοῦ
    theou
    God
    G2316 · θεός