You have conquered the devil and have become higher. Why, then, do you again submit to sin through observing the law, which cannot justify?
Again, Christ, not the law, conquered him who ruled over us. The prize must belong to Him, and likewise to you, who make up the body of Christ.
How, then, do you surrender this gift to the law? It is perfectly clear that if we still live in Jewish fashion, the law rules over us, and through it we hope to be saved.
But if the law is a shadow and the works of Christ are the body, then first we had to become accustomed to the shadow. Therefore He rightly became incarnate in the last days, to bring us to the Father.
“By voluntary humility and worship of angels, intruding into what he has not seen.” After filling them with indignation, by showing that men wish to wrong them and deprive them of their prize, the Apostle sets forth the heretical dogma itself.
He says: they wish to deprive you of the prize by deceiving you with an apparent humility. For they said it was unworthy of the greatness of the Only-begotten to teach that the Only-begotten brought you to the Father.
This, they said, is greater than befits human lowliness. Therefore it is more reasonable to suppose that angels served in bringing you to the Father.
Starting from this thought, they introduced a special worship of angels. They persuaded the simple to turn to them as to our saviors.
Although they had never seen angels, they made assertions about them as though they had seen them.
“Vainly puffed up by his fleshly mind.” He says that they are vainly puffed up by their teaching, which is a work of fleshly reasoning, not of spiritual understanding.
Does not the coarseness of their mind expose itself when they deny what Christ said: “God so loved the world that He gave His only-begotten Son” (Jn 3:16) for men?
And again: “For their sake I sanctify Myself” (Jn 17:19). And again: “I lay down My life for the sheep. And I have other sheep that are not of this fold; them also I must bring” (Jn 10:15-16).
There are many other similar passages. How, then, did he say above, “by humility”? Their humility was apparent, not real.
Or again, they were puffed up as obstinate dogmatists, not even allowing true teaching to be offered to them. Although they insist on their teaching under the pretext of humility, they did not possess humility.
They only spoke humbly, saying: for the Only-begotten to be slain for us is more than men require. It is beyond their measure and unfitting for them.