The Church Fathers on this verse

Deuteronomy 25:5Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

When brethren dwell together, and one of them dieth without children, the wife of the deceased shall not marry to another: but his brother shall take her, and raise up seed for his brother:

Douay-Rheims

כִּֽי־יֵשְׁב֨וּ אַחִ֜ים יַחְדָּ֗ו וּמֵ֨ת אַחַ֤ד מֵהֶם֙ וּבֵ֣ן אֵֽין־ל֔וֹ לֹֽא־תִהְיֶ֧ה אֵֽשֶׁת־הַמֵּ֛ת הַח֖וּצָה לְאִ֣ישׁ זָ֑ר יְבָמָהּ֙ יָבֹ֣א עָלֶ֔יהָ וּלְקָחָ֥הּ ל֛וֹ לְאִשָּׁ֖ה וְיִבְּמָֽהּ׃

Hebrew (Masoretic text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

3 Church Fathers comment on this verse

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

In the third volume, while I was attempting to clarify how Joseph could be regarded as having two fathers, I proposed that he was biologically conceived by one and legally acknowledged by the other. However, it is necessary to elaborate on the nature of this legal acknowledgment. My earlier statement may give the impression that he was recognized by another living father, but in reality, the Law permitted the recognition of the offspring of the deceased. It mandated that a brother should take his deceased sibling's wife if the latter passed away without children, to provide an heir to the deceased brother (cf. Matt. 1:16). Thus, in this light, the notion of one individual having two fathers becomes more comprehensible.

Ambrose of Milan

4th centuryChurch Father

The commandment found in the Old Testament does not concern a physical brother resurrecting the lineage of a fallen sibling; rather, it alludes to that Brother who was to unite with the faithful remnant of Israel, embodying the wisdom that glorifies God. From this divine union, He would bring forth new life through the apostles. They were like unborn infants within the spiritual home of the synagogue, part of the deceased Jewish people. Yet, through the grace of God, they were granted the incredible privilege of being awakened to a new beginning.

Julius Africanus

3rd centuryChurch Father

The Jewish people maintained their lineage records through either biological descent or legal customs. To clarify, when the head of a family passed away, it was customary for his brother to father children with the widow, and these children would be considered the offspring of the deceased. This process was known as 'restoration of the seed.' Thus, when lineage was traced through natural relationships, the biological father was recognized as the living parent, while under legal customs, the deceased father was acknowledged. As a result, one man could have multiple children; some would be recognized as his natural offspring, while others would be associated with the family of his late elder brother, carrying his name.

Read more (66 words)

This practice stemmed from their incomplete understanding of resurrection and eternal life, which were intricately tied to a person's name—belief in the continuation of a name equated to the preservation of life. In this way, the Jews sought to ensure the perpetuation of their names. Consequently, in genealogical records, 'father' could denote either a biological father or a legal father, despite not being a biological parent.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.