The Church Fathers on this verse

Deuteronomy 25:6Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

And the first son he shall have of her he shall call by his name, that his name be not abolished out of Israel.

Douay-Rheims

וְהָיָ֗ה הַבְּכוֹר֙ אֲשֶׁ֣ר תֵּלֵ֔ד יָק֕וּם עַל־שֵׁ֥ם אָחִ֖יו הַמֵּ֑ת וְלֹֽא־יִמָּחֶ֥ה שְׁמ֖וֹ מִיִּשְׂרָאֵֽל׃

Hebrew (Masoretic text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

2 Church Fathers comment on this verse · 3 commentaries

Ambrose of Milan

4th centuryChurch Father

According to the tradition of the Old Testament Law, it was a duty for a brother to ensure the continuation of his deceased sibling's lineage (see Gen. 38:8, Mk. 12:9, Lk. 20:28). Consequently, a person could be recognized as the son of two different men—not due to being born from both, but because he was biologically the offspring of one and, through legal obligation, became associated with the other. This commandment holds the promise that the lineage of those who have passed will endure; however, the Jewish people struggled to grasp this concept and, in adhering strictly to the law's wording, diminished the richness of the promise given.

Read more (75 words)

There was another Brother destined to restore the lineage of the departed; He was not related by physical ties but was bonded through the purity of divine grace. It might seem, then, that redemption could come solely from man (Ps. 48:8), for it was not merely a brother who would accomplish this, but the Lord Himself, the mediator between God and humanity, the man Jesus Christ (1 Tim. 2:5), who granted the gift of resurrection.

The directive from the Old Testament does not concern a literal brother restoring the lineage of a deceased sibling. Rather, it pertains to that Brother who, emerging from the Jewish nation that was spiritually dead, is to unite with the true wisdom that honors God and, through this union, bring forth a new lineage embodied in the apostles. These apostles were once hidden within the synagogue, likened to unborn infants of a dead people, yet through the gift of grace, they were blessed with the awakening of a new spiritual heritage.

Julius Africanus

3rd centuryChurch Father

The Jewish people maintained their family lineage through either biological descent or legal stipulation. To clarify, when a family patriarch passed away, his brother would take the widow as his wife and bear children with her, who were regarded as offspring of the deceased. This practice was referred to as the ‘restoration of the seed.’ Consequently, in matters of genealogy, if traced through natural lineage, the living father was acknowledged as such (the biological father), while in legal terms, the deceased patriarch was recognized as the father. Hence, one man could have multiple children, some recognized as his biological offspring, while others belonged to the lineage of his deceased elder brother and carried his name.

Read more (86 words)

This practice reflected the Jewish hope in the resurrection of the dead, which had not been fully revealed at that time. Their belief in resurrection and eternal life was often linked to the legacy of an individual; a man's existence was thought to persist as long as his name remained known. Thus, the Jews sought to perpetuate their names in this manner. In genealogies, the term ‘father’ could represent both a biological father and a legal father, even when the latter was not the biological parent.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.