The Church Fathers on this verse

Daniel 1:2Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

And the Lord delivered into his hands Joakim, the king of Juda, and part of the vessels of the house of God: and he carried them away into the land of Sennaar, to the house of his god, and the vessels he brought into the treasure house of his god.

Douay-Rheims

וַיִּתֵּן֩ אֲדֹנָ֨י בְּיָד֜וֹ אֶת־יְהוֹיָקִ֣ים מֶֽלֶךְ־יְהוּדָ֗ה וּמִקְצָת֙ כְּלֵ֣י בֵית־הָֽאֱלֹהִ֔ים וַיְבִיאֵ֥ם אֶֽרֶץ־שִׁנְעָ֖ר בֵּ֣ית אֱלֹהָ֑יו וְאֶת־הַכֵּלִ֣ים הֵבִ֔יא בֵּ֖ית אוֹצַ֥ר אֱלֹהָֽיו׃

Hebrew (Masoretic text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

3 Church Fathers comment on this verse

Ephraem the Syrian

4th centuryChurch Father

The Lord entrusted Joachim to Nebuchadnezzar, fulfilling the predictions of the prophet Moses along with others. Nebuchadnezzar seized the sacred vessels from the temple, transporting them to the region of Sennar for his deity’s house. However, he did not dedicate those vessels to the worship of his idol; instead, he placed them in the treasury of his god, thereby defiling them. Though he believed that storing them in his god’s treasury would bring them honor, the act of placing them in the temple of an idol served to bring them disgrace.

Jerome of Stridon

4th centuryChurch Father

The Lord gave Jehoiakim, king of Judah, into the hands of his captors. This act of betrayal illustrates that the triumph was not a product of the adversaries' might, but rather the determination of the Lord. Some of the sacred items from the temple were taken and sent to the land of Shinar, placed within the house of his idol, and brought into the treasury of his deity. Shinar refers to the region in Babylon, notable for the plain of Dura and the tower that those journeying from the east attempted to construct to reach the heavens (Genesis 11). Consequently, this location came to be known as Babylon, a name derived from the confusion of languages, which in our terminology signifies mixture.

Read more (136 words)

It is important to recognize that the Babylonian king was unable to seize all the sacred items from the temple of God, nor could he entirely situate them in the temple he built for himself. Instead, he could only take a portion, which symbolizes the truths of doctrine. If one were to examine the writings of philosophers, they would undoubtedly discover fragments reflective of God’s vessels. For instance, Plato speaks of the Creator of the universe, and Zeno, the Stoic philosopher, acknowledges immortal souls and the concept of absolute goodness or virtue. However, because they blend falsehoods with the truths and corrupt the inherently good with evils, it is said that he carried away only a part of the sacred treasures of the house of God, and not the entirety in its complete and perfect state.

Theodoret of Cyrus

5th centuryChurch Father

The Lord delivered Jehoiakim, the king of Judah, into the hands of Nebuchadnezzar along with some of the holy items from the temple of God. This highlights the prophetic insight granted by divine grace; for no man can comprehend the workings of God without His revelation. Daniel, empowered by the Spirit of God, understood that the conquest of the city happened by the will of the Almighty, due to the transgressions of the people and their leader. Thus, it was essential for the prophet to make it clear that it was the Lord who gave Jehoiakim into Nebuchadnezzar's control, to prevent anyone from mistakenly believing that the king had seized the city by his own strength. It is vital to recognize that when God withdraws His protective grace, the city falls prey to its adversaries.

Read more (625 words)

As the prophet Isaiah states: "How shall the axe be glorified without him who cuts it? Or shall the saw ascend without him who draws it?" (Isaiah 10:15). This illustrates that God Himself administers justice to humanity and utilizes those prepared for His purposes as instruments of His will.

The prophet also notes that he brought the sacred items into the land of Shinar, into the temple of his god, depositing the vessels in the treasure house of that deity. Some may question why, after the people sinned, the sacred offerings presented to God were handed over to ungodly men. Such inquiries often stem from misunderstanding Divine wisdom; for a person devoid of spiritual insight cannot grasp the things of the Spirit of God. Conversely, a spiritual person discerns all things, as expressed by the Apostle (1 Cor. 2:14-15), confident that in Divine Providence, nothing is arbitrary. Thus, those who are guided by the Spirit can fathom the reasons behind these events.

Moreover, the matter at hand reveals a broader lesson that is relevant not just to the Jews but also to the heathen. Firstly, the Jews learned that God lacks neediness; He does not require what is brought to Him but instead nurtures gratitude in His followers and provides opportunities for them to express thanks. How could we ever repay the benevolent God for His acts if He did not accept these humble offerings? Thus, in withdrawing from the Jews and allowing them to be taken captive, He justly permitted the items they offered to be taken as well. Once He punished the rational beings, why would He spare lifeless objects?

Through these events, God instructs the Jews by demonstrating that they share a moral equivalence with the Babylonians, who are regarded as wicked and barbaric, since they too are not revered in the manner they deserve. The Babylonians, lacking the Law and dismissing the guidance of the prophets, remained oblivious. In contrast, the Israelites, enlightened by countless prophets and witnesses to numerous miracles, turned away from the God who supports all things to worship inanimate idols. Thus, the transfer of the sacred vessels served as a declaration: you are no different from the barbarians, as you defile these sanctified objects through your transgressions. Your moral condition is indistinguishable from that of the Babylonians. This truth was a poignant admonishment to the Jews and served to edify them significantly.

The Babylonians, for their part, initially honored the vessels by reserving them for divine service and had no misgivings until King Belshazzar, audaciously using them during a feast, faced immediate retribution. His punishment revealed the sanctity of those items, illustrating that God had not relinquished them against His will but had handed them over in light of the people's great iniquity. This mirrors an earlier event with the tabernacle when the wicked sons of Eli, Hophni and Phinehas, taking the ark into battle, faced divine rebuke. God disregarded their actions and allowed the ark to fall into foreign hands, instructing the Israelites that the ark was not necessary for God but intended for their aid, which had become irrelevant due to their flagrant disobedience.

To prevent the surrounding nations from mistakenly believing they had vanquished the God of Israel—confusing the ark with divine power and claiming victories for their idols—God permitted Dagon, their idol, to be thrown down and shattered before the ark, showing the futility of their worship. This was not a single occurrence but repeated, with God sending afflictions upon them until they returned the ark, accompanied by offerings that acknowledged their judgment. Therefore, during these times, and even under Nebuchadnezzar, there was dual significance: not only for the Jews but also for the Gentiles, wherein God's temporary allowance served a greater purpose.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.