The Church Fathers on this verse

Colossians 2:17Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

Which are a shadow of things to come: but the body is of Christ.

Douay-Rheims

α εστιν σκια των μελλοντων το δε σωμα χριστου

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

13 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

"This is a shadow of the future," he says, of the new covenant. "The body is in Christ." Some punctuate it in this way: "The body is in Christ," meaning that the truth was in Christ. Others punctuate it thus: "The body is in Christ. Let no one defraud you" (χαταβραβευέτω), that is, deprive you. The word χαταβραβευδήναι is used when one person wins the victory, but another receives the prize, when the victor is deceived. You have become higher than the devil and sin. Why, then, do you again submit to sin? For this reason he said, "He is bound to fulfill the whole law" (Gal 5:3). And again, "Is Christ then a minister of sin?" (Gal 2:17). He said this in the Epistle to the Galatians.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

“Which are a shadow of things to come.” By “things to come” he means the blessings of the New Testament. They were future in relation to the Old Testament, which existed so long as its time endured.

“But the body is Christ’s.” “Let no one deceive you.” Some place the punctuation after “Christ’s,” so that the meaning is this: the Old Testament was a shadow, but the body, that is, the truth, is Christ’s.

What need is there to grasp at the shadow when the body is present? Others join these words to what follows, so that it may be understood thus: “the body of Christ,” that is, you, “let no one deprive.”

The Greek word is katabrabeueto, that is, “let no one deprive you.” For katabrabeuein means that one person wins the victory while another receives the prize.

Read more (451 words)

You have conquered the devil and have become higher. Why, then, do you again submit to sin through observing the law, which cannot justify?

Again, Christ, not the law, conquered him who ruled over us. The prize must belong to Him, and likewise to you, who make up the body of Christ.

How, then, do you surrender this gift to the law? It is perfectly clear that if we still live in Jewish fashion, the law rules over us, and through it we hope to be saved.

But if the law is a shadow and the works of Christ are the body, then first we had to become accustomed to the shadow. Therefore He rightly became incarnate in the last days, to bring us to the Father.

“By voluntary humility and worship of angels, intruding into what he has not seen.” After filling them with indignation, by showing that men wish to wrong them and deprive them of their prize, the Apostle sets forth the heretical dogma itself.

He says: they wish to deprive you of the prize by deceiving you with an apparent humility. For they said it was unworthy of the greatness of the Only-begotten to teach that the Only-begotten brought you to the Father.

This, they said, is greater than befits human lowliness. Therefore it is more reasonable to suppose that angels served in bringing you to the Father.

Starting from this thought, they introduced a special worship of angels. They persuaded the simple to turn to them as to our saviors.

Although they had never seen angels, they made assertions about them as though they had seen them.

“Vainly puffed up by his fleshly mind.” He says that they are vainly puffed up by their teaching, which is a work of fleshly reasoning, not of spiritual understanding.

Does not the coarseness of their mind expose itself when they deny what Christ said: “God so loved the world that He gave His only-begotten Son” (Jn 3:16) for men?

And again: “For their sake I sanctify Myself” (Jn 17:19). And again: “I lay down My life for the sheep. And I have other sheep that are not of this fold; them also I must bring” (Jn 10:15-16).

There are many other similar passages. How, then, did he say above, “by humility”? Their humility was apparent, not real.

Or again, they were puffed up as obstinate dogmatists, not even allowing true teaching to be offered to them. Although they insist on their teaching under the pretext of humility, they did not possess humility.

They only spoke humbly, saying: for the Only-begotten to be slain for us is more than men require. It is beyond their measure and unfitting for them.

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

Whoever strives to be estranged from this Judaism attached to the flesh must not only depart from observing those old rules.

With the appearing of the New Testament, after that came whose advent had been signified by them, they undoubtedly ceased to be necessary.

Therefore one is no longer judged in food, or drink, or with regard to a festival, or a new moon, or a Sabbath, which are a shadow of things to come.

But whatever is prescribed in the law as assisting the formation of the morals of the faithful must also be referred, however far one has progressed in it, not to oneself, but to the grace of God.

This grace was given through our Lord Jesus Christ.

Basil the Great

4th centuryChurch Father

There is, however, another life to which the Word calls us. Although our present days are evil (Eph 5:16), there are other days, good days, which are not interrupted by night.

For God Himself will be their eternal light, illumining them with the radiance of His glory. Therefore, when you hear of good days, do not think that the promise speaks to you of this present life.

