The Church Fathers on this verse

Daniel 1:3Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

And the king spoke to Asphenez, the master of the eunuchs, that he should bring in some of the children of Israel, and of the king's seed, and of the princes,

Douay-Rheims

וַיֹּ֣אמֶר הַמֶּ֔לֶךְ לְאַשְׁפְּנַ֖ז רַ֣ב סָרִיסָ֑יו לְהָבִ֞יא מִבְּנֵ֧י יִשְׂרָאֵ֛ל וּמִזֶּ֥רַע הַמְּלוּכָ֖ה וּמִן־הַֽפַּרְתְּמִֽים׃

Hebrew (Masoretic text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

3 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

The king instructed Asphenaz, head of his eunuchs, to select young men from the children of Israel and from the royal and noble families. This was permitted so that God's might could be revealed by means of contrast; just as in many other instances, wisdom was also illustrated through comparison. To prevent any attribution of what transpired to the wisdom of the Persians, others were taught alongside the Hebrew youths to counter it. Those lacking discernment evaluate matters primarily through comparison; thus, God often employs this method, even likening Himself to pagan deities. The prophets affirm, "There is none like Thee, O Lord, among the gods" (Psalm 85:8).

Read more (927 words)

These young men were to be without physical defect, handsome, knowledgeable in all areas of learning, wise, and suitable for service in the king's court, where they were to instruct in the literature and language of the Chaldeans. However, beauty can be an impediment to purity and virtue. Why, then, does the king demand such individuals, who would surpass others merely due to their physical attributes? If a king—and especially a king of a foreign nation—seeks such beauty, does not God cherish the beauty of the soul even more? If those who possess physical defects are deemed unworthy to stand before the Lord, then those with blemishes on their souls are far less worthy. It is logical that the king also seeks those who display strength and capability for service, as the prophet indicates, or he may be referencing intellectual strength, highlighted by the description of them as "wise and fit to serve in the king's chambers." What is the purpose behind his demand for "bright men"? These attributes, wisdom and prudence, are valued; but for what reason? As a king of worldly standing, he requests these qualities out of a desire for power; yet a truly wise individual should focus solely on intellectual gifts. Just as we seek exquisite garments for no practical reason, he desires beautiful faces as if they were trivial ornaments.

What, then, is the divine intention behind the creation of beauty? Another has noted, "from the grandeur of the beauty of creatures, the Maker of their being is known" (Prem. 13:5). Therefore, we observe that in our bodies, many attributes exist not only for functionality but also for aesthetic purposes; colors exist for beauty, not merely utility; one's usefulness does not diminish by being plain. Our hair exists for beauty; as Paul states, "if a man have long hair, it is a shame unto him" (1 Cor. 11:14). Even the neck is aptly proportioned, and all other features serve the purpose of beauty, such that removing even a small part can mar the overall appearance, even while the purpose remains intact. Consequently, the Creator has designed our physical beings for aesthetic appeal, and this extends to all living creatures. However, He bestows varying levels of beauty upon individuals, and some may even receive charm postnatally that they lacked at birth. The position of our body parts can exemplify beauty; for instance, the eyes are elevated, resembling a rainbow with smooth contours, hues, distinctiveness, clarity, and brightness. Yet, one may argue: has beauty ever been a snare? Not inherently, but due to the frivolity of those who fall for its allure. "Turn away thy eye from a woman of good looks," advises the wise, "and do not gaze upon another's beauty" (Sir. 9:8). He does not simply state, "thou shalt not gaze," but specifies "at another's beauty," thereby approving the enjoyment of one's own. Why did beauty not hinder Joseph, making him indulgent or proud? "Rejoice with the wife of your youth, and let her love satiate you at all times," the wise sage advises, "let her love delight thee continually" (Proverbs 5:18-19). Beauty serves as an essential bond in marriage since people are considerably drawn to the physical form. Given the challenges and hardships of life, it is fitting that we were graciously granted some comforts; love arises, encompassing all. The Lord has provided and utilized numerous ways to ensure that the bond of marriage remains steadfast.

