Blessed Theophylact writes: “You have put on Christ, Who said, ‘I am the truth’ (Jn 14:6). How then can you now clothe yourselves in another form, the form of falsehood? Then it will be clear that you are stripping off that form, as it were the uniform garment, which characterizes you by the mark of truth.”
Yet it may also mean this: do not speak falsehood against one another. Do not bring false accusations, and do not slander one another, as the Apostle James says: “Do not speak evil against one another” (Jas 4:11). The latter is closer to the flow of the discourse. For here the Apostle forbids feelings and deeds produced by irritability and mutual hostility, among which slander holds no last place.
Having listed what must be put off, the Apostle now offers motives for this. The first is: “having put off the old man with his deeds.” All these are deeds of the old man, whom you have put off. Therefore you must not touch anything of this kind. “By the old man he means the corrupted will, expressed also in deeds corresponding to it” (Blessed Theophylact). “He calls it old in order to show its shame, ugliness, and weakness” (Chrysostom). “This is life in sins, grown decrepit, corrupted, and exhausted before regeneration and renewal in baptism by faith in Christ the Lord” (Oecumenius).
The man as he became after the fall is the old man. Self-pleasing is active in him, compelling him to use every effort to arrange earthly well-being, which he places in sensual pleasures. He turns everything else into means for this. Consequently, his direct passions are the passions of lust, which the Apostle mentioned above.
The passions of irritability enter as though from without, or are conditioned by external circumstances. People with the character of the old man live together, and each wishes and seeks to arrange only his own well-being. Collisions are therefore inevitable. From them come irritation and all the passions and deeds of hostility that irritation produces among people.
Their basis lies in selfhood. Yet their awakening, manifestation, variation, and aging depend on external collisions. Were this absent, the old man would only indulge himself, wallowing in lusts and living according to his own will without any irritations.
But how does the Apostle present the putting off of the old man, that is, the rejection of self-pleasing, as a motive for putting off not the direct passions of self-pleasing, but the incidental ones? There is nothing unfitting here. When selfhood and self-pleasing have been rejected through conversion to Christ, and this rejection has been sealed and clothed with power in the Mysteries, then all the passions have been rejected together.
This includes those directly born of self-pleasing, namely the passions of lust. It also includes those born of selfhood through incidental collisions and resistances, namely the passions of irritability. Therefore it follows directly from putting off the old man that Christians are obliged to put off these passions too, along with the deeds in which they are expressed.
Taking this into consideration, we may acknowledge that the Apostle continues here the exposition of motives for withdrawing from the passions which he began above (see Col 3:6-7) and seemingly did not finish. There he said, “in which ye also once walked,” that is, in the deeds and passions of lust, when you lived according to the spirit of the old man.
Here, after listing the deeds and passions of irritation, he adds, “having put off the old man.” You walked in those passions of lust, but now you have ceased to walk in them. Why? Because you have put off the old man, from whom they were directly born.
Thus this motive, “having put off,” like the next, “having put on,” is directed immediately against the passions of irritation. Yet since it is connected with the previous motives directed against the passions of lust, it is also directed against these latter. The very essence of putting off the old man requires this.
Hence one must conclude that, conversely, the motives previously indicated against the passions of lust (see Col 3:6-7) also apply against the passions of irritation, which are directly in view here. What in these motives is chiefly directed against one or the other passions? Against the passions of lust there chiefly stands, “the wrath of God comes,” as was already noted in its place. Against the passions of irritation there chiefly stands, “according to the image of Him Who created him,” as will now be explained.