The days produced by the perceptible sun are corruptible, and what is corruptible cannot be a fitting gift to the incorruptible. But if the soul is incorruptible, the gifts given to the soul must also be incorruptible.

Read more (54 words)

“And the form of this world is passing away” (1 Cor 7:31). If the law has in itself “a shadow of good things to come” (Heb 10:1), then conceive certain joy-bearing and holy Sabbaths among the eternal days.

Conceive new moons and festivals, but conceive them in a manner worthy of the spiritual law.

Ephraem the Syrian

4th centuryChurch Father

For these, together with the Sabbath, are traces of the times to come. But the body to which they belong and to which they point is Christ, Whom we preach.

Ambrose of Milan

4th centuryChurch Father

Shall we, then, honor the feasts by spending them in eating food and drinking? But let no one judge us in food, for “the law is spiritual, but I am carnal” (Rom 7:14).

“Let no one judge you in food or drink, or with regard to a festival, or a new moon, or a Sabbath. These are a shadow of things to come, but the body is in Christ.”

The voice of the Father from heaven revealed this body to us, as at the last trumpet, when the Jews cried out, “It thundered” (Jn 12:29).

The body of Christ, in turn, will be manifested to us at the last trumpet. “For the Lord Himself will descend from heaven with a cry of command, with the voice of an archangel and the trumpet of God.”

“And the dead in Christ will rise first” (1 Thess 4:16). “Where the corpse is, there the eagles will be gathered” (Lk 17:37). Where the body of Christ is, there is the truth.

Theodoret of Cyrus

5th centuryChurch Father

The Apostle called the law "a shadow of things to come," teaching that the grace of the New Testament was prefigured by it. He added this also: "but the body is Christ's." That is, the evangelical way of life represents the body, and the law is the shadow. When light appears, the shadow precedes the body. The law is the shadow, grace is the body, and the Master Christ is the light.

Severian of Gabala

5th centuryChurch Father

Paul teaches that the law has been abolished, for Christ erased our handwritten bond (Col 2:14). The Apostle also teaches us that the evil one has fallen, for the Lord stripped and exposed the principalities and powers to shame (Col 2:15). He commands us no longer to obey those whom the working of Christ has abolished, and says: do not listen to the Jews who persuade you to keep the law. For the shadow runs ahead of the body, but has no existence by itself. Therefore the Apostle says: do not obey the law, and still less the Gentiles, who lead you to worship angels or the elements of this world (cf. Col 2:8, 18).

Ivanov A.V.

19th centuryChurch Father

"Which are a shadow of things to come, but the body is Christ's." The Old and New Testaments, or better, the rites and laws of the Old Testament and the worship of the New Testament, stand in the relation of shadow and body. The Old Testament is the shadow; the New Testament is the body. And since the whole New Testament is understood in summary in Christ, this body is called Christ's.

Michail Cheraskov

19th centuryChurch Father

The first warning: “Let no one judge you in food or drink, or with regard to a festival, or a new moon, or Sabbaths. These are a shadow of things to come, but the body is Christ’s” (Col 2:16-17).

The meaning of this instruction is as follows: do not agree to accept Jewish customs. For the false teachers of Colossae, despite all the mysticism of their philosophical speculations, considered circumcision and other prescriptions of the Jewish law necessary for attaining moral perfection.

Thus the Apostle’s words show us the ritual side of the Phrygian false teaching. They also indicate a fanatical attachment to the prescriptions of the ceremonial law of Moses.

Nikanor (Kamenski)

19th centuryChurch Father

Turning to the question of observing particular Old Testament ritual ordinances concerning fasting and feasts, the Apostle speaks very briefly. He says that one must not judge anyone for this.

At the same time he explains that all this had a preparatory significance for Christ and was no more than a shadow in relation to the body.

“The Apostle called the law a shadow of things to come,” says blessed Theodoret, “teaching that the grace of the New Testament was prefigured by it. The evangelical life is the body, and the law is the shadow.

A shadow, when light appears, precedes the body. The law is the shadow, grace is the body, and the Master Christ is the Light.”

Read more (223 words)

Concerning food and drink, Bishop Theophan remarks: “In the law it was precisely prescribed what might be used for food and what might not be used.

The prohibition was based on the usefulness or harmfulness of foods in that climate. Moral lessons were also intended, visibly arising from the qualities of the forbidden animals and birds.

But since these speculators had gone into falsehood, it is very likely that they attached to this some absurd divinations in the spirit of their false teaching.

