The Church Fathers on this verse

Deuteronomy 32:50Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

When thou art gone up into it thou shalt be gathered to thy people, as Aaron thy brother died in mount Hor, and was gathered to his people:

Douay-Rheims

וּמֻ֗ת בָּהָר֙ אֲשֶׁ֤ר אַתָּה֙ עֹלֶ֣ה שָׁ֔מָּה וְהֵאָסֵ֖ף אֶל־עַמֶּ֑יךָ כּֽ͏ַאֲשֶׁר־מֵ֞ת אַהֲרֹ֤ן אָחִ֙יךָ֙ בְּהֹ֣ר הָהָ֔ר וַיֵּאָ֖סֶף אֶל־עַמָּֽיו׃

Hebrew (Masoretic text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

2 Church Fathers comment on this verse

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

I would like to share with you the doubts of Moses, a devoted servant of God. This story serves as an allegorical lesson from the saints of the past. Moses questioned whether water would flow from the rock when he struck it with his staff; he was uncertain. Upon reading about this moment of hesitation, one might gloss over it without deeper contemplation or inquiry. Yet, the Lord was displeased with this uncertainty, rebuking and punishing Moses as a result. Consequently, it was declared to Moses and Aaron, "Ye shall not bring this people into the land which I give unto them" (Num. 20:12), and he was told he would die upon the mountain he was to climb. Here we see God’s anger. But whom was this truly directed against, dear friends?

Read more (1028 words)

Was all his effort, his concern for the people, and the love he expressed when he pleaded, "Forgive them their sin; and if not, blot me out of thy book also" (Ex. 32:32), condemned for a single spontaneous moment of doubt? And what of the declaration from Scripture that love never fails (1 Cor. 13:8)?

Although I had planned to discuss another topic, your enthusiasm has led me to consider a thought that may surprise you. Let us explore and strive to grasp this mystery. Observe, God’s anger is evident in His proclamation that Moses would not guide the people into the promised land, commanding him instead to ascend the mountain to die. Yet at the same time, God commissions Moses to accomplish many tasks: He instructs him on how to organize the people, ensuring that they are not left scattered. Surely, He would not have entrusted this responsibility to one deemed unworthy.

Consider yet another remarkable point. After informing Moses that he would not lead the people into the promised land—done for a divine purpose shrouded in mystery—another leader, Joshua (also known as Hosea, Num. 13:17), was appointed to take his place. When Moses sent Joshua to lead the people, he renamed him Jesus, illustrating that the people of God would enter their promised inheritance not through Moses, symbolizing the law, but through Jesus, signifying grace. Just as that Jesus was not the true Savior but a foreshadowing, so the promised land was not the ultimate truth but a precursor. For that nation, the promise was temporary, whereas the land that is promised to us is everlasting. In those temporary symbols, the eternal was anticipated and foretold.

Therefore, just as that Jesus was merely a type of the true Jesus, the land was likewise a mere image. The manna was not the genuine heavenly sustenance but rather a figure; similarly, the stone was not authentically Christ, but a mere type. In light of this, what should we make of Moses' doubt? Is there not a lesson for those who are perceptive? Will it not inspire inquiry within our spirits? Even after this incident of doubt and the accompanying warnings of death, after having lost the privilege to lead the people into the promised land, God continued to reveal many truths to Moses as a friend, just as He had before. Moses was held up as a model of obedience to Joshua, with the Lord encouraging him to serve faithfully, promising to be with him as He had been with Moses.

It is clear, beloved, that the Lord Himself urges us not to condemn Moses unjustly but to seek to understand his uncertainty. The rock was an image; the rod he struck it with was an image; the water that flowed was an image; and Moses himself became an image of doubt in that moment. Doubt arose within him as he approached the rock. Likewise, those who are wise often caution us while patiently waiting for the slow to comprehend. Moses faltered when the tree came close to the rock, just as the disciples faltered when they witnessed the crucifixion of the Lord. The figures that embody this include Moses himself and Peter, who denied Christ three times. What caused Peter’s doubt? It was the approach of the tree to the stone. When he foresaw the manner of the Lord's death and the cross that awaited Him, Peter cried out in dismay: "Lord! Be it far from thee!" (Matthew 16:22). Doubt arose as he witnessed the threat to the rock from the rod. The Lord's disciples lost their hope when they beheld Him crucified and wept for Him who had died.

Yet, the Lord encountered them after His resurrection, while they lamented the events that had unfolded. He kept their eyes from recognizing Him, joining their conversation as an unfamiliar traveler, inquiring about their discussion. The disciples were astonished that He alone seemed unaware of what had transpired, asking, “Are you only a visitor in Jerusalem, and do you not know what has happened there?" They began to recount their grief, revealing their wounds to the Great Physician without realizing it. “We had hoped that he was the one who would redeem Israel” (Luke 24:13-21). Thus, doubt emerged from the joining of wood to stone, fulfilling the type of Moses.

Now let us reflect on the directive, “Die on the mountain which thou shalt ascend.” In Moses' physical death lies a foreshadowing of the end of all doubt. What a wondrous mystery! The discovery and unveiling of it are even more delightful than the sacrament itself. Doubt was birthed near the rock, yet it found resolution upon the mountain. When Christ endured humiliation and lay like a stone before all, it was natural for His followers to harbor doubts, for such suffering revealed nothing glorious; indeed, it became a stumbling block. However, in the resurrection, the Lord appeared in His glory, majestic as a mountain. Therefore, let the doubt expressed at the rock be extinguished on the mountain.

Let the disciples awaken to their salvation and proclaim their hope. Observe how doubt reaches its end, just as Moses passed on the mountain. Though he was barred from the promised land, it was our desire that doubt not enter there—it must die. Let Christ reveal the death of that doubt. Peter feared and denied Christ thrice because the Savior appeared like a stone. But upon His resurrection, He rose as a glorious mountain, affirming Peter, and thus the doubt was dispelled.

How was the doubt resolved? The Lord asked, “Simon Peter, do you love Me?” (John 21:15). The One who breaks hearts desires to hear that He is cherished. And one affirmation alone was insufficient; He gently probed Peter repeatedly. Peter was bewildered that the All-Knowing One tested him, asking multiple times when a single answer would suffice even for one who is unaware. Yet it is as if the Lord was saying, “I wait for the rightful number to be fulfilled: three times let him profess his love, who denied Me thrice out of fear.” In this manner, through repeated questioning, the Lord dispelled doubt upon the mountain.

Athanasius the Great

4th centuryChurch Father

The illustrious Moses, who had previously concealed himself from Pharaoh and retreated to the land of Midian, showed no fear upon receiving the command to "Go up into Egypt" (Ex. 4:19). When he was subsequently instructed to "Go up to this mountain Abarim and die," he did not tremble, but approached with joy.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.