However, one might object that beauty was a temptation in the beginning: "And the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair, and they took them wives of all which they chose" (Genesis 6:2). The issue was not the beauty itself, but rather the corruption of those individuals. God did not create beautiful daughters to incite shamelessness but intended that each man would cherish his own wife. The text continues by describing them as "skilled and knowledgeable in all wisdom," indicating their fervor and capability in wisdom. "And that he should teach them the books and the language of the Chaldeans." Moses, though a common individual, was raised as royalty; conversely, these young men, of noble descent, were educated alongside the king’s servants. This arrangement allowed them to grasp the sciences and the Chaldean tongue, ensuring that when Daniel addressed the king on profound matters, there would be no intermediary to misconstrue his words. The intention was to recognize Daniel's wisdom, illustrating from the outset how he transcended mere human origins. Another would argue, "I am a captive, lacking provisions; God will certainly overlook my failings." But Daniel did not yield; it was not for gain or fear alone, but out of love for God that he served diligently and for extended periods. For three years they pursued knowledge and for three years they fasted. Do you see Daniel's prudence? When caution was required, he remained steadfast and wise, refusing to comply at times but petitioning graciously. When it posed no danger, he willingly accepted to learn the language and wisdom of others, understanding it was acceptable to study, so long as he did not adopt their teachings blindly. This way, he could deepen his own understanding and reaffirm that no other wisdom surpasses Jewish wisdom, thus growing stronger. Even if it had been wrong, he would still have resisted any transgression. Thus, one can see that his virtues derived from the same place of understanding that those who, like the gluttons enticed by garlic over manna, could not appreciate true nourishment. In this manner, Daniel was revealed as exceptionally wise.

Jerome of Stridon

4th centuryChurch Father

In the common edition, where Asphenaz is mentioned, it is presented as αβριεσδρί, and instead of the term φορθομμίν, Theodotion used this word, while the LXX and Aquila translated it as ‘the elect,’ and Simmachus referred to them as ‘Parthians.’ They interpreted the designation as referring to a people rather than a verb. We, based on the Hebrew text that states κατ ακρίβειαν, translate it as ‘rulers,’ particularly because it pertains to ‘the line of kings’ mentioned beforehand. The Jewish tradition thus holds that Daniel, Ananias, Mishael, and Azariah were eunuchs, as foretold by the prophecy of Isaiah: ‘and of thy children shall they understand, and shall make cajeniks in the house of the king of Babylon’ (Isaiah 39:7).

Read more (118 words)

If they belonged to royalty, it is certain they were descendants of David, unless contradicted by the continuation of the scripture stating, ‘of youths or young men, who have no bodily defect, to teach them the writing and language of the Chaldeans’ (Isaiah 39:7). Philo believes that the Hebrew children came from royal stock and were of Davidic lineage. He also posits that the Hebrew language is akin to the Chaldean, given that Abraham was originally from the Chaldeans. However, if we accept this view, we must contemplate why these Hebrew youths are ordered to learn a language they already knew, unless we consider the notion held by some that Abraham was bilingual, speaking both Hebrew and Chaldean.

Theodoret of Cyrus

5th centuryChurch Father

The Sovereign Creator of all humanity has chosen the tumultuous trials of this world, as well as those who are feeble and abased, to confound the wise and powerful (1 Cor. 1:27). Humanity tends to pursue outward appearances, stature, physical strength, and intellect, rather than seeking divine wisdom, often swayed by mere goodness. This distinction highlights the difference between the Divine and the human condition. The pride of the king is evident in his desire not only for captives but also for those of noble birth.

Read more (143 words)

Concurrently, the words of the prophet Isaiah, addressed to King Hezekiah, come to fruition: "Hear the words of the Lord of hosts, which he spoke unto me: These days are coming, and they shall take all that is in thy house, and whatsoever thy fathers have gathered together even unto this day, they shall go into Babylon, and they shall leave nothing: the Lord shall say, How that even of thy children, which thou hast begotten, they shall understand, and they shall make every man in the house of the king of Babylon" (Isaiah 39:5-7). The esteemed Daniel recalls this prophecy, noting that the king ordered the gathering of the children of Israel from captivity, including those from the royal lineage and the tribe of the forerunner. In Hebrew, the term used for the captives referred to virgins, which Symmachus translated as chosen.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.