The law speaks only about foods. Concerning drink, a rule is laid down only for Nazirite vows. Therefore one may infer that those wise men acted as permanent Nazirites and made the rules of Nazirite life obligatory for all.

The Essenes seemed to live permanently as Nazirites. Perhaps the Colossian wise men belonged to this sect. They also recast everything concerning feasts in their own manner, so that they took something from the former observance, in part.

Yet although such celebration, curtailed and altered, was no longer fully Jewish, the Apostle does not wish the Colossians to touch it.

The Apostle does not turn them away from feasts in general, but from celebrating on certain days in the spirit of Judaism, or of the false teaching current among the Colossians.

Christianity has its own feasts, but in its own spirit.”

Theophan the Recluse

19th centuryChurch Father

“Which” points directly only to what was said before, to feasts and foods. Yet the Apostle’s thought is more general. He spoke as we do when we say, “all this.”

By that we mean not only the particular kinds named, but the whole class to which they belong. Here this means the whole law and all the Old Testament ordinances.

A shadow is the shadow of coming things, or of blessings, in general of what was to be and was expected.

When a man sees a shadow, he rightly concludes that there is a body casting that shadow. From the outlines of the shadow he forms conclusions about the form of the body itself.

By all this he kindles a desire to see the body itself. So the Old Testament ordinances were inscribed in such a way that they pointed to the future.

Read more (385 words)

They prefigured it as far as possible and awakened a desire to see quickly the fulfillment of what they depicted. To nourish this desire and expectation was the chief purpose of all the ordinances.

Consequently, in themselves they had nothing essential, just as a shadow does not. Their meaning was only temporary. Yet although they are a shadow, they should not be abandoned before the body has come.

The Apostle adds: the body has come, Christ the Lord. The body from which the shadow fell and which gave existence to the ordinances of the law is Christ the Lord.

Everything there pointed to Him. Therefore, with His coming, it had to cease. He came, and the shadow ceased.

One who sees the body will not look at the shadow. If he did so, he would insult the body itself and plainly show his lack of understanding. So it is here.

The Lord has come. Look to Him, and let the shadow pass by as something transient.

Let us cite what our interpreters have said about this. “The Apostle called the law a shadow of things to come, teaching that the grace of the New Testament was prefigured by it.

The evangelical life is the body, and the law is the shadow. A shadow, when light appears, precedes the body. The law is the shadow, grace is the body, and the Master Christ is the Light” (blessed Theodoret).

“The Old Testament was a shadow. The body, that is, the truth, belongs to Christ. What need is there to grasp at the shadow when the body is present?” (blessed Theophylact).

“All that was given through Moses was a shadow or image of what was to come, so that when the truth appeared, the image would cease.

As the emperor’s image has authority in his absence, but not in his presence, so what was given through Moses had to be observed before the Lord’s coming.

In His presence, however, it no longer has any significance. Can someone who replaces a master in his absence act as master even in his presence?

If the deputies of prefects, when the prefects themselves are present, are like private persons, how much more must a servant who replaced the master appear, in the master’s presence, among the others subject to him?” (Ambrosiaster).

Eusebius of Caesarea

4th centuryTeacher of the Church

“Therefore let no one judge you in food or drink, or with regard to a festival, or a new moon, or a Sabbath.”

If what was legislated concerning distinctions in food, festivals, and the Sabbath preserved, like a shadow, the image of other true and mystical realities, then you will not be wrong to say this also.

The high priest was a symbol pointing to another High Priest. He was called an anointed one, a “Christ,” according to the image of another, the one true Anointed One, Christ.

Shadows and images truly reflect reality itself. They share in the same name and, for this reason, must be honored. Thus the high priest of the Old Testament can be called “christ,” that is, anointed one, because he is a real image and type of Christ Himself.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 10 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. ἅ
    ha
    who
    G3739 · ὅς, ἥ
  2. ἐστιν
    estin
    I am
    G1510 · εἰμί
  3. σκιὰ
    skia
    a shadow
    G4639 · σκιά
  4. τῶν
    tōn
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  5. μελλόντων
    mellontōn
    I am about to
    G3195 · μέλλω
  6. τὸ
    to
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  7. δὲ
    de
    but
    G1161 · δέ
  8. σῶμα
    sōma
    body
    G4983 · σῶμα
  9. τοῦ
    tou
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  10. Χριστοῦ
    christou
    anointed
    G5547 · Χριστός